bootstrapx
Practical bootstrap uncertainty estimation for Python.
Two-sample experiments · 16 bootstrap methods · sklearn/pandas · bounded batches
Why bootstrapx?
Use bootstrapx when ordinary IID resampling is not enough or when you want one API for IID intervals, block bootstrap, clustered/stratified resampling, Bayesian bootstrap, pandas summaries, and bootstrap cross-validation.
| If you need… | Start with bootstrapx because… |
|---|---|
| An interval for an A/B effect | Compare control and treatment directly as a difference, ratio, or relative lift. |
| A confidence interval for a custom metric | Pass any scalar statistic, such as a quantile, trimmed mean, or model score. |
| A time-series interval | MBB, CBB, stationary, tapered, and sieve methods preserve different forms of dependence. |
| Repeated observations by user, store, or account | Cluster bootstrap resamples whole groups instead of treating their rows as independent. |
| Known sampling strata | Stratified resampling preserves the stratum composition. |
| A reproducible analysis workflow | random_state, batched execution, result exports, pandas, and scikit-learn integrations are built in. |
For a simple IID interval for a standard statistic, SciPy may be all you need. bootstrapx is most useful when the resampling design or the surrounding analysis workflow needs to be explicit.
The library keeps resample matrices in bounded batches. The returned bootstrap
distribution and some method-specific state still grow with n_resamples or
sample size, so this is not a claim of constant total memory.
The audited 0.5.0 experiment suite completed 9,900 interval trials without a
failure or invalid result. Across the 15 cells directly matched with SciPy,
the mean absolute coverage difference was 0.42 percentage points and the
largest was 1.67 points. On the recorded Apple Silicon runtime grid,
bootstrapx was 1.26–2.60× faster than SciPy's scalar (vectorized=False)
configuration. Against bounded-vectorized SciPy, it was slower for the two
small-sample cells and 1.56–2.24× faster for the three larger-sample cells.
These machine- and workload-specific measurements are not a blanket
performance guarantee. See the
benchmark evidence
for methods, uncertainty, difficult cases, and reproducible inputs.
Installation
pip install bootstrapx-lib # core (numpy + scipy + joblib)
pip install "bootstrapx-lib[pandas]" # + pandas accessor
pip install "bootstrapx-lib[sklearn]" # + scikit-learn CV integration
pip install "bootstrapx-lib[numba]" # + faster MBB/CBB/stationary indexing
pip install "bootstrapx-lib[pandas,sklearn]" # pandas + scikit-learn integrations
pip install "bootstrapx-lib[pandas,sklearn,numba]" # all optional features
Quick Start
Version 0.6.0 adds joint-column scalar metrics, optional analysis-unit ID checks, and reporting metadata. See the assigned-user/order walkthrough for the complete workflow. Its known-truth evidence includes skewed, denominator-change, and correlated activity/price cases; method limitations are reported rather than hidden behind aggregate coverage.
Basic usage
import numpy as np
from bootstrapx import bootstrap
data = np.random.default_rng(42).normal(5, 2, size=300)
result = bootstrap(data, np.mean, random_state=42)
print(result)
print(result.confidence_interval.low, result.confidence_interval.high)
print(5.0 in result.confidence_interval) # True
# Compact exports for reports and experiment tracking
print(result.to_dict())
print(result.to_frame()) # requires bootstrapx-lib[pandas]
Independent A/B experiment
import numpy as np
from bootstrapx import bootstrap_two_sample
rng = np.random.default_rng(42)
control = rng.binomial(1, 0.10, size=2_000)
treatment = rng.binomial(1, 0.12, size=2_200)
effect = bootstrap_two_sample(
control,
treatment,
np.mean,
effect="difference",
method="bca",
n_resamples=4_999,
random_state=42,
)
print(effect.control_estimate, effect.treatment_estimate)
print(effect.estimate, effect.confidence_interval)
This estimates the treatment-minus-control conversion difference directly.
Use effect="relative_lift" only when a ratio to the control estimate is
scientifically meaningful and the control baseline is safely away from zero.
Complete A/B walkthroughs
Start with the product A/B reference. Its executable notebook defines one primary metric and decision threshold before generating a reproducible user-randomized experiment whose true effect is known.
Then use the Hillstrom real-data case study to see what changes when the truth is unknown and conversion and revenue are sparse. Its notebook verifies the public source and keeps the raw customer-level CSV out of the repository.
pandas accessor
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import bootstrapx # registers .bootstrap accessor
s = pd.Series(np.random.default_rng(0).exponential(scale=2, size=500))
# On a Series
r = s.bootstrap.bca(np.mean, random_state=42)
print(r)
# On a DataFrame — column-wise summary
df = pd.DataFrame({"control": s, "treatment": s * 1.1 + 0.3})
print(df.bootstrap.summary(np.mean, random_state=42))
This DataFrame helper estimates each column separately. It does not estimate
the difference or lift between columns. Extract the control and treatment
columns and pass them to bootstrap_two_sample() for an experiment effect.
scikit-learn cross-validation
from bootstrapx import BootstrapCV
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
X, y = load_breast_cancer(return_X_y=True)
cv = BootstrapCV(n_splits=200, random_state=42)
scores = cross_val_score(
GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators=100),
X, y, cv=cv, scoring="roc_auc"
)
print(f"AUC: {scores.mean():.4f} ± {scores.std():.4f}")
Time-series bootstrap
import numpy as np
from bootstrapx import bootstrap
rng = np.random.default_rng(0)
y = np.zeros(500)
for t in range(1, 500):
y[t] = 0.7 * y[t-1] + rng.normal()
# Moving Block Bootstrap — preserves serial correlation
result = bootstrap(
y,
np.mean,
method="mbb",
block_length=15,
n_resamples=4999,
random_state=42,
)
print(result)
# Sieve Bootstrap — fits AR(p) model to residuals
result = bootstrap(y, np.mean, method="sieve", n_resamples=9999, random_state=42)
print(result)
A/B test with repeated events per user
import numpy as np
from bootstrapx import bootstrap_two_sample
rng = np.random.default_rng(1)
control_user_ids = np.repeat(np.arange(50), 5)
treatment_user_ids = np.repeat(np.arange(60), 5)
control_events = rng.normal(10.0, 2.0, len(control_user_ids))
treatment_events = rng.normal(10.5, 2.0, len(treatment_user_ids))
result = bootstrap_two_sample(
control_events,
treatment_events,
np.mean,
effect="difference",
control_cluster_ids=control_user_ids,
treatment_cluster_ids=treatment_user_ids,
method="percentile",
n_resamples=4_999,
random_state=42,
)
print(result)
This resamples complete users within each experiment arm. If the estimand is an equally weighted mean per user, aggregate to one row per user first instead.
Bayesian bootstrap with a custom statistic
Bayesian bootstrap evaluates a functional directly under Dirichlet weights.
np.mean, np.nanmean, and np.average work without extra configuration.
For a custom statistic, provide its weighted form explicitly:
def second_moment(x):
return np.mean(x**2)
def weighted_second_moment(x, weights):
return np.sum(weights * x**2)
result = bootstrap(
data,
second_moment,
method="bayesian",
weighted_statistic=weighted_second_moment,
random_state=42,
)
Benchmarks
bootstrapx is not faster than SciPy in every regime. The audited 0.4.4 release run on Apple Silicon/macOS 15.7.4, Python 3.11.5, NumPy 2.4.6, and SciPy 1.17.1 found:
Workflow (np.mean, 4,999 resamples) |
n | scipy / bootstrapx |
|---|---|---|
| BCa | 200 | 1.92× |
| BCa | 1,000 | 1.01× |
| Percentile | 1,000 | 0.94× |
| Percentile | 10,000 | 3.38× |
Values above 1 mean bootstrapx was faster; below 1 mean SciPy was faster. They
are local measurements, not cross-machine guarantees. The complete table,
memory-method caveats, arbitrary-callable results, and optional Numba scope are
in the benchmark documentation.
The versioned raw results and environment metadata live in
benchmark_runs/v0.4.4-release.
A matched coverage study completed 160 cells: BCa and percentile intervals for mean, median, and standard deviation over four sample sizes and the documented distributions. Each cell used 300 independently generated datasets and 4,999 resamples; no trial failed or produced an invalid interval. Mean empirical coverage was 94.2% for both libraries, and their largest cell-level difference was 0.67 percentage points. This compares implementations rather than proving nominal coverage in every finite-sample setting: the 95% Wilson interval for a single 300-dataset cell is still about six percentage points wide, and both libraries under-covered the standard deviation of exponential data at n=200.
Run the safe local suite without overwriting previous results:
pip install -e ".[dev,numba]"
python benchmarks/run_release.py --profile quick
python benchmarks/run_comparison_release.py --profile quick
For release-candidate coverage with checkpoints, use --profile release.
Commands and resume instructions are in the benchmark documentation.
Documentation
📖 Full docs: artyerokhin.github.io/bootstrapx
All supported methods
| Method | method= |
Use case |
|---|---|---|
| BCa | "bca" |
Smooth scalar statistics; verify finite-sample behavior |
| Percentile | "percentile" |
Simple, fast |
| Basic (Hall) | "basic" |
Reflected bootstrap interval |
| Studentized | "studentized" |
Bootstrap-t; expensive nested resampling |
| Bayesian | "bayesian" |
Bayesian UQ, non-parametric posterior |
| Poisson weights | "poisson" |
Poisson multiplier resampling |
| Bernoulli subsets | "bernoulli" |
Calibrated random-subset inference |
| Subsampling | "subsampling" |
Root-scaled inference from smaller samples |
| Moving Block (MBB) | "mbb" |
Stationary time series |
| Circular Block (CBB) | "cbb" |
Stationary series with circular blocks |
| Stationary | "stationary" |
Politis & Romano (1994) |
| Tapered Block | "tapered" |
Paparoditis & Politis (2001) |
| Sieve | "sieve" |
AR(p) time series (Bühlmann 1997) |
| Wild | "wild" |
Heteroscedastic residuals (Wu 1986) |
| Cluster | "cluster" |
One-level grouped / panel data |
| Stratified | "strata" |
Stratified sampling designs |
Contributing
git clone https://github.com/artyerokhin/bootstrapx.git
cd bootstrapx
pip install -e ".[dev,pandas]"
pytest tests/ -v
Citation
If you use bootstrapx in academic work:
@software{bootstrapx,
author = {Erokhin, Artem},
title = {bootstrapx: Practical bootstrap uncertainty estimation},
url = {https://github.com/artyerokhin/bootstrapx},
version = {0.6.0},
year = {2026},
}
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Release files for bootstrapx-lib 0.6.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| bootstrapx_lib-0.6.0.tar.gz | 107.2 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bootstrapx_lib-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 145.9 kB
Release files / bootstrapx_lib-0.6.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | bootstrapx_lib-0.6.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 107.2 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
aff5da7f539f724ca76358c135604c9bf432c44bdad88b43793ed13dbcc5a92f
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
98e033b9752d2f915f710bf4312fb56df273a53cc0bc59302fa659e5b5c17d93
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 24, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / bootstrapx_lib-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | bootstrapx_lib-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 38.7 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c51dd4d0595f7eae02e94ece799dbf6ff353a6f68454474321ef48984484f553
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
cf8cf90e63c87403379d30a59f72f2b32dc43158c576e53b519c976c46c98571
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 24, 2026.
Transparency log