confirm-gate-mcp
Confirm-before-act for MCP. Put it in front of any MCP server. Read tools pass straight through. Every write tool becomes a pending card, and only the user's own tap or voice, on a device they paired, can release it.
The guarantee doesn't depend on a prompt. The agent never holds the one-time nonce or the device key that a confirmation needs, so it can't approve its own action, however it's instructed. A prompt injection can make the agent ask, but it can't make anything happen.
agent ──MCP (bearer token)──▶ confirm-gate ──▶ upstream MCP server
│ ▲
nonce + cards ─────────┘ └──── signed evidence (tap / voice)
user's paired device (/approve page or your own app)
Why
An agent that can write (send, buy, delete, unlock) needs a human yes for the actions that matter. The usual ways of getting one all run through a channel the agent, or whatever is steering it, can reach:
- A "do you approve?" in the chat. The model can say "the user said yes", and an injected instruction can make it.
- Tool annotations.
readOnlyHintanddestructiveHintare hints from the server. The MCP spec says clients must treat annotations as untrusted unless they come from a trusted server. - A confirmation dialog in the agent's own client. It lives in the same app as the agent, often with an "always allow" switch, and it gives nothing to audit afterwards.
confirm-gate moves the yes onto a second channel. The proposal goes to the agent; the one-time nonce goes only to the user's paired device, and every request from that device is HMAC-signed with a key the agent never sees. The write runs only when the evidence from that device checks out, and every run leaves a receipt.
It began as the safety layer of SureSay, a voice assistant for people with dysarthria. Their speech is misheard more than anyone's, so an assistant that acts on its best guess does the wrong thing to the people with the least room to undo it.
Proof
Measured in SureSay's evaluation (report): 50 adversarial cases over HTTP, made up of 20 prompt injections hidden in tool output, 15 near-miss commands and 15 forged confirmations (self-confirming, replayed evidence, expired sets, cross-user evidence, captured signed requests, pairing brute force, racing confirms).
| Agent | Unconfirmed changes |
|---|---|
| Scripted worst-case agent (obeys every injection, tries every forgery), no gate | 35 / 35 |
| Same agent, behind the gate | 0 / 50 |
| A real model, Amazon Nova 2 Sonic, as the agent, no gate | 11 / 35 |
Same model behind the gate, with confirm among its tools |
0 / 35 |
60 seconds
Python 3.12+. Until the first PyPI release (coming soon), install from GitHub:
pip install "git+https://github.com/Prashant-thakur77/confirm-gate-mcp"
confirm-gate demo
confirm-gate demo puts the gate in front of a small built-in notes server with one read tool, list_notes, and one write tool, write_note. There's nothing else to install. It prints:
Agent MCP endpoint: http://127.0.0.1:8800/mcp (Authorization: Bearer <token>)
Approve on your device: http://127.0.0.1:8800/approve pairing code 004730 (10 minutes)
-
Pair. Open
http://127.0.0.1:8800/approvein a browser and enter the pairing code. -
Ask. In another terminal, run
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector(MCP Inspector 2.x needs Node 22.19+). Connect with transport Streamable HTTP, the URLhttp://127.0.0.1:8800/mcpand the headerAuthorization: Bearer <token>. Calllist_notes, which runs straight away. Then callwrite_note, which doesn't run. It answers:{"status": "pending_user_confirmation", "pending_id": "p_9be2…", "preview": ["write_note(name='shopping', text='milk')"], "stage": "choose", "message": "Waiting for the user to confirm on their device. Nothing has changed yet."}
-
Approve. The card is now on the approval page. Tap it. The page says
Done: write_note(name='shopping', text='milk'). Confirmed by your tap. (receipt rcpt_…),list_notesreturns the note, andpending_statussaysconfirmed. If you callconfirmyourself withevidence_ref: "the user said yes", it's refused, and that's the point.
You can skip the Inspector's browser UI and use its CLI, or plain curl (with TOKEN set to the printed token):
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli http://127.0.0.1:8800/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
--method tools/call --tool-name write_note --tool-arg name=shopping --tool-arg text=milk
curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8800/mcp -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"write_note","arguments":{"name":"shopping","text":"milk"}}}'
The demo keeps everything in memory, so stopping it forgets the notes, the pairing and the receipts.
A real server: confirm-gate serve
serve puts the gate in front of any MCP server: a Streamable HTTP URL (--upstream) or a stdio command (--upstream-cmd). By default, a tool the upstream marks readOnlyHint passes through. For a server you didn't write, don't take its word for it: with --strict, only the tools you list in --reads pass through. For example, the official filesystem server:
confirm-gate serve --upstream-cmd "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem ~/sandbox" \
--strict --reads "read_*,list_*,search_*,get_*,directory_tree" --high-risk "move_*"
Here read_file, list_directory, search_files and the other reads run at once. write_file, edit_file, create_directory and move_file each wait for a card, and move_file needs a second yes.
| option | meaning |
|---|---|
--upstream URL / --upstream-cmd CMD |
the server to gate: Streamable HTTP, or a stdio command |
--strict |
ignore the upstream's readOnlyHint; only tools in --reads pass through ungated |
--reads |
tools or glob patterns that pass through |
--writes |
tools or patterns that are always gated, even if marked read-only |
--high-risk |
tools or patterns that need a second, separate yes when picked from a set of cards |
--token, --db, --host, --port, --user |
bearer token (default: generated), SQLite file (default ~/.confirm-gate/gate.db) or :memory:, bind address, user id |
The same options are arguments of wrap_upstream(...) and build_app(...) in Python (trust_annotations=False is --strict). docs/API.md has the full Python API and CLI reference.
With an agent
Any Streamable HTTP MCP client works: give it the endpoint and the bearer token. Pass a fixed --token so the client's config survives a restart:
export GATE_TOKEN=$(python -c "import secrets; print(secrets.token_urlsafe(24))")
confirm-gate serve --upstream-cmd "…" --strict --reads "…" --token "$GATE_TOKEN"
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http confirm-gate http://127.0.0.1:8800/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer $GATE_TOKEN"
Cursor (.cursor/mcp.json) and other clients that read an mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"confirm-gate": {
"url": "http://127.0.0.1:8800/mcp",
"headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer <token>" }
}
}
}
VS Code (.vscode/mcp.json) uses the same entry under "servers", with "type": "http".
MCP Inspector, to poke at it by hand: npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector, then Streamable HTTP, the endpoint and the Authorization header, as in 60 seconds.
Strands Agents on Amazon Bedrock (examples/strands_agent.py):
from strands import Agent
from strands.models import BedrockModel
from strands.tools.mcp import MCPClient
gate = MCPClient(url="http://127.0.0.1:8800/mcp", headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"})
with gate:
agent = Agent(model=BedrockModel(model_id="us.amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0"), tools=gate.list_tools_sync())
agent("Move every .tmp file in ~/sandbox into old/") # the moves wait on your phone
The gated tools tell the agent what is going on: each write's description says it waits for the user's own confirmation, its reply is pending_user_confirmation, and pending_status tells it when the user has decided.
Agent Skill. skills/add-confirm-gate/SKILL.md teaches a coding agent (Claude Code, Kiro, Cursor) to put the gate in front of a server: which way in, --strict for servers you didn't write, how to choose reads and high-risk tools, and how to check the result.
In your own server (20 lines)
examples/wrap_any_server.py wraps an in-process server. The same build_app(upstream, …) call accepts any of these:
- an
MCPServerobject; - a Streamable HTTP URL;
StdioServerParameters.
To build the gate into a server you're writing, register tools through GatedServer:
from mcp.server import MCPServer
from confirm_gate import GatedServer, SqliteStore
mcp = MCPServer("home")
gs = GatedServer(mcp, store=SqliteStore("gate.db"))
@gs.read()
def door_status() -> dict:
"""Is the front door locked?"""
return {"locked": True}
@gs.write(risk=lambda a: "low" if a["locked"] else "high",
preview=lambda a: "Lock the front door" if a["locked"] else "Unlock the front door")
def door_lock(locked: bool) -> dict:
"""Lock or unlock the front door."""
... # runs only after the user confirms
Then mount confirm_gate.device_routes(gs.gate, gs.devices, transcribe=...) next to /mcp for your device app.
What confirm checks
Anyone may call confirm(pending_id, evidence_ref), the agent included. It executes only if every check passes, and each check is listed by name in the receipt:
| check | refuses |
|---|---|
user_evidence_exists |
no evidence, a made-up id, "the user said yes" |
evidence_is_for_this_card_set |
evidence from another card set |
from_a_paired_device |
an unknown or revoked device, or another user's device |
card_set_still_open |
a second confirm of the same set (replay) |
card_set_not_expired, evidence_not_expired |
stale cards (120 s; 60 s for the second yes) |
evidence_not_used |
evidence used before |
user_words_choose_a_card |
"no", "not two", "um", or a number on a yes/no card |
action_unchanged_since_shown |
arguments that changed after the user chose |
nonce_consumed_once |
racing confirms: exactly one wins (atomic in every store) |
The device channel adds its own protections:
- Every request is HMAC-signed with the device key.
- Each signature is accepted once, inside a ±60 s window.
- Pairing codes are one-time and valid for 10 minutes. Each attempt takes from two atomic budgets before the code is checked: 5 wrong tries per 10 minutes per source address, and 30 for everyone together. Parallel guesses and freshly started pairings can't reset or outrun them, and one guesser can't lock out the owner.
- Only a device paired as a voice device (
start_pairing(user, transcriber="alexa")) may send its own transcripts, and the receipt names that recogniser. - A voice recording's fingerprint can't be used twice.
- High-risk actions need a second, separately nonced yes.
- More time (WCAG 2.2.1):
gate.extend(pending_id, user_id=...)restarts a waiting set's own clock, at most 10 times per set. It answers nothing, it is never an MCP tool, and only a route you sign for the user's own device should call it.device_routesmounts one,POST /device/more-time {"pending_id"}, and the built-in/approvepage puts a More time button beside each set's countdown, with a polite warning at 30 s.
Voice
Voice evidence is audio. The server transcribes it with your recogniser, so the words come from the user's own recording, never from the model's account of what they said. confirm_gate.consent.decide turns the words into a decision:
- Picks a card: "two", "the second one", "number 2", "option three". In Hinglish: "doosra", "do number", "teen number", "दो नंबर".
- Confirms the final card: "yes", "haan", "theek hai".
- Cancels: "no", "cancel", "nahin", "mat karo".
- Refused: everything else, including a bare "do", "not two", "yes no", or a sound-alike such as "to"; hesitations and hedges ("hang on", "ek second", "maybe", "shayad", "sochne do"); and, on the high-risk final card, any word it can't read other than the card's own words.
Stores
MemoryStore: tests and single process.SqliteStore: one file, safe across threads and processes.DynamoStore: one on-demand table, conditional writes for one-time use.
All three give the same put_if_absent / set_once / add (atomic counter) / update (compare-and-swap) guarantees, and the same tests run against each.
Receipts
Every executed write leaves a receipt with:
- who confirmed (user and device);
- what ran (action, arguments, and the card text shown);
- when it was proposed, confirmed and executed;
- how it was confirmed: tap or voice, the server's transcript, and the audio fingerprint;
- every check, by name.
receipt.verify_fingerprint(r) detects a receipt edited after it was issued.
What it does not protect against
- Reads. They pass through. Anything a read tool returns, the agent sees.
- A compromised paired device. Whoever holds the device key can approve. Unpair a lost device (
DeviceRegistry.revoke). - A compromised upstream server. The gate decides whether a call runs, not what the server then does with it.
- Approving without reading. The card shows the exact action and arguments, and they can't change after the user chooses; it can't make anyone read them.
- Plain HTTP.
confirm-gate servebinds to localhost. Put anything reachable from elsewhere behind HTTPS.
Develop
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q # 530 tests pass (5 more need a real DynamoDB and are skipped); the DynamoDB ones run on moto
Issues and pull requests are welcome: CONTRIBUTING.md has the setup, the test rules and the release steps. A change near the gate starts with a failing test in tests/. Report a security problem privately through GitHub security advisories, not in a public issue (SECURITY.md).
License
MIT
Metadata
Release files for confirm-gate-mcp 0.8.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0.tar.gz | 180.5 kB | With provenance | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 230.1 kB
Release files / confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 180.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
87db2acc1af41828d1cefc1be5c1458167ed242fba8c3bde6bb7d874963be3b0
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
09c8e9497f0f32b48f348305877ca456d6721edf897fa275f18b43b1ce6e2359
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 22, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 49.6 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
7258ae9ac40aa493291a65e4712e5d72e6ee77f3320c397b664d1d621147a127
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d7357d44454268fea006523fed1824b22b5e62a94f3d9bf5bee7f599c3355c02
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 22, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for confirm-gate-mcp 0.8.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for confirm_gate_mcp-0.8.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 22, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.