Skip to main content

AWS IAM tester - simple command-line tool to check permissions handed out to IAM users and roles.

Project description

Testing AWS IAM policies

Introduction

AWS IAM policies are notouriously complex, it is too easy to add some unintended permissions and it is surprisingly difficult to identify these in heavily used AWS accounts.

Thankfully AWS has provided an IAM simulator that allows you to evaluate existing or new policies for its behavior. Which is very nice, but doing this manually is quite time consuming and it is unrealistic to test the entire environment for what you are trying to do.

However, in good AWS spirit the simulator has an API and this tool provides automation on top of it. It allows you to define the complete list of actions you want to evaluate against what resources, which allows you to run these tests on a regular basis or (better) integrate it in your CI/CD pipeline.

Testing approach

The testing leverages AWS' IAM simulator (api), that basically includes the same IAM evaluation logic that is applied when working in the console or using the cli. The beneits of this approach are:

  • It takes all different levels of policies into account. Think about permission boundaries, service control policies and so on.
  • It is an official service from AWS, so you can expect this to kept up to date over time.
  • The actual actions are evaluated, but NOT executed. Hence no need for cleaning up resources after testing.

Quick testing

For convenience, you can use this tool to quickly test whether a user has a specific permission on a particular resource:

$ aws-iam-tester access -u the_user -a 'glue:DeleteTable'
Test:
Source:     arn:aws:iam::208912673223:user/the_user
Action:     glue:DeleteTable
Resource:   *
Result:     allowed

Matched statements:
Policy:     admin_permissions
Type:       IAM Policy
Start:      L3:C17
End:        L8:C6

Or to see who has access to a particular resource and action by omitting both user and role:

$ aws-iam-tester access -a "s3:PutObject"
..............

Summary:

| Source                                                   | Action       | Resource   | Decision   | Policies            |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------|------------|---------------------|
| arn:aws:iam::XXXXXXXXXXXX:user/the_user                  | s3:PutObject | *          | allowed    | admins_permissions  |
| arn:aws:iam::xxxxxxxxxxxx:role/the_role                  | s3:PutObject | *          | allowed    | AdministratorAccess |

Account testing

However, the initial purpose of this tool is to check an entire account whether there are no users and/or roles having permissons which they should not have.

Configuration

In order to run, a configuration of the tests to run is required.

A sample configuration (with only one test) is shown, in various steps.

First there is a global section where you define settings which are applied to all tests (unless overruled, more on that later).

---
user_landing_account: 0123456789 # ID of AWS Account that is allowed to assume roles in the test account
global_exemptions: # The roles and/or users below will be ignored in all tests. Regular expressions are supported
- "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):user/(.*)(ADMIN|admin)(.*)$"
- "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):role/(.*)(ADMIN|admin)(.*)$"
- "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):role/AWSCloudFormationStackSetExecutionRole$"

Then you define a list of tests, each consisting at least of a set of:

  • actions
  • resources
  • the expected result (should it fail or succeed)
# List of tests to execute. In general the configurations follow the rules of the AWS IAM Policy Simulator.
# For more information: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/access_policies_testing-policies.html
tests: 
- actions: # list of actions to validate
  - "*:*"
  - iam:*
  - iam:AddUser*
  - iam:Attach*
  - iam:Create*
  - iam:Delete*
  - iam:Detach*
  - iam:Pass*
  - iam:Put*
  - iam:Remove*
  - iam:UpdateAccountPasswordPolicy
  - sts:AssumeRole
  - sts:AssumeRoleWithSAML
  expected_result: fail # 'fail' or 'succeed'
  resources: # list of resources to validate against
  - "*"

Rather than using all users and roles (without exemptions) you can also limit your test to a particular set of users and roles.

The test below does that, including defining a custom context that specifies multi factor authentication is disabled when running the test. By default the context under which the simulations are run assumes MFA is enabled, but you can override that with the custom_context element. For more information see the AWS documentation.

- actions: # Same list of actions, but now check (with a custom context) whether
  - "*:*"
  - iam:*
  - iam:AddUser*
  - iam:Attach*
  - iam:Create*
  - iam:Delete*
  - iam:Detach*
  - iam:Pass*
  - iam:Put*
  - iam:Remove*
  - iam:UpdateAccountPasswordPolicy
  - sts:AssumeRole
  - sts:AssumeRoleWithSAML
  expected_result: fail # 'fail' or 'succeed'
  resources: # list of resources to validate against
  - "*"
  limit_to: # check this list for the admin users
  - "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d*):user/(.*)(ADMIN|admin)(.*)$"
  - "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d*):role/(.*)(ADMIN|admin)(.*)$"
  # test if the admins are required to use multi factor authentication
  custom_context: 
    - context_key_name: aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent
      context_key_values: false
      context_key_type: boolean

Or if you want to do that for all tests you can use the global_limit_to:

---
user_landing_account: 0123456789 # ID of AWS Account that is allowed to assume roles in the test account
global_limit_to: # These roles and/or users below will be u. Regular expressions are supported
- "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):user/(.*)(ENGINEER|engineer)(.*)$"
- "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):role/(.*)(SCIENTIST|scientist)(.*)$"

Below an example where an additional set of roles is exempt from testing:

- actions: # list of data centric actions
  - redshift:GetClusterCredentials
  - redshift:JoinGroup
  - rds:Create*
  - rds:Delete*
  - rds:Modify*
  - rds-db:connect
  - s3:BypassGovernanceRetention
  - s3:CreateBucket
  - s3:DeleteBucket
  - s3:DeleteBucketPolicy
  - s3:PutBucketAcl
  - s3:PutBucketPolicy
  - s3:PutEncryptionConfiguration
  - s3:ReplicateDelete
  expected_result: fail # 'fail' or 'succeed'
  resources: # list of resources to validate against
  - "*"
  exemptions: [
  - "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):role/(.*)_worker$" # ignore this for the worker roles
  ]

If you want to run positive tests (i.e. tests that you need to succeed rather than fail), these exemptions don't work that well.

In that case you can limit your tests to a set of roles and users:

- actions:
  - s3:PutObject
  expected_result: succeed
  resources:
  - "arn:aws:s3:::my_bucket/xyz/*"
  limit_to: # if you specify this, test will only be performed for the sources below
  - "^arn:aws:iam::(\\d{12}):role/my_worker$"

Note that the exemptions are ignored when using a limit_to list.

Using a dynamic account id in the resource arn

In case you need to specify the account id in the resource arn, you can specificy this as follows:

- actions:
  - "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue"
  expected_result: succeed
  resources:
  - "arn:aws:secretsmanager:eu-central-1:{account_id}:secret:my-secret/*"

Using regular expressions for user and role matching

Regular expressions can be used when checking the users and/or roles that need to be included in the tests. Hence they are supported for the following elements in the config file:

  • limit_to (the filtered list of users/roles to be used for a particular test)
  • global_limit_to (the filtered list of users/roles to be used for all tests)
  • exemptions (the filtered list of users/roles that should be excluded from a particular test)
  • global_exemptions (the filtered list of users/roles that should be excluded from all tests)

For all other elements, regular expression matching is NOT supported!

How to use

Assuming you have define a config.yml in your local directory, then to run and write the outputs to the local ./results directory:

aws-iam-tester --write-to-file

Using a specific config file:

aws-iam-tester --config-file my-config.yml

Using a specific output location:

aws-iam-tester --output-location /tmp

Or write to s3:

aws-iam-tester --output-location s3://my-bucket/my-prefix

Include only roles that can be assumed by human beings:

aws-iam-tester --no-include-system-roles

Note: including system roles does NOT include the aws service roles.

Or print debug output:

aws-iam-tester --debug

To run a limited number of evaluations (which helps speeding things up, and avoiding API throttling issues):

aws-iam-tester --number-of-runs 10

For more information, run aws-iam-tester --help for more instructions.

Return codes

The tester returns the following return codes:

  • 0 upon successful completion with NO findings
  • 1 upon successful completion with findings
  • 2 (or higher) on failures

Required permissions

Obviously the client has to run under an AWS security context that has sufficient permissions to query the IAM resources and run the simulator.

The following permissions are needed at the minimum:

- sts:GetCallerIdentity
- iam:ListAccountAliases
- iam:ListRoles
- iam:ListUsers
- iam:SimulatePrincipalPolicy

And if you want to write the output to an s3 location, then obviously you need write access (s3:PutObject) to that particular location as well.

Unit testing

pytest is being used for testing the various options.

As long as the aws-iam-tester module is installed, you can run the tests.

After installing tox, you can also simply run $ tox.

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Files for aws-iam-tester, version 0.3.5
Filename, size File type Python version Upload date Hashes
Filename, size aws_iam_tester-0.3.5-py3-none-any.whl (16.0 kB) File type Wheel Python version py3 Upload date Hashes View
Filename, size aws-iam-tester-0.3.5.tar.gz (18.1 kB) File type Source Python version None Upload date Hashes View

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing Datadog Datadog Monitoring DigiCert DigiCert EV certificate Facebook / Instagram Facebook / Instagram PSF Sponsor Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Object Storage and Download Analytics Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Salesforce Salesforce PSF Sponsor Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page