awesomePMC
Copula-based pairwise and hidden Markov chains for the unsupervised classification of non-Gaussian time series and images.
awesomePMC implements pairwise Markov chains (PMC) — up to the general PMC
of Derrode & Pieczynski (2013), whose observation margins fᵢⱼ are indexed by the
pair of consecutive hidden states — and the hidden Markov chains they
contain, with the dependence between consecutive observations modelled by
bivariate copulas. A model is a plain TOML file: simulate it, classify a
signal or an image with it, or estimate it from the data alone (ICE or SEM, with
automatic selection of the copula and margin families). Missing observations are
integrated out exactly. Python API, pmc command line and PyQt6 GUI.
Reference implementation of:
S. Derrode, W. Pieczynski. Unsupervised data classification using pairwise Markov chains with automatic copulas selection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 63 (2013), 81–98. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.027
S. Derrode, W. Pieczynski. Unsupervised classification using hidden Markov chain with unknown noise copulas and margins. Signal Processing 128 (2016), 8–17. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.03.008
Why awesomePMC?
- The general pairwise Markov chain. Five variants, from the classical
hidden Markov chain (HMC-IN) to the PMC of A16 Eqs. 12–14 with pair margins
fᵢⱼ — the law of yₙ given (xₙ, xₙ₊₁) = (i, j), under which X is not a Markov
chain — or state margins fᵢ. Margins are any
scipy.statsfamily, or multivariate Gaussian (d > 1) for the copula-free variants. - 17 copula families — Gaussian, Student-t, Archimedean (Clayton, Gumbel–Hougaard, Frank, Joe, A12, A14, AMH), survival, BB1, Plackett, FGM, cubic section, independence — all parameterised by Kendall's τ, with numerically robust vectorised log-densities: log-space Archimedean kernels (Hofert, Mächler & McNeil 2012) and native elliptical log-densities, never floored, so strong dependence and the tails keep their likelihood.
- Supervised classification: normalised forward–backward, MPM decision, posterior marginals and forward-filtering backward-sampling draws.
- Unsupervised estimation: ICE and SEM (stochastic EM) with, for every pair
of states, automatic copula-family selection among candidates (MLE, AIC, BIC,
Huard's Bayesian evidence of A16 Eq. 20, Cramér–von Mises, cross-validated
CIC
xvcic); GICE margin-family selection of A23 (MLE, Kolmogorov, AIC, BIC); k-means warm start; multistart with parameter jitter or over copula families. - Is a family choice significant? Analytic standard errors of copula parameters, weighted Vuong and Clarke tests with a HAC variance, confidence sets of families not significantly worse than the best — also for the pairs of states of an ICE run.
- Missing observations: exact inference and ICE/SEM estimation with
NaNin the observations,impute(posterior mean, sd, quantiles, draws) andforecast(state probabilities and predictive law h steps ahead), missingness patterns with ImputeGAP's geometry and imputation / classification metrics (pmcprg.missing). - Images: grey-level or multichannel images are linearised along a
generalised Hilbert curve, then classified or estimated (
classify_image,ice_image,sem_image,pmc classify-image,pmc estimate-image). - Goodness of fit: multivariate Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (Naaman 2021), parametric-bootstrap calibration, Neyman smooth tests on margins.
- Three front-ends: Python API,
pmccommand line, PyQt6 GUI (model editor, simulation, classification, estimation and goodness-of-fit in background threads). - Reproducible:
report/reproduces the experiments of CSDA 2013 (§3.2, §3.3, §4.3) with committed results and a LaTeX report;report/missing_benchmark/compares exact marginalisation with naive fill-ins on 2500 simulated sequences. The test suite runs in CI on Python 3.11–3.13.
| Sub-package | What it does |
|---|---|
pmcprg.copulas |
17 copula families, fitting, model selection, standard errors, bivariate joint laws |
pmcprg.pmc |
the 5 HMC/PMC variants: TOML models, simulation, classification, ICE/SEM, missing data, images, CLI, GUI |
pmcprg.diagnostics |
multivariate KS test, parametric bootstrap, smooth tests, Vuong/Clarke tests |
pmcprg.missing |
missingness patterns and metrics on masked positions |
Table of Contents
- Installation
- Example notebooks
- Copula toolkit
- PMC models
- Diagnostics — multivariate Kolmogorov–Smirnov test
- Reproducibility reports
- Folder structure
- Citation and references
- License
Installation
From PyPI (recommended)
pip install awesomepmc
Optional extras:
| Extra | What it adds |
|---|---|
[gui] |
PyQt6, for the graphical interface (pmc gui) — kept optional so the package installs on headless servers |
[ml] |
scikit-learn, for the k-means warm start of ICE/SEM (init = "kmeans") |
[image] |
Pillow, to read and write images (pmc classify-image, pmc estimate-image, image loading in the GUI) |
[dev] |
pytest, pytest-cov, ruff and the notebook runners, plus [image] and [ml] — everything the test suite needs |
pip install "awesomepmc[gui]"
pip install "awesomepmc[gui,ml,image]"
From source
git clone https://github.com/SDerrode/awesomePMC.git
cd awesomePMC
pip install .
Development install
pip install -e ".[dev,gui]"
pytest # full suite; add -m "not slow" for a quick run
Requirements
| Package | Min version |
|---|---|
| Python | ≥ 3.11 |
| numpy | ≥ 1.24 |
| scipy | ≥ 1.10 |
| matplotlib | ≥ 3.7 |
| tomli_w | ≥ 1.0 |
| PyQt6 | ≥ 6.4 (GUI only — extra [gui]) |
The code snippets below run from the root of a clone of the repository (they
load the example models of pmcprg/pmc/models/). The models are also shipped in
the installed package:
from importlib.resources import files
from pmcprg.pmc import PMCModel
mdl = PMCModel(files("pmcprg.pmc") / "models" / "pmc_gauss_k2.toml")
Example notebooks
examples/quickstart.ipynb
walks through the full workflow — copula density, sampling and fitting, Sklar
bivariate law, then PMC simulate → classify → ICE — in less than a minute:
pip install jupyter
jupyter notebook examples/quickstart.ipynb
examples/uci_har_smartphone.ipynb
runs ICE and SEM on a real 3-D accelerometer recording of the Human Activity
Recognition Using Smartphones dataset (UCI ID 240). The dataset is downloaded
on first run and cached in data/uci_har/ (not versioned); if the download
fails or is declined, the notebook falls back to a synthetic 3-D signal
simulated from the bundled hmc_in_mvn_k2_d3.toml model and every later cell
runs unchanged. It exercises the k-means warm start (init = "kmeans"), the SEM
estimator (from pmcprg.pmc import sem) and the multivariate KS test
(from pmcprg.diagnostics import mks_2samp).
Both notebooks are re-run by the test suite (tests marked slow).
Copula toolkit
Available families
All copulas are τ-parameterised (Kendall's τ is the single free dependence
parameter). The Student-t copula additionally has a free df parameter, fitted
jointly by 2-D MLE.
| ID | SHORT_NAME | Family | τ range | Tail dep. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prod |
Independence (Product) | {0} | none |
| 2 | Gauss |
Gaussian | (−1, 1) | none |
| 3 | Student |
Student-t (free ν > 2) | (−1, 1) | symmetric |
| 4 | GH |
Gumbel-Hougaard | (0, 1) | upper |
| 5 | FGM |
Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern | (−2/9, 2/9) | none |
| 6 | CubSec |
Cubic Section | (0, 0.165) | none |
| 7 | Clayton |
Clayton | (0, 1) | lower |
| 8 | A12 |
Archimedean 12 | (1/3, 1) | upper |
| 9 | A14 |
Archimedean 14 | (1/3, 1) | upper |
| 10 | Frank |
Frank | (−1, 1) | none |
| 11 | Joe |
Joe | (0, 1) | upper |
| 12 | SClayton |
Survival Clayton | (0, 1) | upper |
| 13 | SGH |
Survival Gumbel-Hougaard | (0, 1) | lower |
| 14 | SJoe |
Survival Joe | (0, 1) | lower |
| 15 | BB1 |
BB1 (Joe-Clayton) | (0, 1) | both |
| 16 | AMH |
Ali-Mikhail-Haq | (≈−0.18, 1/3) | none |
| 17 | Plackett |
Plackett | (−1, 1) | none |
Quick start
from pmcprg.copulas import CopulaGaussian, CopulaStudent, CopulaClayton
# Instantiate by Kendall's τ
gauss = CopulaGaussian(tau_k=0.5)
stud = CopulaStudent(tau_k=0.5, df=4.0) # df defaults to 4.0
clay = CopulaClayton(tau_k=0.6)
# Evaluate
u, v = 0.3, 0.7
print(gauss.pdf([u, v])) # copula density c(u,v)
print(gauss.cdf([u, v])) # copula CDF C(u,v)
print(gauss.conditional_cdf(v, u))# h-function h(v|u) = ∂C/∂u
print(gauss.tail_dependence()) # (λ_L, λ_U)
# Sampling (Rosenblatt inversion)
samples = gauss.sample(n=1000, seed=42) # shape (1000, 2) on [0,1]²
Fitting and model selection
Data are rank-transformed to pseudo-observations before fitting, so the margins need not be uniform.
from pmcprg.copulas import CopulaClayton, CopulaFrank, CopulaGaussian, CopulaGH
from pmcprg.copulas._base import CopulaVirt
data = CopulaClayton(tau_k=0.5).sample(n=500, seed=0)
# Single-family fit
result = CopulaGaussian.fit(data, method='tau') # or method='mle'
print(result.tau_k, result.aic, result.bic)
# 5-fold cross-validation log-likelihood
print(result.cv_loglik(K=5))
# Parametric bootstrap GoF (Cramér-von Mises)
gof = result.gof_test(B=200)
print(gof.p_value)
# Bootstrap CI on τ
print(result.bootstrap_ci(B=500))
# Analytic standard errors on τ and the native parameters (sandwich for 'mle')
se = CopulaClayton.fit(data, method='mle').standard_errors()
print(se, se.ci())
# Automatic family selection (every family if `families` is omitted)
ranked = CopulaVirt.fit_best(
data, families=[CopulaGaussian, CopulaClayton, CopulaGH, CopulaFrank], method='mle')
best = ranked[0] # sorted by AIC ascending
print(best.copula, best.aic)
# Is the ranking significant? Vuong tests (HAC variance) and the ties
print(ranked.compare()) # or ranked.compare(test="clarke")
print(ranked.confidence_set().members) # families not significantly worse than the best
Bivariate joint laws
from pmcprg.copulas import CopulaGaussian
from pmcprg.copulas.bivariate import BivariateLaw
import scipy.stats as ss
law = BivariateLaw(
copula=CopulaGaussian(tau_k=0.6),
left_margin=(ss.norm, -1, 1), # (scipy_dist, *params)
right_margin=(ss.norm, +1, 1),
)
print(law.pdf([-0.5, 0.8])) # joint density f(x,y)
print(law.cdf([ 0.0, 1.0])) # joint CDF F(x,y)
law.set_seed(0) # reproducible sampling
samples = law.sample(1000) # shape (1000, 2)
# IFM two-step fit
fit = BivariateLaw.fit(samples, copula_class=CopulaGaussian,
left_family=ss.norm, right_family=ss.norm)
print(fit.copula_fit.tau_k, fit.aic)
PMC models
Model variants
Five variants of the jointly Markovian pair process (X, Y) are supported, from
the simplest to the most general. Every model has one of two margin
structures ([model].margin_structure):
"state"— K densities fᵢ, one per state (fᵢⱼ = fᵢ). By the Proposition of A16 §2.1, this is exactly the case where X is a Markov chain: a PMC with state margins is a stationary reversible HMC-DN, and a PMC-IN with state margins an HMC-IN. Every HMC-* variant has state margins."pair"— K² densities fᵢⱼ, the law of yₙ given (xₙ, xₙ₊₁) = (i, j): the general PMC of A16 Eqs. 12–14, where X is not Markov. Allowed for PMC and PMC-IN only.
| Variant | Prior | Observation density (state margins) | Pair margins | Copula |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMC-IN | Transition matrix A | fⱼ(yₙ) | — | No |
| HMC-IN2 | Transition matrix A | fⱼ(yₙ) | — | No |
| HMC-DN | Transition matrix A | fⱼ(yₙ) · cᵢⱼ(Fᵢ(yₙ₋₁), Fⱼ(yₙ)) | — | Yes — cᵢⱼ |
| PMC-IN | Joint distribution p | fᵢ(yₙ) · fⱼ(yₙ₊₁) | fᵢⱼ(yₙ) · fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁) | No |
| PMC | Joint distribution p | fᵢ(yₙ) · fⱼ(yₙ₊₁) · cᵢⱼ(Fᵢ(yₙ), Fⱼ(yₙ₊₁)) | fᵢⱼ(yₙ) · fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁) · cᵢⱼ(Fᵢⱼ(yₙ), Fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁)) | Yes — cᵢⱼ |
Stationarity and reversibility only make the right margin of the pair (i, j) the left margin of (j, i) — the index inversion fⱼᵢ of A16 Eq. 12; they do not make fᵢⱼ independent of j. Versions 0.5.0–0.8.x collapsed K² margins to fᵢ on that mistaken ground.
TOML model files
Models are stored as TOML files. State margins use the K-format (one block
per state, indexed by i only); pair margins use the K²-format (one block
per pair, keys i and j, see
pmc_pair_gauss_k2.toml):
[model]
name = "PMC Gaussien K=2"
variant = "PMC" # HMC-IN | HMC-IN2 | HMC-DN | PMC-IN | PMC
K = 2
N_default = 5000
# margin_structure = "state" # optional: "state" | "pair"; default inferred
# # (K blocks → state, K² blocks → pair)
[prior]
# HMC-* variants: key "A" — K×K row-stochastic transition matrix
# PMC-* variants: key "p" — K×K symmetric joint distribution (sums to 1)
p = [[0.45, 0.05],
[0.05, 0.45]]
# K margin blocks (one per state) — state margins f_i.
[[margins]]
i = 0
dist = "norm" # any scipy.stats distribution name
params = {loc = -1.0, scale = 1.0}
# candidates = ["norm", "gamma", "invgamma", "betaprime"] # GICE: families to
# # select from when fit_margins = true
[[margins]]
i = 1
dist = "norm"
params = {loc = 1.0, scale = 1.0}
[[copulas]] # only for HMC-DN and PMC — K² blocks (i, j)
i = 0
j = 0
name = "Gauss" # SHORT_NAME from the copula table above
tau = 0.6
# df = 4.0 # optional extra param for Student copula
# … blocks (0, 1), (1, 0) and (1, 1)
[ice] # optional — ICE estimator defaults (also consumed
# by SEM for the keys they share)
fit_margins = false
max_iter = 50
tol = 1e-4
candidates = ["Gauss", "Clayton", "GH", "Frank", "Joe"]
selection_criterion = "mle" # "mle" (default) | "aic" | "bic" | "huard" | "cvm" | "xvcic"
# (+ "huard_common", "huard_global")
margin_selection_rule = "mle" # GICE: "mle" (default) | "kolmogorov" | "aic" | "bic"
init = "model" # "model" (default) | "kmeans"
# kmeans_seed = 0 # RNG seed for sklearn.cluster.KMeans (init="kmeans")
# n_starts = 1 # multistart: best final log-likelihood among n_starts runs
# multistart_families = "none" # "none" (default) | "random" | "sweep"
# return_best_iterate = false # true: return the highest-log-likelihood iterate, not the last
# [sem] # optional — SEM-specific overrides
# max_iter = 30 # SEM does not converge; defaults to fewer iterations
# sem_seed = 0 # RNG seed for the per-iteration FFBS draw
ICE vs SEM. Both estimators share the same M-step and config keys. ICE (
algorithm = "ice", default) uses soft posteriors from forward-backward and converges deterministically. SEM (algorithm = "sem") draws a single realisationX̃ ~ P(X | Y)at every iteration via Forward-Filter Backward-Sample, then runs the same M-step on the hard labels — the log-likelihood fluctuates around its stationary regime instead of converging. CLI:pmc estimate --algorithm sem --sem-seed 0 …. GUI: the Estimator combobox in the ICE-config tab. Note that the papers (A16 §4.2, Eqs. 22–24; A23 §3) estimate copulas and margins on one posterior draw (L = 1) and reserve the expectation for the prior — closer to SEM than to this package's ICE; see the docstring ofpmcprg/pmc/ice.py.Selection criteria. At every M-step, each pair (i, j) gets the copula family of
candidatesthat is best underselection_criterion; its τ is always the maximum-likelihood estimate. A margin block that declarescandidates(GICE, A23 §3) gets its family chosen bymargin_selection_rulewhenfit_margins = true— seesp2016_gice_k2.toml.K-means warm-start. Setting
init = "kmeans"clustersYwith k-means++ and derives a hard-labelled warm-start model via a single supervised-style M-step (prior + copula τ always re-estimated; margins re-estimated only iffit_margins = true) — useful when the declared initial parameters are far from the data. Requires scikit-learn (pip install "awesomepmc[ml]"). Works for both ICE and SEM.Multistart over copula families. With
n_starts > 1ICE/SEM keep the run with the highest final log-likelihood; the extra starts jitter the parameters (multistart_jitter) but keep the copula families of the initial model. Those families can decide the fixed point: on the CSDA-2013 Exp. 3 design, ICE started at independence picks Gumbel instead of the true Gaussian copula on pair (0, 0) and no amount of jitter changes it.multistart_families = "random"also redraws the family of every pair (i, j) amongcandidatesat each extra start (τ uniform on the central 60 % of the family's range);"sweep"runs every combination of candidate families on the diagonal pairs (i, i) at τ = 0.5, after the model itself — setn_starts = 1 + |C|^K(10 for 3 candidates and K = 2; fewer drops combinations with a warning, more adds random starts; beyond 256 combinations use"random"). The winning start istrace.run_tag(family-sweep:Gauss/Clayton,family-random-4). Variants without copulas ignore the key. GUI: Start families in the ICE-config tab.Best iterate. ICE is not monotone, and after
patienceconsecutive regressions it stops on its last iterate, possibly several nats below its best one.return_best_iterate = truereturns the iterate θ^q with the highesttrace.log_liks[q](computed with θ^q, before the M-step); a run that reachesmax_iterevaluates the model of its last M-step once more, so its trace hasmax_iter + 1entries. Multistart then ranks the starts by the log-likelihood of the model each one returns. For SEM it is a heuristic (the best point of a noisy chain, not its average).trace.best_iteris the argmax oflog_liksandtrace.returned_iterthe iterate returned. Defaultfalse(unchanged results). CLI:pmc estimate --best-iterate. GUI: Return best iterate in the ICE-config tab.Degenerate fits. The likelihood is unbounded: a variance collapsing on an atom of discretised data, or a copula driven to τ = ±1, gains nats without limit. ICE and SEM check the returned model and log one
WARNING(also printed bypmc estimate, which adds aDegeneratesummary line) when a state has a stationary weight below 0.5 %, a margin (state or pair) a standard deviation below 1 % of that of the data, or a copula τ within 1e-3 of ±1. The findings are intrace.degenerate([]when none); the fit itself is unchanged. Thresholds and their justification:pmcprg.pmc._estim_common.degenerate_states.
K²-format and older files. Blocks indexed by
(i, j)are kept as pair margins fᵢⱼ on PMC and PMC-IN (anINFOline says so once per process), and ICE/SEM estimate each fᵢⱼ separately. Older files that relied on the collapse to K state margins must addmargin_structure = "state"under[model](the(i, 0)block is then kept as fᵢ). HMC-* variants refuse pair margins.Estimating pair margins. ICE and SEM fit fᵢⱼ by weighted maximum likelihood on both views of the pair density: yₙ with weight ξₙ(i, j) and yₙ₊₁ with weight ξₙ(j, i) (each halved, so the total weight stays N − 1). It is an ICE-style estimator, not an exact EM M-step. Copula pseudo-observations for cᵢⱼ are (Fᵢⱼ(yₙ), Fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁)) with weight ξₙ(i, j).
Nine example models are provided in
pmcprg/pmc/models/:
| File | Variant |
|---|---|
hmc_in_gauss_k2.toml |
HMC-IN (classical HMM) |
hmc_in_gauss_k3.toml |
HMC-IN, K = 3 classes |
hmc_in_mvn_k2_d3.toml |
HMC-IN, multivariate Gaussian observations (d = 3, RGB) |
hmc_in2_gauss_k2.toml |
HMC-IN2 |
hmc_dn_gauss_k2.toml |
HMC-DN (copula-dependent HMM) |
sp2016_gice_k2.toml |
PMC with non-Gaussian state margins, i.e. an SR HMC-DN (GICE fixture, SP-2016 §5.1) |
pmc_in_gauss_k2.toml |
PMC-IN |
pmc_gauss_k2.toml |
PMC with state margins (an SR HMC-DN, A16 §2.1 Proposition) |
pmc_pair_gauss_k2.toml |
General PMC with pair margins fᵢⱼ (CSDA-2013 Table 1 Gaussian margins, Clayton τ = 0.7) |
Python API
from pmcprg.pmc import PMCModel, simulate, classify, ice
# ── Load model ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
mdl = PMCModel("pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_gauss_k2.toml")
print(mdl) # PMCModel(name='PMC Gaussien K=2', …)
print(mdl.stationary_pi) # [0.5, 0.5]
print(mdl.transition_A) # [[0.9, 0.1], [0.1, 0.9]]
print(mdl.prior_p) # [[0.45, 0.05], …]
# Margin/copula access
print(mdl.pdf(0, 1, -0.5)) # f_{01}(-0.5)
print(mdl.cdf(1, 0, 0.3)) # F_{10}(0.3)
cop = mdl.copula(0, 0) # CopulaGaussian(τ=0.6)
# ── Simulate ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
X, Y = simulate(mdl, N=5000, seed=42)
# X: (5000,) int — latent states 0/1
# Y: (5000,) float — observations
# ── Supervised classification (MPM) ───────────────────────────────
X_hat, gamma, log_lik = classify(mdl, Y)
# gamma: (5000, K) — posterior P(X_n=k | Y)
from pmcprg.pmc import error_rate
print(f"Error rate: {error_rate(X, X_hat):.3f}")
# ── Unsupervised estimation (ICE) ─────────────────────────────────
raw_init = mdl.raw # deep copy of the TOML dict — safe to mutate
# … perturb parameters …
init_mdl = PMCModel.from_dict(raw_init)
fitted, trace = ice(init_mdl, Y,
ice_cfg={"max_iter": 30, "candidates": ["Gauss", "Clayton", "GH"]})
print(trace.log_liks[-1]) # final log-likelihood
print(trace.best_iter, trace.returned_iter, trace.degenerate)
fitted.save("fitted_pmc.toml")
# ── Edit and save ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
mdl.save("my_model.toml")
sem has the same signature as ice (sem_cfg= instead of ice_cfg=), and
classify_image, ice_image and sem_image take a 2-D array (H, W) or
(H, W, d) instead of Y.
Missing observations, imputation and forecasting
Observations may contain NaN (empty, NaN or NA cells in CSV files). With
a known model, supervised inference integrates the missing values out exactly
(up to quadrature), for every variant and both margin structures:
import numpy as np
from pmcprg.pmc import PMCModel, simulate, classify, impute, forecast
from pmcprg.missing import patterns, metrics
mdl = PMCModel("pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_pair_gauss_k2.toml")
X, Y = simulate(mdl, N=2000, seed=1)
Y_gap, mask = patterns.mcar(Y, 0.2, block_size=10, seed=2) # ImputeGAP-like pattern
X_hat, gamma, log_lik = classify(mdl, Y_gap) # states at every n, missing ones included
imp = impute(mdl, Y_gap, quantiles=(0.05, 0.5, 0.95), n_samples=100, rng=np.random.default_rng(0))
# imp.index, imp.mean, imp.sd, imp.quantile_values, imp.gamma, imp.x_samples, imp.y_samples
fc = forecast(mdl, Y_gap, h=10) # fc.state_probs, fc.mean, fc.sd, fc.quantile_values
print(metrics.error_rate_split(X, X_hat, mask)) # error on missing / observed positions
-
Exact shortcut — HMC-IN, HMC-IN2 and PMC-IN with state margins: the transition of X does not depend on a missing value, whose density is set to 1.
-
Augmented grid — HMC-DN, PMC and PMC-IN with pair margins: inside a run of missing values the forward–backward runs on (state, value) over
gap_nodes(default 64) Gauss–Legendre nodes in the quantiles of the stationary law of y, with an endpoint transform for copula tails. Checked against exact references (brute force over state paths, Gaussian AR(1) bridges and forecasts, distinct Gaussian regimes,quadfor Clayton/Gumbel pair models): log-likelihood and posteriors to 1e-7 or better at G = 64 except in extreme tails (test_gaps_references.py). -
A forecast is a trailing gap;
forecastreturns the state probabilities and the predictive law of the observation k = 1, …, h steps ahead. -
Estimation:
ice,sem(andpmc estimate, which prints the number of missing values) estimate from the observed data;trace.log_liksis log p(y_obs). SEM draws the states and the missing values jointly at each iteration. ICE has two strategies (config keymissing_strategy):"available"(default; exact posteriors given the observed data, margins fitted on observed values, copulas on pairs with both ends observed; deterministic) and"impute"(missing_drawscompleted series per iteration, estimates averaged; better when GICE selects margin families). Complete data give bit-identical results to the previous code.fitted, trace = ice(init_mdl, Y_gap, ice_cfg={"missing_strategy": "available"})
-
pmcprg.missing.patternsgenerates missingness patterns with the geometry of ImputeGAP'sGenGap(mcar, aligned, scattered, blackout, disjoint, overlap, gaussian, distribution);pmcprg.missing.metricsscores imputations (RMSE, MAE, MI, Pearson, CRPS, interval coverage) and classification on missing vs observed positions.
Command-line interface
pmc COMMAND [options] # or: python -m pmcprg.pmc COMMAND [options]
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
simulate |
Generate a synthetic (X, Y) sequence |
classify |
Supervised MPM classification of a 1-D signal |
classify-image |
Supervised MPM classification of a 2-D image (generalised Hilbert path) |
estimate |
Unsupervised parameter estimation — --algorithm {ice,sem} (default ice) |
estimate-image |
Unsupervised estimation on a 2-D image — --algorithm {ice,sem} |
gui |
Launch the PyQt6 graphical interface |
pmc COMMAND --help lists the options of each command.
Examples:
# Simulate 10 000 samples and save to CSV
pmc simulate \
--model pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_gauss_k2.toml \
--N 10000 --seed 42 --out sim.csv
# Classify (reference labels in column X → prints error rate)
pmc classify \
--model pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_gauss_k2.toml \
--data sim.csv --out cls.csv --ref X
# Unsupervised ICE estimation (--algorithm sem --sem-seed 0 for SEM)
pmc estimate \
--model pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_gauss_k2.toml \
--data sim.csv \
--candidates "Gauss,Clayton,GH" \
--max-iter 50 \
--out fitted.toml
# Image: estimate from the image, then segment it (needs the [image] extra)
pmc estimate-image --model init.toml --image photo.png --fit-margins --out fitted.toml
pmc classify-image --model fitted.toml --image photo.png --out segmentation.png
# Launch GUI (with optional startup model)
pmc gui pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_gauss_k2.toml
# Verbose mode (DEBUG to console)
pmc --verbose simulate --model pmcprg/pmc/models/pmc_gauss_k2.toml --N 500
Graphical interface (PyQt6)
pmc gui [MODEL.toml]
The window is divided into a model editor (left) and a result viewer (right):
┌─────────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┐
│ Model info (name, variant, K, N) │ Matplotlib result panel │
│ ───────────────────────────────── │ • Simulate: scatter, histo- │
│ Tabs │ gram, successive-pair plot │
│ Prior — editable K×K matrix │ • Classify: MPM labels, │
│ Margins — state / pair structure │ posterior curves, error map │
│ (dbl-click a cell) │ • Estimate: ICE log-lik curve │
│ Copulas — K×K grid (dbl-click) │ │
│ ICE Config — estimator, criteria,│ │
│ init, multistart │ Log panel (INFO+ records) │
│ ───────────────────────────────── │ │
│ [▶ Simulate] [◈ Classify] │ │
│ [⟳ Estimate] [✓ GoF test] │ │
└─────────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────┘
- File menu: open / save TOML models; load data (CSV) or an image; save data, segmentation, results and plots
- Analysis menu: τ confidence intervals, margin adequacy (KS)
- Double-click any Margins or Copulas cell to edit the distribution or copula parameters
- Long-running operations (simulate, classify, estimate) run in a background thread — the GUI stays responsive
Logging
All pmcprg.* loggers route to three sinks:
| Sink | Level | Location |
|---|---|---|
| File | DEBUG (full tracebacks) | ~/.awesomepmc/pmc.log |
| Console | WARNING (or DEBUG with --verbose) |
stderr |
| GUI log panel | INFO+ | bottom-right panel in the GUI |
The file handler captures every logger.exception(...) call with its full
traceback, the logger.debug(...) records of the forward–backward weights, ICE
iterations and copula fallbacks, and the logger.warning(...) records of
numerical near-failures (zero normalisation constants, incompatible
observations).
To configure programmatically:
import logging
from pmcprg.pmc.logging_setup import configure, add_widget_handler
# Point the file to a custom path; set console to DEBUG
configure(level=logging.DEBUG, log_file="run.log")
# In a PyQt6 application, once the QApplication exists, mirror the records
# in a QTextEdit:
# add_widget_handler(text_edit, level=logging.INFO)
Diagnostics — multivariate Kolmogorov–Smirnov test
The pmcprg.diagnostics sub-package collects standalone goodness-of-fit
utilities that complement the estimation routines of pmcprg.pmc: the
multivariate KS test below, parametric_bootstrap (calibration of any post-fit
statistic by resampling whole series from the fitted model), Neyman smooth-test
components of a fitted margin (neyman_components, neyman_test) and the
Vuong / Clarke family comparisons (vuong_test, clarke_test,
confidence_set, ice_pair_comparisons).
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from pmcprg.diagnostics import mks_1samp, mks_2samp
rng = np.random.default_rng(0)
# 1-sample: is `x` drawn from a 2-D standard normal?
x = rng.standard_normal(size=(300, 2))
cdf = lambda t: float(stats.norm.cdf(t[0]) * stats.norm.cdf(t[1]))
res = mks_1samp(x, cdf, alpha=0.05)
print(res.statistic, res.critical_value, res.reject)
# 2-sample: do `a` and `b` share the same distribution?
a = rng.standard_normal(size=(300, 2))
b = rng.standard_normal(size=(300, 2)) + 2.0 # shifted mean → reject H0
res = mks_2samp(a, b, alpha=0.05)
assert res.reject
The test extends the classical 1-D Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic to d > 1
dimensions via Naaman's construction (Statistics & Probability Letters 173,
2021). The default critical value uses the finite-sample union bound (safe
but conservative); pass asymptotic=True for the tighter large-N
approximation.
Reproducibility reports
report/reproduces the experiments of A16 §3.2 (supervised PMC, impact of the copula shape), §3.3 (i.i.d. PMM baseline) and §4.3 (unsupervised ICE-based copula selection), with the committed CSV results, LaTeX tables and the reportcsda2013_reproduction.pdf. Its README lists what the reproduction established, the commands and the provenance of every result.report/missing_benchmark/compares classification and imputation with missing observations under known models: exact marginalisation against plug-in, linear, LOCF and mean fill-ins, on 5 models × 5 patterns × 5 missing rates × 20 replicates.
A23 (GICE, §5.1 setting) is exercised by the test suite on the bundled
sp2016_gice_k2.toml model.
Folder structure
awesomePMC/
├── pmcprg/ import package
│ ├── copulas/ 17 copula families (archimedean/, elliptical/, explicit/),
│ │ fitting, standard errors, bivariate joint laws
│ ├── diagnostics/ multivariate KS, parametric bootstrap, smooth tests,
│ │ Vuong/Clarke tests, pseudo-observations
│ ├── missing/ missingness patterns, metrics, CSV missing cells
│ ├── pmc/ model, simulate, inference, gaps (missing data),
│ │ │ ice, sem, peano (images), cli
│ │ ├── gui/ PyQt6 interface
│ │ └── models/ example TOML models
│ └── tests/ pytest suite
├── examples/ quickstart.ipynb, uci_har_smartphone.ipynb
├── report/ CSDA 2013 reproduction: scripts, results/, tables/,
│ │ figures/, LaTeX report and PDF
│ └── missing_benchmark/ missing-data benchmark
├── scripts/ maintenance scripts
├── data/ local data folders (UCI HAR cache, not versioned)
├── CHANGELOG.md
├── CITATION.cff
├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── REFERENCES.md
├── pyproject.toml
└── requirements.txt
Citation and references
Please cite both A16 and A23 if you use this package in published work.
Machine-readable citation metadata is in
CITATION.cff
(GitHub's Cite this repository button reads it). Every reference the code and
the reports rely on is listed with its DOI and the module that uses it in
REFERENCES.md.
The pmcprg.pmc sub-package implements the unsupervised classification
methods of two papers by S. Derrode and W. Pieczynski. The CSDA paper (A16)
underpins the PMC model family and ICE-based copula selection; the Signal
Processing paper (A23) adds GICE — automatic margin family selection — on top
of ICE. pmcprg/pmc/README.md
maps every feature to its paper.
- A16 — Derrode S., Pieczynski W. Unsupervised data classification using pairwise Markov chains with automatic copulas selection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 63 (2013), pp. 81–98. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.027
- A23 — Derrode S., Pieczynski W. Unsupervised classification using hidden Markov chain with unknown noise copulas and margins. Signal Processing 128 (2016), pp. 8–17. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.03.008
@ARTICLE{A16,
author = {S. Derrode and W. Pieczynski},
title = {Unsupervised data classification using pairwise {M}arkov chains with automatic copulas selection},
journal = {Comput. Stat. Data Anal.},
volume = {63},
pages = {81--98},
year = {2013},
doi = {10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.027},
}
@ARTICLE{A23,
author = {S. Derrode and W. Pieczynski},
title = {Unsupervised classification using hidden {M}arkov chain with unknown noise copulas and margins},
journal = {Signal Process.},
volume = {128},
pages = {8--17},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.03.008},
}
The general PMC is defined by A16 Eqs. 12–14 (pair margins fᵢⱼ):
- A16, Eq. 12: f(yₙ, yₙ₊₁ | Xₙ = i, Xₙ₊₁ = j) = fᵢⱼ(yₙ) · fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁) · cᵢⱼ(Fᵢⱼ(yₙ), Fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁))
- A16, Eq. 13: p(Xₙ₊₁ = j | Xₙ = i, Yₙ = y) ∝ p(i, j) · fᵢⱼ(y)
- A16, Eq. 14: p(Yₙ₊₁ | Xₙ = i, Xₙ₊₁ = j, Yₙ = y) = fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁) · cᵢⱼ(Fᵢⱼ(y), Fⱼᵢ(yₙ₊₁))
With state margins (fᵢⱼ = fᵢ) Eq. 13 no longer depends on y, X is a Markov chain (A16 §2.1, Proposition) and the model is a stationary reversible HMC-DN — see Model variants above.
Methodological building blocks used by the package:
- Huard D., Évin G., Favre A.-C. Bayesian copula selection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51(2) (2006), pp. 809–822 — the
huardselection criterion (A16, Eq. 20). doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.08.010 - Naaman M. On the tight constant in the multivariate Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality. Statistics & Probability Letters 173 (2021), 109088 — the multivariate KS test in
pmcprg.diagnostics. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2021.109088 - Anguita D. et al. A Public Domain Dataset for Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphones. ESANN 2013, pp. 437–442 (the paper has no DOI) — the UCI HAR benchmark used in
examples/. Dataset DOI (UCI, Reyes-Ortiz & Anguita 2013): doi:10.24432/C54S4K
Related work (a selection; the references the code and the reports rely on are
listed in
REFERENCES.md):
- Gorynin I., Gangloff H., Monfrini E., Pieczynski W. Assessing the segmentation performance of pairwise and triplet Markov models. Signal Processing 145 (2018), pp. 183–192 — quantifies the PMM/TMM gain over classical HMMs. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.12.006
- Gangloff H., Morales K., Petetin Y. Deep parameterizations of pairwise and triplet Markov models for unsupervised classification of sequential data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 180 (2023), 107663 — the deep-learning branch of the PMC/TMC lineage. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2022.107663
- Zimmerman R., Craiu R.V., Leos-Barajas V. Copula Modelling of Serially Correlated Multivariate Data with Hidden Structures. JASA 119(548) (2024), pp. 2598–2609 — the closest copula-HMM methodology outside the pairwise family. doi:10.1080/01621459.2023.2263202
- Nasri B.R., Rémillard B.N., Thioub M.Y. Goodness-of-fit for regime-switching copula models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 48(1) (2020), pp. 79–96 — regime-switching copulas and the R package
HMMcopula. doi:10.1002/cjs.11534 - Grønneberg S., Hjort N.L. The Copula Information Criteria. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 41(2) (2014), pp. 436–459 — why AIC on rank pseudo-observations needs correction (xv-CIC). doi:10.1111/sjos.12042
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file awesomepmc-1.0.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: awesomepmc-1.0.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 392.6 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via:
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
b02cab8851111611feacebb41584762ae52da1099343cf7b74c6109616f84ae5
|
|
| MD5 |
3c5cb05f542ff06c8a6a04bde5c3ed33
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
5ff97cadf8ab43dc8e95c3cb7a9ebf504fb636f9e540f342b509e26f84168fb5
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for awesomepmc-1.0.0.tar.gz:
Publisher:
publish.yml on SDerrode/awesomePMC
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
awesomepmc-1.0.0.tar.gz -
Subject digest:
b02cab8851111611feacebb41584762ae52da1099343cf7b74c6109616f84ae5 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2849577275
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
SDerrode/awesomePMC@6abfd11474b4bbbec81fddffc3045c3e89fdcf32 -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v1.0.0 - Owner: https://github.com/SDerrode
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish.yml@6abfd11474b4bbbec81fddffc3045c3e89fdcf32 -
Trigger Event:
release
-
Statement type:
File details
Details for the file awesomepmc-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: awesomepmc-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 430.2 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via:
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
c483abaccc6f056f70ee3a70b1dcec444a17e57989eec9b74666d4da7a065940
|
|
| MD5 |
854aa307cdc555b526b0e9b3e5651aac
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
db695b4541cac43430db8c4de19137077cd7f319a534885b3c56580a5b21e8f7
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for awesomepmc-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl:
Publisher:
publish.yml on SDerrode/awesomePMC
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
awesomepmc-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl -
Subject digest:
c483abaccc6f056f70ee3a70b1dcec444a17e57989eec9b74666d4da7a065940 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2849577345
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
SDerrode/awesomePMC@6abfd11474b4bbbec81fddffc3045c3e89fdcf32 -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v1.0.0 - Owner: https://github.com/SDerrode
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish.yml@6abfd11474b4bbbec81fddffc3045c3e89fdcf32 -
Trigger Event:
release
-
Statement type: