BillKit Python SDK
Async + sync client for BillKit, the Stripe-Billing-shape multi-tenant SaaS API on Mollie.
Install
pip install billkit-eu
# or
uv add billkit-eu
Requires Python 3.11+. The distribution is billkit-eu because the bare
billkit name on PyPI belongs to an unrelated project. The import name is
unaffected:
import billkit
Quick start
from billkit import BillKit
client = BillKit(api_key="bk_test_...")
customer = client.customers.create(email="ada@example.com", name="Ada Lovelace")
product = client.products.create(
name="Pro",
description="Hosted billing for SaaS",
marketing_features=["Checkout", "Subscriptions"],
)
price = client.prices.create(
product_id=product["id"],
amount_cents=999,
currency="EUR",
interval="month",
trial_days=14,
payment_methods=["creditcard", "directdebit"],
)
session = client.checkout_sessions.create(
customer_id=customer["id"],
price_id=price["id"],
success_url="https://app.example.com/success",
cancel_url="https://app.example.com/cancel",
)
print(session["url"]) # redirect the user here
One-shot (mandate-less) payments
A one-shot is a single charge with no subscription, mandate or renewals: the Stripe PaymentIntent shape, mapped onto Mollie. Create it, redirect to redirect_url, and settle terminal state via the one_shot_payment.succeeded / .failed webhook events.
payment = client.one_shot_payments.create(
customer_id=customer["id"],
amount_cents=2500,
currency="EUR",
method="ideal",
success_url="https://shop.example.com/thanks",
refund_window_days=14, # optional; 0 disables refunds, default is 30
)
print(payment["redirect_url"]) # redirect the payer here
# Later, refund it within its window (omit amount_cents for a full refund):
client.refunds.create(one_shot_payment_id=payment["id"])
# ...or refund part of it. A charge can carry several partials:
client.refunds.create(one_shot_payment_id=payment["id"], amount_cents=500)
Metered billing
A metered price charges for what was consumed. You report usage, and at each period close BillKit invoices the period's total and charges the stored mandate.
There are three ways to price a unit, and a price uses exactly one of them.
# 1. Whole minor units: 5 cents per unit.
client.prices.create(
product_id=product["id"], amount_cents=5,
currency="EUR", interval="month", usage_type="metered",
)
# 2. Finer than a minor unit. "0.02" is 0.02 CENTS, i.e. EUR 0.0002 per unit
# -- the canonical per-API-call price, which no integer can express.
client.prices.create(
product_id=product["id"], unit_amount_decimal="0.02",
currency="EUR", interval="month", usage_type="metered",
)
# 3. By bands. "graduated" prices the units inside each band; "volume" lets
# the period total pick one band which then prices every unit. The same
# table under the two modes is a different bill, so the mode is required.
client.prices.create(
product_id=product["id"], currency="EUR", interval="month",
usage_type="metered", billing_scheme="tiered", tiers_mode="graduated",
tiers=[
{"up_to": 1000, "unit_amount": 1}, # first 1,000 at EUR 0.01
{"up_to": "inf", "unit_amount_decimal": "0.5"}, # then EUR 0.005
],
)
unit_amount_decimal is a string, and a float is refused. Pass str, int or Decimal; a float raises TypeError. A float cannot hold 0.0002 exactly, so accepting one would work for the values that happen to round-trip and silently mis-price the ones that do not. The same rule applies inside a tier.
Reporting usage, exactly once
client.subscriptions.create_usage_record(
sub["id"],
quantity=1200,
identifier="job-2026-09-19T10:00Z", # your id for what you are metering
)
Two dedupe mechanisms, for two different failures. The Idempotency-Key the SDK sends covers a retry of that HTTP request, including its own internal retries. identifier covers a retry of your call -- a job runner replaying a task, a queue delivering twice, your code re-invoking after its own timeout -- which reaches the API as a genuinely new request with a new key. A second report of the same identifier returns the first record unchanged rather than billing twice. If your reporting pipeline is at-least-once, identifier is the one that matters.
Knowing what the next invoice will be
summary = client.subscriptions.retrieve_usage_summary(sub["id"])
summary["pending_quantity"] # 3
summary["gross_cents"] # 15
summary["will_charge"] # False
Check will_charge before you promise a customer an amount. A period whose total is under minimum_charge_cents (EUR 1.00) is not charged, because the payment provider would refuse it. The usage is not lost: it stays pending and rolls into the next period, which is then billed for both. open_invoice_id names an earlier cycle that is invoiced and still unsettled; while one is open, this period cannot be charged.
Telling buyers from abandoned carts
A checkout that captures an email commits its Customer before the charge,
so a checkout nobody finished leaves a row behind. provisional is what
separates the two:
paid = client.customers.list(provisional=False) # people who bought
carts = client.customers.list(provisional=True) # the cart-recovery worklist
everyone = client.customers.list() # both kinds, the default
Abandoned rows are swept after the tenant's retention window.
Finding paused subscriptions
status and renewal_state answer different questions, and only one of them knows about pausing. status is where the subscription stands with its payments (incomplete, trialing, active, past_due, canceled). renewal_state is what happens when the current period ends (auto_renew, paused, canceling, stopped). Pausing sets renewal_state and leaves status at active, because the customer has paid for the period they are in:
paused = client.subscriptions.list(renewal_state="paused")
# Both filters take a comma-separated list, and carry onto every page:
for sub in client.subscriptions.iter(status="active,past_due", page_size=100):
...
status="paused" is not an accepted value and raises InvalidRequestError.
Retiring something, and deleting something
delete() exists on customers and webhook_endpoints, and it returns {"id": ..., "object": ..., "deleted": True} rather than the object: it has left the API, so there is nothing to hand back. A deleted endpoint takes its delivery rows with it, because those are readable only through the endpoint that owns them; the events stay in client.events, which is the record of what you were sent.
The catalogue is retired through its update route instead, because it stays readable afterwards. Prices, products, tax rates and coupons take active=False. Each of them has to survive: subscriptions renew against a price by id, an invoice records the VAT percentage a tax rate produced, and a redeemed coupon is part of what a customer was charged.
status="disabled" on a webhook endpoint is the other half of the pair, not a substitute for deleting. It stops delivery and keeps the endpoint, its secret and its history, and it can be turned back on.
A price accepts active and nothing else, because the amount, currency and interval are fixed at creation. active itself moves both ways: it decides what new checkouts may buy, not what anyone was charged. Re-sending the value it already has is a no-op, so a retry is safe.
# Stop selling a price. It stays readable; customers on it keep renewing.
archived = client.prices.update(price["id"], active=False)
assert archived["active"] is False
# Stop sending to an endpoint, without losing its signing secret.
client.webhook_endpoints.update(endpoint["id"], status="disabled")
# Remove a customer. Refused while they hold a subscription that can
# still charge them.
client.customers.delete(customer["id"]) # -> {"deleted": True, ...}
Invoice and credit-note PDFs
from pathlib import Path
Path("invoice.pdf").write_bytes(client.invoices.retrieve_pdf("inv_123"))
Path("credit-note.pdf").write_bytes(client.credit_notes.retrieve_pdf("cn_123"))
Returns the raw bytes. S3-backed deployments answer with a redirect to a presigned URL, which the SDK follows under its own timeout and retry policy, so both storage adapters look the same from here — and the API key is never sent to the storage host, because the presigned URL carries its own credential. A deployment with PDF rendering disabled answers 501, which surfaces as a ServerError with code == "rendering_pending"; retrieve() still gives you the structured document to render yourself.
Async
from billkit import AsyncBillKit
async with AsyncBillKit(api_key="bk_test_...") as client:
customer = await client.customers.create(email="ada@example.com")
Configuration
from billkit import BillKit, RetryPolicy
client = BillKit(
api_key="bk_test_...", # or set BILLKIT_API_KEY
base_url="https://api.billkit.eu", # override for self-hosted
timeout=30.0, # seconds, or pass httpx.Timeout
retry_policy=RetryPolicy(
max_attempts=5,
max_retry_after_seconds=10.0, # cap 429 Retry-After sleeps
),
)
The SDK auto-generates an Idempotency-Key for every mutating call, so 5xx and short Retry-After 429 retries are safe: the server replays the original response when an earlier attempt completed. Pass idempotency_key= to coalesce retries across process restarts.
409 idempotency_in_progress is retried too. It means an earlier request carrying the same key is still in flight, which is the one 4xx where giving up is the dangerous answer: that request may already have charged the customer, and the obvious workaround — retry with a fresh key — is exactly what turns one charge into two. The retry reuses the original key, so it either loses the race again or replays the first call's result. Every other 409 (idempotency_key_in_use, a conflicting subscription state) fails immediately, because retrying can only repeat it.
Errors
from billkit import BillKit, ResourceMissingError, RateLimitError, BillKitError
client = BillKit(api_key="bk_test_...")
try:
customer = client.customers.retrieve("cus_doesnt_exist")
except ResourceMissingError:
print("Customer is gone")
except RateLimitError as exc:
print(f"Rate limited; retry in {exc.retry_after}s")
except BillKitError as exc:
print(f"BillKit error {exc.status_code}: {exc.message}")
All errors inherit from BillKitError. Subclasses: APIConnectionError, APIError, ServerError, AuthenticationError, PermissionError, ResourceMissingError, InvalidRequestError, ConflictError, RateLimitError.
The class is chosen by HTTP status, not by the envelope's type:
| Status | Class |
|---|---|
| 401 | AuthenticationError |
| 403 | PermissionError |
| 404 | ResourceMissingError |
| 409 | ConflictError |
| 429 | RateLimitError |
| other 4xx (400, 405, 422, …) | InvalidRequestError |
| 5xx | ServerError |
The status is the field the API cannot get wrong. Requests that never reach a route handler — an unmatched path, a method the route does not allow — are serialised by the framework as {"type": "api_error", "code": "unhandled"} with a 4xx status, so mapping on type would turn a plain 404 into a ServerError and tell you BillKit had broken when the request was at fault. The envelope's type, code and param are all still on the raised object if you want them.
Logging
The SDK is silent by default. It owns one logger, logging.getLogger("billkit"), with a NullHandler attached, and it never calls basicConfig, never sets a level, and never adds a handler to a logger it doesn't own. Your logging config is yours.
Turn it on from your application:
import logging
logging.basicConfig()
logging.getLogger("billkit").setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
DEBUG:billkit:BillKit request POST https://api.billkit.eu/v1/customers (attempt 1/3)
DEBUG:billkit:BillKit response POST https://api.billkit.eu/v1/customers -> 503 in 84ms (request_id=req_9f2a)
WARNING:billkit:BillKit retrying POST https://api.billkit.eu/v1/customers after HTTP 503 (attempt 1) in 500ms
DEBUG:billkit:BillKit response POST https://api.billkit.eu/v1/customers -> 200 in 91ms (request_id=req_9f2b)
- DEBUG: one line per attempt, one per response (status, elapsed ms,
X-Request-Id; quote that id to support). - WARNING: one line per retry, with the reason and the delay before the next attempt.
Never logged: your API key or the Authorization header; request and response bodies (they carry customer PII); the query string (list filters carry values like email=); only the path is logged. The final failure isn't logged either: it's raised as a typed BillKitError carrying the status, request id and retry-after, and logging it here too would hand you a duplicate you can't suppress.
One caveat: httpx's own request line
The promise above covers records this SDK writes. httpx, the HTTP client underneath, writes its own at INFO, and it includes the full URL:
INFO:httpx:HTTP Request: GET https://api.billkit.eu/v1/customers?email=ada@example.com "HTTP/1.1 200 OK"
basicConfig() plus a DEBUG level on billkit is enough to surface it, so turning BillKit's logging on would otherwise put customer emails in your logs from a logger BillKit never touched. There is no per-client switch for it in httpx.
So when you opt this SDK in, it raises the httpx and httpcore loggers to WARNING — only if you have not set a level on them yourself, and only for the httpx client the SDK created. Both exceptions are deliberate:
- If you have configured
httpxlogging, you made a decision and a billing SDK does not get to overrule it. Silence the request line yourself, or accept the query strings. - If you passed your own
httpx_client=, you own its logging as much as its connection pooling.
The check happens when the client is constructed, so configure your logging before you build a BillKit / AsyncBillKit (the usual startup order).
The logger object is exported if you'd rather wire it up directly:
from billkit import logger
logger.addHandler(my_handler)
Webhook verification
from billkit import WebhookSignature, WebhookVerificationError
# In your FastAPI / Flask / Django handler:
try:
event = WebhookSignature.verify(
payload=request.body,
signature_header=request.headers.get("BillKit-Signature"),
secret=os.environ["BILLKIT_WEBHOOK_SECRET"],
)
except WebhookVerificationError:
return Response(status_code=400)
if event["type"] == "subscription.created":
handle_new_subscription(event["data"])
The verifier enforces a 5-minute timestamp tolerance (replay protection) and constant-time HMAC compare. Pass tolerance_seconds= to customise.
Development
uv sync --all-extras --dev
uv run pytest
uv run ruff check
uv run mypy src
License
Proprietary.
Release files for billkit-eu 0.6.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| billkit_eu-0.6.0.tar.gz | 120.5 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| billkit_eu-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 178.5 kB
Release files / billkit_eu-0.6.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | billkit_eu-0.6.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 120.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
7594ed4b895818fc7c8f33a67271b380f96b0ddad6ed37118342f0b749d16068
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
31c78e088aa47974a449a457529d0486a171b3ed6096045a0b15cd0e7c1aef0b
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 23, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / billkit_eu-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | billkit_eu-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 58.0 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
910ea149dad97badf4d17469ea4e0e92cc4d45390c50bf3e79615718c32daf3f
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
09d5326669cc7a680b5934a9c0ceac18be2283454cf51ce0946caefc8be1dae7
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 23, 2026.
Transparency log