Skip to main content

Agentic Data Quality Pipeline: profiles CSVs, proposes DQ rules, writes+validates SQL to check them, and reports confirmed violations.

Project description

data-quality-agent-dk

Agentic data-quality pipeline. Point it at a folder of CSVs; it profiles every table, proposes DQ rules from real evidence, writes + validates the SQL to check each one (read-only, sandboxed, retried on failure), and hands back a JSONL report plus an optional Streamlit dashboard.

Requirements

  • Python 3.10+
  • An API key for at least one LLM provider (Examples include Gemini, OpenRouter, OpenAI)

Installation

Running just:

pip install data-quality-agent-dk

gets you the base package — langchain, langgraph, duckdb, streamlit, and everything else the pipeline itself needs. What it does not include is a library for talking to any specific LLM provider, since most people only use one and there's no reason to install libraries for providers you're not using.

So say you want to use Gemini: you add [google] to the install command, which tells pip "install the base package, and also install what's needed for Gemini support":

pip install data-quality-agent-dk[google]

That [google] is called an extra — an optional add-on dependency set. Under the hood it just pulls in langchain-google-genai alongside everything else. The same idea applies for the other providers:

Any model + provider that langchain's 'init_chat_model' supports will work (Eg: OpenRouter). Install the respectibe provider's own package yourself and pass it as a parameter while calling 'run_pipeline' below. (see Step 2 below)

Step 1 — Set up your environment

Create a .env file in your project's working directory (not inside this package) with whichever credentials your chosen models need. At minimum, the LLM provider key(s) for whatever you pass as planning_model_provider / worker_model_provider:

# pick whichever provider(s) you're using
GOOGLE_API_KEY=...
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=...
OPENAI_API_KEY=...
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=...

# optional: enables per-table LangSmith tracing (profiling -> rule
# planning -> every SQL generate/execute retry, as one trace per table)
LANGSMITH_TRACING_V2=true
LANGSMITH_API_KEY=...
LANGSMITH_PROJECT=your-project-name

You only need the key(s) matching the provider(s) you actually pass in — if both planning_model_provider and worker_model_provider are "google_genai", you only need GOOGLE_API_KEY.

Step 2 — Run it

from data_quality_agent_dk import run_pipeline

result = run_pipeline(
    data_dir="data",              # folder of .csv files, one table per file
    output_dir=".",               # where dq_report.jsonl / todo_list.md land

    # any model string + provider langchain's init_chat_model accepts
    planning_model="gemini-2.5-flash",
    planning_model_provider="google_genai",
    worker_model="gemini-2.5-flash-lite",
    worker_model_provider="google_genai",

    temperature=1.0,
    max_tokens=40000,

    sample_rows_limit=100,
    max_retries=3,
    max_violation_rows_shown=3,
    suspicious_violation_ratio=0.45,

    display=True,   # launch the Streamlit dashboard when the run finishes
)

print(result["report_path"], result["failed_tables"])

data_dir is the only required argument. Everything else has a default (see the table below) — but planning_model/planning_model_provider and worker_model/worker_model_provider default to Gemini models, so if you're using a different provider, you must set those four explicitly, or the pipeline will try to call Gemini regardless of which API key you've set.

What you get back

run_pipeline returns a dict:

Key What it is
table_names Every table (CSV) that was processed
failed_tables Tables that errored out and were skipped
report_path Path to dq_report.jsonl — one line per confirmed violation
todo_path Path to todo_list.md — every rule considered, with its final status

If display=True (the default), a Streamlit dashboard also opens automatically once the run finishes, showing the same report visually with filters and sample violating rows per rule.

Choosing your own values

Every field below has a working default — you only need to touch a value if your data or budget genuinely calls for something different.

Parameter Ask yourself Default
planning_model This makes one exhaustive, column-by-column reasoning pass per table — is my data complex enough (many columns, many edge cases) to justify a stronger/pricier model here? gemini-2.5-flash
worker_model This is called once per rule — PK inference, every SQL write/repair, every report entry. It runs many times per table, so cost and latency matter more than raw reasoning depth here. Do I want the cheapest/fastest model that's still reliable? gemini-2.5-flash-lite
temperature Do I want the same table to produce roughly the same rules and SQL if I re-run it? Lower = more deterministic/reproducible. Higher = more variation between runs. 1.0 (gemini supports this better)
max_tokens How wide are my tables, and how long do my rule descriptions/SQL tend to get? A table with 40+ columns or many cross-column rules needs more headroom than a 5-column table. 40000
sample_rows_limit How big is my dataset, and how representative does a sample need to be to catch rare-but-real issues? A 5000-row table can be mostly sampled; a 5-million-row table needs a bigger absolute sample to surface low-frequency problems, even though it's a smaller fraction of the whole. 100
max_retries How much do I value catching every possible rule vs. how much do I care about runtime/cost? Higher retries recover more rules from a bad first attempt, at the cost of more LLM calls per rule that's genuinely hard to express in SQL. 3
max_violation_rows_shown Am I using this report for a human to skim, or feeding it into another system? Fewer sample rows keeps the report/dashboard readable; more gives more diagnostic context per issue. 3
suspicious_violation_ratio How dirty do I expect this data to genuinely be? Raise it if you have reason to expect genuinely high violation rates. 0.45
display Toggling to true allows you to view the output in a simple streamlit interface True

For the full technical reference — every config field, the graph architecture, and troubleshooting — see docs/config.md.

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1.tar.gz (37.6 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl (40.5 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 37.6 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.14.3

File hashes

Hashes for data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 4be54e93cbbab2f82d9dfcb55ec104083bc6c09be972e5b908838e56b4d15bf1
MD5 fa1aa3503121557e5f6bb98f9a25fac8
BLAKE2b-256 df32e3cfb2796fbd5668bfe30402b2646151481f92eb8e6647addc1579fd789a

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for data_quality_agent_dk-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 9609003e9bf2578feb7216a5f916afadcca68e771ca4a1429eba64c4a4e9c3f0
MD5 e83a1db272e4f80ced0c4e7fcee1c7ce
BLAKE2b-256 39571b98e21d475ea8212e8fa6b455e1f6feb63c3ecb658a6f1df3476b94fb65

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page