Stop burning tokens on repeated context.
Project description
Burnless
Intent-compressed intelligence orchestration.
A maestro that orchestrates any LLM from any vendor. Multi-turn agent loops cost O(N²) — Burnless makes them O(N).
Burnless is a vendor-agnostic orchestration layer for multi-agent workflows. You pick the model that conducts the orchestra (Maestro / Brain) — Claude, GPT, Gemini, Mistral, a local Llama, anything — and the models that execute each task (Workers). Tiers are roles, not vendors: gold/silver/bronze/diamond map to whatever CLI you put in config.yaml. Mix providers freely. Run encoder and decoder on a local Ollama model for zero marginal cost on the cheap stages.
On top of that independence, Burnless flips the cost curve. Every turn in a standalone agent loop replays the full conversation as input — token cost on turn N is proportional to N, so total cost across N turns is Θ(N²). Burnless keeps only short capsules in history and shares a cached system prompt across Maestro and Workers. History stays linear; the persistent prefix is billed once per cache window instead of once per turn.
The asymmetry is mechanical, not heuristic. Any provider that charges per input token is subject to the same arithmetic — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Mistral, anyone. The reference numbers below use Anthropic's pricing because their cache read/write spread is published and the cheapest to verify ($15/MTok fresh input vs $0.15/MTok cache read — a 100× spread). The mechanism reproduces wherever a provider exposes prompt caching.
Four things, in this order
- Independence. Any model as Maestro. Any model as Worker. Switch providers in one line.
- User-enforced rules, not LLM goodwill. You write the routing keywords, the per-tier
allowedTools, and the cost budgets in.burnless/config.yaml. Withrouting.hardcore_filter: true(orBURNLESS_HARDCORE=1), the Maestro cannot escape to a higher tier than the keyword router resolved — no quiet upgrades to Opus for tasks the rules said belong to Haiku.allowedToolsis enforced by the worker CLI itself, not hinted at in the prompt: when bronze ships withRead,Bash, it physically cannotEdit. Bypass requires an explicit--forcefrom the human. - Three compression layers. Deterministic minifier (regex, zero cost), semantic encoder (small model, ~$0.001/turn), optional LLMLingua-2 (CPU-only, no API). Each layer is independent and additive.
- Math, not marketing. 88% cheaper at turn 10 by arithmetic on the published pricing pages. Verify with
python bench/run.py --turns 8and your own API key.
The numbers
Two views, both reproducible on your machine.
Real API run — 10 turns against claude-opus-4-7, 23k-token prefix, no mocks, raw response.usage (actual spend: $5.76):
| Scenario | Cost | vs no-cache |
|---|---|---|
| A — Standalone, no cache | $4.66 | — |
| B — Standalone + cache | $0.65 | −86.0% |
| C — Burnless Maestro | $0.45 | −90.3% |
Reproduce: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python bench/run.py --turns 10 (~$6).
Monte Carlo simulation — 30 runs × 100 turns × 4 scenarios. Per-turn input/output sampled Uniform(2k, 10k) / Uniform(200, 1500), capsule compression Uniform(0.20, 0.30). Zero API cost:
| Scenario | Mean | vs Pure Opus |
|---|---|---|
| A1 — Pure Opus 100 | $532.61 | — |
| A2 — Pure Sonnet 100 | $105.42 | −80.2% (5× cheaper) |
| B — Free-pick (Opus/Sonnet) | $328.74 | −38.3% (1.6× cheaper) |
| Z — Burnless | $33.35 | −93.7% (16× cheaper) |
The interesting row is B. A developer alternating Opus and Sonnet ad-hoc — what most people actually do — costs 3× more than just sticking with Sonnet, because every model switch invalidates the prefix cache. Burnless is 10× cheaper than B and 3× cheaper than the disciplined "all Sonnet" strategy, because Brain stays fixed (cache hot) while workers tier down to Haiku where they can.
Reproduce: python bench/v2.py --runs 30 --turns 100 --seed 42. Zero cost, no key.
For the formal derivation — including why Burnless only loses at N = 1 — read MATH.md.
Design decisions
The 88% number is an outcome. These are the calls that produced it, in the order they were made.
1. Treat the cost curve as math, not engineering. Multi-turn agents replay full history every turn. Tokens billed across N turns sum to Θ(N²) — that is arithmetic on the pricing page, not a property of any SDK. Once the problem is stated as O(N²), the only useful question is what to truncate. Everything else follows.
2. Brain stores capsules, not transcripts. The Brain's conversation history holds ~80-char single-line summaries of each prior turn, not the raw exchange. Full output stays on disk, read on demand. This is the single change that flips the curve to O(N) — every other layer compounds on top of an already-linear baseline.
3. Shared prefix cache across models. If two models from the same provider see a byte-identical system prompt with cache_control set, they hit the same prefix cache. Switching Opus → Sonnet mid-session does not invalidate it. Brain and Worker can be different models and still amortize the 23k-token system prompt at read price ($0.15/MTok) instead of write price ($15/MTok). The 100× spread is the lever.
4. Tiers are roles, not models. gold/silver/bronze/diamond map to commands in config.yaml, not to Opus/Sonnet/Haiku. Any model can be Brain. Any model can be Worker. GPT-4o as Brain delegating to Codex workers is a one-line config change. Hardcoding tier→model would have made the orchestration layer a single-vendor wrapper instead of a pattern.
5. Determinism before LLMs. Layer 1 of the compression stack is pure Python — no model call, zero latency, zero cost. Filler phrases stripped, whitespace normalized, before the encoder ever sees the text. Cheap stages run first for a reason.
6. Cache-emergent glossary, not static dictionaries. The semantic compression layer (Layer 2) uses Haiku with session context as the only "dictionary." Abbreviations emerge from the session — Haiku infers them from prior turns and applies them consistently. No YAML, no _ABBREV, no per-language file. The glossary lives in the cache and dies with the session. This is both cheaper and more universal than any static approach: it works in any language without configuration, and the compression dialect is unique to each session.
6b. Cipher layer kills auditability by design. Layers 3 and 4 (XOR + base64 with a session-unique key) are pure Python, zero cost, zero API. The session key is never written to disk — it dies when the session ends. A capsule on disk after TTL expiry is opaque to humans and to AI systems without the session context. This is a structural property of the protocol, not a configuration option.
7. The benchmark is the proof. bench/run.py is short, dependency-light, hits the Anthropic SDK directly with no mocks, and writes raw response.usage to JSON. Anyone can rerun it, contest the numbers, and open an issue with their own results file. We did not write a marketing page about savings; we wrote a script that produces them and invited disagreement. That is the only honest way to publish a cost claim.
Install
pip install burnless
cd <your-project>
burnless setup # one-time per project: detects CLIs/keys + initializes .burnless/
burnless # enter the shell
burnless setup writes .burnless/config.yaml and creates the project structure in one shot — no separate init needed unless you want a minimal config without auto-detection (then run burnless init instead).
Python 3.10+. Tiers map to whatever models you configure — mix providers freely.
Or install from source:
git clone https://github.com/rudekwydra/burnless.git
cd burnless && pip install -e .
To remove from a project: rm -rf .burnless/ (no built-in uninstall command yet — pip uninstall burnless removes the package but leaves your project state untouched, which is intentional).
Any model. Any role. Full control.
Tiers are roles, not models. You decide what runs each role — and any model can be the Brain.
# .burnless/config.yaml — example: GPT-4o as Brain, Sonnet as executor, Codex for code
agents:
gold: { command: "openai api chat.completions.create -m gpt-4o" }
silver: { command: "claude --model claude-sonnet-4-6 -p --allowedTools Read,Edit,Write,Bash" }
bronze: { command: "claude --model claude-haiku-4-5 -p --allowedTools Read,Bash" }
diamond: { command: "codex exec --sandbox workspace-write" }
Gemini as Brain, DeepSeek for execution (both have published cache pricing):
agents:
gold: { command: "gemini -m gemini-2.0-flash-thinking -p" } # Brain
silver: { command: "deepseek chat --model deepseek-chat -p" } # execution
bronze: { command: "ollama run qwen2.5-coder" } # local, zero cost
Or Sonnet as Brain delegating to Codex workers:
agents:
gold: { command: "claude --model claude-sonnet-4-6 -p" } # Brain
diamond: { command: "codex exec --sandbox workspace-write" } # code execution
bronze: { command: "ollama run llama3" } # local model, cheap tasks
Each tier gets its own allowedTools, routing keywords, and cost budget. The routing layer reads your task description and picks the right tier automatically — or you override it explicitly.
The O(N²) → O(N) math applies to any provider that charges per input token. Burnless is the orchestration and caching layer, not a wrapper for one API.
Taking it further: the encoder and decoder — the models that compress user messages into capsules and expand capsules back into natural language — can run on a local model at zero marginal cost:
agents:
bronze: { command: "ollama run llama3.2" } # capsule encoder/decoder — $0
silver: { command: "claude --model claude-haiku-4-5 -p" }
gold: { command: "claude --model claude-sonnet-4-6 -p" } # Brain
diamond: { command: "codex exec --sandbox workspace-write" }
As local models improve, more tiers move to zero cost. The expensive models (Opus, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro) handle only what requires genuine reasoning — and they do it with a cached prefix and a linear history.
The O(N²) → O(N) math applies to any provider that exposes prompt caching: Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen — and any local provider via Ollama. If the provider charges per input token and supports a prefix cache, Burnless works.
Four compression layers
Each layer is independent and additive. Layers 1, 3, and 4 are pure Python — zero API calls, zero cost:
| Layer | What it does | Cost | When it fires |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Deterministic minifier | Strips universal filler phrases, normalizes whitespace | Zero — pure Python | Every turn, before encoder |
| 2. Cache-emergent glossary | Haiku compresses semantically. Abbreviations emerge from session context — no static dictionary. Glossary lives in the cache; dies with the session | ~$0.001/turn | balanced and extreme modes |
| 3. XOR cipher | Session-unique key (secrets.token_hex(16)) scrambles the compressed text. Key is never persisted — it dies when the session ends |
Zero — pure Python | Every turn after Layer 2 |
| 4. Base64 encode | Encodes the ciphered output to a portable ASCII capsule | Zero — pure Python | Every turn after Layer 3 |
Capsule format: burnless:<session_id>:<key>:<base64_ciphertext>
Decode: burnless decode --file session.capsule — pure Python, no API call.
What this replaces: static glossary files, LLMLingua-2 (which requires a heavy local model for compression and decompression), and vector databases for session memory. The capsule is the memory. It persists on disk, decodes instantly, and requires no server.
Structural property: the session key dies with the cache TTL (1h). After that, the capsule on disk is opaque to humans and to AI systems without the session context. This is not a design choice — it is a consequence of the architecture.
The 88% cost reduction in the benchmark comes primarily from the architecture — shared prefix cache + linear capsule history. The four compression layers compound on top.
Compression modes
Three modes control the cost × epistemic fidelity trade-off — how much of the argumentative trajectory a session preserves:
| Mode | Layers active | Anchor preserved | Friendly output | Savings | Use when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
light |
Minifier only (L1) | Yes | On | ~40% | Architecture debates, decisions that may need revisiting |
balanced (default) |
Minifier + encoder (L1+L2) | No | On | ~88% | Project execution, multi-step implementation |
extreme |
All layers (L1+L2+L3) | No | Off | ~93%+ | CI/CD pipelines, batch automation, no human in the loop |
Anchor preserved means the Brain's capsules retain enough argumentative structure that prior decisions remain revisable — you can genuinely reconsider, not just append. balanced discards the trajectory and keeps only the semantic result: the Brain knows what was decided, not why. Workers are always epistemically pure regardless of mode — they receive a clean task without the Brain's debate history.
compression:
mode: light # light | balanced | extreme
Or per-invocation: burnless --mode light "review this architecture decision".
The formal derivation of why capsule compression reduces both cost and anchoring bias is in MATH.md §10.
How it works
Brain. A thin orchestrator — any model you configure — that holds the plan, decides what to delegate, and reasons over results. Its conversation history contains only capsules — single-line summaries of past turns, ~80 characters each.
Worker. A delegated execution (any tier, any provider — local Ollama, Codex, Claude, GPT, Gemini) that receives one task, the cached system prompt, and the relevant capsules. It runs, returns a compact result, and exits. Raw output is written to .burnless/logs/dNNN.log, never replayed into the Brain.
Capsule. The compact handoff between turns. The Brain reads the capsule; the full log stays on disk and is read on demand. This is what flips the cost curve from quadratic to linear.
Shared cache, kept hot by architecture. Brain and Worker use a byte-identical persistent prefix marked with the provider's prompt-caching directive (Anthropic: cache_control: {"type": "ephemeral", "ttl": "1h"} — 1h, not the 5min default). The session is append-only on disk (.burnless/maestro_session.jsonl): every turn extends the message array without rewriting earlier blocks, so the cached prefix stays bit-identical and lookups hit. Up to 4 nested cache breakpoints (Anthropic's per-request limit) sit at system → memory → plan → capsules, shared by Brain and all Workers. When capsules accumulate (~30+), Haiku pre/post-compacts them into a denser prefix block which is then re-marked — the cached region stays bounded and stays hot indefinitely within the TTL.
The one known gap: if a session sits idle > 1h with zero calls, the TTL expires and the next call pays write price again. A --keepalive mode (1-token ping every ~50min for daemon-style usage) is on the v0.4 roadmap; not in v0.3. See MATH.md §8 for the full derivation of why the cache_read assumption is load-bearing for the O(N) result.
Benchmark
The benchmark in bench/run.py is the source of truth for the table above. Three scenarios run through a real provider SDK directly with no mocks; costs come from response.usage exactly. The reference run uses Anthropic because their cache pricing is published and easiest to reproduce — adapters for OpenAI and Gemini are tracked in the issues.
- A — standalone, no cache, full history each turn
- B — standalone, system prompt cached, full history each turn
- C — Burnless Maestro: cached system prompt + capsule history
Reproduce the math without an API key:
python bench/run.py --project 50
Reproduce empirically (real API calls, ~$5 for 8 turns):
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... python bench/run.py --turns 8
Raw results land in bench/results/run_<timestamp>.json for inspection.
CLI
burnless # interactive shell (Brain)
burnless plan "<objective>" # write a plan to .burnless/maestro.md
burnless delegate "<task>" # create a delegation, route to a tier
burnless run d001 # execute it (worker streams to live panel)
burnless status # current plan + open delegations
burnless metrics # token counter + audit ledger
State lives entirely under .burnless/ in your project. No hosted backend.
vs. LangChain / CrewAI / AutoGen
Burnless is not a competing orchestration framework — it is an optimization layer that sits under your existing agent logic. The distinction matters:
| LangChain / CrewAI / AutoGen | Burnless | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Agent connectivity and orchestration | Cost reduction and cache efficiency |
| Memory model | Sliding window or RAG | Compact capsules, Brain-led |
| Cost shape | Θ(N²) — grows quadratically |
Θ(N) — grows linearly |
| Dependencies | Heavy libraries, many abstractions | Lightweight CLI (pip install burnless) |
| Hosting | Local or cloud | 100% self-hosted — zero data retention |
| Provider lock-in | Varies | None — any CLI, any provider, any model |
You can wrap a LangChain agent as a Worker. The Brain→Worker pattern is compatible with any existing agent framework — Burnless manages the context budget and cache strategy; your agent handles the task logic.
When Burnless is not the right tool: single-turn queries (N = 1), one-off scripts with no repeated context, or workflows where a managed cloud platform is the explicit requirement (in that case: waitlist for Burnless Cloud at burnless.pro).
Contributing
Issues, PRs, and benchmark contestation are all welcome. The benchmark script is intentionally short and dependency-light so you can read it end-to-end and disagree with concrete numbers. If your workload produces a different ratio, open an issue with the JSON from bench/results/ — that is exactly the conversation worth having.
Status — what works today, what's roadmap
The architecture is provider-agnostic by design. Current implementation status:
- ✅ Workers: shell out to any CLI (
claude,codex,openai,gemini,ollama, anything). Configure per tier inconfig.yaml. Works today. - ✅ Routing, capsules, exec_log, three compression layers, shared system prompt: provider-neutral, work today.
- ✅ Reference benchmark: uses Anthropic SDK because their cache pricing is published and easiest to reproduce. The math reproduces wherever a provider exposes prompt caching.
- ⚠️
burnless braininteractive command: uses the Anthropic SDK in-process today. OpenAI, Gemini, and OpenRouter adapters are tracked in v0.4. If you want to skip the in-process Brain,burnless delegate+burnless runalready cover the full Brain→Worker loop using whatever CLI you configured. - ✅ PyPI release:
pip install burnless— version 0.3.0 live at https://pypi.org/project/burnless/.
Honest about gaps. PRs welcome — especially for the OpenAI/Gemini Brain adapter.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
Repo: github.com/rudekwydra/burnless
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file burnless-0.5.1.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: burnless-0.5.1.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 283.6 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.14.2
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
3531ca58b0494ad0cc2aaf40acd8f06a6607f39d54a10a8a13463a9498473a46
|
|
| MD5 |
f53e1f3f1225b6be4797e111dd6b2c41
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
77384d1fc09063d7ff08d38c6cb932a9062961daef8e3517300accaa9198472d
|
File details
Details for the file burnless-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: burnless-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 74.3 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.14.2
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
664b26e284008299d8bbd229744630f2c0f8654072f6f90d2a65f12df4fee67b
|
|
| MD5 |
d274bcf16125c01df05a37c0bf9ae314
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
57ed1962fe5d38918b0a88b072d3ec43036a1cfbd7ec39b4133e9ccfd88aad3d
|