cacheverifier
Python client for CacheVerifier — a hosted API that verifies semantic-cache hits. Given a query and a candidate cached answer, it approves or rejects serving that answer from cache, so a similarity match that is close but wrong doesn't become a silent error in your app.
CacheVerifier does not run your cache or do similarity search. Your cache backend does
its own lookup first; you call verify() only on the candidates in the similarity "gray
zone", where a plain threshold match might be wrong.
- Docs / API reference: https://www.cacheverifier.com/docs
- Why similarity ≠ correctness: https://www.cacheverifier.com/why-similarity-fails
- The research behind it (paper + benchmarks): https://github.com/imxinchengyou/CacheVerifier
Install
pip install cacheverifier
# with the GPTCache adapter:
pip install "cacheverifier[gptcache]"
# with the offline Health Check (adds torch + sentence-transformers):
pip install "cacheverifier[healthcheck]"
Requires Python 3.9+. The only runtime dependency is httpx — the extras above
are opt-in.
Quickstart
Get a free API key at https://www.cacheverifier.com (self-serve verify and fine-tuning are free forever, no card).
from cacheverifier import CacheVerifier
cv = CacheVerifier(api_key="cv_...")
query = "how do I cancel my subscription"
candidate = "Go to Settings > Billing > Pause subscription for a month." # from your cache
result = cv.verify(query, candidate)
if result.approved:
answer = candidate # verified hit — skip the LLM call
else:
answer = call_your_llm(query) # not trustworthy — fall through
# Later, once you know if it was actually right (thumbs-down, reopened ticket, ...):
cv.feedback(query, answer, was_correct=True, similarity_score=0.86)
verify() returns a VerifyResult:
| field | meaning |
|---|---|
approved |
serve the cached answer (True) or fall through (False) |
score / threshold |
approved is score >= threshold |
model_version |
"stock", "v<id>" (fine-tuned), "cold_start_fail_closed" / "cold_start_auto_pending", or "verify_unavailable" |
latency_ms |
server-side inference time |
degraded |
True when the call failed and this result was synthesized client-side |
On your request path
verify() runs inline with your traffic, so its defaults are conservative:
- 1s timeout (
verify_timeout=), separate from the 10stimeout=used for fine-tuning / feedback / monitoring calls. Warm verification is tens of milliseconds server-side; 1s covers the network round trip and a cold model load after a deploy without letting a stuck verifier stall your request. - Fails closed. On a timeout, connection error, or 5xx,
verify()does not raise — it logs a warning on thecacheverifierlogger and returns aVerifyResultwithdegraded=Trueandapproved=False, so you fall through to your LLM exactly as you would on a cache miss. A4xx(bad key, bad request, rate limit) still raisesCacheVerifierError.
cv = CacheVerifier(api_key="cv_...", verify_timeout=1.0, fail_open=False) # the defaults
# fail_open=True instead returns approved=True on an outage — only if a
# stale-or-near-miss answer is acceptable for that traffic:
cv = CacheVerifier(api_key="cv_...", fail_open=True)
There is no formal uptime SLA yet, which is the other reason the fallback path is a built-in default rather than left to you.
GPTCache
Drop the verifier into a GPTCache pipeline as its similarity evaluator — no fork required:
from gptcache import cache
from cacheverifier.integrations.gptcache import CacheVerifierEvaluation
evaluator = CacheVerifierEvaluation(api_key="cv_...")
cache.init(similarity_evaluation=evaluator, ...)
# when you learn a served hit's real outcome:
evaluator.report_feedback(query, answer, was_correct=False, similarity_score=0.9)
See examples/gptcache_example.py.
Fine-tuning
Once you have ~20+ feedback rows (the service found fine-tuning is often a net negative below ~1,000 on the hardest data — see the research), train a verifier on your own gray-zone labels:
job = cv.finetune() # or cv.finetune(target_risk=0.01, cost_ratio=5.0)
job = cv.get_finetune_job(job["id"]) # poll until status == "done"
print(job["auc_baseline"], job["auc_tuned"])
# a model can finish as "held_for_review" — promote it explicitly:
if job.get("result_model_version"):
cv.activate_model_version(job["result_model_version"])
cv.dry_run([...]) reports the same baseline-vs-tuned AUC on examples you pass directly,
without writing anything or deploying a model.
Local Health Check (offline)
cv.dry_run() still uploads your examples to the API. If that's a blocker — a
compliance review, or just not wanting production traffic to leave your network —
run the identical stock-vs-fine-tuned evaluation entirely on your own machine:
pip install "cacheverifier[healthcheck]"
cacheverifier healthcheck traffic.jsonl
cacheverifier healthcheck traffic.jsonl --emit-summary summary.json
traffic.jsonl is a JSON array or JSONL of {"query", "candidate_answer", "was_correct"}
rows in arrival order (the train/calibrate/test split is chronological, matching the
hosted service so the numbers are comparable). Optional per row: "stale": true.
Nothing is sent anywhere — the base model downloads once from Hugging Face, then it's
fully offline. --emit-summary writes an aggregate-only JSON file (AUCs, counts, rates —
no query or answer text) that's safe to share for a human read.
results
------------------------------------------------------------------
train / calibrate / test: 3349 / 419 / 419
stock verifier held-out AUC: 0.6120
fine-tuned held-out AUC: 0.7080 (delta +0.0960)
label-noise proxy (disagreement): 11.4%
ceiling status: still_improvable
verdict
------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPROVED -- fine-tuning on your own data helps this traffic
API surface
| method | endpoint |
|---|---|
verify(query, candidate_answer) |
POST /v1/verify |
verify_batch(pairs) |
POST /v1/verify/batch |
feedback(...) / feedback_batch(items) |
POST /v1/feedback / /batch |
finetune(...) / dry_run(examples, ...) |
POST /v1/finetune/jobs / /dry-run |
get_finetune_job(id) / list_finetune_jobs() |
GET /v1/finetune/jobs[/id] |
activate_model_version(id) |
POST /v1/finetune/model-versions/{id}/activate |
drift_status() |
GET /v1/monitor/drift-status |
gray_zone_threshold() |
GET /v1/monitor/gray-zone-threshold |
usage() / savings() |
GET /v1/usage/status / /savings |
Non-2xx responses raise CacheVerifierError (.status_code, .detail).
License
MIT — see LICENSE. (The research repository
is separately licensed; this client is not.)
Metadata
Release files for cacheverifier 0.3.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cacheverifier-0.3.0.tar.gz | 24.4 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cacheverifier-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 46.8 kB
Release files / cacheverifier-0.3.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | cacheverifier-0.3.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 24.4 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
cf08f49cc4bb6ce22b27b2d8d9c3ab886fee793c833aa94995e487d008ba8fd6
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
ae867e28c21c011712fa7b1dd488541a9196fc9dd096ecb17ecb06b89a9ce257
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 4, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / cacheverifier-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | cacheverifier-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 22.4 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
754a06338a176b4aef6f758a28347011237b9032c494897580b082478b96011d
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
a107ee0a2eb79f93405561049f452943530896235265ef48ec26a1f30aaaa7ad
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 4, 2026.
Transparency log