beliq
Official Python SDK for the beliq e-invoicing compliance API. Generate, validate, parse, and convert EN 16931 invoices (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD, Factur-X, Peppol BIS) against authority-pinned, nightly-drift-checked rules.
beliq produces and checks the compliant document. Transmission (Peppol, PDP, KSeF, SDI), archiving, and tax-authority reporting stay with your access point.
Install
pip install beliq
Requires Python >= 3.10.
Quick start
from beliq import Beliq
beliq = Beliq(api_key="blq_...")
# Account, plan, and quota context (no quota cost).
account = beliq.me()
# Generate an XRechnung document from an EN 16931 invoice.
generated = beliq.generate(
standard="xrechnung",
verify=True,
invoice={
"number": "INV-2026-001",
"issueDate": "2026-01-15",
"currencyCode": "EUR",
# The XRechnung CIUS asks for more than plain EN 16931: a seller contact
# (BR-DE-2), payment instructions (BR-DE-1), a VAT breakdown (BR-CO-18)
# and an electronic address per party. examples/invoice.json is this
# same shape.
"buyerReference": "04011000-12345-06",
"seller": {
"name": "Seller GmbH",
"vatId": "DE123456789",
"contactName": "Anna Muster",
"email": "billing@seller.example",
"phone": "+49 30 1234567",
"address": {"street": "Hauptstr. 1", "city": "Berlin", "postalCode": "10115", "countryCode": "DE"},
"peppol": {"schemeId": "9930", "id": "DE123456789"},
},
"buyer": {
"name": "Buyer GmbH",
"vatId": "DE987654321",
"email": "ap@buyer.example",
"address": {"street": "Marktweg 2", "city": "Munich", "postalCode": "80331", "countryCode": "DE"},
"peppol": {"schemeId": "9930", "id": "DE987654321"},
},
"lines": [
{"description": "Consulting", "quantity": 10, "unitCode": "HUR", "unitPrice": 100, "lineTotal": 1000, "vatRate": 19, "vatCategoryCode": "S"}
],
"taxSummary": [{"vatCategoryCode": "S", "vatRate": 19, "taxableAmount": 1000, "taxAmount": 190}],
"paymentMeans": {"typeCode": "58", "iban": "DE89370400440532013000"},
"totalNetAmount": 1000,
"totalTaxAmount": 190,
"totalGrossAmount": 1190,
},
)
print(generated.xml, generated.meta.schematron_version)
# Validate any document against authority-pinned rules.
result = beliq.validate(generated.xml, format="auto")
if not result.valid:
for issue in result.errors:
print(issue.rule_id, issue.message)
Authentication
Create an API key in the beliq dashboard under API Keys:
Beliq(api_key="blq_...") # sends X-API-Key (default)
Beliq(api_key="blq_...", auth="bearer") # sends Authorization: Bearer
Beliq(api_key="blq_...", base_url="https://staging.beliq.eu")
Timeouts and retries
The client retries transient failures for you, so you do not have to reimplement backoff around it.
Beliq(
api_key="blq_...",
timeout=90.0, # per-attempt deadline in seconds (default)
max_retries=3, # extra attempts after the first (default)
)
Only 429, 502 and 503 are retried, honouring the server's Retry-After
with jitter. beliq refunds the document's quota unit on a 503, so a retry never
costs you a second document.
504 and a client-side timeout are deliberately not retried: both mean the
work may still be running on beliq's side, so retrying risks producing a second
document rather than recovering the first.
A 429 carrying QUOTA_EXCEEDED is not retried either. RATE_LIMITED and
ACCOUNT_THROTTLED clear on their own, but a spent monthly allowance only returns
when your billing window turns, so the error is raised straight away and names the
cause instead of sleeping against it.
The default deadline is generous because beliq runs the full Schematron rule set
over each document, and a generate or validate can legitimately take tens of
seconds. If you lower it, keep it above the latency you actually see: a deadline
shorter than the server's own turns completed work into an unknown outcome. Pass
max_retries=0 to handle retrying yourself. If you supply your own
httpx.Client, its timeout is used as-is and timeout is ignored.
Async
AsyncBeliq mirrors the sync client with await:
import asyncio
from beliq import AsyncBeliq
async def main():
async with AsyncBeliq(api_key="blq_...") as beliq:
result = await beliq.validate(open("invoice.xml", "rb").read(), format="auto")
print(result.valid)
asyncio.run(main())
API
| Method | Endpoint | Input | Returns |
|---|---|---|---|
me() |
GET /v1/me | none | AccountInfo (no quota cost) |
generate(...) |
POST /v1/generate | EN 16931 invoice dict | GenerateResult |
validate(document, ...) |
POST /v1/validate | XML or PDF | ValidationResult |
parse(document, ...) |
POST /v1/parse | XML or PDF | ParseResult |
convert(document, ...) |
POST /v1/convert | XML or PDF | ConvertResult |
document accepts a str, bytes, or bytearray. The content type is sniffed from the bytes (PDF vs XML) unless you pass content_type=. generate and convert return the raw document content (bytes) plus the response-header metadata: meta.schematron_version, meta.pdf_kind, meta.source_format/meta.target_format, meta.lost_elements, meta.conversion_tools, the ruleset fingerprint meta.ruleset_sha256 / meta.ruleset_artifacts, and meta.livemode. For an XML output, generate also decodes xml.
JSON responses are Pydantic models. Any field not explicitly typed (such as the per-country authority versions on a validation result) is preserved and accessible. Errors raise BeliqApiError with a typed .code, HTTP .status, and any .details:
from beliq import BeliqApiError
try:
beliq.validate("not xml")
except BeliqApiError as err:
print(err.code, err.status, err.message)
Method options
Keyword arguments the examples on this page do not show. Beliq and AsyncBeliq take the same ones, and an argument left out (or None) is not sent.
generate:
template="standard"renders the built-in invoice layout foroutput="pdf". It is the only value.xrechnungandpeppol-bishave no hybrid PDF, so they need it (orpdf_template_id) to return a PDF at all: a visualization PDF with no embedded XML (meta.pdf_kind == "visualization"), while the legal document stays the XML.zugferdandfacturxrender that same layout onto their hybrid PDF with or without it.pdf_template_id="k3d-9mp"renders the PDF from one of your organization's own templates, designed in the dashboard. The value is the short ref shown next to the template there. It takes precedence overtemplateand applies to anyoutput="pdf". An unknown ref raisesBeliqApiErrorwith codePDF_TEMPLATE_NOT_FOUND.
validate:
france_ctc=Truealso runs the FNFE-MPE BR-FR-CTC Flux 2 rules of the French e-invoicing reform on a CII or UBL document. They run without it when the document's BT-24 is the EXTENDED-CTC-FR CustomizationID or its BT-23 carries a French cadre de facturation code, sofrance_ctc=Falsedoes not switch them off.
convert:
target_profilepicks the profile whentarget_formatis"zugferd"or"facturx", one ofLIVE_PROFILES("basicwl","en16931","extended","extended-ctc-fr"). The API uses"en16931"when it is left out. For any othertarget_formatthe SDK does not send it.drop_france_ctc_overlay=Truelets a CII source that carries a French cadre de facturation code (BT-23) convert to a UBL target ("ubl","xrechnung","peppol-bis"). UBL has no place for that code, so by default the API refuses withCONVERSION_LOSSY_FAILCLOSED(422). With this set, the code is dropped and counted inmeta.lost_elements_count.
generate, validate, parse and convert:
advancedis a dict deep-merged over what the SDK sends, and its values win over the named arguments: into the JSON body ongenerate, into the query string on the other three. It is there for a field the API accepts before this SDK has an argument for it.
Allowances and charges
A discount or surcharge sits either on the invoice or on a single line, and the two shapes differ: a document-level entry states its own VAT, a line-level one inherits the line's. The API rejects an unknown key rather than ignoring it, so the two are not interchangeable.
from beliq import DocumentAllowanceCharge, LineAllowanceCharge
document_discount: DocumentAllowanceCharge = {
"amount": 25,
"vatCategoryCode": "S", # required at document level
"vatRate": 19,
"reason": "Volume discount",
"reasonCode": "95", # UNTDID 5189
}
line_surcharge: LineAllowanceCharge = {"amount": 12.5, "reason": "Express handling"}
invoice = {
# number, dates, parties and totals as in the quick start
"lines": [
{
"description": "Consulting", "quantity": 10, "unitCode": "HUR",
"unitPrice": 100, "lineTotal": 1000, "vatRate": 19, "vatCategoryCode": "S",
"charges": [line_surcharge],
},
],
"allowances": [document_discount],
}
The invoice itself stays a plain dict, so these two are annotations you opt into; they exist so a type checker and an IDE can see the fields. tests/test_spec_contract.py pins both shapes to the vendored openapi.json, including which fields are required.
The seal: verify it yourself
Pass seal=True to generate to get the document back as a JSON envelope: the decoded content (bytes) plus its sha256 and the full validation_result. Hashing the returned bytes reproduces the returned hash, so you can prove which ruleset the document passed.
import hashlib
sealed = beliq.generate(standard="xrechnung", verify=True, invoice=invoice, seal=True)
assert hashlib.sha256(sealed.content).hexdigest() == sealed.sha256
print(sealed.validation_result.valid, sealed.meta.ruleset_sha256)
Without seal, generate returns the raw document body (unchanged, the default). The ruleset fingerprint (meta.ruleset_sha256, meta.ruleset_artifacts) is present in both modes.
Sandbox and live keys
A blq_test_ key is a sandbox key; a blq_live_ key is live. The client derives the mode from the key prefix before any request:
beliq = Beliq(api_key="blq_test_...")
beliq.livemode # False for a sandbox key, True for a live key
Each generate / convert response also carries the authoritative mode from the server as meta.livemode.
Generate presets
LIVE_GENERATE_PRESETS is the curated set of public generate targets (matching beliq.eu's own generator). NLCIUS is a Peppol BIS profile rather than a standalone standard, so it is reachable here:
from beliq import LIVE_GENERATE_PRESETS
nlcius = next(p for p in LIVE_GENERATE_PRESETS if p.id == "nlcius")
beliq.generate(standard=nlcius.standard, profile=nlcius.profile, output=nlcius.output, invoice=invoice)
Which profiles a standard accepts
profile is pinned per standard, and the API answers a pair outside its table with 422 PROFILE_STANDARD_MISMATCH. LIVE_PROFILES is one flat list for the Factur-X family, so offering it for every standard offers values that cannot succeed: none of them is legal on XRechnung or Peppol BIS, and extended-ctc-fr is Factur-X only. Build a per-standard choice from profiles_for_standard instead:
from beliq import is_profile_allowed_for_standard, profiles_for_standard
profiles_for_standard("zugferd") # ('basicwl', 'en16931', 'extended')
is_profile_allowed_for_standard("zugferd", "extended-ctc-fr") # False
An unknown standard returns () and is allowed, so the API stays the authority on values this table does not carry.
Development
uv sync --locked --extra dev # installs exactly what uv.lock pins
uv run ruff check src tests
bash scripts/scrub-check.sh # no em-dash in any tracked file
uv run mypy
uv run pytest # unit tests (no network)
BELIQ_API_KEY=blq_xxx uv run pytest tests/test_integration.py # hits the live API; draws quota
uv.lock pins the development and CI tree, not what pip install beliq resolves for users. It records the package's own version too, so a change to pyproject.toml (a dependency or the version) needs uv lock in the same commit. CI installs with --locked and fails on a stale lock.
tests/test_spec_contract.py reads the vendored openapi.json and fails if the error-code set, the core validate/seal fields, or the public option lists drift from the spec. Refresh the vendored spec with python scripts/sync_spec.py. A weekly workflow (scripts/check_live_drift.py) flags when the vendored spec falls behind the deployed API. python scripts/check_profile_drift.py checks LIVE_PROFILES_BY_STANDARD against the engine's own table; it needs a beliq-engine checkout beside this repo (or BELIQ_ENGINE_PATH) and fails without one, so it is run by hand, not in CI.
Publishing
Released to PyPI as beliq. Releases run from .github/workflows/release.yml via PyPI Trusted Publishing (OIDC, with attestations): bump version in pyproject.toml and __version__ in src/beliq/__init__.py, run uv lock, add the release's entry to CHANGELOG.md, merge, then push a v*.*.* tag on the merge commit to publish. No token is stored in the repo.
License
MIT
Release files for beliq 0.3.3
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| beliq-0.3.3.tar.gz | 118.7 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| beliq-0.3.3-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 140.7 kB
Release files / beliq-0.3.3.tar.gz
| Download URL | beliq-0.3.3.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 118.7 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
7f883727d0ce95a4960bc5cfaa59a7fd2287b2e37ffdfd4bbb37e20afd654d1e
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
496ef9c8a73a1ef6db5daa3f28518979d1604b2b5612b63aacb3fee21f2a46be
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 26, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / beliq-0.3.3-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | beliq-0.3.3-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 22.0 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
f4de8d6d9578646c9668cba7c6a60e4994e49bc0a6ef04e98882076ad338dcbf
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
2c7109ced24ce9e1f5ba624c76ea18651a0d58a7f0f935d9304c12765d949136
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 26, 2026.
Transparency log