cve-dedup-checker 0.1.1

Parallel duplicate-check across free CVE and vulnerability databases for security researchers

cve-dedup-checker

Before you submit a CVE finding to WPScan, Patchstack, or HackerOne, check whether someone already reported it. cve-dedup-checker queries the major free vulnerability databases in parallel and tells you clean, possible match, or confirmed duplicate. Built for security researchers, bug bounty hunters, and disclosure coordinators. All data sources are free; no API keys required.

Databases it queries

Database	Auth	Notes
NVD (NIST)	none	REST API 2.0. Keyword and CPE search.
OSV (Google)	none	Aggregator covering GHSA, PyPA, RustSec, Go, Maven, NuGet, crates.io, and more.
GitHub Security Advisories	optional	Public. GITHUB_TOKEN bumps rate limit from 60/hr to 5000/hr but is not required.
WPScan	none	Scrapes the public plugin/theme page.
Patchstack	none	Scrapes the public vulnerability database page.
CISA KEV	none	Known Exploited Vulnerabilities JSON feed.
Exploit-DB	none	CSV index mirrored on GitLab.

All responses are cached locally for 6 hours by default so you can iterate on a finding without re-hammering the free APIs.

Install

pipx install cve-dedup-checker

Or from the latest main:

pipx install git+https://github.com/jashidsany/cve-dedup-checker.git

pipx puts the cve-dedup-checker command on your PATH automatically. Standard pip install also works if you prefer managing your own venv.

Requires Python 3.10 or later.

Use

$ cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin <slug> --class broken-access-control

Exit codes:

• 0 clean
• 1 possible match (review required)
• 2 confirmed duplicate
• 3 inconclusive (no sources responded - usually a network issue)

Target types

cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin <slug>
cve-dedup-checker wp-theme <slug>
cve-dedup-checker npm <package>
cve-dedup-checker pypi <package>
cve-dedup-checker github <owner/repo>
cve-dedup-checker cpe <cpe-2.3-string>
cve-dedup-checker keyword "<free text>"

Output formats

cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin <slug> --output human      # default
cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin <slug> --output json       # pipe to jq, save to file
cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin <slug> --output markdown   # paste into writeup

Narrow by vulnerability class

Accepts short codes or natural language; the matcher normalizes both:

xss                        sqli                  csrf
ssrf                       rce                   lfi
broken-access-control      info-disclosure       file-upload
deserialization            open-redirect         auth-bypass

cve-dedup-checker npm lodash --class prototype-pollution
cve-dedup-checker pypi django --class sqli

Pipeline use

# Only proceed if clean
if cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin my-plugin --output json > /dev/null; then
  echo "No prior disclosure. Safe to submit."
fi

Watch mode

During an active audit, you can keep an eye on whether a new advisory lands for your target before you submit. --watch re-runs the check on a fixed interval and prints only what's changed since the last run.

cve-dedup-checker wp-plugin my-plugin --class broken-access-control --watch 30m
cve-dedup-checker npm some-package --watch 6h
cve-dedup-checker pypi my-lib --watch 1d

• Supported units: s, m, h, d (e.g. 300s, 15m, 2h, 1d).
• Minimum interval is 60s to stay polite to free upstream APIs.
• State is stored at ~/.local/state/cve-dedup-checker/watch/ (or the OS equivalent).
• First run establishes a baseline. Subsequent runs print only new or resolved match URLs.
• Ctrl+C exits cleanly.

Optional config

The tool works out of the box with zero config. If you want a higher GitHub rate limit, create ~/.config/cve-dedup-checker/config.toml:

cve-dedup-checker config-sample > ~/.config/cve-dedup-checker/config.toml

Then uncomment the github_token line. Environment variables GITHUB_TOKEN and WPSCAN_TOKEN also work and take precedence over file config.

Cache management

cve-dedup-checker cache-clear

Cache lives at ~/.cache/cve-dedup-checker/.

How dedup classification works

For every advisory returned from any source, the matcher:

1. Identifier check - does the advisory text contain the target's slug, package name, or a permutation of it?
2. Class check (if --class is supplied) - does the advisory text mention the same vulnerability class, via a synonym dictionary (XSS, sanitizer bypass, stored XSS, etc. all fold together)?

• Both match: confirmed.
• Only identifier matches: possible (different vuln class, review).
• No match: clean.

This is deliberately conservative: the tool flags things you might have missed, and you make the final judgment. It will never silently drop a hit you should see.

Limitations

• Fuzzy matching is keyword-based, not semantic. Review possible matches yourself.
• Some sources have rate limits on the free tier (NVD is the tightest); the local cache mitigates this for iterative work.
• This tool is a signal, not a verdict. If it says clean and you suspect a dupe, keep searching (vendor bug trackers, Wordfence Intelligence, security mailing lists, HackerOne hacktivity).

License

MIT - see LICENSE.