debate-hall-mcp
MCP server for Wind/Wall/Door multi-perspective debate orchestration with production-oriented design patterns.
Production Status: This server implements production-minded patterns (validation, bounded operation, atomic persistence) suitable for development and small-scale deployments. For larger production deployments, see production deployment considerations.
Table of Contents
For AI Agents
===AGENT_BOOTSTRAP===
DEV_BOOTSTRAP::scripts/dev-bootstrap.sh
DEV_HOOKS_OPT_IN::scripts/install-git-hooks.sh[core.hooksPath=.githooks]→DEBATE_HALL_AUTO_BOOTSTRAP=1
SKILL::skills/debate-hall/SKILL.md
WORKFLOW::init→turn→get→close
AGENTS::agents/README.md[Wind/Wall/Door definitions]
COGNITIONS::agents/cognitions/[PATHOS|ETHOS|LOGOS overlays]
RECIPES::[SPEED(3)|STANDARD(12)|DEEP(36)|FORTRESS|LABORATORY]
===END===
What It Does
- Structured debates with Wind (explore) → Wall (constrain) → Door (synthesize)
- Deterministic state with turn limits, hash chain, and verifiable transcripts
- Multiple modes: Fixed sequence or mediated orchestration
- GitHub integration: Sync debates to Discussions, create ADRs from synthesis
- OCTAVE export: Semantic compression format with tamper-proof sealing (v1.0.0)
Quick Start
1. Install
pip install debate-hall-mcp
2. Configure MCP Client
Add to Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json) or Claude Code (~/.claude.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"debate-hall": {
"command": "debate-hall-mcp"
}
}
}
3. Start a Debate
User: Start a debate about whether to rewrite our backend in Rust
Claude: [calls init_debate with thread_id="rust-rewrite",
topic="Should we rewrite our backend in Rust?"]
4. Run the Dialectic
Wind → "What if we rewrote in Rust? Memory safety, performance..."
Wall → "Yes, but: team expertise, ecosystem maturity, timeline..."
Door → "Therefore: Profile hotspots first, consider Rust for specific components..."
That's it. For GitHub integration, see Configuration.
Installation
PyPI:
pip install debate-hall-mcp
# or
uv pip install debate-hall-mcp
From source:
git clone https://github.com/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp
cd debate-hall-mcp
./scripts/dev-bootstrap.sh
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
Development bootstrap (worktrees/branches)
One-command setup:
./scripts/dev-bootstrap.sh
Optional: enable repo-local git hooks (prints reminder, or auto-runs bootstrap when DEBATE_HALL_AUTO_BOOTSTRAP=1):
./scripts/install-git-hooks.sh
MCP Tools
Core Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
init_debate |
Create debate: thread_id, topic, mode?, max_turns? |
add_turn |
Record turn: thread_id, role, content |
get_debate |
View state: thread_id, include_transcript? |
close_debate |
Finalize: thread_id, synthesis, output_format?, seal? |
Mode Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
pick_next_speaker |
Set next speaker (mediated mode) |
Admin Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
force_close_debate |
Emergency shutdown (I5 kill switch) |
tombstone_turn |
Redact turn (preserves hash chain) |
GitHub Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
github_sync_debate |
Sync turns to GitHub Discussion/Issue |
ratify_rfc |
Generate ADR from synthesis, create PR |
human_interject |
Inject human GitHub comment into debate |
Auto-Orchestration Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
run_debate |
Run complete Wind→Wall→Door debate automatically |
resume_debate |
Resume a PAUSED debate after failure |
Configuration
Minimal (No GitHub)
The MCP config above is sufficient for local debates.
With GitHub Integration
- Copy
.env.exampleto.env - Add your GitHub token:
GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_your_token_here
Token scopes needed:
repo,write:discussionGet one at: GitHub → Settings → Developer settings → Personal access tokens
Tier Configuration (Auto-Orchestration)
The run_debate tool uses tier configurations to determine which AI providers to use for each role.
Quick Start:
# Copy the template and add your API key
cp tiers.yaml.example tiers.yaml
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=your-key-here
Resolution order:
DEBATE_HALL_TIERS_FILEenvironment variable./tiers.yaml(project root)~/.debate-hall/tiers.yaml(user home)- Built-in defaults
See tiers.yaml.example for all configuration options including CLI providers and custom prompts.
Example tier configuration:
# ~/.debate-hall/tiers.yaml
standard:
wind:
provider: cli # Use external CLI (claude, codex, gemini)
cli: claude
role: wind-agent # Optional: role for PAL MCP
wall:
provider: cli
cli: codex
door:
provider: cli
cli: gemini
settings:
consensus_required: true # Wind/Wall must approve synthesis
max_turns: 12
max_refinement_loops: 3
premium:
wind:
provider: openrouter # Use OpenRouter API
model: anthropic/claude-3-opus
wall:
provider: openrouter
model: openai/gpt-4-turbo
door:
provider: openrouter
model: google/gemini-pro
settings:
consensus_required: true
max_turns: 20
max_refinement_loops: 5
Provider options:
cli: External AI CLIs (requiresclaude,codex, orgeminiCLI installed)openrouter: OpenRouter API (requiresOPENROUTER_API_KEYenv var)
Settings:
consensus_required: If true, Wind and Wall must approve Door's synthesismax_turns: Maximum total turns in debatemax_refinement_loops: How many times Door can refine after rejection
See Usage Patterns for detailed configuration options.
Example
Thread: "microservices-vs-monolith"
Topic: "Should we migrate to microservices?"
[WIND] "What if we decomposed into services? Independent scaling,
technology diversity, team autonomy..."
[WALL] "Yes, but we have 3 developers. Microservices add operational
complexity, network latency, distributed transactions..."
[DOOR] "Therefore: Start with a modular monolith. Design service
boundaries now, but keep deployment unified. Extract services
only when team grows or specific scaling needs emerge."
Documentation
| Doc | Content |
|---|---|
| Usage Patterns | Recipes, tuning, agent tiers, cognition prompts |
| Evidence | Empirical research validating the approach |
| Architecture | Execution tiers, Wall content contract |
| Examples | Real multi-model debate patterns |
| Agents | Wind/Wall/Door agent definitions |
| Skills | AI agent skill installation |
The Pattern
Three cognitive voices in tension:
| Role | Cognition | Voice |
|---|---|---|
| Wind | PATHOS | "What if..." — expansive, visionary |
| Wall | ETHOS | "Yes, but..." — grounding, critical |
| Door | LOGOS | "Therefore..." — synthesizing, decisive |
Architecture Immutables
| ID | Principle |
|---|---|
| I1 | Cognitive State Isolation — server manages state |
| I2 | OCTAVE Binding — exportable semantic transcripts |
| I3 | Finite Closure — hard turn/round limits |
| I4 | Verifiable Ledger — SHA-256 hash chain |
| I5 | Safety Override — admin kill switch |
Production Deployment Considerations
While debate-hall-mcp implements production-minded patterns (validation, bounded operation, atomic persistence), there are considerations for larger-scale production deployments.
For comprehensive deployment guidance, see Production Deployment Guide.
Current Strengths
- Deterministic behavior: Rule-based validation with no LLM dependency
- Resource limits: Hard turn/round limits prevent runaway sessions
- Atomic persistence: File writes use atomic replace with fsync
- Concurrency control: File locking with Compare-and-Swap (CAS) for race prevention
- Content verification: SHA-256 hash chain with optional tamper detection
- GitHub integration: Rate-limit handling and feature toggles
Quick Configuration
| Setting | Environment Variable | Recommended Value |
|---|---|---|
| State directory | DEBATE_HALL_STATE_DIR |
/var/lib/debate-hall/ |
| OpenRouter API | OPENROUTER_API_KEY |
Use secret manager |
| GitHub token | GITHUB_TOKEN |
Use secret manager |
Production Checklist
Before deploying at scale:
- Configure
DEBATE_HALL_STATE_DIRto dedicated path outside repository - Set proper file permissions (600 for state files, 700 for directory)
- Use explicit secret injection (avoid
.envin production) - Plan for state backup/retention
- Monitor file lock contention if using multiple workers
- Consider database backend for >10 concurrent instances (#106)
Recommended Use Cases
Well-suited for:
- Development and testing workflows
- Single-instance or low-concurrency deployments
- Scripted automation with sequential debates
- Research and experimentation
Requires additional work for:
- High-concurrency multi-instance production environments
- Large-scale orchestration with 10+ concurrent debates
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, testing, and guidelines.
# Quick dev setup
git clone https://github.com/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp
cd debate-hall-mcp
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# Run tests (800+ tests)
pytest
# Quality checks
ruff check src tests && mypy src && black --check src tests
License
Apache-2.0 — Built with HestAI and MCP Python SDK.
Release files for debate-hall-mcp 0.5.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| debate_hall_mcp-0.5.0.tar.gz | 275.1 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| debate_hall_mcp-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 451.9 kB
Release files / debate_hall_mcp-0.5.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | debate_hall_mcp-0.5.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 275.1 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
f1f10afa723af9cdaf560fe3698e660e8e852768e56f941134553ef58fd2e243
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
9195f4ecb073cf0ddc4f05be0c03ced840207ad9f3fdcf40b7894ed4852c6736
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 26, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / debate_hall_mcp-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | debate_hall_mcp-0.5.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 176.8 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
40d941434dd0e1ba42c265cad48539c2519d64fe124191d2d4b6d179b20951d7
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
334d1f51097fe7f511837abc794163be7c50f165298972f24c127bf26eea22f0
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 26, 2026.
Transparency log