cloudg reference
cloudg (cloud graphing) maps AWS, Azure and GCP infrastructure into a graph, runs security scanners over that inventory, and merges every finding into one deduplicated, compliance-mapped result set. It can also skip the scanning entirely and aggregate outputs you already have.
This is the complete reference: every CLI command, the exact input and output formats, the data models, the full Python API with integration examples, configuration, plugins and authentication. Release history lives in the changelog.
Contents:
- Installation
- The pipeline
- CLI reference
- Input requirements
- Output contract
- Data models
- Configuration
- Python API
- Integration recipes
- Plugin system
- Authentication
- Docker
Installation
From PyPI:
pip install cloudg # core
pip install cloudg[aws] # + boto3, aioboto3
pip install cloudg[azure] # + Azure management SDKs
pip install cloudg[gcp] # + google-cloud-asset, google-auth
pip install cloudg[all] # every provider SDK
The cloud SDKs are optional extras, pulled in only when you collect from that provider. The core package alone ships the graph engine, the ontology builder, the findings normaliser, the report renderers and cloudg ingest. That is enough to aggregate existing scan results on a machine with no cloud access at all.
The external scanners are separate executables, not Python dependencies: Prowler (pip install prowler), ScoutSuite (pip install scoutsuite), Checkov (pip install checkov) and Trivy (binary install). Install whichever subset you want. cloudg checks PATH at run time and skips anything missing with a warning; the rest of the pipeline is unaffected. install.sh (Linux/macOS) and install.bat (Windows) set up all of them plus the cloud CLIs, and the Docker image bundles the four scanner binaries.
Requires Python 3.11 or newer.
The pipeline
collect -> graph -> scan -> normalise -> report
\-> ontology / RAG / terraform
Collection runs all configured providers concurrently with asyncio, iterating accounts and regions per provider. Regions auto-discover when you pass --regions all. Assets and network edges go into a directed NetworkX graph: BFS from the internet node finds exposed resources, and blast-radius scoring estimates what an attacker could reach from each node.
The enabled scanners then run in parallel over the same inventory, each in its own thread with its own timeout. Their findings, plus the graph's own reachability findings and the built-in IAM linter's results, all flow into the normaliser, which deduplicates within and across scanners, rescores against CVSS, and maps everything to compliance controls. The renderers turn the final ScanResult into the report files listed under Output contract.
Every phase degrades gracefully. A missing scanner binary, an unreachable provider or a failed exporter logs a warning; nothing else stops.
CLI reference
Global options go before the subcommand: cloudg -v -c my-config.yaml run ...
| Option | Meaning |
|---|---|
-v, --verbose |
debug logging |
-c, --config PATH |
path to config.yaml |
--log-file PATH |
also write logs to a file |
cloudg run
The full pipeline: collect, graph, scan, normalise, report.
cloudg run -p aws --regions us-east-1
cloudg run -p all --regions all
cloudg run -p aws --scanners prowler,trivy
cloudg run -p aws --regions us-east-1 --terraform
| Flag | Meaning |
|---|---|
-p, --provider |
aws, azure, gcp or all; repeatable |
--regions |
all for auto-discovery, or a comma-separated list |
--scanners |
subset of prowler,scoutsuite,checkov,trivy,iam; defaults to scanners.enabled in config |
--iac-dir |
directory for the IaC scanners (Checkov, Trivy fs) |
--images |
comma-separated container images for Trivy |
--ontology / --no-ontology |
RDF export, on by default |
--rag-export / --no-rag-export |
RAG chunks, on by default |
--terraform / --no-terraform |
Terraform recreation, off by default |
-o, --output |
output directory, ./reports by default |
Credential flags are listed under Authentication.
A detail worth knowing: when no IaC directory is configured but --terraform is on, the IaC scanners target the generated Terraform recreation of the live infrastructure. Checkov then audits your actual cloud rather than whatever directory cloudg happens to run from. There is deliberately no fallback to .: a zero-finding scan of an unrelated directory reads like a clean bill of health, and cloudg refuses to produce one.
cloudg collect
Asset collection alone, one provider at a time. Writes assets and edges without running any scanner.
cloudg collect -p aws --profile prod --region eu-west-1 -o ./reports
cloudg collect -p azure --subscription-id <id>
cloudg collect -p gcp --project-id <id>
cloudg scan
Scanners alone, no collection. Writes raw-findings.json.
cloudg scan -p aws --scanners prowler,checkov --iac-dir ./terraform
cloudg ingest
Aggregation without execution. Feed cloudg the native output files of scans that already ran (in CI, on another host, on a schedule) and it runs the normalisation half of the pipeline: cross-scanner dedupe via the check-equivalence rulesets, compliance mapping and report generation. No scanner executes and no cloud credentials are needed.
cloudg ingest \
--prowler ./prowler-output/ \
--scoutsuite ./scoutsuite-report/ \
--checkov ./results_json.json \
--trivy ./trivy-image.json --trivy ./trivy-fs.json \
-o ./reports
| Flag | Accepts |
|---|---|
--prowler |
ASFF JSON or JSONL file, or Prowler's -o output directory (searched recursively for *.json) |
--scoutsuite |
the scoutsuite_results_*.js file, or the --report-dir directory |
--checkov |
a checkov --output json file (or results_json.json), or a directory containing it |
--trivy |
a trivy image or trivy fs JSON file, or a directory of them |
--format |
html, json or all (default) |
-o, --output |
output directory |
Every input flag is repeatable and any combination or subset of tools works: one tool alone, or all four together. See Input requirements for the exact formats.
cloudg report
Re-render reports from a previous run's findings.json. No cloud, no scanners.
cloudg report -i ./reports/findings.json --format html
--format takes html, json, svg or all.
Input requirements
This section pins down exactly what each ingest path expects, and the command that produces it.
Prowler
Produce:
prowler aws -M json-asff -o ./prowler-output
cloudg accepts the output directory itself or any single file from it. Files may be a JSON array or JSONL (one ASFF object per line); both parse. The fields cloudg reads from each ASFF finding:
{
"Id": "prowler-aws-s3_bucket_default_encryption-123456789012-eu-west-1-...",
"Title": "S3 bucket default encryption",
"Description": "...",
"Severity": {"Label": "HIGH"},
"Resources": [{"Id": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"}],
"Compliance": {"Status": "FAILED", "RelatedRequirements": ["CIS 2.1.1"]},
"Remediation": {"Recommendation": {"Text": "..."}}
}
Findings with Compliance.Status of PASSED are skipped. The check name embedded in Id (the third dash-separated token) becomes the dedupe key.
ScoutSuite
Produce:
scout aws --report-dir ./scoutsuite-report --no-browser
cloudg accepts the report directory (searched recursively for scoutsuite_results*.js) or the file itself. The file is JavaScript, a single JSON object assigned to a variable; cloudg strips the assignment and parses the JSON. Findings come from services.<service>.findings.<key>, where each entry with flagged_items > 0 yields one finding per item in items. The level field maps to severity: danger becomes CRITICAL, warning HIGH, caution MEDIUM.
Checkov
Produce:
checkov -d ./iac --output json > results_json.json
cloudg accepts the JSON file or a directory containing results_json.json (falling back to any *.json in the directory). Both shapes Checkov emits parse: a single {check_type, results} object, or a list of them when several frameworks ran. Findings come from results.failed_checks[], reading check_id, check_name, severity, resource, file_path, file_line_range and guideline.
Trivy
Produce either or both:
trivy image --format json myrepo/app:latest > trivy-image.json
trivy fs --format json --scanners vuln,misconfig,secret ./iac > trivy-fs.json
cloudg accepts a single JSON file or a directory of them. Each report's top-level ArtifactType decides the parser: container_image goes through the image parser (vulnerabilities and secrets), everything else (filesystem, repository) goes through the filesystem parser, which also handles misconfigurations. ArtifactName becomes the resource identifier. From each vulnerability cloudg reads VulnerabilityID, PkgName, InstalledVersion, FixedVersion, Severity, Description and the CVSS v3 score when present.
Output contract
All commands write into the output directory (./reports by default).
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
report.html |
interactive report: D3 topology, findings table, compliance matrix. Self-contained, works offline. |
findings.json |
the machine-readable result, structure below |
raw-findings.json |
pre-normalisation findings (from scan and ingest) |
topology.svg, topology.graphml, topology-cytoscape.json |
the graph in three formats |
ontology.ttl, ontology.jsonld |
RDF ontology, around 62 inferred relation types, SPARQL-queryable |
rag_chunks.jsonl, rag_metadata_index.json |
retrieval-ready chunks, one JSON object per line |
terraform/*.tf.json, terraform/import.sh |
Terraform recreation of live infrastructure, 25+ asset types |
findings.json has this shape:
{
"metadata": {
"scan_id": "uuid",
"provider": "AWS",
"account_id": "...",
"region": "...",
"started_at": "...",
"completed_at": "..."
},
"summary": {
"total_assets": 0,
"total_findings": 0,
"total_edges": 0,
"severity_breakdown": {"CRITICAL": 0, "HIGH": 0},
"compliance_frameworks": ["CIS", "NIST-800-53"]
},
"assets": [],
"findings": [],
"compliance": [],
"graph": {"nodes": [], "links": []}
}
assets, findings and compliance are lists of the models below, serialised with Pydantic's JSON mode. graph is D3 force-layout data. cloudg report -i accepts this same file back, so the format round-trips.
Data models
Everything flowing through cloudg is a Pydantic v2 model from cloudg.schema.models. All models allow extra fields, so scanner-specific attributes survive serialisation.
Finding
The unit every scanner and parser produces.
| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
id |
str |
auto-generated UUID |
resource_id |
str |
internal asset ID or native identifier |
resource_arn |
str | None |
cloud-native identifier when known |
severity |
Severity |
CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO |
title |
str |
display title; scanner tags such as [Checkov/terraform] are stripped during cross-scanner comparison |
description |
str |
|
evidence |
str | None |
file path, package version, raw product fields |
remediation |
str | None |
|
source_tool |
str |
"prowler", "checkov", ...; becomes "prowler, checkov" after a merge |
source_finding_id |
str | None |
the scanner's own check or CVE ID; drives dedupe |
compliance_frameworks |
list[str] |
unioned on merge |
cvss_score |
float | None |
0.0 to 10.0 |
detected_at |
datetime |
|
is_suppressed |
bool |
|
risk_score |
computed float |
severity base averaged with CVSS when present |
CloudAsset
| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
id |
str |
auto UUID |
arn |
str | None |
native identifier |
name |
str |
|
asset_type |
AssetType |
45-value taxonomy: EC2, S3_BUCKET, IAM_ROLE, VPC, KMS_KEY, ... |
provider |
CloudProvider |
AWS, AZURE, GCP |
region |
str |
"global" for regionless resources |
account_id |
str | None |
|
tags |
dict[str, str] |
|
metadata |
dict[str, Any] |
normalised extra attributes |
is_internet_exposed |
bool |
set by the graph analysis |
NetworkEdge
Directed edge between two asset IDs. edge_type is one of SECURITY_GROUP_RULE, NACL_RULE, ROUTE, IAM_TRUST, IAM_POLICY_ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS, PEERING, LOAD_BALANCER_TARGET, INTERNET_EXPOSED; the model also carries ports, port_range, protocol, cidr and direction.
ComplianceResult
One control-level verdict: framework (for example CIS, NIST-800-53), control_id, control_title, status (PASS, FAIL, NOT_APPLICABLE, MANUAL) and the finding_ids behind it.
ScanResult
The aggregate container the normaliser returns and the renderers consume: assets, findings, edges, compliance, timing fields, and a computed summary dict with totals and the severity breakdown.
Configuration
config.yaml mirrors every CLI flag and adds persistent settings; pass it with -c or keep it next to where you run. Everything is optional, defaults are sensible. The shipped config.yaml documents each field inline. The structure, with defaults:
providers: [aws] # aws, azure, gcp; several at once is fine
aws:
regions: [us-east-1] # or [all]
accounts: [] # multi-account fan-out
role_name: null # role to assume in each account
role_arn: null # single-account AssumeRole or OIDC target
external_id: null
web_identity_token_file: null
profile: null
max_retries: 10
retry_mode: adaptive
azure:
subscription_ids: []
tenant_id: null
client_id: null
client_secret: null
certificate_path: null
federated_token_file: null
use_managed_identity: false
regions: [ALL]
gcp:
project_ids: []
credentials_file: null
impersonate_service_account: null
regions: [ALL]
scanners:
enabled: [prowler, scoutsuite, checkov, trivy, iam]
timeout_seconds: 3600
iac_directories: [] # targets for Checkov and Trivy fs
trivy_images: []
checkov_frameworks: [] # empty = auto-detect
prowler_extra_args: [] # passthrough args, per scanner
graph:
persist_graphml: true
compute_attack_paths: true
ontology:
enabled: true
export_formats: [turtle, json-ld]
rag:
enabled: true
chunk_strategy: hybrid # entity | community | relation_group | hybrid
max_chunk_tokens: 2000
terraform:
enabled: false
output_dir: ./reports/terraform
report:
formats: [html, json, svg]
inline_js: true # air-gapped friendly
rulesets:
rules_dir: null # defaults to the packaged cloudg/rules/
concurrency_limit: 5
In code, the same structure is CloudGConfig, a Pydantic model:
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, load_config
config = load_config("config.yaml") # file, validated
config = CloudGConfig(providers=["aws"]) # or programmatic
config.scanners.enabled = ["prowler", "iam"]
config.aws.regions = ["eu-west-1", "eu-central-1"]
Python API
CloudGEngine in cloudg.api is the integration entry point: async-first, sync wrappers included, built for embedding in larger systems (SIEM pipelines, orchestration platforms, command extensions such as hol-guard). The package root re-exports the essentials: CloudGEngine, CloudGConfig, load_config, PipelineResult, CollectionResult, AnalysisResult.
Construction and hooks
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
engine = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig(providers=["aws"]))
engine.on_phase_start = lambda phase: print(f"phase: {phase}")
engine.on_finding = lambda finding: siem.send(finding.model_dump(mode="json"))
engine.on_error = lambda phase, exc: alerting.notify(phase, exc)
Hook signatures:
| Hook | Signature | Fires |
|---|---|---|
on_phase_start |
(phase: str) -> None |
at each phase: collection, scanning, ingest, analysis, normalisation, reporting |
on_collection_complete |
(result: CollectionResult) -> None |
after collection |
on_finding |
(finding: Finding) -> None |
once per finding, after scan or ingest |
on_scan_complete |
(findings: list[Finding]) -> None |
after scan or ingest |
on_analysis_complete |
(result: AnalysisResult) -> None |
after analysis |
on_error |
(phase: str, exc: Exception) -> None |
on any phase failure |
Exceptions raised inside a hook are swallowed, so a broken callback cannot take the pipeline down.
Methods
run_pipeline(output_dir="./reports") -> PipelineResult and its sync twin run_pipeline_sync() run everything: collect, scan, analyse, normalise, report.
collect() -> CollectionResult runs multi-provider collection alone. The result carries assets (list[CloudAsset]), edges (list[NetworkEdge]), per-service coverage records, providers_scanned, regions_scanned and duration_ms.
scan(assets, edges, iac_dir=None, images=None, profile=None, output_dir="./reports") -> list[Finding] runs the scanners from config.scanners.enabled in parallel, plus graph reachability analysis and the IAM linter. Missing binaries are skipped.
ingest_reports(reports: dict[str, list[str | Path]]) -> list[Finding] parses existing scanner outputs instead of running anything. Keys are tool names (prowler, scoutsuite, checkov, trivy), values are lists of report paths, file or directory. Unparseable paths are logged and skipped rather than raising.
normalise_findings(findings, assets=None) -> ScanResult applies the full dedupe, cross-scanner merge, CVSS rescoring and compliance mapping. This is the same code path run_pipeline uses.
analyze(assets, edges, findings, output_dir="./reports") -> AnalysisResult builds the graph and produces the ontology, RAG chunks, Terraform files, attack paths and reachability findings, gated by the corresponding config sections.
run_from_reports(reports, output_dir="./reports") -> PipelineResult and run_from_reports_sync(...) chain ingest, normalise and report generation in one call.
PipelineResult
| Field | Type |
|---|---|
assets, edges, findings |
the collected and normalised data |
scan_result |
ScanResult | None |
graph_nodes, graph_edges, ontology_triples |
int |
rag_chunks_path, terraform_paths, report_paths |
output locations |
attack_paths |
lateral movement paths from the graph |
providers_scanned, regions_scanned, coverage |
collection metadata |
duration_ms, errors |
run metadata |
total_assets, total_findings, severity_breakdown |
computed properties |
to_summary() |
one dict with the headline numbers, ready to serialise |
Integration recipes
Working examples against the real API. Each is self-contained.
Aggregate existing scan results, get reports
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
engine = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig())
result = engine.run_from_reports_sync(
{
"prowler": ["./prowler-output/"],
"trivy": ["./trivy-image.json", "./trivy-fs.json"],
},
output_dir="./reports",
)
print(result.total_findings, result.severity_breakdown)
print(result.report_paths["html"]) # ./reports/report.html
for f in result.findings:
if f.severity.value in ("CRITICAL", "HIGH"):
print(f.risk_score, f.title, f.resource_arn)
Parse first, decide later
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
from cloudg.ingest import parse_report, ingest_reports
findings = parse_report("prowler", "./prowler-output/")
findings += parse_report("checkov", "./results_json.json")
# or in one call:
findings = ingest_reports({"prowler": ["./out/"], "checkov": ["results_json.json"]})
engine = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig())
scan_result = engine.normalise_findings(findings)
print(scan_result.summary)
for c in scan_result.compliance:
if c.status.value == "FAIL":
print(c.framework, c.control_id, len(c.finding_ids))
The per-scanner parsers are also public, if you want a single tool with no engine:
from cloudg.scanners.trivy import TrivyScanner
findings = TrivyScanner.parse_report("./trivy-image.json")
Stream findings into a SIEM as they arrive
import asyncio
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
engine = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig(providers=["aws"]))
engine.on_finding = lambda f: queue.put(f.model_dump(mode="json"))
engine.on_error = lambda phase, exc: log.warning("cloudg %s failed: %s", phase, exc)
result = asyncio.run(engine.run_pipeline(output_dir="/var/lib/cloudg/reports"))
Run the phases yourself
import asyncio
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
async def main():
engine = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig(providers=["aws"]))
collection = await engine.collect()
findings = await engine.scan(collection.assets, collection.edges)
analysis = await engine.analyze(collection.assets, collection.edges, findings)
scan_result = engine.normalise_findings(findings, assets=collection.assets)
print(analysis.graph_nodes, "nodes,", len(analysis.attack_paths), "attack paths")
return scan_result
asyncio.run(main())
Combine live collection with ingested reports
Collection needs credentials; ingest does not. Together they give you the graph outputs and the aggregated findings in one result:
import asyncio
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
async def main():
engine = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig(providers=["aws"]))
collection = await engine.collect()
ingested = engine.ingest_reports({"prowler": ["./ci-prowler-output/"]})
scan_result = engine.normalise_findings(ingested, assets=collection.assets)
await engine.analyze(collection.assets, collection.edges, scan_result.findings)
asyncio.run(main())
Gate a CI job on severity
import sys
from cloudg import CloudGConfig, CloudGEngine
result = CloudGEngine(CloudGConfig()).run_from_reports_sync(
{"checkov": ["results_json.json"], "trivy": ["trivy.json"]}
)
critical = result.severity_breakdown.get("CRITICAL", 0)
if critical:
print(f"{critical} critical findings, failing the build")
sys.exit(1)
Plugin system
Custom collectors and scanners register through setuptools entry points; no core changes needed. PluginRegistry (in cloudg.registry) discovers them at startup and falls back to the built-ins for any name not overridden.
A minimal scanner plugin:
# my_package/scanner.py
from cloudg.schema.models import Finding, Severity
class MyScanner:
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
...
def run(self) -> list[Finding]:
return [
Finding(
resource_id="arn:aws:s3:::example",
severity=Severity.HIGH,
title="Example finding",
description="What was found and why it matters",
source_tool="myscanner",
source_finding_id="MY_CHECK_001",
)
]
Registered in the plugin's own pyproject.toml:
[project.entry-points."cloudg.scanners"]
myscanner = "my_package.scanner:MyScanner"
[project.entry-points."cloudg.collectors"]
mycloud = "my_package.collector:MyCollector"
After pip install, the name is available in scanners.enabled and --scanners. Collectors follow the base interface in cloudg/collectors/base.py. If your scanner emits a stable check ID in source_finding_id, you can add it to rules/check_equivalence.yaml so its findings merge with equivalent checks from other tools.
Authentication
Every provider supports several methods, resolved in a fixed priority order, so the same config works on a laptop, in CI and on cloud compute.
AWS, in priority order: direct keys (--aws-key, --aws-secret, --aws-session-token or the standard env vars); OIDC web identity federation (--aws-role-arn with --aws-web-identity-token-file, the GitHub Actions, GitLab CI and EKS pattern with no long-lived keys); a named CLI profile via --profile, SSO included; or nothing, letting the default chain pick up env vars, cached SSO or the instance role. On top of any of these, STS role assumption with --aws-role-arn and, for the third-party auditor pattern, --aws-external-id. Multi-account fan-out uses accounts plus role_name in the config, assuming that role in each account before collecting.
Azure, in priority order: workload identity federation (--azure-tenant-id, --azure-client-id, --azure-federated-token-file); a service principal with a client secret (--azure-client-secret) or a certificate (--azure-cert-path); managed identity (--azure-managed-identity, with managed_identity_client_id in config for user-assigned identities); or the DefaultAzureCredential chain, which covers az login.
GCP: a credentials file via --gcp-credentials-file (service account key JSON or a workload identity federation external_account config), or application default credentials. --gcp-impersonate-sa layers service account impersonation on either.
Docker
The image bundles all four scanner binaries, so it is the shortest path to the full pipeline:
docker pull ghcr.io/morpheuslord/cloudg:latest
docker compose run --rm cloudg run -p aws --regions us-east-1
Or build locally with docker build -t cloudg:latest .
Found a gap in this reference? Open an issue.
Metadata
Release files for cloudg 0.4.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cloudg-0.4.0.tar.gz | 291.1 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cloudg-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 619.5 kB
Release files / cloudg-0.4.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | cloudg-0.4.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 291.1 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
6f448ee4565f88e141ef631f164a61f90c00c74db05affd317572f28ee3b437e
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5b7fe375ff4644aba5ebd1ebfbf8d57e0e7c12326f3c2dd3721e98ee8c70cd6d
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 29, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / cloudg-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | cloudg-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 328.4 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c7fc81992417c6c1c5fc7ccb26eb8c57b4f7933605cbfd1d23270edf4acdf96b
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
46e279bf381fd1fc1dfad4d76a48c9e984d49f4b72d6db1f50206655c816734e
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 29, 2026.
Transparency log