co2-eos 0.1.0

Differentiable CO₂ thermodynamic properties in JAX

CO2-EOS

Differentiable CO₂ thermodynamic properties in JAX.

CO2-EOS is a pure-JAX implementation of the Span-Wagner equation of state for carbon dioxide. Every property evaluation is JIT-compiled, vectorisable with vmap, and fully differentiable with jax.grad, enabling gradient-based optimisation of any system that depends on CO₂ thermodynamics.

import co2_eos as co2
import jax

# Properties from (T, ρ)
state = co2.properties(T=310.0, rho=350.0)
print(state['pressure'], state['cp'], state['speed_of_sound'])

# State from (P, T): phase-aware, robust near the critical point
state = co2.state_from_PT(P=8e6, T=310.0)

# Differentiate anything: e.g. ∂ρ/∂T at constant P
# (peaks near the Widom line at these conditions)
drho_dT = jax.grad(lambda T: co2.state_from_PT(P=8e6, T=T)['density'])(310.0)

# Vectorise across conditions
import jax.numpy as jnp
T_array = jnp.linspace(280, 340, 100)
states = jax.vmap(lambda T: co2.state_from_PT(P=8e6, T=T))(T_array)

Try it without cloning

examples/launch_demo.ipynb is the launch demo: validation against CoolProp, the CPU and GPU benchmarks cited below, and a worked example of gradient-based optimisation through state_from_PT. Read it on GitHub for a static render, or open it on Colab and switch the runtime to T4 GPU to reproduce the comparison in about 15 minutes, most of that being the CPU baseline.

Why this exists

If you're building CO₂ system models in Python and need thermodynamic properties, CoolProp is the standard choice. It's excellent: accurate, well-tested, and covers 110+ fluids.

But CoolProp is a C++ library with Python bindings. You can't jax.grad through it. You can't JIT-compile a simulation loop that calls it. And the per-call overhead from the Python↔C++ boundary adds up fast in tight integration loops.

CO2-EOS solves this for CO₂ by implementing the same reference EOS (Span-Wagner 1996) directly in JAX:

• Differentiable. jax.grad through any property, any inversion, any combination. No finite differences. Exact gradients via autodiff, including second and higher derivatives for free.
• Fast. JIT-compiled and vectorisable. Forward state evaluation at fixed (T, ρ) runs in roughly 1.8 μs/point under jax.vmap. The (P, T) workflow that mirrors PropsSI includes an iterative density solve and flattens to a few tens of microseconds per point at large batches, roughly 2.7× faster than CoolProp.PropsSI in a Python loop on the same inputs (measured at a 10,000-point batch on an Apple M2 Pro; see examples/launch_demo.ipynb, section 2). On a Colab T4 GPU the same state_from_PT workflow runs at 27,800 states/sec on a 10⁶-point batch (36 μs/pt), versus 1,600 states/sec on Colab CPU (615 μs/pt), a 17× speedup. The ceiling is set by the iterative density solve: a jax.while_loop with data-dependent control flow forces lockstep execution across GPU warps, so the polynomial evaluation parallelises cleanly but is not the dominant cost. A fully feed-forward kernel on the same hardware would land closer to 50 to 100×.
• Composable. jit, vmap, grad, custom_vjp: the full JAX transformation stack works. Embed property evaluations inside your own JIT-compiled simulation and differentiate end-to-end.
• Phase-aware. Robust inversions near the critical point using Halley's method with step damping and bisection fallback. Two-phase dome detection that avoids convergence to thermodynamically unstable spinodal states.

What's included

Equation of state: Full Span-Wagner (1996) formulation for CO₂. Helmholtz free energy as A(T, ρ), with all thermodynamic properties derived by autodiff:

• Pressure, internal energy, enthalpy, entropy
• Isochoric and isobaric heat capacities (Cv, Cp)
• Speed of sound
• Gibbs energy

Transport properties:

• Viscosity: Laesecke & Muzny (2017), including dilute-gas, initial-density, and residual contributions, plus critical enhancement
• Thermal conductivity: Huber, Sykioti, Assael & Perkins (2016), with critical enhancement via the simplified crossover model

Saturation curve:

• Saturation pressure, densities, enthalpies, and entropies as functions of T or P
• Cubic spline interpolation of a precomputed Maxwell-construction table, JIT-compilable and differentiable

State inversions:

• state_from_PT(P, T): Halley's method with pressure-aware critical-region initial guess, step damping, and bisection safety net
• state_from_Ph(P, h, phase_hint=) (phase-aware): detects the two-phase dome at subcritical pressures and returns saturation properties directly, bypassing single-phase Newton iteration inside the dome
• state_from_Du(rho, u): for simulation codes carrying (ρ, u) as conserved variables. Uses custom_vjp for clean gradient propagation through the implicit solve

Valid range

CO2-EOS covers the full fluid region of the Span-Wagner EOS:

• Temperature: 216.6 K (triple point) to 1100 K
• Pressure: up to 800 MPa
• Saturation curve: triple point to within 1 mK of the critical point (304.1282 K, 7.3773 MPa)

Transport properties follow the valid ranges of their respective correlations (broadly: gas and liquid up to 100 MPa, with reduced accuracy in the immediate critical region for thermal conductivity).

Installation

pip install co2-eos

Requires Python ≥ 3.10 and JAX ≥ 0.4. No other dependencies.

To run the validation tests (which compare against CoolProp):

git clone https://github.com/John-FluxTech/co2-eos.git
cd co2-eos
pip install -e ".[test]"
pytest tests/ -v

The [test] extra adds CoolProp (validation only, not a runtime dependency) and pytest. The [dev] extra additionally pulls in scipy for regenerating the saturation table from scratch via scripts/generate_saturation_table.py.

Validation

CO2-EOS is validated against CoolProp across the full valid range. The test suite covers:

• Single-phase properties on a dense (T, ρ) grid spanning gas, liquid, and supercritical regions
• Saturation curve properties from triple point to near-critical
• Transport properties (viscosity and thermal conductivity) across all phases
• Inversions (P,T → ρ), (P,h → state), (ρ,u → state) including near-critical conditions
• Comparison of all Helmholtz derivatives against CoolProp's analytical values

Both libraries implement the same Span-Wagner polynomial and the same reference transport correlations, so empirical agreement across the validation grid is at machine precision for the primary quantities and only loosens where physics (not formulation) amplifies floating-point noise:

• Density and viscosity: below 10⁻¹² relative error everywhere on the grid (limited by floating-point evaluation order).
• cp, speed of sound, thermal conductivity: below 10⁻⁹ in the bulk; up to a few × 10⁻⁸ for the speed of sound near the Widom line and within ~10 % of the saturation curve, and up to a few × 10⁻⁶ for cp at the very tip of its peak just above the critical pressure. There the inversion's residual ρ-error is amplified through ∂q/∂ρ, which is locally enormous (cp climbs above 30,000 J/(kg·K) at the peak, so a ~0.1 J/(kg·K) absolute difference still rounds to ~10⁻⁶ relative); at the same (T, ρ) the underlying polynomials still agree at machine precision.

Run the validation suite:

pytest tests/ -v

Scope and philosophy

CO2-EOS is a CO₂-first library. Rather than expanding to cover more fluids, we go deeper on CO₂, improving accuracy, coverage, and robustness in the regions that matter for real engineering: near-critical, transcritical, and two-phase.

There are excellent general-purpose thermodynamic libraries: CoolProp for broad fluid coverage, teqp for autodiff-native multi-model EOS evaluation, FeOs for SAFT models and density functional theory, and Clapeyron.jl in the Julia ecosystem. CO2-EOS complements these by providing a JAX-native path for the single fluid where differentiability, speed, and near-critical robustness matter most.

Contributions that extend CO₂ capability are welcome:

• Better transport property models as new correlations are published
• Improved near-critical formulations (crossover EOS, scaled equations)
• Mixture models where CO₂ is the primary component (CO₂ + impurities for CCS, CO₂ + lubricant for heat pumps)
• Fitting to experimental data for conditions where Span-Wagner accuracy is insufficient

Physical references

The implementations follow these published formulations:

• EOS: Span, R. and Wagner, W. (1996). "A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide." J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 25(6), 1509–1596.
• Viscosity: Laesecke, A. and Muzny, C. D. (2017). "Reference Correlation for the Viscosity of Carbon Dioxide." J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 46, 013107.
• Thermal conductivity: Huber, M. L., Sykioti, E. A., Assael, M. J., and Perkins, R. A. (2016). "Reference Correlation of the Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Dioxide from the Triple Point to 1100 K and up to 200 MPa." J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 45, 013102.

Solver design is informed by:

• Bell, I. H. et al. (2014). CoolProp solver architecture: phase-aware initial guesses and fallback chains.
• Bell, I. H., Deiters, U. K., and Leal, A. M. M. (2022). "Implementing an Equation of State without Derivatives: teqp." Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 61(17), 6010–6027.
• Bell, I. H. and Alpert, B. K. (2018). "Exceptionally Reliable Density-Solving Algorithms." Fluid Phase Equilibria, 477, 87–97.

Acknowledgements

CO2-EOS was developed by Claude and John Patrick Therrien during research on transcritical CO₂ thermoacoustic engines at FluxTech UG in Berlin. The Helmholtz-first autodiff design was validated against CoolProp and informed by the solver strategies documented in teqp and the CoolProp codebase.

License

Apache-2.0