creforge
PII-safe synthetic credit bureau data, generated from explicit behavioural rules.
creforge generates realistic, linked credit-bureau-shaped datasets: borrowers, credit inquiries, accounts, the joint borrowers and guarantors on them, and monthly payment histories. The data has real delinquency dynamics, vintage curves and stress scenarios, and no real data ever goes in. There is no model fitted to real records, so there is nothing to memorise or leak.
Use it to test credit data pipelines, demo dashboards, teach credit-risk analytics, benchmark warehouses, or give contractors and vendors a realistic dataset without a data-sharing agreement.
Just want the data? Every release has a ready-made sample attached (10,000 borrowers × 36 months, Parquet and CSV) that opens in DuckDB, Power BI, Excel or pandas, with nothing to install.
$ pip install creforge
$ creforge generate --subjects 1000000 --months 36 --seed 42 --out ./bureau --workers 4
$ creforge validate ./bureau --strict
Why not SDV / Faker?
| Faker-style | Fit-to-real (SDV, GAN, ...) | creforge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Needs real data | No | Yes: privacy review, leakage risk | No |
| Delinquency dynamics | None | Learned; can break the rules | Explicit Markov model |
| Can a loan jump from current to 90+? | n/a | Yes | Never (tested invariant) |
| Referential integrity across tables | Manual | Often approximate | Guaranteed and validated |
| Reproducible | Mostly | Rarely byte-identical | Byte-identical per seed, any worker count |
| Explainable parameters | n/a | No | Every probability is in a commented YAML file |
The data
| Table | One row per | Highlights |
|---|---|---|
subject |
borrower | Latent risk_grade A–E is exported, so it doubles as ground truth for testing scorecards. No names, IDs or addresses. |
inquiry |
credit application | Approval odds fall as a borrower makes more applications ("credit hungry" behaviour). |
account |
credit facility | credit_card, personal_loan, mortgage, auto_loan, overdraft, bnpl. New accounts link to their approved inquiry. Older accounts start part-way through their life. |
account_month |
account × month | Balance, amount due, amount paid, DPD bucket (0 … 120+), months in arrears, status. |
account_party |
person on an account | Role primary, joint or guarantor. About 40% of mortgages are joint; personal and auto loans to risky or young borrowers often have a guarantor (typically an older relative with a better grade). |
Output is one Parquet or CSV part file per chunk per table, plus a manifest.json
recording the version, schema version, seed, full resolved config and its SHA-256.
Money columns are exact Decimal(18, 2), or Float64 rounded to 2 decimal places with
--money float.
Every column, type and allowed value is documented in the data dictionary. What stays stable between versions (the schema, same seed → same data, the Python API and the CLI) is set out in docs/stability.md.
How it works
Every month, each open account draws one event: roll (miss a payment, move one bucket worse), cure (pay all arrears), back (pay one installment of arrears), restructure, close, or stay. The probabilities are
base[product, state] × grade multiplier × seasoning(months on book) × macro(month)
The DPD bucket is derived from months in arrears. Balances and payments are derived from the event. So an account can never skip a bucket, pay while rolling forward, or show a DPD that disagrees with its arrears. Accounts that already exist when the window opens start in a state drawn from the model's own age-conditional distribution, so the first month shows no warm-up artefact.
Joint accounts blend both borrowers' risk. Guaranteed loans that reach 90+ DPD can be rescued when the guarantor is called and pays off the arrears, so fewer of them are written off.
Validation
creforge validate reports:
- Integrity (hard guarantees; any failure is a bug): unique ids, every foreign key resolves, the account opens on or after its approved inquiry, month histories are contiguous and end at closure, no rows after write-off, no skipped buckets, no payment on a roll-forward, no negative amounts, no nulls in required columns, no codes outside the allowed values, no dates outside the window, exactly one primary borrower per account, and no person listed twice on the same account.
- Calibration (against the profile's
targets): 30+ DPD share and annual write-off rate per product; 12-month bad rate increasing across grades; the seasoning peak falls at 6–35 months on book; no artefact at the start of the window; joint accounts go bad less often and guaranteed loans are written off less often than comparable single-borrower accounts; guarantors have better grades than the borrowers they back. - Privacy statement, with the config hash, to attach to data-handling approvals.
Baseline, 50k subjects × 36 months, seed 11 (creforge 0.4), next to the US commercial bank range for 2015–2026 that each target is set from:
| Product | 30+ DPD share | Reference range | Annual write-off rate | Reference range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| credit_card | 2.3% | 1.5–3.2% | 3.9% | 1.6–4.7% |
| personal_loan | 2.0% | 1.5–2.4% | 2.3% | 0.3–1.2% (banks only) |
| mortgage | 2.1% | 1.7–6.2% | 0.2% | 0.0–0.3% |
| auto_loan | 1.4% | 1.5–2.4% | 1.6% | 0.3–1.2% (banks only) |
| overdraft | 1.8% | assumption | 3.0% | assumption |
| bnpl | 6.5% | assumption | 1.0% | assumption |
12-month bad rate by grade: A 0.03% · B 0.3% · C 0.9% · D 5.7% · E 16%.
Sources, method and caveats are in docs/calibration.md. For example, personal and auto write-offs sit above the bank-only series on purpose, because that series excludes finance companies.
Testing data-quality checks: fault injection
Test data that is wrong in known ways proves your pipeline's data-quality checks work.
creforge inject corrupts a copy of a clean dataset with 16 kinds of realistic fault
(duplicates, orphan rows, missing months, nulls, unknown codes, ×100 amounts, future
dates, DPD jumps, activity after write-off, bad date formats, text in number columns
and more) and writes an answer key listing every one. creforge score then grades
what your checks found:
$ creforge inject clean --faults standard -o dirty
$ creforge score dirty/faults.parquet my_findings.csv --min-recall 0.9
- Recall: 94.2% (injected faults your checks found)
- Precision: 99.1% (findings that were real faults)
(The recall and precision above are illustrative output.) Details, the full fault catalogue and the answer-key format are in docs/fault-injection.md.
Testing bureau ingestion: monthly submissions
A bureau receives one file per lender per month, and those files arrive late, twice,
in parts, a month behind, or with wrong values that a later correction fixes.
creforge submissions turns a dataset into that stream of files (with an answer key),
and creforge reconcile checks whether your ingestion pipeline rebuilt the truth:
$ creforge submissions clean --issues standard -o inbox
$ creforge reconcile clean rebuilt/ --inbox inbox # PASS, or each difference with its cause
The file layout, the six delivery issues, and a short reference ingester are in docs/submissions.md.
Loading into a warehouse
creforge ddl writes the table definitions for Athena, Glue, DuckDB, Postgres, Redshift
or Snowflake, with the right types for every column and, optionally, keys and allowed
values. creforge load duckdb loads a dataset in one step.
$ creforge ddl --dialect athena --dataset out --location s3://my-bucket/creforge
$ creforge ddl --dialect postgres --dataset out --constraints -o schema.sql
$ pip install "creforge[duckdb]" && creforge load duckdb out --db creforge.duckdb
Postgres users also get a psql \copy script. Details, and which engines are tested
for real, are in docs/warehouses.md.
Quickstart notebook
examples/quickstart.ipynb walks through generating a
portfolio and building vintage curves, a roll-rate matrix, a simple scorecard check
against the known risk grade, and a baseline-vs-stressed comparison.
Python API
import creforge as cf
cfg = cf.Config.from_profile("stressed", subjects=100_000, months=48, seed=7)
ds = cf.generate(cfg) # in memory; ds.account_month is a polars DataFrame
report = cf.validate(ds)
print(report.to_markdown())
cf.write_dataset(cfg, "out/", workers=4) # streaming, bounded memory, for big runs
fast = cf.Config.from_profile("baseline", subjects=10_000, money="float") # Float64 money columns
Profiles
baseline (flat economy) and stressed (roll rates ramp to 1.8× around month 15,
then recover) are built in. creforge profiles show baseline prints every parameter.
To make your own, write a YAML file that starts with extends: baseline and override
only what you need:
extends: baseline
name: subprime_cards
grades:
E: {share: 0.20} # fields merge; this assumes you rebalance the other shares
All built-in parameters are illustrative. They are hand-set to land in the right order of magnitude compared with published aggregate statistics: Federal Reserve delinquency and charge-off rates, and the FFIEC write-off timing rules. Every source is cited in the YAML and in docs/calibration.md. They do not describe any real lender's or bureau's portfolio.
Performance
| Run | Time | Peak memory per worker | Parquet size |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200k subjects × 36 months, 1 worker | 15 s | < 1 GB | 0.16 GB |
| 1M subjects × 36 months, 4 workers | 24 s | 0.9 GB | 0.78 GB |
Measured on a 4-vCPU Linux container. Run python benchmarks/bench_generate.py to
measure your own machine.
Roadmap
Guarantor and joint-account links: done in 0.2.Fault injection for testing data-quality checks: done in 0.5.Monthly submissions with late, duplicate and corrected files: done in 0.7.- Contagion: a called guarantee raising the guarantor's own risk; supplementary cards.
- Business subjects, directors and shareholding graphs.
- Collateral and legal/litigation records.
- Clearly marked synthetic PII for UI testing.
- Calibration to published aggregate statistics.
- Scripted scenarios (moratoria, rate shocks).
DuckDB/Postgres loaders and Glue catalog DDL: done in 0.6. Iceberg and dbt integration.- Country flavour packs built only from public specifications.
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md, including the clean-room rule. Changes are listed in CHANGELOG.md; report vulnerabilities privately as described in SECURITY.md.
$ pip install -e ".[dev]"
$ ruff check . && pytest -m "not slow" # fast suite
$ pytest -m slow # calibration suite
CI runs on Linux, macOS and Windows with Python 3.10–3.13. Design notes are in
docs/superpowers/specs.
Clean-room rule: contributions must not contain parameters, code sets or schemas derived from any employer's or institution's non-public systems or data.
License
Apache-2.0
Metadata
Release files for creforge 0.7.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| creforge-0.7.0.tar.gz | 206.1 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creforge-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 282.6 kB
Release files / creforge-0.7.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | creforge-0.7.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 206.1 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c5787b56e76536b86eba4158ae0871123d399fb40d6aa89ce02000994576efc6
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
8a0487068f637bbdaaf182c687e264c49e70826be429fd034ad968954e2502c2
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 27, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / creforge-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | creforge-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 76.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c058c5cbbc9f49bc29699e7c2f37bc143fef1137c69fce9abab496135c305bef
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4a2e20c5ce7ee9f2ddbe3823b2838c3785b1ff2600064108741bc63cde917909
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 27, 2026.
Transparency log