Protocol-first context engineering framework for multi-agent applications
Project description
CEMAF
Context Engineering Multi-Agent Framework
At A Glance
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Package | cemaf |
| Purpose | Protocol-first context engineering framework for multi-agent systems |
| Core primitives | Context, ContextPatch, DAGExecutor, RuntimeServices, EventBus, evals, memory, citations |
| Design stance | Substrate, not application; app/domain code belongs in consuming repos |
| Integration style | Bring-your-own LLM, vector store, memory backend, tools, agents, and policies through Protocols |
| Operator promise | Budgeted, auditable, replayable agent execution with provenance |
| Python | 3.14+ |
Open source context engineering infrastructure for multi-agent systems. Use CEMAF as the execution substrate, or compose its modules into an existing stack without inheriting a second application framework.
See it run — 60 seconds. Open
docs/architecture/cemaf-graph.htmlin a browser. Two tabs:
- Module graph — every module in
src/cemaf/as a node, everyimportas an edge, AST-exact (regenerate withdocs/architecture/build_graph_data.py).- DAG process — 7 progressive runs (
hello → chain → parallel → council → auction → gate → full flow) showing realEventBusoutput from actualexecutor.run(dag)calls. Generate fresh traces withuv run python docs/architecture/scripts/produce_dag_trace.py.Deeper read:
docs/architecture/deep-architecture.md·docs/architecture/cemaf-architecture.html(interactive atlas) ·docs/architecture/spec-module-map.md.
The dual DAG · agents on top, context below
AGENT DAG ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
bp ─→ lib ─→ research ─→ council(3) ─→ writer.fast(auction)
│
cite ─→ gate ─→ publish │ recover lane
│ ─────────────
│ gate↯ → heal → writer.attempt2
↓
CONTEXT DAG ────────────────────────────────────────────────
blueprint KG memory[L0/L1/L2] research.findings draft.body
citations session→PROJECT
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
↑ every read/write a wire · every patch carries source + reason + run_id
CEMAF treats every agent decision and every context byte as a first-class structured event. One executor.run(dag) emits a typed stream — task.started, council.ballot(weight), auction.bid(fitness, load), auction.award(saved_p95_ms), citation.added(claim, src, supported, strength), eval.completed(composite, sub, verdict), memory.hit(tier), blueprint.harvested(score), dag.completed. Glass-box by default, not by configuration.
Patterns CEMAF Standardizes
Most agent stacks grow glue code around the same runtime concerns. CEMAF packages those concerns as protocols, services, and DAG primitives. Less ceremony, fewer private assumptions, and yes, fewer places for future-you to mutter at a constructor.
| Hard problem the field keeps re-solving | CEMAF's standard | Spec |
|---|---|---|
| "How do I keep agents from blowing the token budget?" | Context is immutable, compiled per-turn under a TokenBudget with priority selection. Every byte has provenance. |
SPEC-00 |
| "How do I keep confidential context out of a low-clearance prompt?" | Every ContextPatch carries a SecurityLevel (PUBLIC/INTERNAL/CONFIDENTIAL); PriorityContextCompiler gates sources above the caller's clearance before selection, recording each drop in metadata["security_excluded"]. Default INTERNAL → backward-compatible. |
SPEC-11 |
| "How do I prove an LLM output is grounded?" | CitationTracker + GateEvalInterceptor enforce citation-membership: every claim must trace to a retrieved source, or the gate halts downstream. |
SPEC-05 · SPEC-01a |
| "How do I pick between 3 agents that could all do the job?" | Auction selection: agents bid by fitness × (1 - load); ballot is preserved in NodeResult.metadata for audit. |
SPEC-09 |
| "How do I get N agents to agree?" | Council node-kind: deliberative vote with pluggable VoteAggregator (majority / weighted / quorum / unanimous) and a persisted ballot trail. |
SPEC-10 |
| "How do I stop two concurrent agents from clobbering the same context?" | CollisionCoordinator: TCAS-style risk over intended ContextPatch write paths (overlap + KG dependency + tree proximity, noisy-OR). At resolution level the lower-priority agent steers (defers), the higher holds — deterministic, surfaced as a CONTEXT_CONFLICT event. |
SPEC-12 |
| "What happens when an LLM call fails the eval?" | RECOVER budget (max_recovery_attempts ≤ 2), AutoHealManager mutates the goal with FailureSignal context, agent re-runs with a patched goal. |
SPEC-08 |
| "How do I observe this in production?" | OTel GenAI-shape events on the EventBus (gen_ai.request.model, usage.input_tokens, cost_usd, span), correlation_id propagation, structured logs, Prometheus metrics. |
observability.md |
| "How do I integrate with my existing stack?" | Every integration is a @runtime_checkable Protocol (LLM client, vector store, embedding provider, memory backend, agent selector, vote aggregator, …). BYO-X — structural typing, no inheritance. |
patterns.md |
| "How do I scale a successful run into a reusable template?" | BlueprintHarvesterEngine subscribes to EVAL_COMPLETED, distills high-quality runs into reusable Blueprints, persists them via create_blueprint_harvester(library, ...), and exposes them via BlueprintLibrary.search(...). The flywheel is a Protocol-driven engine, not a script. |
SPEC-03 |
| "How do I stop one project's learned blueprints from polluting another's?" | Harvested blueprints carry project_id + scope; ProjectScopedRecipeDistiller namespaces entries per project (no cross-project clobber), and evaluate_promotion only lifts a blueprint to GLOBAL once it's proven in ≥2 distinct projects at mean confidence ≥0.8. |
SPEC-13 |
| "Where does the framework end and my code begin?" | RuntimeServices frozen dataclass with ~20 optional Protocol-typed fields. bootstrap.create_executor(services=...) is the composition root. No module-level singletons. No magic. |
SPEC-00 · patterns.md |
| "How do I expose run state to a dashboard / CLI / MCP without coupling to internals?" | cemaf.session.v1 — a versioned, read-only SessionSnapshot projected deterministically from a RunRecord or ExecutionResult via snapshot_from_run_record / snapshot_from_execution_result. The stable operator-plane contract every surface renders from; absent services show as "absent", never errors. |
SPEC-14 |
Where these primitives live (copy-paste imports)
from cemaf.context import Context, ContextPatch, TokenBudget, PriorityContextCompiler, SecurityLevel
from cemaf.citation import CitationTracker
from cemaf.interceptors import GateEvalInterceptor
from cemaf.agents.selection import AgentSelector # auction selection
from cemaf.council import VoteAggregator, DefaultVoteAggregator
from cemaf.collision import CollisionCoordinator, create_collision_coordinator
from cemaf.core.recovery import AutoHealManager
from cemaf.iteration import FailureSignal
from cemaf.blueprint import Blueprint, BlueprintLibrary, BlueprintHarvesterEngine, create_blueprint_harvester, ProjectScopedRecipeDistiller, evaluate_promotion
from cemaf.orchestration import DAG, Node, Edge, DAGExecutor
from cemaf.orchestration.services import RuntimeServices
from cemaf.operator import SessionSnapshot, snapshot_from_run_record # cemaf.session.v1
from cemaf.bootstrap import create_executor
Live-verified at HEAD on every CI run — every name above resolves against src/cemaf/.
See it run — open the interactive demo →
Table of Contents
- Overview
- The Hard Problems We Solve
- Installation
- Quick Start
- Integration Modes
- Key Features
- Documentation
- Configuration
- Testing
- Contributing
- Getting Help
- Philosophy & Open Startup
- License
Overview
CEMAF is a protocol-first framework for context engineering in multi-agent AI systems. It owns the hard infrastructure problems — token budgeting, provenance, memory scoping, eval, moderation, resilience, self-hosting — while staying framework-agnostic. Use it standalone or drop modules into LangGraph / AutoGen / CrewAI.
- Protocol-first: every integration point is a
@runtime_checkableProtocol. Bring your own LLM, vector store, memory backend, embedding provider. Structural typing, no inheritance required. - Immutable context with provenance:
Context.apply(patch)— every context change is an auditableContextPatch. Replay, debug, and grade any past run deterministically. - Composition root:
create_executor(services=RuntimeServices(...), config=ExecutorConfig(...))wires 15+ optional services into one typed bundle. Request-scoped DI shape, no module-level singletons. - Self-hosting meta-layer: CEMAF uses CEMAF to introspect, audit, spec, and extend itself. One instruction becomes a runnable CEMAF-based app on disk.
A different shape of agent system
Most agent frameworks are message-bus PUSH systems. Every step is an LLM turn against a rolling shared state; every capability you add (eval, intent detection, memory, routing, gates) is paid on every step. Ask the system 2 + 2 and it still pays for an intent classifier, a judge, a memory recall, and a router. Floor cost = ceiling cost.
CEMAF is PULL. Nodes are typed units of work that declare what they need (input_mapping={"a": 2, "b": 2}) and the executor resolves exactly that — no ambient state firehose. Context compiles per-turn within a TokenBudget with priority selection. Services (eval, moderation, memory, budget) live in RuntimeServices as | None fields — absent = never runs. Evaluators bind to node patterns, not "every step." NodeType.TOOL is a different handler from NodeType.AGENT; deterministic work doesn't accidentally become an LLM call.
# Deterministic work pays deterministic cost. No LLM, no eval, no recall.
DAG(nodes=(Node(type=NodeType.TOOL, ref_id="add", input_mapping={"a": 2, "b": 2}),), ...)
create_executor(agent_registry=registry) # no services attached → nothing to pay for
# LLM work with quality telemetry. OBSERVE runs in the background — never blocks the hot path.
NodeEvalBinding(
node_pattern="generate_sql",
evaluators=(LLMJudgeEvaluator(llm_client=my_llm),),
mode=EvalMode.OBSERVE,
)
The payoff isn't "CEMAF makes 2+2 cheap." It's that a pipeline containing both 2+2 and an LLM-backed SQL generator pays appropriately for each. The trivial node doesn't subsidize the expensive node's infra cost. Message-bus frameworks can't easily express that — everything is an LLM turn against a shared rolling state, so the floor cost is the ceiling cost.
This is a different way to build software. We treat context as a compiled, auditable asset with provenance — not a prompt you glue together. We treat agents as typed units of work with declared contracts — not opaque turns on a chatty loop. The rails that keep it honest (typed node types, opt-in RuntimeServices, pattern-bound evals, OBSERVE vs GATE, immutable Context + ContextPatch) are the framework; the framework isn't a collection of helpers you remember to use.
Full treatment: docs/architecture.md#cost-model-pull-context-and-unit-of-work-nodes.
Architecture at a Glance
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LAYER 2 — Self-Hosting │
│ audit/ • knowledge/ • meta/ (MetaSpecifier, MetaScaffolder…) │
│ ▲ │
│ │ one-way dependency │
│ ─────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────── │
│ LAYER 1 — Base Framework │
│ │
│ orchestration/ ────── DAGExecutor + ContextNodeExecutor │
│ │ (topo sort → node dispatch → context) │
│ ▼ │
│ agents/ • tools/ • skills/ • blueprint/ │
│ context/ • memory/ • retrieval/ • rlm/ │
│ llm/ • generation/ • streaming/ │
│ evals/ • moderation/ • validation/ • citation/ │
│ events/ • observability/ • resilience/ • persistence/ │
│ mcp/ • cache/ • replay/ • ingestion/ │
│ │
│ Composition root: │
│ bootstrap.create_executor( │
│ agent_registry=registry, │
│ services=RuntimeServices(...), # 15+ optional deps │
│ config=ExecutorConfig(...), # sizing / timeouts │
│ ) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Interactive companion:
docs/architecture/cemaf-architecture.html— the architecture atlas. Every module placed by measured import fan-in (not by feature category). Tier 4 is the single node hub each feature funnels through; Tier 0 is the foundation everything depends on. Five tabs: Core Bytes · Agent Behaviours · Context Lifecycle · Runtime + Reactive · Principles.
Read docs/architecture.md for the canonical software architecture we build toward, docs/patterns.md for the design patterns catalog, and docs/modules.md for ideal package boundaries.
CEMAF runs on CEMAF
CEMAF's self-hosting layer is its first client. Meta-agents, meta-tools, and pre-built meta-DAGs are standard Agent / Tool / DAG citizens — they run through the same DAGExecutor as user code. No special paths, no shadow framework.
| Meta-agent | Role | Tools |
|---|---|---|
MetaArchitect |
Design DAG pipelines from a feature description | IntrospectRegistryTool, GenerateDAGTool |
MetaSynthesizer |
Generate CEMAF agent Python source from templates | (template-based) |
MetaAuditor |
Analyze execution traces for quality / anomalies | TraceAnalyzerTool |
MetaKnowledgeGraph |
Query and refresh the entity knowledge graph | KnowledgeGraphTool |
| Pre-built DAG | Flow | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
self_audit |
MetaAuditor → audit report |
Audit recent execution quality |
feature_synthesis |
MetaArchitect → MetaSynthesizer |
Design + generate a new agent |
knowledge_refresh |
MetaAuditor → MetaKnowledgeGraph |
Promote execution data into the KG |
Entry point: cemaf.meta.bootstrap.create_meta_executor() — wraps create_executor(), auto-wires audit (from EventBus) and KG (from MemoryManager), and registers all meta-agents and meta-tools.
from cemaf.meta.bootstrap import create_meta_executor
from cemaf.meta.dags import create_self_audit_dag
executor = create_meta_executor()
result = await executor.run(create_self_audit_dag())
print(result.final_context.get("audit_report"))
See docs/self-hosting.md for the full meta catalog, DAG walkthroughs, and the extension pattern for adding new meta-agents. The Enterprise Context Brain target architecture (SPEC-00..06) and where each spec concept lands in the codebase are tracked in docs/architecture/spec-module-map.md.
The Hard Problems We Solve
| Problem | What Happens | CEMAF Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Context Growth | Token limits blow up | Token budgeting + automatic summarization |
| Reliability | Non-deterministic behavior | Patch-based provenance tracking |
| Cost | Wasteful token usage | Smart context compilation |
| Reproducibility | Can't replay/debug runs | Run recording + deterministic replay |
| Memory Leaks | State bleeds between scopes | Strict memory boundaries with TTL |
| Content Safety | Harmful outputs slip through | Pre/post-flight moderation gates + PII detection |
| Quality Drift | Output quality degrades silently | Online eval pipeline with rolling monitors and halt gates |
| Prompt Engineering | Inconsistent LLM outputs | Semantic blueprints for structured content generation |
| Spec Drift | Code and intent diverge silently | MetaSpecifier authors OpenSpec proposals; openspec validate --strict is a deterministic eval signal |
| Zero-to-App | Going from feature idea to runnable code takes days | app_synthesis DAG: description → spec → DAG design → agents → scaffolded, importable CEMAF app on disk |
| Framework Evolution | Adding new capabilities requires hand-wiring registries, DAGs, bootstrap | Self-hosting meta-layer — CEMAF uses CEMAF to extend CEMAF |
| Prompt Injection via Tool Results | Retrieved docs / MCP results bypass moderation, land in the next turn | ModeratingLLMClient wraps any LLMClient: NFKC-normalizes, strips zero-width chars, flattens structured tool output, runs pre-flight gate |
| Streaming Leaks Unsafe Tokens | Chat UIs show content to users before moderation fires | Sentence-boundary buffered moderation in stream() — caller never sees more than one sentence of disallowed content |
| Silent Budget Overrun | Cost cap looks configured but never fires | BudgetGuard records every billed call (success OR failure) with NaN-safe accumulation; HaltSignal(reason=BUDGET_EXHAUSTED) propagates into loop bodies between iterations |
| Context-Length Surprises | Heuristic token counts under-estimate 30-50% → 400 context_length_exceeded in prod |
count_tokens_exact(messages, tools) via Anthropic / OpenAI / Gemini APIs + tiktoken fallback |
| Concurrent-Run Contamination | One DAGExecutor instance shared across coroutines clobbers route choices & correlation IDs |
contextvars.ContextVar per-run state; concurrent calls on the same executor are isolated |
Installation
# Core installation: offline examples, protocols, DAGs, context, memory
pip install cemaf
# Local/free LLM serving through Ollama's OpenAI-compatible HTTP API
pip install "cemaf[ollama]"
# Hosted providers are explicit opt-in
pip install "cemaf[openai]" # OpenAI Responses API + tiktoken
pip install "cemaf[anthropic]" # Anthropic
pip install "cemaf[gemini]" # Gemini / Vertex HTTP client support
pip install "cemaf[prometheus]" # Prometheus metrics export
pip install "cemaf[all]" # All optional integration dependencies
# Development installation
git clone https://github.com/drchinca/cemaf.git
cd cemaf
make install # uv sync --extra dev
make check # lint + typecheck + every doc/code audit (CI-equivalent)
make demo # regenerate the 7 real CEMAF run traces
make showcase # open the interactive demo in your browser
make # print the full menu
Requirements: Python 3.14+
Quick Start
from pydantic import BaseModel
from cemaf.agents.base import Agent, AgentContext, AgentResult, AgentState
from cemaf.agents.registry import AgentRegistry
from cemaf.bootstrap import create_executor
from cemaf.core.enums import NodeType
from cemaf.core.types import AgentID, NodeID
from cemaf.orchestration.dag import DAG, Node
from cemaf.orchestration.executor import ExecutorConfig
from cemaf.orchestration.services import RuntimeServices
# 1. Define your goal / result types (Pydantic)
class ResearchGoal(BaseModel):
topic: str
class ResearchResult(BaseModel):
findings: str
# 2. Define an agent
class Researcher(Agent[ResearchGoal, ResearchResult]):
@property
def id(self) -> AgentID:
return AgentID("Researcher")
@property
def description(self) -> str:
return "Researches a topic and returns findings"
@property
def skills(self) -> tuple[()]:
return ()
async def run(self, goal, context):
return AgentResult.ok(
output=ResearchResult(findings=f"key findings on {goal.topic}"),
state=AgentState(),
# BudgetGuard / eval pipeline read these telemetry keys
metadata={"cost_estimate_usd": 0.05, "tokens_total": 500},
)
# 3. Wire services via RuntimeServices (budget, evals, moderation, memory…)
registry = AgentRegistry()
registry.register_agent(agent_instance=Researcher(), goal_type=ResearchGoal)
executor = create_executor(
agent_registry=registry,
services=RuntimeServices(), # defaults; add budget_guard, event_bus, …
config=ExecutorConfig(enable_events=False),
)
# 4. Build the DAG and run
dag = DAG(
name="research",
nodes=(
Node(
id=NodeID("n1"),
type=NodeType.AGENT,
name="research",
ref_id="Researcher",
input_mapping={"topic": "quantum computing"},
output_key="findings",
),
),
edges=(),
entry_node=NodeID("n1"),
)
result = await executor.run(dag=dag)
print(result.final_context.get("findings"))
See examples/hello_world.py for a complete runnable example and
tests/integration/test_full_stack.py for a realistic 3-agent pipeline
wiring SqliteMemoryStore, BudgetGuard, ContextCompiler, and EventBus.
examples/security_clearance.py shows clearance-gated context compilation —
CONFIDENTIAL sources dropped below the caller's clearance (SPEC-11).
examples/collision_avoidance.py shows two concurrent agents resolving a
write-path conflict deterministically (SPEC-12).
examples/scoped_blueprint_harvest.py shows per-project blueprint harvesting
and PROJECT→GLOBAL promotion (SPEC-13).
examples/session_snapshot.py projects a real run into the read-only
cemaf.session.v1 operator snapshot (SPEC-14).
The whole engine, end-to-end
examples/release_engine.py is the flagship — a release-notes engine that
composes the full framework into one declarative DAG: a council of reviewer
agents votes ship/hold → the verdict steers the DAG → an auction picks
the least-loaded writer → the draft is quality-gated → the run is harvested
into a reusable blueprint, with full provenance. It has a real run lifecycle:
uv run python examples/release_engine.py --dry-run # plan: show stations + DAG, no side effects
uv run python examples/release_engine.py --produce # run for real → ./.release_out/{RELEASE_NOTES.md,run_report.json}
uv run python examples/release_engine.py --wipe # remove produced artifacts
This is the answer to "what is CEMAF for": you declare the stations, the engine threads every subsystem through them, and you get the artifact plus the provenance that proves how it was produced.
Integration Modes
Mode A: CEMAF Orchestrates
CEMAF owns execution, external frameworks are "engines":
from cemaf.orchestration import DAGExecutor
from cemaf.observability import InMemoryRunLogger
executor = DAGExecutor(
node_executor=LangGraphNodeExecutor(langgraph_app),
run_logger=InMemoryRunLogger(),
)
result = await executor.run(dag, context)
# Replay later for debugging
replayer = Replayer(run_logger.get_record("run-123"))
await replayer.replay()
Mode B: CEMAF as Library
External frameworks orchestrate, CEMAF provides infrastructure:
from cemaf.context import Context, ContextPatch
from cemaf.observability import InMemoryRunLogger
@langgraph_node
def my_node(state):
ctx = Context.from_dict(state)
# Track provenance of every change
patch = ContextPatch.from_tool("search", "results", search_results)
ctx = ctx.apply(patch)
run_logger.record_patch(patch)
# Compile within budget
compiled = compiler.compile(ctx, budget)
return compiled.to_dict()
See the Integration Guide for detailed patterns.
Key Features
Context Engineering
- Context Patches: Track every context change with full provenance
- Token Budgeting: Stay within limits with smart compilation (greedy, knapsack, optimal algorithms)
- Deterministic Replay: Record and replay runs for debugging
- Glass Box Audit: Full provenance chain linking every LLM call to its context sources, citations, and costs
- Context Type Classification: RESOURCE/MEMORY/SKILL behavioral semantics with per-type compaction rules
- Semantic Blueprints: Structured content generation with Denis Rothman's blueprint pattern
- Recursive LLM: Parallel divide-and-conquer querying for 1M+ token contexts
Memory System
- Strict Scoping: Memory boundaries with TTL prevent state leaks
- Three-Tier Progressive Loading: L0 abstract / L1 overview / L2 full content for token-efficient retrieval
- Semantic Deduplication: Exact key + embedding similarity detection with merge/skip resolution
- Post-Session Extraction: Automatic promotion of session learnings to long-term memory (patterns, corrections, facts)
- Hierarchical Scope Propagation: Parent-to-child score propagation for scope-aware retrieval
- SQLite Persistence: SQLite-backed persistent memory store via aiosqlite
Online Evaluation
- Hierarchical Judge: Three-tier evaluation -- fast deterministic checks, semantic similarity, LLM judge (escalates only when needed)
- Online Eval Pipeline: Subscribe to execution events and run evaluators on node outputs in real-time
- Quality Police: Rolling window quality monitor with anomaly detection and automatic halt gates
- Eval Tools & Agents: RunEvalTool, CheckQualityTool, RecordScoreTool, QualityGuardAgent -- dogfooding the eval system as CEMAF tools
- GroundednessEvaluator: deterministic n-gram overlap between output and retrieved context sources — catches hallucination without an LLM judge
- ToolUseSuccessEvaluator: tool-call success rate × result-reference in output — detects silent tool-use failures
LLM Integration
- Provider adapters: local Ollama/mock paths first; OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock CLI, and OpenAI-compatible gateways by explicit configuration
count_tokens_exact(messages, tools)async method for pre-flight sizing: Anthropic API, OpenAI tiktoken, Gemini:countTokens, heuristic fallbackModeratingLLMClientdecorator: NFKC unicode normalization + zero-width strip + structured-content flattening, runs pre-flight gate on every tool-result message before forwarding. Defends against prompt injection via retrieved docs / MCP results.- Streaming-aware moderation:
stream()buffers by sentence boundary and runs post-flight gate per completed sentence — callers never see more than one sentence of disallowed content ResilientLLMClient: retry (narrow transient-error list) + circuit breaker + rate limiter composing around any LLMClient
Production Backends
- Resilient LLM Client: Retry with exponential backoff + circuit breaker + rate limiter composing around any LLMClient
- Embedding Providers: Offline hash embeddings by default, with explicit OpenAI and Hugging Face adapters when configured
- Structured Logging: JSON-lines logger with context fields for production observability
- Prometheus Metrics: Counter/gauge/histogram/timing export with lazy metric registration
Orchestration
- DAG Executor: Topological sort, parallel execution, conditional routing, loop nodes, cooperative cancellation
- Concurrent-Safe:
contextvars.ContextVarper-run state — oneDAGExecutorinstance handles N concurrentrun()calls without clobbering route choices or correlation IDs - HaltSignal: structured halt reporting with
HaltReasonenum (BUDGET_EXHAUSTED,QUALITY_DEGRADED). Propagates into LOOP bodies viashould_haltcallback so runaway loops don't burn N-1 calls after halt fires - Canonical constructor:
DAGExecutor(services=RuntimeServices(...), config=ExecutorConfig(...))— cross-cutting deps bundled, not 13 kwargs - Node Type Handlers: Extracted router, conditional, loop, parallel handlers for clean separation
- RuntimeServices: Frozen dataclass bundling 15+ optional dependencies for composition root
- Bootstrap: Single
create_executor()entry point wiring registry, services, and subscriptions - Context Agents: Built-in Librarian, Researcher, Summarizer, Writer agents with dynamic registry
- Budget Guard: Configurable cost/token limits. Records every billed call including failures and retries. NaN-safe. Halts the DAG between nodes AND mid-loop via
HaltSignal.
Infrastructure
- Protocol-Based: Plug into any framework -- modules work standalone, extend with your own implementations
- Extensible Registries: ProviderRegistry pattern for pluggable LLM, compiler, and retrieval backends
- Instrumented LLM: Transparent LLM call recording for automatic glass box audit
- Moderation & Guardrails: Pre/post-flight content safety with PII detection and compliance rules
- Configuration-Driven: Zero-config defaults with .env customization
- Resilience: Retry, circuit breaker, rate limiting as composable decorators
Self-Hosting Engine
CEMAF is its own first client — opt-in modules where the framework uses its own primitives to introspect, audit, spec, and extend itself. Fully decoupled from the base framework (one-way dependency).
- Audit Trail:
EventBusAuditLogsubscribes to EventBus, converts events into queryableAuditEntryrecords with quality trend analysis and z-score anomaly detection - Knowledge Graph:
MemoryBackedKnowledgeGraph— entities and relations backed by MemoryManager with semantic search and neighbor traversal - Meta-Agents:
MetaArchitect(DAG design),MetaSpecifier(OpenSpec proposal authoring),MetaSynthesizer(agent code gen),MetaAuditor(trace analysis),MetaKnowledgeGraph(KG operations),MetaScaffolder(runnable CEMAF-app synthesis) - OpenSpec Bridge:
OpenSpecRuntimeprotocol (System/Npx/Fake impls) +OpenSpecWorkspace(atomic writes, per-change locks) exposesopenspec validate/list/show/write/deleteas CEMAF tools - Pre-built DAGs:
create_self_audit_dag(),create_feature_synthesis_dag(),create_knowledge_refresh_dag(),create_self_spec_dag(),create_app_synthesis_dag() - Entry point:
create_meta_executor()wrapscreate_executor(), auto-wires audit + KG fromRuntimeServicesand MetaSpecifier/OpenSpec tools fromMetaServices
What this gets you: one instruction ("build an app that does X") becomes a working CEMAF-based app on disk — spec validated by openspec validate --strict, agents synthesized from the spec, scaffolded into an importable package with its own registry, DAGs, and smoke tests. See create_app_synthesis_dag().
Blueprint Triad — the self-growing knowledge asset
Blueprint is CEMAF's semantic prompt object. The triad turns it from a reference type into a runtime asset that learns from successful runs:
BlueprintLibrary— curated, searchable catalog. Three storage kinds (SNAPSHOT / FACTORY / RECIPE) all resolving to the sameBlueprint. Developer-authored entries and autonomously harvested entries coexist under onesearch().BlueprintSelectorHook— one-method@runtime_checkableProtocol wired intoContextNodeExecutor. Before every LLM call, the executor retrieves the best-matching blueprint's prompt and injects it into compiled context as the highest-priority artifact.BlueprintHarvesterEngine— autonomous write path. Subscribes toEVAL_COMPLETED, turns high-quality runs into RECIPE entries, appends them to a writable source. Every decision (policy, correlator, distiller) is a pluggable Protocol — bundled defaults are opt-in, not the only way.
from cemaf.blueprint import BlueprintLibrary, BlueprintHarvesterEngine
from cemaf.blueprint.sqlite_source import SqliteBlueprintSource
from cemaf.meta.blueprint_selector import LibraryBlueprintSelectorHook
from cemaf.meta.harvest_defaults import (
InMemoryRunCorrelator, RecipeBlueprintDistiller, ScoreThresholdHarvestPolicy,
)
source = SqliteBlueprintSource(db_path="blueprints.db")
library = BlueprintLibrary(); library.register_from(sources=(source,))
selector = LibraryBlueprintSelectorHook(library=library)
engine = BlueprintHarvesterEngine(
writable_source=source, library=library,
policy=ScoreThresholdHarvestPolicy(threshold=0.85),
correlator=InMemoryRunCorrelator(),
distiller=RecipeBlueprintDistiller(),
)
engine.subscribe(event_bus=bus) # auto-harvest from now on
Full reference: docs/blueprints.md. Design pattern: docs/patterns.md#13-protocol-gated-growing-asset-blueprint-triad.
Docs for LLMs (cemaf.docs_api)
CEMAF exposes its own documentation as a first-class queryable index — so
agents reasoning about how to use CEMAF can look up CEMAF. The index
covers docs/**/*.md, each cemaf.* package docstring, each module
docstring, and individual design-pattern sections — 340+ entries built
automatically from the repo at startup.
If you are using an AI coding assistant to build on CEMAF, start with
AGENTS.md and
docs/agent-assisted-development.md.
Those files are intentionally explicit about composing the whole framework
through RuntimeServices, registries, interceptors, and event subscribers
before generating app-level replacements for orchestration, context, memory,
evals, moderation, replay, citations, budget, or blueprint harvesting.
# Humans — CLI search
uv run cemaf docs search "composition root runtime services" -k 3
uv run cemaf docs show pattern:4-composition-root
# Agents — register as CEMAF tools
from cemaf.docs_api import build_default_index, CemafDocsSearchTool, DocsRetrievalTool
index = build_default_index()
tool_registry.register_instance(item=CemafDocsSearchTool(index=index))
tool_registry.register_instance(item=DocsRetrievalTool(index=index))
# MCP clients (Claude Desktop, IDE plugins) — run as stdio MCP server
uv run cemaf docs serve
In claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"cemaf-docs": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "cemaf", "docs", "serve"]
}
}
}
See src/cemaf/docs_api/ for the indexer, source
protocols, and search tools.
Documentation
Start Here (new to CEMAF?)
- Architecture - The software architecture we build toward
- Design Patterns - Protocol-first, BYO-X, RuntimeServices, HaltSignal, Context-as-Patch
- Module Layout - Ideal package division, what lives where
- Agent-Assisted Development - CEMAF-first checklist for LLM/coding-agent integrations
- Quick Start Guide - Get running in 5 minutes
Getting Started
- Protocol Guide - Understanding CEMAF's protocol-based architecture
- Extension Patterns - How to extend CEMAF with your own implementations
- Standalone Usage - Using modules independently
Core Guides
- Context Management - Patches, provenance, budgeting
- Replay & Recording - Deterministic replay
- Tools, Skills, Agents - Execution layer
- Integration Guide - Framework integration patterns
Module References
- LLM Integration
- Caching
- Persistence
- Observability
- Citation Tracking - Source attribution
- MCP Integration - Model Context Protocol
- Blueprint - Semantic blueprints for content generation
- Moderation - Guardrails and content safety
- Retrieval - Vector stores and search
Configuration
CEMAF is designed for zero-config local startup with conservative defaults. Production readiness belongs to a validated deployment profile, not a default constructor. Customize via environment variables:
# Copy example configuration
cp .env.example .env
# Free/local default setup
CEMAF_LLM_PROVIDER=ollama
CEMAF_LLM_DEFAULT_MODEL=gemma3:4b
CEMAF_CACHE_BACKEND=ttl
CEMAF_CACHE_MAX_SIZE=10000
Use factory functions for automatic configuration loading:
from cemaf.llm import create_llm_client_from_config
from cemaf.cache import create_cache_from_config
# Automatically loads from .env or environment
client = create_llm_client_from_config()
cache = create_cache_from_config()
See the Configuration Guide for all available settings.
Testing
# Run all tests
pytest tests/
# Unit tests only
pytest tests/unit/
# Skip slow tests
pytest tests/ -m "not slow"
# With coverage
pytest tests/ --cov=cemaf
# Pre-commit checks
pre-commit run --all-files
Project Stats: 4,000+ automated tests | unit, integration, live-adapter, and destructive harnesses
Contributing
Contribution workflow lives in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Development setup:
# Fork and clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/cemaf.git
cd cemaf
# Install dependencies with uv
uv venv
uv sync
# Install pre-commit hooks
uv run pre-commit install
See HOW_TO_USE.md for detailed usage examples.
Getting Help
Use these channels when you need support:
Documentation
- Full Documentation - Comprehensive guides for all features
- Quick Start Guide - Get started in minutes
- HOW_TO_USE.md - Detailed usage patterns
- Architecture Guide - Understand CEMAF's design
Community
- Discord Server - Community chat and contributor coordination
- GitHub Discussions - Ask questions and share ideas
- GitHub Issues - Report bugs or request features
Contributing
Contribute through the Contributing Guide.
CEMAF 3.0 is the public release line. The protocol shape is stable enough to build against; release notes own any breaking changes. That is the grown-up version of "we changed it because Tuesday was weird."
Philosophy & Open Startup
CEMAF operates as an open startup: roadmap, decisions, metrics, and tradeoffs are public by default.
Our Principles
- Community First: We serve developers building AI agents
- Transparent: All decisions, metrics, and roadmap are public
- Bias Toward Action: Show > tell. Open PRs, not long debates
- Anyone Can Help: Contribution > credentials
- Learn in Public: We share wins AND mistakes
Resources
- Philosophy Guide - Our 10 core principles and values
- Open Metrics - Transparent metrics, roadmap, and financials
- Decision Log - All major decisions documented
- Weekly Updates - Progress, learnings, and challenges
We're building CEMAF together. Your voice matters.
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.
Authors
Hikuri Bado Chinca (@drchinca) Email: chincadr@gmail.com
Copyright (c) 2026 | Published on 1.1.2026 🎉
Links
- Documentation: docs/README.md
- Issues: GitHub Issues
- Contributing: CONTRIBUTING.md
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file cemaf-3.1.1.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: cemaf-3.1.1.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 1.7 MB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
a48a32e93ec766a36668e17e31cd68b58be71269e2a8ab9f893b740faa9b4eb8
|
|
| MD5 |
24834ebd12ddcd5f87695a0e033a318b
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
1afc5490a34d3ec3172705cc8cb305dcd94b8586054ca5d3fd7ea974d04f36a0
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for cemaf-3.1.1.tar.gz:
Publisher:
publish-to-pypi.yml on drchinca/cemaf
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
cemaf-3.1.1.tar.gz -
Subject digest:
a48a32e93ec766a36668e17e31cd68b58be71269e2a8ab9f893b740faa9b4eb8 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2167205826
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
drchinca/cemaf@ac6422efcaf603c106226d26180d7e7bd4256753 -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v3.1.1 - Owner: https://github.com/drchinca
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish-to-pypi.yml@ac6422efcaf603c106226d26180d7e7bd4256753 -
Trigger Event:
release
-
Statement type:
File details
Details for the file cemaf-3.1.1-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: cemaf-3.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 784.1 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
5ec01cc6f12775bb18d5bcd1f08a311eaafa451db09e59a9080000f442064a5e
|
|
| MD5 |
9b6ec6f0103c8ad46b88c4930f6c1d63
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
947970a90767824685f7db218d81fa523f5c78e6ad3b063ba0f79783b1ba49b2
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for cemaf-3.1.1-py3-none-any.whl:
Publisher:
publish-to-pypi.yml on drchinca/cemaf
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
cemaf-3.1.1-py3-none-any.whl -
Subject digest:
5ec01cc6f12775bb18d5bcd1f08a311eaafa451db09e59a9080000f442064a5e - Sigstore transparency entry: 2167205838
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
drchinca/cemaf@ac6422efcaf603c106226d26180d7e7bd4256753 -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v3.1.1 - Owner: https://github.com/drchinca
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
publish-to-pypi.yml@ac6422efcaf603c106226d26180d7e7bd4256753 -
Trigger Event:
release
-
Statement type: