Skip to main content

densely

Lossless context compression for LLMs. Pack any text into 2x–8x fewer tokens with guaranteed byte-exact reconstruction — verified by sha256 on every decompress.

demo

An o200k token can carry up to ~17.6 bits of information, but typical code occupies tokens at only ~5–6 bits each. densely reclaims the difference:

text -> lzma -> 16-bit chunks -> 65,536 single-token English words

Each carrier word (" the", " of", …) costs exactly 1 token — the o200k pre-tokenizer never merges across word boundaries — so every token in the payload carries 2 bytes of compressed data (16 of the ~17.6 theoretically available bits, 91% of channel capacity).

Benchmarks

Reproduce with python3 bench.py (fixed seeds, stdlib code sample):

Scenario Backend Tokens (o200k) Ratio Saved
Code (argparse.py + densely) lzma 21,659 → 10,726 2.02x 50.5%
Code (same sample) neural 21,659 → 2,538 8.53x 88.3%
Code never seen by the model neural 3,433 → 472 7.27x 86.3%
JSON (code search, 100 hits) lzma 15,465 → 1,995 7.75x 87.1%
Logs (SRE incident, ~1600 ln) lzma 117,766 → 16,962 6.94x 85.6%

The neural backend (--backend neural, python3 bench.py --neural) drives an integer arithmetic coder with next-token probabilities from Qwen2.5-Coder-0.5B, NNCP-style batched across segments. The 88.3% figure benefits from the model having seen Python's stdlib during training; the 86.3% row is this repo's own sources — code that did not exist before 2026-08-08 — and is the honest number for novel code (~0.56 bit/byte).

For comparison, Headroom reports 15–20% savings for coding agents and 60–95% on JSON — achieved by dropping content from context, with originals kept in a local cache with a TTL. densely keeps the full data in the context itself, restorable byte-for-byte with no external storage and no expiry.

Lossless compression below the entropy of the data is mathematically impossible (Shannon; see also Fundamental Limits of Prompt Compression) — within that bound, densely sits near the practical ceiling for a deterministic, CPU-only method.

Usage

pip install "densely[mcp]"
# extras: [neural] for the neural backend (torch + transformers)

densely compress  big_context.txt -o payload.dense
densely compress  src.py -o payload.dense --backend neural
densely decompress payload.dense   -o restored.txt   # byte-identical
densely stats     file1.py file2.json                # token savings

Library:

from densely import compress, decompress

payload = compress(text)        # ~2x-8x fewer tokens
assert decompress(payload) == text  # always true, sha256-checked

compress via the CLI self-verifies the round trip before writing output; decompress raises ValueError on any corruption or hash mismatch.

Use it in Claude Code / Cursor (MCP)

# Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user densely -- "$(which densely-mcp)"

# Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and other MCP clients
{"mcpServers": {"densely": {"command": "/absolute/path/to/densely-mcp"}}}

Three tools:

  • compress_file(path) — agent calls this instead of reading a large log/JSON/dump: gets a preview + dense payload at 2x-8x fewer tokens.
  • compress_text(text) — same for a big tool output already in hand.
  • expand(payload | payload_file, start_line, end_line) — exact original back, sha256-verified; line ranges let the agent pay only for the slice it needs.

Small payloads are returned inline and live in the conversation itself, so exact data survives context compaction and session export. Payloads too large for MCP tool-output limits are written to a .dense sidecar file next to the original and expanded by path — a plain text file you can commit, ship, or archive; no cache, no TTL, nothing to expire.

Automatic mode (hook)

Zero-effort savings: a PostToolUse hook compresses every large tool output (Bash output, Read of non-code files, >= 5,000 tokens) on the fly — the agent sees a preview + stats, exact content stays available via search/expand, and every replacement is recorded in a savings ledger (stats tool, or the running total shown in each replacement).

Add to ~/.claude/settings.json (absolute paths — hooks run outside your shell PATH):

{
  "hooks": {
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Read|Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "/absolute/path/to/densely-hook",
        "timeout": 30
      }]
    }]
  }
}

(which densely-hook after install gives the absolute path — hooks run outside your shell PATH, so absolute paths only.)

Tune with DENSELY_HOOK_MIN_TOKENS (default 5000). Code files the agent is editing are never touched.

When it saves tokens (and when it doesn't)

Agent sessions resend the whole history to the API on every turn, so anything sitting in context is paid for again and again. What densely does to each kind of content:

Content in context Savings Why
Code the agent is actively editing none — don't compress it the agent must read it; payloads are unreadable
Reference code (read once, kept "just in case") 20–40% exact copy stays cheap; expand a line range when needed
Tool outputs: logs, JSON, dumps 78–87% the agent never needed all 1,500 lines — preview + targeted expand covers it
Anything that must survive compaction indirect payloads pass through compaction verbatim; summaries don't

Note on prompt caching: cached history is cheaper, but the context window stays the same size — densely primarily buys you room, then money.

vs. Headroom

Headroom and densely make opposite trade-offs:

  • Headroom is lossy-but-readable: AST skeletons for code, sampled JSON — the model can still read what remains, so it also saves 15–20% on code the agent is actively using (densely saves nothing there). Originals live in a local cache with a TTL; if the cache is gone, the agent silently works from a skeleton it believes is the full file.
  • densely is lossless-but-unreadable: nothing is dropped, recovery is byte-exact and sha256-verified, payloads live in the conversation (or a plain .dense file) — surviving compaction, session export, and machine moves. The cost: the model can't read a payload, so it only helps for content the agent doesn't need to read in full.

Different philosophies: maximum savings with silent degradation vs. exactness or nothing. Pick per content type — or use both.

The honest caveats

  • The payload is not readable — by humans or by the model. It looks like a stream of random English words. Use it as a dense carrier for exact data (chat history, tool outputs, source files) alongside a readable summary; expand it with a tool call when exact content is needed.
  • Savings depend on redundancy: highly repetitive data (JSON, logs) compresses 7x+, dense prose ~1.5–2x, already-compressed or random data ~0% (payload is never larger than a few header tokens worse than raw input — check stats before shipping).
  • Token counts are measured with the o200k tokenizer. Other tokenizers share the single-token-word property but need their own alphabet scan.
  • Neural backend caveats: slow (~85 KB of code takes minutes on Apple Silicon vs milliseconds for lzma) and requires torch + a ~1 GB model download on first use. Reconstruction is bit-exact only when decompression runs the same model/software stack as compression — which is why compress(backend="neural") verifies the full round trip before returning and silently falls back to lzma on any mismatch. The 100% guarantee never rests on the neural path.

Densely Pro (coming)

The library is MIT and stays free. We're building a managed tier for teams running agents in production:

  • Cloud neural compression — 86% on code without a local GPU
  • Managed proxy — savings with zero code changes
  • Team dashboard — token savings per agent, per day, in dollars
  • Cross-machine payloads — compress in CI, expand anywhere

Join the waitlist → (early access + founding-user pricing)

Roadmap

  • Cross-machine determinism for the neural backend (integer/fixed-point inference or a mismatch-tolerant coder), so payloads compressed on one machine decompress on another.
  • Larger/faster models via llama.cpp for better ratios at higher speed.

Tests

python3 -m pytest tests/test_core.py tests/test_mcp.py   # fast suites
python3 -m pytest tests/test_neural.py                   # slow (~1 min): real LLM round trips

Fast suite: byte-exact round-trips (unicode, CJK, emoji, random bytes, payload-lookalike inputs), tamper detection, carrier-alphabet density. Neural suite: single- and multi-segment round trips, no-silent-fallback, beats-lzma check.

Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

densely-0.1.1.tar.gz (21.9 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

densely-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl (17.3 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file densely-0.1.1.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: densely-0.1.1.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 21.9 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.12.6

File hashes

Hashes for densely-0.1.1.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 28d6c2823d5e308b5e4cad8ecd5c729c6eabbdb91dcf554d2eb93b736bc75f64
MD5 ff5c81a373a7bb3da63b63d10a34f67f
BLAKE2b-256 ff9118f2eefb8ea70d56042033c49f5ef988cd9be81cc3c282c64254a7ea7343

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file densely-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: densely-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 17.3 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.12.6

File hashes

Hashes for densely-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 99a5ed2a37a84edf0854b2ac5eeb23f98215ac384fffedf9311af675901c8c7a
MD5 9f089bd2af6f3d15a8918dff77300d6d
BLAKE2b-256 7f0ed25d48ed84565ab5c99ab808e176622120f102867cbfed3dfce47d056091

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page