A benchmarking framework for decentralized optimization
Project description
Welcome to decent-bench
Docs | Installation | Background
decent-bench allows you to benchmark decentralized optimization algorithms under various communication constraints, providing realistic algorithm comparisons in a user-friendly and highly configurable manner.
Installation
Requires Python 3.13+
pip install decent-bench
Background
Multiple paradigms exist in the field of mathematical optimization. One such paradigm is decentralized optimization. It addresses several of the challenges posed by traditional, centralized optimization. In centralized optimization, all training data is transferred to a central server that employs an optimization algorithm. In addition to increased network and power consumption, transferring data may raise privacy concerns, especially in the context of sensitive information such as medical data. There are also regulatory restrictions such as GDPR and the EU AI Act that may impact the feasibility of centralized optimization.
The decentralized paradigm addresses these issues. A network of agents participate in the optimization process by sending local variable updates to their neighbors, no training data is transmitted. There are two main approaches in decentralized optimization, federated and distributed. In the federated approach, agents only communicate with a coordinator. In each iteration, the coordinator retrieves local variable updates from the agents, updates the global model, and then distributes it back to the agents for the next iteration. In contrast, distributed optimization does not use a coordinator, agents communicate directly with their neighbors instead. Both approaches have their pros and cons, with federated being faster and distributed more robust. Despite their differences, both approaches take advantage of the Internet of Things and address the privacy concerns detailed earlier.
However, as decentralized optimization relies on network communication, factors such as noise, packet loss, compression, network sparsity, and agent heterogeneity may all impact the optimization process. Therefore, these constraints must be considered when evaluating an algorithm's performance. This is where decent-bench comes in. By benchmarking algorithms in different settings with different communication constraints, decent-bench provides you with realistic algorithm comparisons in a user-friendly and highly configurable manner.
Author
decent-bench is developed by Elias Ram under the supervision of Dr. Nicola Bastianello.
Project details
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file decent_bench-0.1.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: decent_bench-0.1.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 1.5 MB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.13.3
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
e62ed788ece1f4904a32cc08fa929b918f1aacdad933226b465db84895876cc8
|
|
| MD5 |
864f4b684267c66af41e0d85cf8dd488
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
b2959a381c01548a0b79d5a0e329042eeb98df9a63d8527229c304a81d81313d
|
File details
Details for the file decent_bench-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: decent_bench-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 40.9 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.13.3
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
e8880025458eab88d524599e2cc2c73c7d5fc04666e0091eea7147b7240dfa02
|
|
| MD5 |
6b02fd783170e06fe2d4af520f8fc08d
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
8ef142d6b0f1473ed1d57e8c9eedf8b257d2efecd064171ba0e88b8ba050b5ff
|