dbt-plan

Static analysis tool that warns about risky DDL changes before dbt run.

Like terraform plan for dbt, and used the same way: you run it before the thing that changes your warehouse, not only in CI afterwards.

Runs on compiled SQL. It reads files and nothing else, so it works with any warehouse — Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Postgres, DuckDB — through one code path.

What It Looks Like

$ dbt-plan check

dbt-plan -- 2 model(s) changed

DESTRUCTIVE  int_order_enriched (incremental, sync_all_columns)
  DROP COLUMN  shipping_info
  DROP COLUMN  billing_info
  ADD COLUMN   shipping_city
  Downstream: dim_customers, fct_orders (2 model(s))
  >> BROKEN_REF  fct_orders: references dropped column(s): shipping_info

SAFE  dim_customers (table)
  CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE

dbt-plan: 2 checked, 1 safe, 0 warning, 1 destructive, 1 cascade risk(s)

What It Does

dbt-plan analyzes compiled SQL diffs to catch dangerous schema changes at PR time:

• Column changes: detects ADD/DROP COLUMN from SQL diff
• Risk assessment: judges safety based on materialization x on_schema_change rules
• Cascade analysis: finds downstream models that reference dropped columns
• Config changes: detects materialization or on_schema_change policy changes
• Type changes: compares explicit CAST types between revisions
• SELECT * resolution: reads the columns from the CTEs of the same statement, and follows a ref() into the referenced model's compiled SQL

It does NOT execute anything, connect to any warehouse, or simulate dbt run. It reads files, compares them, and warns you.

Quick Start

pip install dbt-plan
dbt-plan run               # compile baseline → compile current → check

dbt-plan run does the whole thing in one command, and needs whatever credentials your dbt compile normally needs.

The loop it is built for

Once you have a baseline, the inner loop is a single sub-second command. Edit a model or a macro, recompile, and see what dbt run would do — before running it:

dbt-plan snapshot          # once, on the revision you are changing from
                           # ... edit models, edit macros ...
dbt compile && dbt-plan check

Measured on a project of 3 models, median of 3 runs:

200 models, every one of them changed: 0.48 s. The compile is the cost, and you were compiling anyway — dbt-plan itself is fast enough to sit in the edit loop rather than at the end of it.

Working with a coding agent

An agent editing models cannot eyeball a diff and hesitate. Give it the check and the reasons behind it:

dbt-plan agent-setup       # writes dbt-plan guidance into your AGENTS.md
dbt-plan check --format json

The guidance leads with what an agent most often gets wrong: adding a model to ignore_models, or downgrading on_schema_change from sync_all_columns to ignore, silences a real finding without making the change safe.

Or give it the check as an MCP tool:

pip install 'dbt-plan[mcp]'
dbt-plan-mcp                # stdio MCP server exposing `plan` and `snapshot`

plan returns the verdict, the per-model operations, and — separately — a refusals list naming everything dbt-plan declined to judge. That separation is the point: a person reading "safe" may still glance at the diff, an agent reading it proceeds, so a non-empty refusals must never be collapsed into the verdict.

The server is a separate package from the analysis core. The core is offline and synchronous by design and tests/test_invariants.py fails the build on an asyncio or network import anywhere inside it; an MCP server is both, so keeping them apart is what keeps that guarantee provable.

Registry entry — the line below is how the MCP registry verifies that whoever publishes the entry also owns this PyPI package, so it has to stay in the README that ships:

mcp-name: io.github.PresentJay/dbt-plan

More commands

dbt-plan init              # Generate .dbt-plan.yml config + update .gitignore
dbt-plan stats             # Analyze project readiness
dbt-plan ci-setup          # Generate GitHub Actions workflow
dbt-plan check --format github   # GitHub markdown output
dbt-plan check --format json     # JSON for CI pipelines
dbt-plan check --select model1   # Check specific model only

Scope

dbt-plan is a static analysis warning tool, not a runtime simulator.

Design principle: false warnings are OK, false safe is never OK.

When to use it

dbt-plan answers a narrower question than the warehouse-connected tools (Recce, SQLMesh, data-diff) and costs nothing to run, so it works as the cheap gate in front of them — and on the Fusion engine, which compiles without a warehouse connection, that includes fork pull requests where they cannot run at all. See use cases for the comparison, real timings, and what it gets wrong.

Deliberately Not Planned

Ideas that look useful but contradict what this tool is:

DDL Prediction Rules

CI Integration (GitHub Actions)

name: dbt-plan
on:
  pull_request:
    paths: ['models/**', 'macros/**', 'dbt_project.yml']

jobs:
  plan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: read
    env:
      # Whatever your profiles.yml reads. `dbt compile` connects; dbt-plan does not.
      SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT: ${{ secrets.SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT }}
      SNOWFLAKE_USER: ${{ secrets.SNOWFLAKE_USER }}
      SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY: ${{ secrets.SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY }}
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0          # the base revision has to be in the clone
          persist-credentials: false
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with: { python-version: '3.12' }
      - run: pip install uv && uv sync

      - uses: PresentJay/dbt-plan@v1

Keep the pull_request trigger. Never switch it to pull_request_target — dbt compile runs Jinja and macros written in the pull request, so that would hand your warehouse credentials to code from any fork.

Outputs verdict (safe / destructive / warning), exit-code, and report (path to the JSON report), so a later step can comment on the PR or open a ticket.

For a workflow you own outright rather than a wrapped action, dbt-plan ci-setup generates one with the credential wiring and least-privilege notes inline. Details in docs/ci-integration.md.

How It Works

flowchart TD
    A[dbt-plan snapshot] --> B[Save compiled SQL + manifest.json]

    C[dbt-plan check] --> D[diff_compiled_dirs]
    D --> E[base compiled SQL]
    D --> F[current compiled SQL]
    E --> G[extract_columns]
    F --> H[extract_columns]
    G --> I[base columns]
    H --> J[current columns]
    I --> K[column diff]
    J --> K
    K --> L[predict_ddl + manifest config]
    L --> M{Safety?}
    M -->|SAFE| N[exit 0]
    M -->|WARNING| O[exit 2]
    M -->|DESTRUCTIVE| P[exit 1 — block merge]
    L --> Q[find_downstream]
    Q --> R[format_text / format_github]

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, TDD workflow, and coding rules.

Architecture

src/dbt_plan/
├── columns.py      # SQLGlot column extraction (multi-dialect)
├── config.py       # .dbt-plan.yml + env var configuration
├── predictor.py    # DDL risk assessment rules + cascade analysis
├── manifest.py     # manifest.json parsing + downstream BFS
├── diff.py         # compiled SQL directory comparison
├── formatter.py    # text / GitHub markdown / JSON output
└── cli.py          # CLI: snapshot, check, init, stats, run, ci-setup

How to Contribute

Where to start: the open issues, particularly those labelled good first issue. Each one says what it is, how it was found, and what has to be decided before code.

Design decisions: See docs/design-notes.md.

Supported

• dbt-core 1.7+, and the dbt Fusion engine (verified against 2.0.0-preview.218)
• Any warehouse: Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Postgres, DuckDB, etc. (--dialect)
• Python 3.10+
• CTE, UNION ALL, QUALIFY, window functions, VARIANT access

License

Apache-2.0