Baton SDK
Structured signal capture for agent-mediated tool use. Thin event capture surface with pluggable sinks (stdout / file / HTTP / fan-out); a worker on the other side of the sink assembles signals, applies policy, and dispatches.
Pre-1.0 (0.2.0) — public API not yet stable; breaking changes flagged in SPEC §13. Vendor integration via install_baton(mcp, ...) against either the official Anthropic mcp SDK (baton.integrations.official) or the standalone fastmcp library (baton.integrations.standalone); library API path (baton.Client / AsyncClient) for Skill-instrumented code. Thin SDK + fat collector worker per CHARTER ADR-4. MCP tool-call events captured across Claude Code, Cursor, and Claude Desktop; the proactive + reactive annotation flow works on Claude Code and Cursor (per-runtime support matrix in SPEC §5.1.3). See docs/SPEC.md for the wire protocol.
30 seconds, zero config — python examples/01_stdout/demo.py emits structured signals you can pipe through jq. See examples/ for the four-rung sink ladder.
What Baton is
MCP is Anthropic's Model Context Protocol — the standard way agents (Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT, etc.) discover and call vendor tools. MCP standardizes the transport and tool-discovery layer; it doesn't capture why a call happened or whether it actually helped the user. Baton instruments agent–tool interactions on the vendor side — either by wrapping a vendor's MCP server (middleware) or by direct library-API calls in vendor code — and captures the four things only an agent-using-a-tool has in one context — intent, tool calls, observed outcomes, expected outcomes — plus friction signals (eight types per SPEC §3.1). It hands these as events to a sink of your choice; an HttpSink pointed at a collector (your own or a hosted Console) is the production path — the collector interprets, applies policy, and routes structured signals to the vendor's agent layer (which triages, deflects, or escalates to human support).
PII scrubbing is on by default as of the next release (
src/baton/scrub.py).baton.scrub.Scrubberrecursively walks every event payload and redacts email /Bearer …/sk-*/AKIA*/ JWT / Luhn-validated CC / NA-format phone, plus the field-name overridesemail/phone/ssn/api_key/token/secret/password. Same ruleset asbaton-proxy. Vendors needing raw payloads can opt out withVendorConfig(scrubber=baton.scrub.identity_scrub).
Shape of the protocol — agent-to-agent, not agent-to-human
customer ↔ customer agent ↔ Baton ↔ vendor agent ↔ vendor support
↑ (Claude / Cursor / (this project) (vendor's AI (humans, last
human ChatGPT / Codex) assistant) resort)
Baton is the protocol layer connecting two agent layers, with humans on both ends. The vendor's agent (triage / deflection / structured-action routing) is the FIRST consumer of Baton signals; humans are the fallback when the agent can't resolve. This is the shape of modern agent-to-agent support — not agent-to-human handoff.
Implementation — two integration paths
MCP middleware path
Customer agent (Claude / Cursor / ChatGPT / …)
│ MCP transport
▼
┌────────────────────────────┐
│ Vendor MCP server │
│ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ Sink
│ │ baton-sdk │ │ (stdout / file / http / multi)
│ │ • middleware │ │ ─────────────────▶ Collector
│ │ • annotation tool │ │ (your own, or a hosted
│ │ • capture surface │ │ Console — Baton is
│ │ • PII scrub │ │ collector-agnostic)
│ └──────────────────────┘ │ │
│ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ▼
│ │ vendor tools │ │ Vendor agent layer
│ └──────────────────────┘ │ (triage / deflection /
└────────────────────────────┘ routing)
│
▼
Human support
(last resort)
Library API path (Skills pattern)
Customer agent runtime (Claude Code / Cursor — following a vendor-published Skill)
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ agent-generated code (vendor's Skill) │
│ ┌────────────────────────┐ │ Sink
│ │ baton.Client │ │ (stdout / file / http / multi)
│ │ • client.trace(...) │ │ ─────────────────▶ Collector
│ │ • client.annotate │ │ (same as MCP path)
│ │ • PII scrub │ │ │
│ └────────────────────────┘ │ ▼
│ ┌────────────────────────┐ │ Vendor agent layer
│ │ vendor SDK / HTTP call │ ───► Vendor │ │
│ └────────────────────────┘ API │ ▼
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘ Human support
Everything downstream of the sink is identical across both paths — same wire envelope, same collector, same vendor-agent / human-support routing. The SDK has no state, no policy, no routing logic; everything beyond capture lives on the other side of the sink. See docs/SPEC.md §11 for the capture/interpretation/egress separation.
Install
pip install baton-sdk # core only — library API for Skill-instrumented code
pip install baton-sdk[mcp] # +MCP integration for the official `mcp` SDK (Anthropic's)
pip install baton-sdk[fastmcp] # +MCP integration for the standalone `fastmcp` library
pip install baton-sdk[http] # +HttpSink (POST events to a Console); needs httpx
pip install baton-sdk[all] # everything
Core SDK ships always. Protocol-specific surfaces live under baton.integrations.* and require opt-in extras — the same pattern Sentry / Datadog / OpenTelemetry use.
Dependency footprint — near-zero for the vendor. The core installs one runtime dependency (pydantic), and UUIDv7 is generated in-tree (no uuid6). Crucially, when you wrap an existing MCP server the marginal cost is zero: the official mcp package and standalone fastmcp already require pydantic and httpx, so baton-sdk (and baton-sdk[http] for the Console path) add nothing your server doesn't already have. The stdlib-only demo path (StdoutSink / FileSink) needs no extras at all.
Minimal MCP integration
Two parallel adapters covering the two production Python MCP libraries. The vendor-facing API (install_baton, VendorConfig, BatonHandle) is identical across both — only the import path differs.
Which one do I need?
| You import FastMCP via… | Use the adapter at… | Install extra |
|---|---|---|
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP (Anthropic's official mcp SDK — the dominant library) |
baton.integrations.official |
baton-sdk[mcp] |
from fastmcp import FastMCP (standalone fastmcp library, v2.x by jlowin) |
baton.integrations.standalone |
baton-sdk[fastmcp] |
Official mcp SDK path
import os
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
from baton.integrations.official import install_baton, VendorConfig
from baton.sinks import HttpSink # or StdoutSink / FileSink / MultiSink
mcp = FastMCP("your-vendor-mcp")
install_baton(mcp, VendorConfig(
vendor_id="your-vendor",
vendor_display_name="Your Vendor",
consent_token=os.environ["BATON_CONSENT_TOKEN"],
sink=HttpSink(
url=os.environ["BATON_INGEST_URL"],
api_key=os.environ["BATON_API_KEY"],
),
))
@mcp.tool()
async def your_tool(...): ...
Standalone fastmcp path
import os
from fastmcp import FastMCP
from baton.integrations.standalone import install_baton, VendorConfig
from baton.sinks import HttpSink
mcp = FastMCP("your-vendor-mcp")
install_baton(mcp, VendorConfig(
vendor_id="your-vendor",
vendor_display_name="Your Vendor",
consent_token=os.environ["BATON_CONSENT_TOKEN"],
sink=HttpSink(
url=os.environ["BATON_INGEST_URL"],
api_key=os.environ["BATON_API_KEY"],
),
))
@mcp.tool()
async def your_tool(...): ...
That's the integration. install_baton registers a vendor-namespaced annotation tool (named after your MCP server — a server called "Acme Knowledge Base" gets acme-knowledge-base_annotate; override with VendorConfig(annotation_tool_name=...)), sets the MCP server instructions motivating proactive + reactive annotation, captures events at the MCP transport boundary, and hands those events to your sink. The SDK is whitelabeled — no Baton-branded strings reach the calling agent or end user.
Under the hood the two adapters use different hook mechanisms — the official mcp SDK's FastMCP has no middleware system, so its adapter wraps each registered tool handler in place; the standalone fastmcp library uses its native middleware chain. The choice doesn't surface to vendors; both emit identical events through the same sink layer.
Turning capture off
BATON_DISABLED=1 in the environment of the process running the server, and the
SDK installs nothing at all: no wrapped tools, no annotation tool, no
instructions rewrite, no collector connection, no background thread. (A handle
or client still exposes a sink attribute — a no-op stand-in holding no key and
opening no socket — so finding one there is not a sign the switch failed.) Your server starts and
behaves exactly as it would if install_baton were not in the file. It is read
once at startup, it never writes to stdout (which is the JSON-RPC stream under
stdio transport), and it cannot make your server fail to boot — a config the
SDK would otherwise refuse is accepted and ignored while the switch is on.
The switch belongs to whoever RUNS the server. For a server you distribute, that is your user. For one you host, it is you — your users cannot set an environment variable on your machine, and there is no per-user opt-out today.
If you pass this on to your users, say where the variable goes. For a
server started by an MCP client, it belongs in the env block for your server
in that client's config file — not in their shell. MCP clients spawn
servers with a fixed, short allowlist of environment variables
(mcp.client.stdio.DEFAULT_INHERITED_ENV_VARS — six names on macOS and Linux,
a different dozen on Windows), and BATON_DISABLED is on neither list, so an
exported one never reaches your process.
Someone who follows "set the environment variable" gets a server that is still
capturing and believes it is not.
What you tell your users about what is captured is yours to write, on your own surface. The SDK does not put words in your README beyond the switch.
Sinks — where events go
The SDK is sink-agnostic. The capture surface is the same regardless of destination:
| Sink | Use case |
|---|---|
StdoutSink() |
Zero config, no backend. Events to stderr as JSON Lines. Default if sink= is omitted. |
FileSink("./events.jsonl") |
Capture to a file for later analysis. |
HttpSink(url=..., api_key=...) |
POST to any HTTP collector — your own, a hosted Console, anyone's. Bounded buffer + retry + circuit breaker. |
MultiSink([...]) |
Fan out (e.g., stdout + http during dev). |
Four runnable examples laddered by complexity in examples/ — 01_stdout → 02_local_file → 03_local_https → 04_hosted_console. The SDK is identical across all four; only the sink changes.
Library API — for non-MCP integrations
For vendors whose customers reach the API via agent-generated code (Skills pattern) rather than MCP tool calls, the library API (baton.Client / baton.AsyncClient) is the equivalent capture surface. Same event envelope, same sink layer, same wire contract — different emission boundary:
from baton import Client, SignalType
from baton.sinks import HttpSink
client = Client(
vendor_id="your-vendor",
consent_token=os.environ["BATON_CONSENT_TOKEN"],
sink=HttpSink(url=..., api_key=...),
)
with client.trace(
tool_name="chat.completions.create",
intent="summarize the user's question",
expected_outcome="2-3 sentence answer",
) as trace:
response = vendor_client.chat.completions.create(...)
trace.observed(response)
Worked end-to-end at examples/skill_demo/; full surface (sync + async parity, client.annotate(...), trace.annotate(...), exception path) covered in src/baton/client.py docstrings and validated by examples/library_api_smoke_test/.
Choosing between MCP integration and Library API
| Concern | MCP integration (install_baton) |
Library API (Client) |
|---|---|---|
| Where instrumentation lives | Vendor side (in MCP server runtime) | Agent side (in agent-generated code) |
| Setup | Vendor's MCP server adds 5 lines | Vendor publishes a Skill teaching agents the pattern |
| Reliability | Deterministic — wrap/middleware runs on every tool call | Soft — depends on agent following the Skill |
| Annotation surface | MCP tool (<your-server>_annotate) with MUST/REQUIRED framing |
Python function calls (trace.annotate(...)) |
| Vendor API call captured? | Yes (vendor controls MCP server) | Yes (agent calls vendor API from inside trace context) |
| Where partner invests | Wire SDK into their MCP server | Author + maintain a Baton-aware Skill |
| Best fit | Vendors with MCP servers as their primary surface | Vendors using Skills as their primary distribution |
Both paths emit identical events through the same sink — downstream of the sink, correlation + policy + dispatch are unchanged.
Development
make install # uv sync --locked --extra dev (uv.lock is committed)
make test # pytest -q
make ci # lint + typecheck + test (CI gate)
make format # ruff format
See Makefile for the full target list.
What's in this repo
baton/
├── src/baton/ # SDK package (Python)
│ ├── client.py # library API (Client, AsyncClient, Trace)
│ ├── sinks.py # Sink ABC + StdoutSink / FileSink / HttpSink / MultiSink
│ ├── events.py / scrub.py / _state.py # core substrate
│ └── integrations/
│ ├── mcp/ # Official `mcp` SDK adapter (install_baton, VendorConfig, tool-handler wrapping)
│ └── fastmcp/ # Standalone `fastmcp` library adapter (install_baton, VendorConfig, middleware)
├── docs/
│ ├── SPEC.md # the wire protocol — the hero artifact
│ └── CHARTER.md # load-bearing project decisions
├── examples/ # runnable examples (skill_demo, library_api_smoke_test)
├── tests/ # test suite
├── pyproject.toml
├── Makefile
├── AGENTS.md # per-repo guidance for AI coding agents (agents.md convention)
├── CHANGELOG.md # user-facing release notes (SPEC §13 has wire-format changes)
├── CONTRIBUTING.md # dev setup + PR conventions
├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
├── SECURITY.md # disclosure policy
├── LICENSE # Apache 2.0
└── README.md # this file
The Console (ingest + worker + Channels + UI) lives in a separate sibling repo.
Status
Pre-1.0 (0.1.0). Wire format and public API are not yet stable; breaking changes will be flagged in docs/SPEC.md §13 and the top-level CHANGELOG.md.
For design-partner conversations: reach out via Good Timing.
Metadata
Release files for baton-sdk 0.8.5
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| baton_sdk-0.8.5.tar.gz | 240.5 kB | With provenance | Details for baton_sdk-0.8.5.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| baton_sdk-0.8.5-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for baton_sdk-0.8.5-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 423.7 kB
Release files / baton_sdk-0.8.5.tar.gz
| Download URL | baton_sdk-0.8.5.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 240.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
9eb60538f0ec150474811cc22dbde09651bf5babb3cc8a8574d33b338cd626da
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
62bbfeb0b33f29493584f12102f09058b50f88d410e6ed6960c187b58bb04f15
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 15, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / baton_sdk-0.8.5-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | baton_sdk-0.8.5-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 183.2 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
271938ad62fca8c2195956dbb94f6a7fccfe9877cd3c5c35153bd713e176e7c3
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4d1f9f6f53d3ba72b5fb0e1716efa0bf925b04cee0a8ea55ada0383a41af2f0a
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 15, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for baton-sdk 0.8.5
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for baton_sdk-0.8.5.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 15, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.