Skip to main content

CobotAR-Protocol

A collection of protobuf messages for the CobotAR-project

Current version: 1.5.2

Documentation

Find it here: documentation/README.md

New version

  1. Make changes
  2. make publish bump={patch,minor,major}

NATS subjects

NATS subjects are defined in subjects/catalog.yaml. The catalog records each subject pattern, protobuf payload or request/reply types, lifecycle, conformance state, intended publishers, and consumers. Generated Go, C#, TypeScript, and Python helpers reject invalid concrete subject tokens and provide explicit wildcard builders for subscriptions. Entity route families generate both concrete message-aware routes and generic helpers whose entity argument uses the shared generated EntityName contract.

See the generated subject catalog and naming rules. Run go run ./cmd/subjectgen check to validate the catalog and verify that all generated outputs are current.

Conceptual design of Assembly processes

A. Product definition (What the thing is)

  • Parts
  • Assemblies / sub-assemblies
  • Product BOM / hierarchy
  • Part occurrences / instances
  • CAD / 3D model references
  • Mating / connection hints if you have them

B. Process template (How the thing is normally assembled)

  • Process recipe
  • Sequences / sub-sequences
  • Tasks / operations / steps
  • Preconditions / ordering / alternatives / variants
  • Required tool roles, skill requirements, actor constraints
  • Operator text

C. Execution instance (What is happening right now on the floor)

  • Running process
  • Current state of sequences/tasks
  • Assigned human(s)/robot(s)
  • Start/end timestamps
  • Current station
  • Evidence / completion / faults / overrides

D. Resource library (What can be used to perform the work)

  • Humans
  • Robots
  • Tools
  • Fixtures
  • Assets
  • Stations / cells
  • Models

E. Capability layer (Why a given resource can or cannot do a task)

  • Skills
  • Capability profiles
  • Tool roles
  • Constraints
  • Validity / training / retraining / calibration / certification

Distinguish type from instance

Example: Part. In assembly we usually need both:

  • Part definition: “M4x12 screw”
  • Part occurrence: “the third M4x12 screw in this assembly”

thus distinguishing between the two is important and must be supported and done consistently.

Minimal TaskDefinition example

TaskDefinition {
  id: "task-fasten-cover-screw-1"
  name: "Fasten cover screw 1"
  instruction_text: "Fasten screw 1 to 0.8 Nm"
  task_type: TASK_TYPE_FASTEN
  target: {
    target_node_id: "node-screw-1"
    target_part_definition_id: "part-m4x12"
    local_target: {
      anchor_id: "node-screw-1"
    }
  }
  tool_requirements: [{
    role: TOOL_ROLE_APPLY_TORQUE,
    required_properties: [TOOL_PROPERTY_TORQUE_CONTROLLED],
    minimum_capability: {
      min_torque_nm: 0.72,
      max_torque_nm: 0.88
    }
  }]
  skill_requirements: [{
    skill_id: "SK-APPLY-CONTROLLED-TORQUE",
    minimum_level: SKILL_LEVEL_QUALIFIED
  }]
  validation: {
    require_tool_feedback: true
    allow_manual_confirmation: true
    manual_confirmation_min_level: SKILL_LEVEL_QUALIFIED
  }
  execution_policy: {
    assignment_preference: TASK_ASSIGNMENT_PREFERENCE_EITHER
    actor_constraint: {
      allowed_actor_kinds: [ACTOR_KIND_HUMAN, ACTOR_KIND_ROBOT]
      collaboration_mode: COLLABORATION_MODE_SEQUENTIAL_HRC
    }
  }
}

Variant handling

Types of variants

Bucket A — Structural variants

Affect product tree. Modeled in product.

Examples:

  • hinge side
  • optional handle
  • different fastener family
  • extra sensor module

Bucket B — Workflow variants

Affect tasks/sequences/skills/tools/validation. Modeled in recipe applicability or recipe branching.

Examples:

  • door must be flipped
  • adhesive cure step required
  • fragile part requires two-person lift
  • robot can only assemble one orientation

Bucket C — Parametric variants

Do not change workflow structure. Passed at run-time.

Examples:

  • color
  • language
  • customer text
  • batch number
  • cosmetic finish code

Handle variants without recipe explosion

For a product family, do this:

  • One ProductDefinition

    • Contains all structural possibilities.
  • Few ProcessRecipes

    Only split recipes where the workflow truly differs. For example:

    • recipe-door-standard
    • recipe-door-flipped-fixture
    • recipe-door-adhesive

    Not:

    • red-left-short-handle
    • red-left-long-handle
    • blue-right-short-handle
    • …
  • One ProcessRun per actual order/build

    Contains:

    • selected product configuration
    • runtime parameters

Example

Product dimensions
  • hinge_side = left | right
  • color = red | green | blue
  • handle = short | long
Recipe
  • recipe-door-standard is applicable when:
    • handle = short or long
    • color = any
    • hinge_side = left
  • recipe-door-flipped is applicable when:
    • hinge_side = right

They need to be split into two recipes because right-hinge requires a flip operation and different fixture.

Process run

When a real order starts the selection might look like this:

product_selection:
  hinge_side = right
  color = green
  handle = long

thus the system chooses the recipe-door-flipped recipe and the recipe stays the same regardless of color.

Metadata

Release files for cobotar-protocol 1.5.2

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for cobotar-protocol 1.5.2
File Size Uploaded Provenance
cobotar_protocol-1.5.2.tar.gz 1.4 MB With provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for cobotar-protocol 1.5.2
File Interpreter ABI Platform
cobotar_protocol-1.5.2-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 1.8 MB

Release files / cobotar_protocol-1.5.2.tar.gz

Download URL cobotar_protocol-1.5.2.tar.gz
Size 1.4 MB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
0e41528c3024644b2785535a86d1cdf6833ba2c83f4c763f36007e07436420e8
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
f6b8a57ed014082be9f29ccb130dcd96bb097200e3f067b21a909d4deeeeeda4
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 19, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / cobotar_protocol-1.5.2-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL cobotar_protocol-1.5.2-py3-none-any.whl
Size 351.4 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
267a6fa92c46a7ca924ebab20e643483876315802ae1ae39c343431bc459a665
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
476b82215e293835ab3c30f28ca19adb5273e842af0f1277bf4547e20e75e8a0
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 19, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for cobotar-protocol 1.5.2

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for cobotar_protocol-1.5.2.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 19, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

1.5.2 This release

2 release files Full provenance

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page