commensa-audit 0.2.1

Commensa audit CLI — point it at a GitHub repo, get a one-page AI Rework Report.

commensa-audit

What % of your AI engineering effort went to fixing your AI's own work?

commensa-audit answers that from your git history. Point it at a GitHub repo; get a one-page report:

• Rework tax — share of PRs (and changed lines) that corrected earlier work, vs. net-new value
• Superseded work — PRs whose output was entirely replaced later (shown separately — discarded ≠ correcting)
• Abandoned attempts — PRs closed without merging: the waste merge-based metrics never see
• Churn clusters — chains of PRs rewriting each other ("it took 10 PRs to get dark mode right")
• Line survival — how much merged code is still alive at the end of the window
• Hotspots — rework share by module, against the repo-wide rate
• Agent-marked share — "at least X% of PRs carry agent markers" (Co-Authored-By trailers, body signatures) — a stated lower bound, never an attribution claim

We built it because we needed it: our own agent-built product shipped 162 PRs in 13 days, and the audit showed 27% of them were the AI correcting itself.

Install & run

pip install commensa-audit
commensa-audit --repo owner/name --token $GH_TOKEN

Or straight from source:

pip install git+https://github.com/commensa-ai/commensa-audit

Output: report_<repo>.html (self-contained, forwardable), audit_<repo>.json (raw numbers), units.csv (per-PR data).

Privacy, by architecture

• Read-only. GET requests only; a token with read scope is sufficient.
• Local-first. Everything runs and stays on your machine. No telemetry, no phone-home, nothing leaves your network.
• Inspectable. Pure Python, stdlib + requests + jinja2. Read every line before you run it.

How classification works (and its honest limits)

Every PR is classified by a transparent signal cascade — explicit corrective titles/reverts → self-correction (a PR predominantly undoing lines added in the prior N days) → churn-cluster membership → otherwise generative. Every classification in the output carries the signal that fired and a human-readable why. Thresholds live in one config block; tune them and re-run offline with --reuse.

Known limits (also printed in the report footer): classification is heuristic; squash merges blur attribution; survival windows mean young repos read optimistic; agent-marked share is a lower bound — absence of a marker is not evidence of human authorship. We grade our own certainty rather than fake precision — that's the whole point of the project.

Why "rework tax"?

Agent-era teams measure activity — PRs merged, lines shipped, velocity. None of that distinguishes progress from cleanup. The rework tax does: it's the share of motion that was correction, the closest git-only proxy for "how well was this work directed?" It won't tell you everything (cost-per-outcome needs token data git doesn't have — that's what we're building next) — but it's the most honest first number, and it's free.

The continuous version

This tool is a snapshot. Commensa is the trendline: continuous rework measurement by team and module, alerts, monthly executive reports — and the cost side git can't see, captured at the agent harness. First 25 companies: founding-partner terms.

measure the durable work, not the noise.

MIT licensed.