c-py-py 0.1.5

No project description provided

C-Py-Py

from cpp import *

x = (cpp)[std::vector<int>v({1, 2, 3})]
x.push_back(4)
(cpp)[std::cout] << "Vector x: " << x << (cpp)[std::endl]
# -> prints 'Vector x: [1, 2, 3]'
for i in auto& x:
    (cpp)[std::cout] << "Incrementing " << i << "..." << (cpp)[std::endl]
    # -> prints 'Incrementing 1...', 'Incrementing 2...', etc.
    i += 1

(cpp)[std::cout] << "Vector after: " << x << (cpp)[std::endl]
# -> prints 'Vector after: [2, 3, 4, 5]'

How?

Template notation

The <> template notation was quite difficult to pull off. Python has a weird concept of multiple-boolean-operators, so the following:

x = (cpp)[std::vector<int>v({1, 2, 3})]

is equivalent to

x = (cpp)[std::((vector < int) and (int > v({1, 2, 3})))]

We can then overwrite the less than operator for the object vector to simply return True, so that it's negligible:

x = (cpp)[std::(True and (int > v({1, 2, 3})))]
x = (cpp)[std::(int > v({1, 2, 3}))]

Now we can overwrite the less than operator on a different class (v, in this case) so that it simply takes in a fully formed vector object as self and a type as the comparison, then tries to transform that into a new vector of the type in the comparison. This would be equivalent to:

x = (cpp)[std::(v({1, 2, 3}))]

C++-style namespacing

Nearly there. For the namespacing (::), we turn to the only place in the Python syntax where adjacent colons are allowed: slice notation. The code above is equivalent to:

x = cpp[slice(std, None, v({1, 2, 3}))]

We can define cpp to be an instance of a class that overrides the __getitem__ method to simply return the rightmost part of the slice:

class cpp:
    def __getitem__(self, other: slice):
        return other.step
cpp = cpp()

Now the code is equivalent to just:

x = v({1, 2, 3})

where v is essentially a thin wrapper around list.

cout

cout performs a small sleight-of-hand. Since Python is evaluated left-to-right, we have to have the << operator reduce each of the expressions down into a single format string, then pass that to endl to actually do the printing. We do this by making cout.lshift() return a Coutable:

class _Coutable:
    def __init__(self, o) -> None:
        self._total_str: str = format(o)

    def __lshift__(self, other: Any) -> Self:
        if other is endl:
            print(self._total_str)
        self._total_str = self._total_str + format(other)
        return self

This class will just keep accumulating objects' formatted representations until it hits endl, when it will print everything out.

Taking references

Unfortunately, Python's for _ in _: syntax is pretty rigid, and won't allow any operations in-between for and in, so we have to stick the auto& on the right side. This

Why?

Scientists are hard at work trying to come up with an answer to that question.