CodeRAG

Token-efficient, structure-aware Code Intelligence + RAG for private source repositories.

CodeRAG indexes private source-code repositories, retrieves only the code relevant to a developer's request, builds a token-budgeted context package, and sends it to your organisation's Claude endpoint (or any LLM behind the LLMProvider interface).

Primary objective: reduce LLM input-token consumption without reducing answer quality — and prove it with measurements, never claims.

This is not a generic document-RAG app:

• Chunks are code constructs — functions/methods/classes/modules — via Tree-sitter, never fixed-size text slices.
• Retrieval is hybrid: exact-symbol + PostgreSQL full-text (lexical) + pgvector (semantic)
  • a lightweight one-hop code graph, fused with Reciprocal Rank Fusion.
• Every result explains why it was retrieved (exact_symbol, lexical, semantic, graph_caller, graph_test, …).
• Embeddings run locally by default — no source code leaves your infrastructure.
• Retrieval works with no LLM. Only ask needs a provider.

What problem this solves

Instead of pasting whole files (or a whole repo) into a prompt, CodeRAG retrieves the smallest useful set of symbols for a task and packs them under a hard token budget, deduplicating overlapping code and dropping low-priority symbols before anything is sent externally. Token consumption is measured end-to-end and comparable against a naive baseline.

Architecture

flowchart LR
  G[Git repo] --> IDX[Indexer]
  IDX --> TS[Tree-sitter parse] --> SX[Symbols + graph]
  SX --> PG[(PostgreSQL + pgvector)]
  EMB[Local embeddings] --> PG
  Q[Query] --> SYM[symbol] & LEX[full-text] & SEM[vector]
  PG --- SYM & LEX & SEM
  SYM & LEX & SEM --> RRF[RRF fusion] --> EXP[1-hop graph expand]
  EXP --> RR[reranker*] --> CB[Context builder + token budget] --> LLM[LLMProvider] --> C[Claude]

Full details: docs/architecture.md, plus ADRs in docs/adr/ and topic docs for retrieval, security, evaluation, LLM providers, and adding a language.

Install

Two commands. Ships a rootless bundled PostgreSQL+pgvector — no Docker, Homebrew, or sudo:

pipx install "coderag-ai[mcp,localdb]"
cd /path/to/your-project && coderag setup

coderag setup starts the database, applies migrations, indexes the repo, registers the MCP server with Claude Code, and appends the retrieval nudge to your CLAUDE.md — the step that makes Claude Code actually call the tools. It records the database URL, so no export CODERAG_DATABASE_URL is needed; later commands find it automatically. Re-running is safe (it won't duplicate the nudge). Opt out with --no-mcp / --no-claude-md.

coderag search "where is authentication handled?"   # works in any new shell

Full walkthrough incl. Claude Code wiring: docs/install-macos.md.

Other install forms:

# from PyPI
pip install coderag-ai
# with local semantic embeddings (pulls torch, ~2GB)
pip install "coderag-ai[embeddings]"
# straight from git (no PyPI needed)
pipx install "coderag-ai[mcp,localdb] @ git+https://github.com/galacticsurfer/coderag"
# or clone + editable
git clone https://github.com/galacticsurfer/coderag && cd coderag && pip install -e ".[dev]"

Distribution name is coderag-ai (plain coderag was taken on PyPI by an unrelated project). The CLI command, the MCP binary, and the import name are all still coderag.

This installs the coderag CLI and the coderag.api.app FastAPI app. Extras: embeddings (SentenceTransformers), tokens (tiktoken), analyzers (pylint/flake8), metrics (prometheus). You still need a PostgreSQL+pgvector to point CODERAG_DATABASE_URL at (docker compose up -d provides one).

Quick start

Option A — Docker one-shot (recommended)

One command boots PostgreSQL+pgvector and the API, runs migrations, and indexes the bundled demo repo so the dashboard has data immediately:

make up          # == docker compose up -d --build
# open http://localhost:8000/dashboard   and   http://localhost:8000/docs

Index your own code (mount it, then run the indexer inside the container):

CODERAG_REPO_PATH=/abs/path/to/your/repo make up
docker compose exec api coderag index /workspace --name myrepo
docker compose exec api coderag search "where are failed payments retried?" --repo myrepo

Option B — Local (venv)

cp .env.example .env
docker compose up -d db                         # just Postgres+pgvector
make install && make migrate
coderag index ./examples/demo-repository
coderag search  "where are failed payments retried?"                # no LLM needed
coderag context "why can payment retry leave an invoice pending?"   # no LLM needed
coderag eval                                                        # Recall@K, MRR, tokens
coderag benchmark --compare-baseline                                # measured token savings
coderag ask     "why can payment retry leave an invoice pending?"   # needs an LLM (see below)

Do I need an API key?

No — for almost everything. index, search, context, eval, benchmark, and the /dashboard are pure retrieval + local embeddings + telemetry: no key, nothing leaves your box. Only ask calls an LLM to turn the retrieved context into a natural-language answer, so only ask needs CODERAG_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (or an internal proxy / Bedrock — see docs/llm-providers.md). That separation is the whole point: you can run, measure, and demo the token savings with zero LLM credentials.

Indexing

coderag index /path/to/repo --name myrepo     # full index
coderag index /path/to/repo --incremental     # only reindex what changed since last commit

Respects .gitignore; skips vendored/generated/binary files and secret files (.env, *.pem, keys, …); redacts residual secret-shaped strings; never indexes credentials. Incremental indexing preserves embeddings for unchanged code.

Searching & context

coderag search "retry failed payment" --repo myrepo --limit 10
coderag context "why pending?" --show-prompt          # exact prompt + token accounting

coderag context prints the selected symbols by priority (target → dependencies → callers → tests → semantic → additional), the token accounting, and (optionally) the full prompt — so you can debug token usage without calling the model.

Claude configuration

Set in .env (never commit credentials):

CODERAG_LLM_PROVIDER=anthropic
CODERAG_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-...
CODERAG_ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://api.anthropic.com   # or your internal proxy
CODERAG_ANTHROPIC_MODEL=claude-sonnet-5

The provider talks to the Messages API over HTTP, so pointing it at an internal proxy — or subclassing for AWS Bedrock — needs no changes to the retrieval layer (docs/llm-providers.md).

Embedding configuration

CODERAG_EMBEDDING_PROVIDER=hashing            # offline default (deterministic)
# or, for genuine semantics (installs torch): pip install 'coderag-ai[embeddings]'
CODERAG_EMBEDDING_PROVIDER=sentence_transformer
CODERAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL=sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2

The default hashing embedder is offline and deterministic (great for CI/air-gapped dev); similarity reflects shared vocabulary. Switch to the local SentenceTransformers model for true semantic matching — code still never leaves your infra.

Evaluation & token measurement

coderag eval --dataset examples/eval/eval_dataset.json
coderag benchmark --compare-baseline

On the bundled demo (offline hashing embedder), measured:

Measure it on your own repo (--measure)

coderag context "why can payment retry leave an invoice pending?" --measure

reports the counterfactual an agent actually faces — "instead of this context I'd have opened the files" — using per-file token counts recorded at index time:

Read that honestly: on the bundled demo that's only 8.3% saved, and the full prompt is bigger than the files it replaces. That's a real measurement, not a bug — with 11 tiny files, one-hop expansion reaches most of the repo and fixed scaffolding (~1.1k tokens) dominates. Savings scale with file size ÷ symbol size: pulling one 40-line method out of a 900-line service is where this wins, and that ratio is routine on a real backend. Recall@1 is likewise limited by the offline hashing embedder; the local SentenceTransformers model improves ranking.

So run --measure on your repository before believing any headline number, including ours. That's why the measurement ships instead of a claim. See docs/evaluation.md.

Security model

Source code is treated as sensitive: secrets are never indexed, credentials are redacted, full source/prompts are never logged, every retrieval query is scoped by repository_id (cross-repo isolation is a test, not a hope), and an AuthorizationProvider interface gates repository access. Retrieved code is delimited as untrusted data in the prompt to mitigate injection. See SECURITY.md and docs/security.md.

Limitations (MVP)

• Python only (architecture is language-independent; other parsers are interface stubs).
• Graph is syntax-heuristic: only in-repo, confidently-resolved edges are stored (incomplete-but-correct by design). Ambiguous/external calls are dropped.
• Exact vector scan (no HNSW yet — added when dataset size warrants).
• Token counts are estimates for budgeting; authoritative counts come from the LLM's usage report (stored in llm_requests).
• Default hashing embedder is lexical-overlap, not truly semantic.
• Analyzer workflow produces fix context + proposals; patch apply/verify is a caller interface (bounded by MAX_FIX_ATTEMPTS).
• The MVP AuthorizationProvider is permissive (development). Deploy a real one.

API

uvicorn coderag.api.app:app exposes POST /repositories, /repositories/{id}/index, GET /repositories/{id}/index/status, POST /search, POST /context, POST /ask, GET /symbols/{id}, /symbols/{id}/relationships, GET /metrics, GET /queries, and a GET /dashboard page.

Dashboard

A self-contained observability page at /dashboard (no external assets, light/dark) shows what was queried and how many tokens the budgeted context saved — KPI tiles (tokens saved, overall reduction, LLM tokens), a per-query "context vs. saved" bar chart, and a full query log. It reads the persisted queries/llm_requests telemetry via GET /metrics and GET /queries.

uvicorn coderag.api.app:app --port 8000   # then open http://localhost:8000/dashboard

Development

make lint typecheck test      # ruff + mypy + pytest

Tests use pgserver — a rootless, bundled PostgreSQL+pgvector — so the DB/FTS/vector paths are exercised for real, no Docker required.

Licensed under Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE / NOTICE). Dependency licenses (incl. the psycopg LGPL and pylint GPL flags) are in docs/licenses.md.

Use it to cut Claude Code's token usage (MCP)

Claude Code reads whole files to build context. Register CodeRAG as an MCP server and it can call coderag_context / coderag_search instead — getting only the budgeted, relevant symbols:

pipx install "coderag-ai[mcp]"
claude mcp add coderag \
  --env CODERAG_DATABASE_URL=postgresql+psycopg://coderag:coderag@localhost:5432/coderag \
  --env CODERAG_DEFAULT_REPOSITORY=myrepo -- coderag-mcp

Tools: coderag_context, coderag_search, coderag_symbol, coderag_repositories, coderag_index. Every call is recorded, so /dashboard shows the savings live. No API key needed — Claude Code is the LLM. Full step-by-step: docs/claude-code.md. Copy-pasteable .mcp.json + CLAUDE.md snippet, with real captured tool output: examples/mcp/.

Composes with other token-efficiency tools

CodeRAG attacks one slice of token spend: the code you'd otherwise read whole files to get. It does nothing about output tokens, conversation history, cache placement, or model routing. Tools that target those slices stack with it, because the slices are disjoint:

Savings on disjoint slices are near-additive. On a typical mid-session turn, CodeRAG's measured file-slice reduction works out to ~26% of cost; adding an output-compression layer takes the combined figure to roughly ~38%. Both halves of that are models, not measurements — verify on your own workload before believing either.

Wiring: they use different mechanisms and don't conflict — CodeRAG is an MCP server, a compression skill is a Skill, a proxy is an ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL. CodeRAG's own ask can also route through such a proxy, since the LLM base URL is configurable:

export CODERAG_ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=http://localhost:<proxy-port>

Enable one at a time and compare /cost between them — a proxy that compresses context may be compressing context CodeRAG already minimised, so the marginal gain can be smaller than the two vendors' claims added together.

Editor integration (VS Code)

A ready-to-build extension lives in vscode-extension/ — commands for Index this workspace (the indexing step, one click), Search symbols, Show context, Ask about this code (right-click), and Open token dashboard.

cd vscode-extension && npm install && npm run package   # → coderag-vscode-0.1.0.vsix
code --install-extension coderag-vscode-0.1.0.vsix

Or download the prebuilt .vsix from the repo's Releases. It's a thin client — point coderag.serverUrl at your running CodeRAG server. Design notes: docs/vscode-extension.md.