Dev Charter
Know what your product does, which code delivers it, and what is proven — in one spreadsheet.
Dev Charter keeps a plain-English record of every feature your product promises, links each one to the code that builds it and the tests that prove it, and turns that into a spreadsheet a founder, product manager or executive can read in five minutes. It is built for teams who write software with Claude Code, where code now arrives faster than anyone can read it.
Status: 0.1, the first working release. Built and tested with Claude Code. Feedback and issues are welcome on GitHub.
The problem
AI coding agents let a small team build a large product quickly. The cost shows up later:
- Nobody can say what the product actually does today. The code is there, but the answer to "can a customer do X yet, and how do we know?" takes a day of reading or an engineer's opinion.
- Code grows that no one can explain. Tens of thousands of lines appear, and no one can point to which customer need each part serves, or whether any of it is still needed.
- Plans pile up as documents. Designs, reviews and decision notes multiply until they are longer than the code and too long to read.
- "Done" means "the agent said so." Status is claimed, not proven, and it goes stale the moment the next change lands.
- Scope drifts quietly. Each "while I'm here" improvement looks reasonable on its own; together they build a different product than the one you planned.
What you get
For founders and product owners
- One page that answers "where are we?" Every feature, in plain English, with its status, in a spreadsheet at the root of your project. No technical knowledge needed to read it.
- Features written the way customers think. Each one reads "As a customer, I want to … with … so that …", followed by what "done" means in plain words. You review the product, not the code.
- Status you can trust. A feature only moves to Built when its checks pass, and only to Proven when a named person has seen it work on real data and signed it off. Status is never typed in: it is worked out from the checks and the sign-offs, and every sign-off records who and when.
- Early warning. A feature that used to work and now fails is flagged At risk the next time the spreadsheet is generated, before a customer finds it.
- Control over what gets built. Every piece of work names the feature it serves. Ideas that don't serve an agreed feature are captured in one list for you to decide on later, instead of quietly becoming code.
For executives, investors and customers
- A summary you can share. Features by area and status, the share that is proven, and what changed this week.
- Claims backed by evidence. Every "this works" points to the checks behind it and the date it was last proven.
- Release readiness at a glance. See which features in a release are proven, which are built but unproven, and which haven't started.
For engineers and AI coding agents
- Every task is tied to a customer need. The agent knows which feature and which checks its work serves, and what is out of bounds.
- Code that explains itself. Each module carries a short tag naming the feature it serves. The Code map shows every module, the features behind it, and the code that serves nothing: candidates to justify or remove.
- Decisions made once. One decisions log, plain-English summary first, so settled questions are not reopened in every session.
- Clean handoffs. Each session ends with where it stopped and the exact next step, so the next session, or the next person, starts without guessing.
Before and after
| Question | Without Dev Charter | With Dev Charter |
|---|---|---|
| Is this feature done? | Ask someone, get an opinion | Open the spreadsheet: calculated status and last proven date |
| Why does this code exist? | Read it, or guess | The Code map names the feature it serves |
| What code serves nothing? | Nobody knows | Listed as Unexplained code |
| What did we decide, and why? | Spread across chats and documents | One decisions log |
| What changed this week? | A status report someone writes by hand | Generated after every commit |
| Did the agent stay on task? | Find out in code review | Work that serves no feature is flagged before you commit |
What a feature looks like
F-014 · Area: Orders and delivery · Priority: Must · Release: Spring launch
As a customer of an online store
I want to see where my order is and when it will arrive
With the current step (packed, shipped, out for delivery), the expected delivery date,
and a text message when it is out for delivery
Must also load in under 2 seconds on a phone · show me only my own orders
So that I don't have to contact support to ask where my package is
Done means
a. Every order shows its current step and expected delivery date
b. A text message is sent when the order goes out for delivery
c. Opening someone else's order shows a sign-in page, never their order
Status Built: 3 of 3 checks passing (calculated)
Built in shop-api: orders/status.py · notifications/sms.py (found in the code)
Proven by 7 automated checks (7 passed) · results of 24 Oct 10:42
1 sign-off by Joji John
Decisions DEC-001 (delivery dates come from the carrier, never guessed)
You write the top half, or ask your agent to. Dev Charter fills in the bottom half from the code and the test results.
Statuses: Idea → Agreed → Being built → Built → Proven → Live, plus At risk, Parked and Retired.
Promises are product-wide rules that apply to many features, such as "customers only ever see their own orders and details" or "the price shown is always the price charged". They get their own rows and their own checks.
How it works
Dev Charter has three layers. You can use the first two on their own.
- The Ledger: what and why. One short text file per feature, promise and decision, kept in your repository. People and agents write these.
- The Trace: where and how do we know. A one-line tag in each module (
serves: F-014) and the feature's ID in each test's name (test_F014_b_text_sent) link code and tests back to features. Dev Charter scans your repositories, in any language, and reads test results in JUnit XML, which pytest and most test runners write (Jest and Go through a small add-on). - The Workflow: how the agent works. Task cards that name the feature they serve, a plan → review → prove → build → ship loop, one list for parked ideas, and a handoff on each card.
dev-charter report combines all three into LEDGER.xlsx and a one-page status.html. They are rebuilt after every
commit, on demand, and in CI, and never edited by hand, so they cannot drift from the truth.
Built for Claude Code
Dev Charter's rules live in your repository, in AGENTS.md, which Claude Code reads every time it opens the project,
so every teammate's sessions follow them. The full guide for each stage comes from the installed Dev Charter
(dev-charter guide plan), so every project gets the same guides and upgrading Dev Charter upgrades them everywhere. The
Dev Charter plugin adds commands such as /dev-charter:feature and /dev-charter:plan, and Strict mode.
Other AI coding tools that read AGENTS.md are planned for a later release; this release is tested with Claude
Code only.
The spreadsheet
| Tab | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Summary | Features by area and status, share proven, what changed this week |
| Features | One row per feature, the main view |
| Promises | Product-wide rules and their status |
| Code map | Each module and the features it serves, linked to the file on GitHub; unexplained code flagged |
| Work in progress | The open task cards on teammates' branches, before they merge |
| Decisions | Every decision, plain English first |
| Ideas | Everything parked for later |
Choose how strict to be
| Mode | When Dev Charter checks | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Light | In CI, after work is merged | Prototypes, adding Dev Charter to an existing project gradually, teams without AI agents |
| Standard | Before each commit | Everyday work where a person reviews and commits |
| Strict | At every file change: Claude Code is blocked from writing outside its task | Long unattended agent runs, several agents at once, shared core code |
Switch modes with one line in charter.toml (then dev-charter sync), or turn Strict on in your own clone for an
unattended run with /dev-charter:strict on.
Working as a team
Every feature, promise, decision and task card is its own small file, so people on different branches rarely touch the same one, and Dev Charter takes care of the rest:
- IDs never collide once you have fetched. A new ID comes after every ID ever used on any branch git knows about,
and is never reused. If two people still pick the same one,
dev-charter renumber F-017moves one of them, with every reference to it, and the pull-request check refuses a reused ID before it reaches your main branch. - No merge conflicts in the charter. Each task card keeps its own handoff, and parked ideas merge line by line.
- See work before it merges. The Work in progress tab, and
dev-charter status, list the open task cards on every teammate's branch, so neither people nor agents start work someone else is already doing. - The product owner approves product changes.
dev-charter init --owner @namemakes any pull request that changes a feature, a promise or a decision need that person's approval (turn on GitHub's "Require review from Code Owners" for your main branch). - One ledger for the team.
dev-charter ciwrites a GitHub workflow that, on each pull request, posts a plain-English summary of what it changes in the product and stops it on a reused ID or untagged new code; and, after each merge, runs the tests and puts the team'sLEDGER.xlsxandstatus.htmlon aledgerbranch.
Joining a team: after cloning, run dev-charter sync once. It installs the commit checks in your clone (git does
not copy them), and CI checks every pull request either way.
Getting started
1. Install Dev Charter (once per machine, in a terminal):
uv tool install dev-charter
2. Add the Dev Charter plugin (once per machine, inside Claude Code):
/plugin marketplace add joji-opensource/charter
/plugin install dev-charter@dev-charter
3. Set up your project (open Claude Code in your project folder):
/dev-charter:init
Claude asks six questions (product name, areas, user roles, how strict to be, the branch work merges into, and who
approves product changes) and sets everything up. Prefer the terminal? dev-charter init asks the same questions.
4. Work
/dev-charter:feature As a customer I want to save products for later …
/dev-charter:status where are we?
LEDGER.xlsx and status.html are rebuilt after every commit; dev-charter report rebuilds them any time. For the team's view on GitHub, run
dev-charter ci once and commit the workflow it writes.
So that statuses include your tests, have your test runner write JUnit XML (with pytest:
pytest --junitxml=reports/junit.xml) and tell Dev Charter where, with results = ["reports/*.xml"] in
charter.toml. Name each test after the check it proves: test_F014_b_text_sent.
/dev-charter:init adds only your product's own content to your project: a charter.toml settings file, a charter/
folder with your features, promises, decisions, ideas and task cards, a short marked section in AGENTS.md, two lines
in .gitignore and .gitattributes, and git hooks that check each commit and refresh the spreadsheet. It never
overwrites a hook you already have. Framework code never lives in your repository; upgrading Dev Charter upgrades every project that uses
it.
What Dev Charter is not
- Not a task tracker. It does not replace Jira, Linear or ClickUp for scheduling work. It records what the product promises and whether each promise is kept.
- Not a test framework. It reads the results of the tests you already run.
- Not tied to a language, stack or cloud. Anything that can carry a comment and produce JUnit XML works.
License
Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE and NOTICE.
If you redistribute Dev Charter or a modified version, keep the LICENSE file, the copyright notices and the NOTICE file, as the License requires.
Metadata
Release files for dev-charter 0.1.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dev_charter-0.1.0.tar.gz | 110.5 kB | With provenance | Details for dev_charter-0.1.0.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dev_charter-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for dev_charter-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 189.1 kB
Release files / dev_charter-0.1.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | dev_charter-0.1.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 110.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d026f9f2857c0da5652370d5e05317b09fcfd90608be9baa45154afd77a84b0b
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
9429a2d4948db689d850d66e3fad22ff5577d34ec4a49c4b7c03d205641bb741
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / dev_charter-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | dev_charter-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 78.6 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
090f84a7314cd610ab919ae0f01b6c26fe5b782acd96843982a28cf640637f51
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
f985c8d6e78bb8e3bd8881366bb476d701e05069e3ee5e89ecf36c6e66889db1
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for dev-charter 0.1.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for dev_charter-0.1.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.