bettermemory 2.7.1

Memory you can verify — MCP-native memory for AI coding agents, with per-hit staleness verdicts and claim-level audit trails. Local-first, MIT, no cloud.

bettermemory

Memory you can verify.

MCP-native memory for AI coding agents. Every retrieved fact carries a staleness verdict — calendar age + filesystem path drift + git commit drift — so the model knows when a stored memory has rotted before it relies on it. Retrievals are logged with three attribution tiers — model-explicit (with claim-level excerpts), Stop-hook substring match, or an auto-fallback if neither fires — so a reply months later can be traced back to the load-bearing stored claim wherever the model or hook recorded one. Retrieval is opt-in; writes about you always stage for confirmation. Stored as plain markdown on disk; MIT-licensed; works with Claude Code, Cursor, Continue, Cline, and any MCP client.

Why this exists. Every other memory layer — Mem0, Zep, Letta, claude-mem, Anthropic's reference server, the dozen SQLite-FTS5 MCP clones — stores facts. None of them tell the model when a stored fact has rotted, which sentence in the reply a memory shaped, or which retrievals the model never deliberately reaches for. bettermemory does all three. See Where it fits for the comparison.

Install

For Claude Code:

/plugin marketplace add 0Mattias/bettermemory
/plugin install bettermemory@bettermemory

For any other MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue, Cline), see docs/clients.md. The short form:

uv tool install bettermemory           # or: pipx install / pip install
bettermemory init --client claude-desktop

What it looks like

Day one. You say: "When I ask for a tutorial, I want runnable code, not screenshots of an IDE." Claude calls memory_write(category="user-inference"). Because it's a claim about you, the write goes pending. Claude asks: "Want me to remember that?" You confirm. A markdown file lands at ~/.claude-memory/.

Week two, fresh session: "Walk me through pandas from zero to hero." The phrase is ambiguous in a way stored preferences could resolve, so Claude calls memory_search, surfaces the preference, and tells you up front: "Using your stored preference for code-driven tutorials…" before answering.

Month three: "What's the difference between find and fd?" Generic question. Claude doesn't search. The reply isn't tinted by months of accumulated personal context. That's the design point.

Features

Verification surface (the differentiated lane)

• Per-hit staleness verdict. Every retrieval carries staleness_verdict ∈ {fresh, spot_check_recommended, spot_check_required}, derived from three orthogonal drift signals: calendar verification age, filesystem path drift (paths cited in the body that no longer exist), and commit drift against the memory's origin repo. The model can decide whether to trust the memory before relying on it. Hits also carry an inline path_drift = {checked, missing, verified} list when drift is detected, so the model can memory_update the rotted path or memory_verify the rest without a memory_show round-trip.
• Claim-level audit trail. memory_record_use(claim_excerpts=[…]) logs the load-bearing sentence each retrieved memory shaped — when the model deliberately calls it. The Stop hook (bettermemory audit-turn) catches retrievals the model forgot to log by running a precision-tuned substring match against the assistant reply and emitting a record_use(attribution="hook") event with the matched phrase. Retrievals that neither path covers within ~2 turns fall back to attribution="auto" with no excerpt — present in the count of the dead-letter detector (endorsement_rate) but not the load-bearing numerator. Three tiers, one event per retrieval, no double-counting. Explicit ignored / contradicted / corrected overrides record nuance.
• Endorsement-debt visibility. memory_health surfaces memories the ranker keeps surfacing but the model never deliberately reaches for — the search-result equivalent of a dead-letter queue. No other memory system exposes this.
• Silent-miss probe. memory_audit_turn re-runs the model's ranker over the just-completed turn and flags high-relevance hits the model didn't retrieve. Closes the loop on retrieval-contract slippage that is otherwise structurally invisible.
• Confirmation tier for claims about you. category="user-inference" always stages pending regardless of config — misattribution of preferences sticks for months, so the user always has the veto on claims about themselves.
• Write-time groundedness gate. Opt-in memory_write(groundedness_check=True, source_transcript=…) flags sentences in the proposed memory that don't anchor to the conversation that produced them. Catches LLM-extraction hallucinations at write time.
• Negative-results suppression. A hit that was ignored or contradicted recently and not since applied carries recent_negative_outcomes. The model doesn't re-suggest junk the user already rejected.

The rest

• Opt-in retrieval. memory_search is a tool the model calls deliberately. The default per turn is not to call it.
• Proactive writing with structural gates. Aggressive writing is safe because a durability check, content/tombstone dedup, scope-mismatch check, and the pending tier guard the writes.
• Hybrid retrieval. Four selectable rankers: hybrid (default since 2.6.8 — RRF over keyword + BM25, plus semantic when the embeddings extra is installed; degrades gracefully without it), bm25 (Okapi BM25), keyword (legacy TF + coverage; no IDF), or semantic (sentence-transformers, requires extra).
• Typed inter-memory links. supersedes / contradicts / extends / depends_on. Surfaced bidirectionally on memory_show.
• Tombstones, not deletes. Removed memories keep their removed_reason. Tombstone-aware dedup catches paraphrases six months later. Reversible via memory_restore.
• Auto-scoped by repo and worktree. Memories written from a git checkout carry the repo URL and worktree root; memory_search filters by both. Sibling worktrees of the same repo are isolated.
• Cross-machine sync, no cloud. bettermemory sync is a thin git wrapper — your laptop and workstation share the same memory via your own git remote, no SaaS account required.
• Plain-text storage. No database, no opaque blob. Files are grep-able, git-versionable, hand-editable.

Where it fits

bettermemory occupies the file-backed, retrieval-on-demand corner of the memory-system design space. Most other projects optimize for more memory, faster retrieval; bettermemory optimizes for memory the model can decide whether to trust. The table sketches what each system does in its own terms — pick the one whose defaults match what you need.

	bettermemory	mem0	Letta (MemGPT)	Zep / Graphiti	Anthropic native (Claude Code + Dreaming)	claude-mem
Storage	Markdown + YAML on disk	Vector DB (+ optional graph)	Tiered core/recall/archival	Temporal knowledge graph	Filesystem + auto-managed	SQLite + ChromaDB
Retrieval	MCP tool-call, opt-in per turn	Explicit search() API	Tool-routed across tiers	search() over temporal graph	Auto-injected + on-demand	KG + vector
Per-hit staleness verdict	Calendar + path + commit drift, exposed per result	Temporal created/updated	—	Bi-temporal (t_valid + t_invalid)	Dreaming refreshes asynchronously, no per-hit signal	—
Claim-level audit trail	memory_record_use(claim_excerpts=…)	—	—	—	—	—
User-inference confirmation tier	Claims about the user always stage for veto	Auto-extraction (no staging)	Background memory manager	Auto-ingest	Auto-write	Auto-compress
Endorsement-debt visibility	memory_health surfaces never-deliberately-used hits	—	Letta Evals (offline)	—	—	—
Inter-memory links	Typed (supersedes / contradicts / extends / depends_on)	Graph edges (optional Neo4j)	Implicit via tiers	Graph edges (Graphiti)	—	KG
Cross-host sync	Built-in git wrapper, BYO remote	Self-host or managed cloud	Self-host or managed cloud	Self-host or managed cloud	Provider-managed	Per-machine
License	MIT	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0 (Graphiti)	Closed	MIT

The four bolded rows are the lane bettermemory deliberately runs in. The dashes elsewhere aren't gaps in those projects — they're choices, and most of those projects optimize for objectives bettermemory doesn't (multi-tenant cloud, graph reasoning over evolving facts, transparent in-context memory). Pick what fits.

Coexistence with Claude Code's built-in memory

Claude Code 2.x ships its own filesystem-backed memory that auto-injects into the system prompt. Installing the plugin lands the "persistent memory between sessions lives in this server's MCP tools, do not fragment it across ad-hoc files alongside" anchor in the system prompt, which keeps the model from drifting back to the built-in directory mid-conversation. Manual installs can paste docs/system_prompt.md into CLAUDE.md for the same effect.

On-disk format

One file per memory:

~/.claude-memory/2025-03-14-jupyter-tutorial-style.md

---
schema_version: 1
id: 01HXYZ123ABC
created: 2025-03-14T10:23:00+00:00
updated: 2025-03-14T10:23:00+00:00
scopes: [tools, learning-style]
confidence: high
source: explicit-statement
---
When I ask for a "zero to hero" tutorial, I want a hands-on
walkthrough with code I can run, not a tour of the IDE.

Tombstones move to .tombstones/. Optional fields are written only when populated: origin (cwd + repo + branch + worktree captured at write time), last_verified_at, category, verified_paths / verified_commits / verified_versions, and links.

Storage resolution: $BETTERMEMORY_DIR if set, else ./.claude-memory/ if it exists, else ~/.claude-memory/. Project-scoped overrides global; cross-project queries are explicit (auto_scope=false).

Tools

18 MCP tools, grouped:

• Retrieval — memory_search, memory_show, memory_list, memory_scope_overview
• Writing — memory_write (plus memory_write_confirm / memory_write_cancel for the staged-write flow), memory_update
• Lifecycle — memory_remove, memory_restore, memory_list_tombstones
• Verification — memory_verify
• Curation — memory_record_use, memory_health, memory_audit_turn, memory_rename_scope
• Session-local — memory_scope_disable, memory_scope_enable

Full signatures, defaults, and return shapes in docs/api.md.

CLI

The bettermemory script is the MCP server entry point by default — no args, runs over stdio. It also exposes offline tooling:

bettermemory init --client claude-code      # register with a client (idempotent)
bettermemory doctor                         # diagnose install state
bettermemory health                         # curation rollup (text or --json)
bettermemory consolidate                    # dedup + demote + cold-scope + typo passes
bettermemory consolidate --apply            # commit dedup + demotions
bettermemory consolidate --llm              # +LLM pass: merges, contradictions, date rewrites, demotions
bettermemory consolidate --llm --from-transcript PATH  # +propose new memories from a Claude Code session JSONL / plain transcript
bettermemory consolidate --llm --apply      # interactive accept; or --apply --yes for batch
bettermemory eval                           # memory_helped_rate / endorsement_rate / silent_miss_rate
bettermemory eval --since 7d --scope tools  # narrow to a window or a scope
bettermemory reindex                        # rebuild FTS5 index from on-disk files
bettermemory reindex --embeddings           # also re-embed bodies into the active provider's cache
bettermemory sync init --remote URL         # git-based cross-host sync
bettermemory sync push | pull | auto | status
bettermemory ui                             # local FastAPI curation UI (needs [ui] extra)
bettermemory tombstones list | prune
bettermemory export                         # backup

Performance

Below ~500 memories, search uses load_all (byte-stable to 1.x). Above the threshold (BETTERMEMORY_INDEX_THRESHOLD), an SQLite FTS5 inverted index pre-filters candidates, capping per-search work regardless of corpus size. Files stay canonical; the index is a derived cache at <store>/.index.sqlite, kept live by Store hooks. Recovery from hand-edits: bettermemory reindex.

Embeddings for semantic / hybrid retrieval

Hybrid retrieval (RRF over keyword + BM25) is the default and ships with zero extra deps — the hybrid mode gracefully degrades to keyword+BM25 fusion when no embedding extra is installed. To add the semantic third leg (paraphrase matching via sentence-transformers cosine), install one of two optional extras:

uv pip install -e ".[embeddings]"       # sentence-transformers + PyTorch (~500MB; the well-trodden path)
uv pip install -e ".[embeddings-fast]"  # fastembed + ONNX Runtime (~50MB total; same retrieval surface)

[behavior] semantic_provider = "auto" (the default) picks torch when [embeddings] is installed, otherwise fastembed, otherwise falls back to Jaccard for the dedup path and keyword for retrieval. Set "torch" or "fastembed" to pick explicitly. The persistent embedding cache is provider-namespaced (.embeddings.<model>.npz for torch, .embeddings.fastembed.<model>.npz for fastembed) so flipping providers gives a fresh file rather than mixing incompatible vectors. After flipping providers, run bettermemory reindex --embeddings to populate the new cache before the next dedup-heavy operation.

Config

config.toml is created on first run under platformdirs:

• macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/bettermemory/config.toml
• Linux: ~/.config/bettermemory/config.toml
• Windows: %LOCALAPPDATA%\bettermemory\config.toml

Defaults are sensible — most users never edit it. Knobs that matter: behavior.search_mode (hybrid default since 2.6.8, plus keyword / bm25 / semantic), behavior.semantic_provider (auto / torch / fastembed), behavior.require_write_confirmation (per-write veto; off by default for solo setups, but category="user-inference" always goes pending regardless), behavior.verification_stale_days (default 30), telemetry.enabled (flip to false to disable the event log), telemetry.log_queries_verbatim (default false; off-by-default opt-in for storing raw memory_search query text — see Privacy below).

Limitations

• No encryption. Memories are plaintext on disk. Don't store secrets; use OS-level disk encryption if you need it.
• No automatic conflict resolution for sync. bettermemory sync delegates to git. True content conflicts surface as normal merge conflicts.
• Web UI is read-mostly. Curation and one-click memory_verify only. Writes happen in-conversation.
• Disabled scopes don't survive restart. Intentional; each session starts fresh.
• Multi-process locking falls back to no-op on Windows. Single-process recommended there.

Out of scope

• Cloud sync as a service. Sync is git-based; bring your own remote (GitHub, Forgejo, bare repo over SSH).
• Cross-user sharing. Single-user tool. Team scopes are deferred.
• Silent / autonomous memory extraction from transcripts. Writes that happen behind the user's back defeat the opt-in retrieval contract. bettermemory consolidate --llm --from-transcript PATH is the audited alternative: explicit command, dry-run by default, every proposed memory rendered as a diff with a source_excerpt provenance line, --apply refuses without --yes (batch) or interactive per-proposal y/N.

Design notes

The motivating observation is that stored facts rot. A memory written last quarter about "the auth middleware in src/auth/middleware.py" doesn't know the file moved to src/auth/jwt.py. A preference captured from a conversation last March may have been provisional. A configuration fact may have been superseded by a commit two days ago. Most memory systems treat retrieval as a black box that produces text; once the text comes back, the model is on its own to decide whether to trust it.

bettermemory's response is to surface the provenance and freshness of every memory at retrieval time — calendar age, filesystem path drift, commit drift against the originating repo, the chain of supersession links, and the user's prior outcomes (applied / ignored / contradicted). The model gets a signal to spot-check before relying. The opt-in retrieval contract, the user-inference confirmation tier, the typed links, the groundedness gate, the silent-miss probe, and the endorsement-debt rollup all exist to make that loop trustworthy enough to actually depend on.

Further reading

• docs/eval.md — the three metrics bettermemory wants the field to adopt: memory_helped_rate, endorsement_rate, silent_miss_rate. Defined for any system that exposes the right telemetry, not just this one.
• docs/incidents/ — public postmortems for memory-rot bugs the verification trifecta should have caught. The contract puts the verdict in every retrieval response; we owe a public accounting when the verdict was wrong.
• docs/ROADMAP.md — what's planned (comparative-publication run of bettermemory eval against Mem0 / claude-mem / agentmemory; operational polish) and what's deliberately out of scope (managed cloud, multi-user RBAC, graph backend). The fastembed extra, bettermemory eval CLI, consolidate --llm Dreaming-defense pass, and consolidate --llm --from-transcript writing-reflex closure all shipped between 2.5.0 and 2.6.0. 2.7.0 added the calibration trio (eval --tool-usage for "which tools is the model actually reaching for?", eval --threshold-sweep for counterfactual silent-miss replay), the memory_scope_overview delta field (curation_pending_new_since_last_session), and the bettermemory ingest bridge from Claude Code's auto-memory directory.

Built by Mattias Rask. MIT licensed — see LICENSE.