Skip to main content

DepTrail

Time-axis forensics for npm supply-chain incidents — did we install it, did it actually run, and what must be rotated?

PyPI Python License

When a supply-chain attack hits npm (Shai-Hulud, chalk/debug, TanStack, Keyv, ...), every organization asks the same three questions the morning after the IOC drops:

  1. Did any of our repos install the compromised version during the attack window?
  2. Did it actually run — in a CI build — or did it just sit in a lockfile?
  3. Which secrets were in scope at that time and must be rotated?

Current-state scanners answer a different question — "are we infected now?". DepTrail answers "were we hit then, and what must be rotated?" by walking the full git history of your lockfiles, correlating it with CI run records, and grading every repo with evidence:

CONFIRMED / LIKELY / POSSIBLE / NO EVIDENCE

Try it in ten seconds

No token, no network, no waiting — the bundled demo builds a mock infection and judges it with the production code path:

pip install deptrail          # Python 3.10+, no dependencies
deptrail demo                 # writes .deptrail-demo/ here; --workdir puts it elsewhere
built 4 synthetic demo repositories in .deptrail-demo (not a real incident)
advisory GHSA-demo-0000-0000 — Demo incident — chalk compromised
scanned 4 repo(s); worst grade CONFIRMED
installable windows (one per judgment)
  chalk@5.6.1: 2025-11-24T00:00:00+00:00 → 2025-11-26T23:59:59+00:00
    provenance: start operator-supplied from https://example.test/demo-advisory; end
        operator-supplied from https://example.test/demo-advisory

timeline
  [LIKELY     ] docs-site: chalk@5.6.1 in package-lock.json 2025-11-25 12:00 → still pinned
                run 4415 (Docs, push) built 62741f22 at 2025-11-25T13:00:00+00:00, while 5.6.1 was still served, but the workflows at that commit install no dependencies
  [CONFIRMED  ] api-server: chalk@5.6.1 in package-lock.json 2025-11-25 14:30 → 2025-11-28 09:00
                run 4412 (CI, push) built 54676c71 at 2025-11-25T15:30:00+00:00, while 5.6.1 was still served by the registry
                the workflows at that commit install dependencies, so 5.6.1 executed

rotate (3 credential(s))
  [CONFIRMED  ] api-server: DEPLOY_KEY (run 4412) — named in .github/workflows/ci.yml at
                54676c71 (covers chalk@5.6.1)
  [CONFIRMED  ] api-server: NPM_TOKEN (run 4412) — named in .github/workflows/ci.yml at 54676c71
                (covers chalk@5.6.1)
  [LIKELY     ] docs-site: ALGOLIA_KEY [DEVELOPER] — pinned in package-lock.json, and no
                implicated run could have installed it — so any install happened outside CI;
                Actions secrets are not automatically present on a developer machine, but the
                same values often are, so investigate that machine's credentials as well (covers
                chalk@5.6.1)

not judged (no lockfile this tool can read)
  mobile-app: yarn.lock: Yarn lockfiles are not parsed yet, so the versions this tree installed were not judged

this scan cannot prove absence of exposure

Four repositories, four different answers. api-server holds a third secret the CI workflow never reads, so it is not on the list. web-frontend never held the version while the registry served it, so it is absent from the report entirely. mobile-app is locked with Yarn, which this version cannot parse — so it is named as unread rather than cleared, and it raises no credentials, because nothing about it suggests one.

Each line of the rotation list ends with the versions it covers, which is how one credential stays one line: an advisory naming 180 packages — the September 2025 Shai-Hulud wave named roughly that many — would otherwise repeat the same entry 180 times, once per package.

Exit codes split verdicts from non-verdicts, so a caller knows whether to act, to retry, or to fix something:

code meaning what to do
0 absence of exposure was established nothing
1 credentials to rotate act on the list
2 looked, and could not prove absence deepen the clone, or investigate by hand
3 the request was malformed fix the arguments or the advisory
4 the tool could not run retry; a tool or an API call failed

How it differs from existing tools

Capability Dependabot worm-sign DepTrail
Current lockfile malware check ✅ ✅ byproduct
Heuristic / payload detection ✖ ✅ ✖ (their domain)
Attack-window exposure from lockfile git history ✖ ✖ ✅ core
CI run correlation ("did it actually execute?") ✖ ✖ ✅ core
Org-wide incident timeline current only ✖ ✅
Secrets rotation scope & checklist ✖ ✖ ✅
Evidence grading ✖ ✖ ✅

Upstream IOC feeds (OSV malicious-packages, vendor advisories, wormsign.io) are inputs, not competitors. They are not yet readable inputs: DepTrail accepts advisories in its own schema and rejects anything else outright, so today you transcribe one with deptrail advisory init. An importer is #10.

Real use

On incident day, start from the advisory — it is the only thing you have to write:

--id is the advisory's own id, never one you invent, and --end-unknown records that no registry publishes a removal time — see below.

deptrail advisory init \
  --id GHSA-... \
  --name "chalk compromised" \
  --package chalk --version 5.6.1 \
  --start 2025-11-24T00:00:00+00:00 \
  --end-unknown \
  --source https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-... \
  --output incident.json

# Check it before a verdict depends on it.
deptrail advisory validate incident.json

init fills exactly what you give it and leaves the rest as REPLACE-ME, which the loader rejects by name — an advisory with blanks must not validate, because a half-filled one would produce a confident CLEAN. Nothing is derived: the identifier in particular is asked for rather than invented, since there has been more than one chalk incident and the report keys its verdict on that field.

--end-unknown writes "end": null, which is usually the truth — no registry records when a version stopped being served, so the window's right edge is not a fact anyone holds. Pass --end only for a removal time somebody actually recorded; the advisory's own publication time is not it, and using that hides everyone who installed in the gap. And init will not accept silence for either: leave both out and the blank stands, because a forgotten flag must not become a window that never closes.

The template carries the definition of the window in the file itself, because that is the field most easily transcribed wrong and getting it backwards makes every scan report clean. Full format in docs/ioc-format.md.

Then judge:

deptrail scan --ioc incident.json --org my-org          # clone and judge an org
deptrail scan --ioc incident.json --repo . --no-ci      # one local clone, no token
deptrail scan --ioc incident.json --org my-org --format html --output report.html
deptrail feeds                                          # bundled advisories

As a GitHub Action:

- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: Official-Space-AI/deptrail@v0.1.1
  with:
    ioc: advisories/shai-hulud.json
    report: deptrail-report.html

The action installs the version it is pinned to, so the ref you write is the code that runs. It fails the job when credentials need rotating, and always fails when the scan could not run at all — a green check must never mean "we could not look".

How it decides

Limitations

What the tool cannot do, it says out loud — a scan that could not look must never read as a scan that found nothing.

  • npm lockfiles only. package-lock.json and npm-shrinkwrap.json are parsed. A tree locked with Yarn, pnpm, Bun or Deno is reported as not judged, exits 2, and produces no rotation list — neither cleared nor accused (#17).
  • A package.json with no lockfile is not yet reported. Such a tree resolves ranges fresh at install time, so what it installed is unknown, but deciding which lockfile governed which directory when needs npm's workspace rules and is tracked separately (#22).
  • An incomplete clone cannot be cleared. Shallow (actions/checkout is depth-1 by default) and single-branch clones are detected, named, and reported as exit 2. Use a full clone with fetch-depth: 0, or accept the gap deliberately with --allow-incomplete-history — off by default, and it still prints the reason. A partial clone (--filter=blob:none) is fine as long as its blobs can be fetched; any snapshot that could not be read is listed instead.
  • A one-branch fetch cannot be told from a full clone. git init + git fetch origin <branch> keeps a wildcard refspec, so a branch that was never fetched looks like a branch that does not exist. Deciding this needs the remote's ref list (#27).
  • A pull-request run installed a tree that is in no branch. GitHub synthesises refs/pull/N/merge for pull_request events, and it is reachable from no ref in a normal clone, so what such a run installed is currently graded from the head commit instead (#25).
  • Submodules are not crossed. git log does not descend into a gitlink, so a Node project inside a submodule is invisible (#21).
  • CI evidence is bounded by retention. GitHub keeps run records for about 90 days; older incidents can reach LIKELY but not CONFIRMED.
  • Secret values are never visible, only names — so the report tells you what to rotate, not what leaked.
  • Advisories are an input, not a feature. One example feed ships with the package; an importer that derives windows from registry publish times is #10.

Status

🏗 Built for the 2026 Korea Open Source Developer Contest, and under active development. Released on PyPI as deptrail. deptrail --version names the version that is installed, so an answer can be reproduced with pip install deptrail==<version> — reports do not yet carry the version that wrote them (#53).

Releases are published straight from a tag by release.yml over OIDC trusted publishing — no API token exists to leak, and every artifact carries a PEP 740 attestation tying it to the commit and workflow that built it. Nothing is uploaded until the build proves the wheel installs into an empty environment, opens every bundled feed, and produces the demo's rotation list.

한국어 요약

npm 공급망 침해 사건(예: Shai-Hulud 웜)이 터진 다음 날 아침, 각 조직이 수작업으로 하던 조사 — "우리 레포가 공격 기간에 감염 버전을 설치했나 → 실제로 CI에서 실행됐나 → 어떤 시크릿을 재발급해야 하나" — 를 lockfile의 git 이력과 CI 실행 기록을 교차 대조해 증거 등급(확정/개연성 높음/가능성 있음/증거 없음)과 함께 자동 판정하는 도구입니다. "지금 감염돼 있나"를 보는 기존 스캐너(Dependabot, worm-sign)와 달리 과거의 시간축을 재구성합니다.

License

Apache-2.0

Metadata

Release files for deptrail 0.1.1

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for deptrail 0.1.1
File Size Uploaded
deptrail-0.1.1.tar.gz 153.8 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for deptrail 0.1.1
File Interpreter ABI Platform
deptrail-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 236.4 kB

Release files / deptrail-0.1.1.tar.gz

Download URL deptrail-0.1.1.tar.gz
Size 153.8 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
4d4bbe8b3ef4c25ecf6600dc1cfa28842bb2bda3c73eac04ac9fc71aabe6712e
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
d99b278252247ee4d2954e1e7eccbad02a917ea8ee88ab22af986b72db405df4
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 19, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / deptrail-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL deptrail-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
Size 82.5 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5ba22bbb9645493ca7a20eaf68f4710343d178f80d2b2fbd9e2c2f23f9d34632
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ca6f756dd98742e83d38d4f5f6a7ab986aaa25043c89464005e5d6154f7acbf8
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Aug 19, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.2.0

2 release files

This release

0.1.1 This release

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page