decision-circuits

Deterministic decision gates over calibrated model answers.

pip install decision-circuits          # no dependencies, Python 3.10+

The idea in one paragraph

Ask a model small, typed questions about a piece of state and get back probabilities, not prose. Then decide with code: thresholds, AND/OR/NOT, argmax with a confidence floor, majority votes, verification, ordinal buckets. That code is a decision circuit. The model never sees it, so the circuit is versionable, testable offline, and auditable per item: every result carries its probability, its outcome, and a trace. And when the probability sits too close to a threshold to call, the gate says so (abstain or escalate) instead of guessing.

Background: Attaining LLM Certainty with AI Decision Circuits.

Sixty seconds

from decision_circuits import Circuit, Q, argmax

c = Circuit()
c.noul("pii", "Does this text contain personal information about a private individual?")
c.noul("angry", "Is the writer angry?")
c.choice("dept", "Which team should handle this?", {"billing": "Money, refunds", "technical": "Bugs, outages", "other": None})

c.gate("redact", Q("pii") >= 0.7, on_uncertain="escalate")
c.gate("route", argmax("dept", min_confidence=0.3))
c.gate("human", (Q("angry") | Q("pii")) >= 0.6)

Now something has to answer the questions. Anything with one method will do:

from decision_circuits.backends import SystemOne

jev = SystemOne(api_key=TYPESAFE_API_KEY, model="jev-latest")  # TypeSafe's System One model
out = c.run(jev, "Card charged twice, refund NOW. My card ends in 4412.")

out["gates"]["redact"]
# {'value': True, 'p': 0.97, 'outcome': 'decided', 'trace': ['pii p=0.97'], ...}
out["gates"]["route"]
# {'value': 'billing', 'p': 1.0, 'confidence': 1.0, 'outcome': 'decided', ...}

No model handy? c.evaluate(answers) runs the gates on answers you already have, and examples/01_first_circuit.py does exactly that with hand-written numbers.

Where it plugs in

The point of a circuit is to sit inside an agent and make the small decisions the agent shouldn't be trusted with. Adapters exist for the three agent SDKs; each is a few lines over the same object.

from decision_circuits.integrations.langchain import CircuitToolGuard

guard = CircuitToolGuard(c, jev, gate="block", tools=[delete_file, send_email])
agent = create_agent(model, tools=[read_file, delete_file, send_email], middleware=[guard])

Compared with a single yes/no classifier at a fixed 0.5 (what langchain-typesafe's AutoModeMiddleware does), a circuit lets you combine several questions, set the threshold and its uncertainty band explicitly, and send the uncertain cases to a human rather than silently allowing or blocking them. See docs/integrations.md.

Backends

Circuits are built for System One models: models that answer typed questions with calibrated probabilities, in one pass, fast. That is what makes a threshold and a band mean something. The SystemOne backend talks to any server speaking the System One contract:

A backend is any object with answer(state, questions, *, model=None), so wrapping one (a cache, code-owned facts, a fallback) is a dozen lines: examples/03_your_own_backend.py.

The expression language

Every gate takes on_uncertain="abstain" | "escalate" | "default" (with default=value) and band=width. c.to_mermaid() draws it.

What changes the decision

Change the input, run the circuit again, and compare. Each intervention is Pearl's do(): the effect is measured, not explained after the fact, and it works on any backend.

from decision_circuits import drop, set_to

r = refund_circuit.intervene(
    api,
    ticket,
    {
        "no receipt": drop("receipt"),  # remove a field
        "vip": set_to("customer", "tier", "vip"),  # do(tier = "vip")
    },
)
r["effects"]["no receipt"]["flipped"]  # ['pay']: the gates whose decision changed
r["effects"]["vip"]["answers"]["desk"]  # {'option': 'general', 'p_before': 0.9, 'p_after': 0.1, 'dp': -0.8}

refund_circuit.ablate(api, ticket)  # remove each field (dict) or sentence (text) in turn

One backend call per intervention, plus one for the baseline (pass baseline= to reuse a run); workers sets how many run at once.

Several options, and pointing at the text

Circuit v2 models (circuit-1.7b v2.0 and later) answer two more kinds of question about a text state:

c.multi("issues", "Which problems does the customer report?", {"late": None, "damaged": None, "wrong_item": None})
c.locate("ask", "Which sentence says what they want?", none="the message never says")
c.gate("escalate", at_least(2, "issues"), on_uncertain="escalate")
c.gate("says_what", ~Q("ask")["none"] >= 0.5)

multi gives every option its own probability (none may apply, or all). locate points at a field, a list element or a sentence of the state, or at "none". See examples/13_what_v2_reads.py.

Tracing

With pip install "decision-circuits[otel]" and any OpenTelemetry SDK and exporter configured, every run is a span:

decision_circuits.run                  gen_ai.request.model, gen_ai.response.id, gen_ai.usage.input_tokens,
│                                      decision_circuits.escalated = ["pay"], decision_circuits.abstained = []
│   event decision_circuits.answer     question, type, pick, p           (one per answer; per option for a multi)
│   event decision_circuits.gate       gate, value, outcome, p, trace    (one per gate)
└── decision_circuits.backend          the model call

intervene and ablate add a decision_circuits.intervene span over one run per edited state, threads included. SystemOne sends traceparent, so a traced server joins the same trace. Circuits called inside LangChain, LangGraph or an agent SDK nest under that framework's spans. The state is never recorded; question ids, option names, probabilities and gate traces are. Without OpenTelemetry installed, nothing is imported and nothing is recorded.

Images and audio

The state can be a picture or a recording; the circuit does not change.

from decision_circuits import Audio, Circuit, Image, Q, argmax

out = receipt_circuit.run(api, Image("receipt.png"), model="circuit-vl-4b")
out = call_circuit.run(api, Audio("call.wav", text="Inbound, Tuesday"), model="circuit-audio-7b")

Image and Audio take a path, a URL, or bytes, plus an optional caption, and are sent as {"image": <data URI>, "text": ...}. See examples/12_images_and_audio.py.

Examples

Numbered, each self-contained, in examples/:

1. a circuit with hand-written answers (offline)
2. the same circuit answered by Jev
3. writing a backend (offline)
4. LangChain tool guard
5. OpenAI Agents guardrails
6. Claude Agent SDK hook
7. integrating a framework that has no adapter (offline)
8. a refund desk: seven questions, six gates, code-owned facts mixed with model judgments, five tickets routed to four queues (offline or Jev)
9. the refund desk answered by Claude, stated versus sampled probabilities
10. the refund desk answered through OpenAI-compatible logprobs (OpenAI, Fireworks, vLLM)
11. the article's water-utility call center: the two-parser, negative-checker circuit from Attaining LLM Certainty with AI Decision Circuits, on its original 100 calls, with the article's confidence tiers and cost model

Docs

• docs/concepts.md: questions, answers, gates, uncertainty, the trace
• docs/integrations.md: each SDK adapter and what "ask" means there
• docs/extending.md: backends, gate ops, adapters

Status

0.4.x, alpha. The wire format is TypeSafe's POST /v1/systemone request plus a gates block, and for the vision and audio models a media state. MIT. See CHANGELOG.md.

Changed in 0.3.0: Circuit.run takes a backend, not an HTTP client. Where 0.2 wrote c.run(httpx.Client(), state, url=..., headers=...), write c.run(SystemOne(url, api_key=...), state). The full server response (usage, model) is on SystemOne.last_response. The core no longer depends on pydantic.