Skip to main content

A Visual Programming Environment for Prompt Engineering

Project description

⛓️🛠️ ChainForge

An open-source visual programming environment for battle-testing prompts to LLMs.

prompt-injection-test

ChainForge is a data flow prompt engineering environment for analyzing and evaluating LLM responses. It is geared towards early-stage, quick-and-dirty exploration of prompts and response quality that goes beyond ad-hoc chatting with individual LLMs. With ChainForge, you can:

  • Query multiple LLMs at once to test prompt ideas and variations quickly and effectively.
  • Compare response quality across prompt permutations and across models to choose the best prompt and model for your use case.
  • Setup an evaluation metric (scoring function) and immediately visualize results across prompts, prompt parameters, and models.

This is an open alpha of Chainforge. Functionality is powerful but limited. We currently support OpenAI models GPT3.5 and GPT4, Anthropic's Claude, Google PaLM2 (text-bison), and Alpaca 7B (through Dalai) at default settings. Visualization nodes support numeric and boolean evaluation metrics. Try it and let us know what you'd like to see in the future! :)

ChainForge is built on ReactFlow and Flask.

Installation

To install Chainforge alpha, make sure you have Python 3.8 or higher, then run

pip install chainforge

Once installed, do

chainforge serve

Open localhost:8000 in a Google Chrome browser (other browsers are currently unsupported).

You can set your API keys by clicking the Settings icon in the top-right corner. If you prefer to not worry about this everytime you open ChainForge, we recommend that save your OpenAI, Anthropic, and/or Google PaLM API keys to your local environment. For more details, see the Installation Guide.

Example evaluation flows

In the examples/ folder, we've prepared a couple example flows to give you a sense of what's possible with Chainforge. Click the Import button in the top of the screen and select one. Here is basic_comparison.cforge, plotting the length of responses across different models and arguments for the prompt parameter {game}:

basic-compare

For more details about features and available nodes, check out the User Guide.

Features

A key goal of ChainForge is facilitating comparison and evaluation of prompts and models, and (in the near future) prompt chains. Basic features are:

  • Prompt permutations: Setup a prompt template and feed it variations of input variables. ChainForge will prompt all selected LLMs with all possible permutations of the input prompt, so that you can get a better sense of prompt quality. You can also chain prompt templates at arbitrary depth (e.g., to compare templates).
  • Evaluation nodes: Probe LLM responses in a chain and test them (classically) for some desired behavior. At a basic level, this is Python script based. We plan to add preset evaluator nodes for common use cases in the near future (e.g., name-entity recognition). Note that you can also chain LLM responses into prompt templates to help evaluate outputs cheaply before more extensive evaluation methods.
  • Visualization nodes: Visualize evaluation results on plots like grouped box-and-whisker (for numeric metrics) and histograms (for boolean metrics). Currently we only support numeric and boolean metrics. We aim to provide users more control and options for plotting in the future.

Taken together, these three features let you easily:

  • Compare across prompts and prompt parameters: Choose the best set of prompts that maximizes your eval target metrics (e.g., lowest code error rate). Or, see how changing parameters in a prompt template affects the quality of responses.
  • Compare across models: Compare responses for every prompt across models.

We've also found that some users simply want to use ChainForge to make tons of parametrized queries to LLMs (e.g., chaining prompt templates into prompt templates), possibly score them, and then output the results to a spreadsheet (Excel xlsx). To do this, attach an Inspect node to the output of a Prompt node and click Export Data.

For more specific details, see the User Guide.

Development

ChainForge was created by Ian Arawjo, a postdoctoral scholar in Harvard HCI's Glassman Lab with support from the whole Harvard HCI community, especially PhD student Priyan Vaithilingam.

This work was partially funded by the NSF grant IIS-2107391. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

We provide ongoing releases of this tool in the hopes that others find it useful for their projects.

Future Planned Features

Highest priority:

  • Model settings: Change settings for individual models, so one can test across the same model with different settings.
  • LLM annotator nodes: Select an LLM to evaluate and "tag" responses (for instance, named-entity recognition). Currently, one can chain prompt nodes into prompt nodes, but the final output loses information on which LLM generated the input response.

Medium-to-low priority:

  • Compare across response batches: Run an evaluator over all N responses generated for each prompt, to measure factors like variability or parseability (e.g., how many code outputs pass a basic smell test?)
  • System prompts: Ability to change the system prompt for models that support it (e.g., ChatGPT). Try out different system prompts and compare response quality.
  • Collapse nodes: Nodes should be collapseable, to save screen space.
  • LMQL and Microsoft guidance nodes: Support for prompt pipelines that involve LMQL and {{guidance}} code, esp. inspecting masked response variables.
  • AI assistance for prompt engineering: Spur creative ideas and quickly iterate on variations of prompts through interaction with GPT4.
  • Compare fine-tuned to base models: Beyond comparing between different models like Alpaca and ChatGPT, support comparison between versions of the same model (e.g., a base model and a fine-tuned one). Helper users detect where fine-tuning resulted in any 'breaking changes' elsewhere.
  • Export to code: In the future, export prompt and (potentially) chains using a programming API like LangChain.
  • Dark mode: A dark mode theme
  • Compare across chains: If a prompt P is used across chains C1 C2 etc, how does changing it affect all downstream events?

See a feature you'd like that isn't here? Open an Issue.

Inspiration and Links

ChainForge is meant to be general-purpose, and is not developed for a specific API or LLM back-end. Our ultimate goal is integration into other tools for the systematic evaluation and auditing of LLMs. We hope to help others who are developing prompt-analysis flows in LLMs, or otherwise auditing LLM outputs. This project was inspired by own our use case, but also shares some comraderie with two related (closed-source) research projects, both led by Sherry Wu:

  • "PromptChainer: Chaining Large Language Model Prompts through Visual Programming" (Wu et al., CHI ’22 LBW) Video
  • "AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Prompts" (Wu et al., CHI ’22)

Unlike these projects, we are focusing on supporting evaluation across prompts, prompt parameters, and models.

How to collaborate?

We are looking for open-source collaborators. The best way to do this, at the moment, is simply to implement the requested feature / bug fix and submit a Pull Request. If you want to report a bug or request a feature, open an Issue.

License

ChainForge is released under the MIT License.

Project details


Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This version

0.1.3

Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

chainforge-0.1.3.tar.gz (4.1 MB view hashes)

Uploaded Source

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Datadog Monitoring Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Download Analytics Microsoft Microsoft PSF Sponsor Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page