composeai 0.1.1

Radically simple, functional framework for multi-agent AI workflows — typed agent functions, pipe composition, always-on local tracing, durable flows.

composeai — 𝑓(𝑔(𝑥))

A radically simple, functional framework for multi-agent AI workflows.

• Agents are typed functions. The docstring is the system prompt, the body returns the user prompt, the return annotation is the structured output type. Calling one returns that type — or raises.
• Composition is checked before it runs. pipe(researcher, copywriter) verifies every stage boundary at build time; a wiring bug raises CompositionTypeError before a single API call is made.
• Tracing is always on, and local. Every run persists spans, token usage, and cost to a SQLite store on your disk (./.compose). No SaaS, no instrumentation, no opt-in — the trace is just there:

trace 01KXC6RDB8E29NZHEAC2F54M11 — ok — [$0.0150 · 2.9k tok · 3ms]
└─ ◆ researcher [$0.0150 · 2.9k tok · 3ms]
   ├─ ▸ anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 [$0.0075 · 1.5k tok · 0ms]
   ├─ ⚙ count_words [0ms]
   └─ ▸ anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 [$0.0075 · 1.5k tok · 0ms]

• Flows are durable. A @flow journals every step; if it crashes — or pauses on a named interrupt (approve("publish")) waiting for a human — resume(run_id) continues it in the same process or a brand-new one, days later, replaying finished steps without re-paying for them.
• Streaming and tracing are the same event bus. .stream() yields token deltas interleaved with the very span events the trace is built from, so a live UI and the trace can never disagree.

Runtime dependencies: pydantic + the standard library. Provider SDKs are optional extras. Python ≥ 3.10.

Install

pip install composeai                  # core: pydantic + stdlib only
pip install "composeai[anthropic]"     # + the Anthropic SDK
pip install "composeai[openai]"        # + the OpenAI SDK
pip install "composeai[all]"           # both

Quickstart

import composeai as compose
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field


class FactSheet(BaseModel):
    topic: str
    key_facts: list[str] = Field(description="Three crisp, verifiable facts")


@compose.tool
def count_words(text: str) -> int:
    """Count the words in a piece of text.

    Args:
        text: The text whose words should be counted.
    """
    return len(text.split())


@compose.agent(model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", tools=[count_words])
def researcher(topic: str) -> FactSheet:
    """You are a meticulous researcher. Extract crisp, verifiable facts."""
    return compose.prompt(f"Build a fact sheet about: {topic}")


facts = researcher("quantum computing")   # -> FactSheet (or raises)

The decorated function is the agent: docstring → system prompt, body → user prompt (or a full list[Message] conversation), return annotation → structured output schema, validated back into the type. compose.prompt(...) marks the body's return value as the prompt — it's a typed no-op that keeps static type checkers happy about the body returning a prompt where the annotation declares the output type (a bare str works identically at runtime). Tools run in a loop until the model produces the final answer.

Need more than the output? .run() returns the whole Run:

run = researcher.run("quantum computing")
run.output          # the FactSheet
run.usage           # tokens + USD cost, rolled up across every LLM call
run.trace.print()   # the tree shown above

Every agent also takes an optional spend cap: researcher.run(topic, budget=compose.Budget(usd=0.50, tokens=200_000)) raises BudgetExceededError at the first LLM-call boundary past the cap.

Composition

@compose.agent(model="openai/gpt-5.6-luna")
def copywriter(sheet: FactSheet) -> str:
    """Turn a fact sheet into one punchy line."""
    return f"Write one punchy line from: {sheet.model_dump_json()}"


write_post = compose.pipe(researcher, copywriter)   # types checked HERE
post = write_post("quantum computing")

A mismatch never gets to run (and never spends a token):

compose.pipe(researcher, researcher)
# CompositionTypeError: pipe(): stage 1 (researcher) returns FactSheet
#                       but stage 2 (researcher) expects str

Fan-out is a function too — branches run in parallel threads:

audits = compose.aggregate(words=lambda s: len(s.split()), chars=len)
audits("count these words")          # {'words': 3, 'chars': 17}

compose.map(summarize, sources)      # one stage over many items, order preserved

Stages are agents, pipelines, aggregates, or plain Python callables — routing is an if statement, not a graph edge class.

aggregate()/map()/an agent's parallel tool calls have no per-branch timeout of their own — a single hung branch (a tool body blocked on a network call with no read timeout, a provider HTTP call that never returns) blocks the whole combinator, and therefore the enclosing run, until it finishes or the process is killed. Give an individual stage its own bound with @task(timeout=...) (or build one into a tool/agent body) if it needs one; there's no combinator-level equivalent.

Durable flows & human-in-the-loop

@compose.flow
def research(topic: str) -> str:
    sources = fetch_sources(topic)                     # journaled step
    summaries = compose.map(summarize, sources)        # parallel, journaled steps
    draft = editor(summaries)                          # a whole agent run = one step
    if compose.approve("publish", payload={"draft": draft}):   # named interrupt
        return publish(draft)
    return f"kept as draft: {draft}"


run = research.run("quantum computing")
run.status    # "paused"
run.pending   # id='publish' kind='approval' question=None payload={'draft': ...}

Pausing is not an error — the process may simply exit. Later, from any process:

run = compose.resume(run.id, answers={"publish": True})
run.status    # "completed"

On resume, finished steps replay from the journal (the editor agent's LLM calls are not re-made and not re-billed); only the unfinished tail runs:

└─ ▶ research [3ms]
   ├─ • fetch_sources [0ms] (replayed)
   ├─ ⇉ map(summarize) [2ms]
   │  ├─ • summarize [0ms] (replayed)
   │  └─ • summarize [0ms] (replayed)
   ├─ ◆ editor [0ms] (replayed)
   └─ • publish [0ms]

Interrupts are named (approve("publish"), ask_human("style", "Formal or casual?")), never positional — answers are journaled under that name, so resuming is idempotent and order-independent. The same mechanism gates tools: @compose.tool(requires_approval=True) pauses the agent mid-loop until resume(run_id, answers={"tool_name": True}) (or False to deny — the model sees "denied by user" and carries on). The same crash-recovery works with no interrupt at all: if a flow dies halfway, resume(run_id) re-runs it and the journal skips what already happened.

Streaming

stream = poet.stream("event buses")

for event in stream:
    if event.kind == "text_delta" and event.text:
        print(event.text, end="", flush=True)

stream.run.trace.print()   # blocks until settled; the full trace, same events

One bus carries text_delta / thinking_delta / tool_call_started / tool_args_delta / span_started / span_finished / run_finished — pipelines and flows stream the same way (write_post.stream(...), research.stream(...)).

The CLI

Everything above persisted to ./.compose (override with COMPOSE_DIR). The compose CLI reads it:

$ compose runs
01KXC6RD  flow      research             completed  9s ago       $0.0012      760 tok
01KXC6RD  agent     researcher           completed  9s ago       $0.0150     2920 tok
01KXC6RD  agent     researcher           completed  9s ago       $0.0150     2920 tok

$ compose trace 01KXC6RDF5CNYVXCRVCQWJDBRR    # or: compose trace --last
trace 01KXC6RDF6TQE8PPKA0XSECBKS — paused — [$0.0012 · 760 tok · 127ms]
├─ ▶ research [$0.0012 · 760 tok · 3ms] ⏸ paused
│  ├─ • fetch_sources [0ms]
│  ├─ ⇉ map(summarize) [2ms]
│  │  ├─ • summarize [0ms]
│  │  └─ • summarize [2ms]
│  ├─ ◆ editor [$0.0012 · 760 tok · 0ms]
│  │  └─ ▸ anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 [$0.0012 · 760 tok · 0ms]
│  └─ ⏸ publish [0ms] ⏸ paused
└─ ▶ research [3ms]
   ├─ • fetch_sources [0ms] (replayed)
   ...

$ compose costs --by model        # or --by name / --by day, --since 7d
costs by model
  claude-haiku-4-5         calls=1      tokens=760        cost=$0.0012
  claude-sonnet-5          calls=4      tokens=5840       cost=$0.0300
  TOTAL                    calls=5      tokens=6600       cost=$0.0312

$ compose diff 01KXC6RDB8TS2SPXGKKXV7Z64G 01KXC6RDBC6Z1H2DSBMFAKF01D

diff 01KXC6RD -> 01KXC6RD
  Δcost: +$0.0000
  Δtokens: +0
  Δduration: -2ms

  ◆ researcher  Δcost=+$0.0000 Δtokens=+0 Δdur=-2ms
    ▸ anthropic/claude-sonnet-5  Δcost=+$0.0000 Δtokens=+0 Δdur=-0ms  (output changed)
    ...

compose trace on a paused run also prints its pending interrupts and the exact resume(...) call to answer them. compose runs -q "search terms" full-text-searches span payloads; compose export RUN_ID --cassette x.json turns a run's recorded LLM calls into a replayable test fixture (below). compose path prints the state directory.

Test kit

FakeModel scripts an agent without a provider or network — each item is one model turn:

from composeai.testing import FakeModel

model = FakeModel([
    {"tool_calls": [{"name": "count_words", "arguments": {"text": "a b c"}}]},  # turn 1
    {"json": {"topic": "quantum computing", "key_facts": ["fact one"]}},        # turn 2
])

@compose.agent(model=model, tools=[count_words])
def researcher(topic: str) -> FactSheet:
    """You are a meticulous researcher."""
    return compose.prompt(f"Build a fact sheet about: {topic}")

Plain strings script text turns; .stream() synthesizes word-level deltas from the same script. Every request the agent made is recorded in model.requests for assertions.

Cassettes record real model traffic once and replay it offline forever. Re-export the bundled pytest fixture from your conftest.py:

from composeai.testing import cassette  # noqa: F401

def test_researcher(cassette):
    with cassette("tests/cassettes/researcher.json"):
        facts = researcher("quantum computing")

Run once with COMPOSE_RECORD=1 against the real provider and commit the JSON; afterwards the test replays it with no key, no network, and no SDK constructed. (compose export builds the same file from an already-persisted run.)

@compose.agent(model=..., cache=True) is for iterating locally against a real provider: identical requests are answered from a filesystem cache under {COMPOSE_DIR}/cache/, report zero usage (a hit is never re-billed), and tag their span cached=true. Applies to non-streaming calls only.

Rules of the road

The contracts composeai holds you to — and the ones it holds itself to:

• Flow bodies must be deterministic. Replay works by re-running the body and substituting journaled step results in call order. Side effects, randomness, and clock reads belong inside @task/@agent steps, never in the flow body itself. Nothing detects a violation; it just won't replay correctly.
• A step journals only after it returns. If the process dies between a task's external side effect and its journal write, resume re-runs that task — make external side effects idempotent.
• Journals are for pause/approval and crash recovery, not cross-release storage. If a @flow's source changes between pause and resume, resume() fails loud with ResumeMismatchError (the journal may no longer match the new call sequence); allow_code_change=True overrides it deliberately.
• State lives at COMPOSE_DIR (default ./.compose). COMPOSE_TRACE_CONTENT=0 stops spans from capturing input/output payloads — usage, status, and timing are always recorded regardless. This does not extend to anything composeai needs as functional state to actually work, all of which are written in full unconditionally, regardless of COMPOSE_TRACE_CONTENT: a paused agent's agent_state snapshot (durable pause/resume — approve()/ask_human()/@tool(requires_approval=True) — requires the full in-progress conversation, including tool call arguments and results, so resume() can continue exactly where it left off); the @flow journal (step results must be real to replay correctly); and the test kit's own on-disk artifacts — record_cassette/the cassette fixture and @compose.agent(cache=True)'s filesystem response cache both need a call's real request/response to be replayable or servable as a cache hit later. If your tools handle secrets/PII in their arguments or results, treat {COMPOSE_DIR} (runs.db, cache/, and any cassette files you commit) as sensitive (filesystem permissions, encryption at rest, etc.) rather than relying on COMPOSE_TRACE_CONTENT to keep it out of the store.
• temperature is passthrough-only. composeai never sets one for you, and modern Claude models reject sampling parameters with a 400 — leave it unset for Claude.
• Cost is never fabricated. Priced models get exact USD from a dated, in-repo price table; calls with no known price report cost_usd=None, and any total that includes them renders as a ≥$X partial (or - when nothing was priceable) instead of a made-up number. USD budgets consequently can't see unpriced spend — set a token budget too if you need a hard cap.
• Retries can re-stream. With retries > 0, a provider error striking mid-stream re-runs the call from the start — consumers of .stream() may see the same deltas twice on one llm span. Render final outputs (or treat a fresh delta burst as a reset) if double-rendering matters.

vs. the alternatives

	LangChain / LangGraph	composeai
Core architecture	Configuration & state graphs (Runnable, StateGraph)	Plain typed functions, composed with pipe/aggregate/map
Learning curve	A proprietary class ecosystem	Decorators on regular functions and pydantic types
Wiring bugs surface	At runtime, mid-graph	At composition time, before any API call
Debugging	Deeply nested framework traces	A breakpoint between two functions; local trace trees with exact costs
Observability	External/SaaS platforms, opt-in callbacks	Always-on local SQLite tracing + a CLI, zero setup
Durability & HITL	Separate checkpointer/orchestrator machinery	Journaled @flow + named interrupts, one resume()
Dependencies	Heavy transitive footprint	pydantic + stdlib; provider SDKs as optional extras

Releasing (maintainers)

Two equivalent paths:

• Local: put a project-scoped PyPI token in .env (git-ignored; see the placeholder), commit your work, then scripts/release.sh X.Y.Z — it bumps the version, runs the full gate, builds, and uploads. Commit the bump and tag vX.Y.Z afterwards.
• GitHub: publish a GitHub Release and .github/workflows/release.yml tests, builds, and publishes via PyPI trusted publishing (no stored token). One-time setup: add this repo as a trusted publisher on pypi.org (workflow release.yml, environment pypi).

Roadmap

• OpenTelemetry exporter (the span model already tracks gen_ai.* attribute conventions)
• Async API (await agent(...), async tools)
• TypeScript sibling package
• Extended-thinking / reasoning request configuration (Anthropic thinking budget, OpenAI reasoning.summary/encrypted_content) -- today ThinkingPart only round-trips whatever a provider returns unprompted by default; there's no ModelRequest field to actually ask for it

License

MIT