dataveil
Local data profiling, PII classification, and plan-based cleansing.
Aggregate-only, with documented limits. The LLM reasons over counts,
rates, and generalized format signatures (ddd-dd-dddd, not an actual SSN).
No raw rows or samples are returned — not one row, not a "few examples."
Some aggregates can still reveal a value (for example a median that equals
one row's value); see Known limits.
No LLM-authored code, ever. The LLM's only output is a plan: a list of
{operation, column, params, rationale} picked from a closed, versioned
operation vocabulary written and reviewed by a human. A plan referencing
anything outside that vocabulary is rejected before it ever executes.
Install
pip install dataveil[duckdb] # core + the DuckDB reference adapter
pip install dataveil[sqlmesh] # core + the SQLMesh adapter
pip install dataveil[postgres] # core + the Postgres adapter
# optional: recognize person names (PII:PERSON_NAME) with a local spaCy model
pip install "dataveil[duckdb,ner]"
python -m spacy download en_core_web_sm
The core engine (dataveil.core) has no dependencies of its own — an
adapter extra only pulls in what that one adapter needs.
Example
Three stages, strictly separated: profile (no LLM) → an agent proposes a plan by reasoning over that profile → execute (no LLM). This runs all three directly against a DuckDB table:
import duckdb
from dataveil.adapters.duckdb import DuckDBAdapter
from dataveil.core.profile import profile_table
from dataveil.core.classify import classify_table
from dataveil.core.execute import execute_plan
con = duckdb.connect(":memory:")
con.execute("CREATE TABLE customers (id INTEGER, email VARCHAR, signup_date VARCHAR)")
con.executemany(
"INSERT INTO customers VALUES (?, ?, ?)",
[
(1, "alice@example.com", "03/15/2024"),
(2, "bob@example.com", "07/02/2024"),
(3, None, "11/30/2024"),
],
)
adapter = DuckDBAdapter(con)
# 1. Profile -- aggregate stats only, no raw rows or samples (see Known limits).
profile = profile_table(adapter, "customers")
print(profile.to_dict())
# {'table': 'customers', 'row_count': 3, 'columns': [
# ...,
# {'name': 'email', ..., 'format_signatures': [{'signature': '<other signatures>', 'count': 2}]},
# {'name': 'signup_date', ..., 'format_signatures': [{'signature': '<other signatures>', 'count': 3}]},
# ]}
# A signature is only shown when at least 5 values share it (MIN_SIGNATURE_COUNT);
# on a 3-row table every shape is rare. On a larger table you get shapes such
# as {'signature': 'dd/dd/dddd', 'count': 312} -- see the messier example below.
# 2. Classify -- local regex/checksum matching, same aggregate-only posture.
for result in classify_table(adapter, "customers"):
print(result.column, result.tag, result.match_rate)
# id none 0.0
# email PII:EMAIL 1.0
# signup_date none 0.0
# 3. An agent reasons over that profile/classification (not shown here --
# this project doesn't call an LLM itself) and proposes a plan:
plan = [
{
"operation": "mask",
"column": "email",
"params": {"method": "hash"},
"rationale": "PII:EMAIL at match_rate=1.0",
},
{
"operation": "parse_date",
"column": "signup_date",
"params": {"source_format": "%m/%d/%Y", "target_format": "%Y-%m-%d"},
"rationale": "normalize inconsistent date format",
},
]
# 4. Execute -- validates the whole plan against the operation vocabulary
# and the table's schema before running a single step. Requires confirm=True.
execute_plan(adapter, "customers", plan, confirm=True)
print(con.execute("SELECT email, signup_date FROM customers").fetchall())
# [('<md5 hash>', '2024-03-15'), ('<md5 hash>', '2024-07-02'), (None, '2024-11-30')]
A plan referencing anything outside the vocabulary is rejected before
execute_plan touches the adapter at all:
from dataveil.core.plan import PlanValidationError
try:
execute_plan(
adapter,
"customers",
[{"operation": "drop_table", "column": "email", "params": {}, "rationale": "x"}],
confirm=True,
)
except PlanValidationError as e:
print(e) # "step 0: unknown operation 'drop_table'; must be one of [...]"
A messier, more realistic example
The example above uses three clean rows. examples/messy_customers.py
generates ~300 rows of synthetic (Faker-based) customer data with the kind
of mess real end-user data actually has -- duplicate rows, nulls,
inconsistent casing, stray whitespace, a non-ISO date format, a few
malformed emails -- and runs the full pipeline against it:
python examples/messy_customers.py
profile surfaces the mess as aggregate stats (null rates, scattered
format signatures such as ' aaaaa aaaaaa ' next to 'aaaaa aaaaaa', which
show the stray whitespace; letter case is folded, so 'ALICE' and 'alice'
both become 'aaaaa'), classify
flags the PII columns, and a 9-step plan (trim_whitespace,
standardize_case, mask, impute, parse_date, dedupe_rows) cleans it
up -- in the seeded run, 12 duplicate rows removed, every email/SSN masked,
ages imputed, dates normalized to ISO 8601, casing standardized.
Documentation
The full documentation is at zain-ul-abdin45.github.io/dataveil:
- Getting started
- Configuration: every key of
dataveil.toml, including custom classifiers - Classifiers and operations
- Adapters: DuckDB, Postgres, SQLMesh, dbt, and plugins
- MCP server and audit log and approval
- Benchmarks on 1M and 10M row tables
Known limits
The profile is aggregate-only, but aggregate does not always mean it cannot reveal a value. In short:
- Numeric stats are withheld for small or constant columns, and
minandmaxonly appear when at least 5 rows share that value. - Percentiles and the mean can still equal a cell value.
- Format signatures keep spaces and punctuation, and a signature only appears when at least 5 values share it.
- Classification is pattern-based, and the name model is English only and statistical.
So the guarantee is "no raw row is returned and no sample is taken", not "no value can ever be inferred". The privacy page lists every limit in full.
Development
make setup # .venv + ".[dev]" + pre-commit hook
make check # lint, format check, mypy, tests (same as CI)
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the design rules and the pull request process, and SECURITY.md to report a privacy leak.
To build the documentation locally:
pip install -e ".[docs]"
mkdocs serve
The sqlmesh extra pulls in real SQLMesh; tests/test_sqlmesh_adapter.py
runs the SQLMeshAdapter end to end against a small, self-contained SQLMesh
project (tests/fixtures/sqlmesh_project) and is skipped automatically if
SQLMesh isn't installed.
tests/test_postgres_adapter.py runs the PostgresAdapter end to end
against a real Postgres instance — point it at one with
DATAVEIL_TEST_POSTGRES_URL (default: a local dataveil_test database);
the whole module skips automatically if nothing is reachable there. CI
spins up a throwaway postgres:16 service container for this.
Metadata
Release files for dataveil 0.4.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dataveil-0.4.0.tar.gz | 85.1 kB | With provenance | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dataveil-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 134.2 kB
Release files / dataveil-0.4.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | dataveil-0.4.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 85.1 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
6043589d9da23f3482e26f8b7fdd107306d9c405fa9c3d0baaf658a5e33712cc
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5dcd448d87282b2adcdc143d82fc9db0262c275e06ae89d28c71512b21ddbd08
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 21, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / dataveil-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | dataveil-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 49.1 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
87d887c0d8b2afefa607ac3f79cbce5b77fd712b76d9a1558cddbc393a8ac56b
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
3a8cced9ab70c0f40df8a2c47b06118560bfdc4531d7cefbbc7474194d80b93b
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 21, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for dataveil 0.4.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for dataveil-0.4.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 21, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.