Async-native dependency injection framework based on type hints
Project description
DIBox
⚠️ Project Status: Early Development
This library is in its early stages. The design and API are not yet fully established and may change significantly in future releases. Feedback, suggestions, and contributions are very welcome!
DIBox is an async-native dependency injection container for Python. It builds and manages object graphs from standard type hints, removing factory and wiring boilerplate.
Concrete classes can be constructed automatically; explicit bindings supply configuration, choose implementations, or define factories. DIBox also coordinates startup and reverse-order teardown for managed resources.
Installation
pip install dibox
Requires Python 3.11+.
Key Features
- Auto-Wiring: Type-annotated constructors are resolved and injected automatically — no factory boilerplate.
- Async‑Native: Async factories, async context managers, and async lifecycle hooks all work out of the box.
- Lifecycle Management: Resources start and clean up automatically. DIBox recognizes context managers, generator factories and
start/closeconventions. - Context-aware
@inject: Decorate at import time, resolve at call time from the active container — no container reference at the call site. - Flexible Bindings: Interfaces, instances, sync/async factories, named dependencies, and predicate-based bindings.
- Missing-Binding Policy: Choose whether unbound roots and dependencies may be created implicitly, with allow and deny rules for trusted types and packages.
- Non‑Invasive: Works with any class using type hints — third-party SDKs, dataclasses, attrs — no wrappers or base classes required.
- Modular: Group bindings into reusable
BindingBoxmodules. Compose, override, and share across workers, tests, and entry points. - Typed API: Fully type-annotated — works seamlessly with type checkers and IDE autocompletion.
QuickStart
DIBox requires almost no setup. Define your classes as usual — whether you use standard Python classes with __init__, dataclasses, or attrs models.
1. Define your application as usual
Just use type hints to declare dependencies, no DI boilerplate needed.
import asyncio
class Credentials:
def __init__(self, username: str):
self.username = username
class Database:
def __init__(self, creds: Credentials):
self.creds = creds
class Service:
def __init__(self, db: Database):
self.db = db
async def start(self):
await asyncio.sleep(0.05) # simulate warm-up
print("Service started")
async def close(self):
await asyncio.sleep(0.05) # simulate cleanup
print("Service closed")
def run(self):
print("Service is running...")
DIBox detects and manages lifecycle hooks automatically. Service uses start()/close() — one of several supported patterns covered in Resource Lifecycle.
2. Wire and Run
Only bind what DIBox can't infer — here, a configured Credentials instance because DIBox should not invent a value for its username: str parameter.
from dibox import DIBox
box = DIBox()
box.bind(Credentials, Credentials(username="admin")) # configured instance: bind it explicitly
async def main():
async with box: # activate the container
service = await box.provide(Service) # build the graph and call Service.start()
service.run()
# Service.close() is called automatically on exit
asyncio.run(main())
The binding supplies the configured Credentials. With the default "open" policy, DIBox infers how to construct Database and Service from their constructor annotations.
For framework entry points — FastAPI routes, CLI commands — @inject is the idiomatic choice. Decoration happens at module load time; resolution happens at call time from whichever container is active:
from dibox import DIBox, Injected, inject
app_box = DIBox()
app_box.bind(Credentials, Credentials(username="admin"))
@inject # Injected[T] marks the parameter for injection
async def run_service(service: Injected[Service]):
service.run()
async def run():
async with app_box: # make app_box active in this async context
await run_service() # resolve and inject Service automatically
asyncio.run(run())
Next step: The quickstart uses the default
"open"policy, where eligible unbound concrete types are created automatically. Use"explicit-roots"to declare the container's entrypoints while retaining inferred internals, or"closed"to require allow rules for inferred dependencies. See Missing-Binding Policy.
Usage Guide
Using Decorators for Injection
Decorators allow injecting dependencies into entry points — API routes, CLI commands, Lambda handlers — without cluttering call sites. A key feature: @inject rewrites the function's runtime signature, removing Injected[T] parameters. Frameworks that inspect signatures at import/routing time only see your "real" parameters (path/query args, request objects, etc.).
DIBox offers two options with different container-selection behavior.
1. @inject — context-based (idiomatic)
The recommended default. Apply @inject at module level — no container reference needed at decoration time. At call time, it resolves dependencies from whichever DIBox is active via async with box:. Because the active container is stored in a ContextVar, it is isolated per async task and per OS thread — there is no process-wide global, and concurrent requests each see their own container.
from dibox import inject, Injected
@inject
async def get_report(report_id: str, svc: Injected[ReportService]) -> Report:
return await svc.fetch(report_id)
This pairs naturally with framework lifespans. The async with box: that starts your container also establishes the injection context for all @inject-decorated functions:
from contextlib import asynccontextmanager
from fastapi import FastAPI
from dibox import DIBox, inject, Injected
box = DIBox()
box.bind(Database, factory=create_database)
@asynccontextmanager
async def lifespan(app: FastAPI):
async with box:
yield # app runs here; @inject resolves from box
app = FastAPI(lifespan=lifespan)
@app.get("/report/{report_id}")
@inject
async def get_report(report_id: str, db: Injected[Database]):
return await db.fetch_report(report_id)
FastAPI sees get_report(report_id: str) — the injected db parameter is invisible to the framework.
2. @box.inject — explicit container
When you want injection tied to a specific container instance rather than the active context, use @box.inject. Unlike @inject, it ignores the ContextVar entirely — the container is captured at decoration time and always used, regardless of which container is active at call time.
local_box = DIBox()
@local_box.inject
async def specific_handler(service: Injected[Service]):
...
Useful when you have multiple concurrent containers, in integration tests where you want injection to be explicit, or when you simply prefer the container reference visible at the call site.
For advanced use cases (custom container resolution strategies, enforcing architectural layers), the underlying Injector class is available directly. It accepts either a container instance or a container_resolver callable and exposes the same .inject decorator.
Resource Lifecycle
DIBox acts as the coordinator for resource startup and teardown. All managed instances are started when first provided and torn down in reverse order (LIFO) when the container exits:
async with box:
setup_bindings(box)
await run()
# All managed resources are torn down here, in reverse order of creation
Class-based resources
For class instances, DIBox detects lifecycle hooks automatically after construction. The detection priority is:
- Async context manager (
__aenter__/__aexit__) - Sync context manager (
__enter__/__exit__) start/close/acloseconvention — sync or async, detected by name
class DatabaseClient:
async def start(self):
self.conn = await engine.connect()
async def close(self):
await self.conn.close()
# DIBox calls start() after construction and close() on container exit
db = await box.provide(DatabaseClient)
Factory-based teardown
When setup and teardown belong together, generator factories keep them co-located. DIBox injects the yielded value and runs the post-yield code when the container exits.
from contextlib import contextmanager, asynccontextmanager
@contextmanager
def create_db_session(engine: Engine) -> Iterator[Session]:
session = engine.connect()
try:
yield session
finally:
session.close()
@asynccontextmanager
async def create_http_client(settings: Settings) -> AsyncIterator[httpx.AsyncClient]:
async with httpx.AsyncClient(base_url=settings.api_url) as client:
yield client
box.bind(Session, create_db_session)
box.bind(httpx.AsyncClient, create_http_client)
Plain generator functions (without the decorator) are also accepted — DIBox wraps them automatically — but the explicit decorator is recommended for clarity.
Binding Patterns
DIBox shines when you need precise control over object creation. You can mix and match these patterns to handle everything from cloud clients to dynamic configuration.
Binding Interfaces & Instances
You can bind a base class to a concrete implementation or a specific instance.
from dibox import DIBox
box = DIBox()
azure_credentials = DefaultAzureCredential()
# Any request for TokenCredential will receive azure_credentials object
# box.bind(TokenCredential, azure_credentials) works too!
box.bind(TokenCredential, instance=azure_credentials)
# Or bind an interface to a concrete class
box.bind(DatabaseInterface, CosmosDBDatabase)
Factory Functions
Sometimes a simple constructor isn't enough—you may need asynchronous setup (fetching secrets, warming a client) or a third‑party initialization step. Bind the target type to a factory function—sync or async.
Key Feature: DIBox inspects your factory’s signature, auto‑injects its parameters, and if it is async it awaits it automatically before wiring downstream dependencies.
# Async factory: simulate secret fetch / remote handshake
async def create_cosmos_client(settings: Settings) -> CosmosClient:
await asyncio.sleep(0.05) # simulate IO
return CosmosClient(url=settings.url, key=settings.key)
# Sync factory depending on the async-created client
def create_orders_container(client: CosmosClient) -> OrderContainer:
return OrderContainer(client.get_container("orders"))
# Bind factories (DIBox auto-injects Settings, awaits async factory)
box.bind(CosmosClient, create_cosmos_client)
# to be more explicit, you can use the factory= keyword argument:
box.bind(OrderContainer, factory=create_orders_container)
order_container = await box.provide(OrderContainer) # auto sequence:
# Settings -> await create_cosmos_client -> create_orders_container
Named dependencies
If you need multiple instances of the same type (like two different storage containers), use the name parameter. DIBox matches this binding to the argument name.
box.bind(ContainerClient, "users", factory=create_users_container)
box.bind(ContainerClient, "orders", factory=create_orders_container)
class DataService:
def __init__(self, users: ContainerClient, orders: ContainerClient):
self.users = users # Injected with "users" binding
self.orders = orders # Injected with "orders" binding
# Requesting DataService will get both ContainerClients injected correctly
data_service = await box.provide(DataService)
Dynamic Predicate-Based Binding
For repeatable patterns, you can use a predicate function to match types dynamically. This is useful for generic loaders or handlers. The factory function can also receive the requested type as a parameter for more context-aware creation.
def load_settings(t: type) -> object:
# Load settings based on type t
...
# Bind ANY type ending in 'Settings' to the 'load_settings' function
box.bind(lambda t: t.__name__.endswith("Settings"), load_settings)
# Now requesting AppSettings or DBSettings will use load_settings automatically
app_settings = await box.provide(AppSettings)
db_settings = await box.provide(DBSettings)
Missing-Binding Policy
When no binding matches a concrete class, DIBox can use the class itself as a factory and follow its constructor annotations. The missing-binding policy controls where this implicit creation is allowed:
box = DIBox() # "open" (default)
box = DIBox(policy="explicit-roots")
box = DIBox(policy="closed")
"open"— eligible unbound roots and transitive dependencies are created implicitly. This is the zero-configuration path used throughout the QuickStart."explicit-roots"— a direct request must have a binding, but eligible unbound dependencies inside that accepted graph are still created implicitly. This makes the container's entrypoints explicit without registering every implementation detail."closed"— direct requests must have bindings, and unbound transitive dependencies must match an allow rule. This limits inferred construction to trusted types and packages.
Common value types such as str, int, and Path are not created implicitly by default. Interfaces, external values, and constructor parameters that express configuration choices also need explicit bindings. An explicit binding always bypasses the missing-binding policy because it already records construction intent.
With explicit roots, bind the services that callers may request directly and let their concrete internals follow constructor annotations:
box = DIBox(policy="explicit-roots")
box.bind(AppConfig, instance=load_config()) # external value
box.bind(StorageClient, S3StorageClient) # interface → implementation
box.bind_many(AuthService, ReportService) # accepted request roots
report_service = await box.provide(ReportService)
bind_many(...) is shorthand for registering several bindings at once.
For finer control, create a policy object and add rules for exact types, packages and their subpackages, or custom predicates. Deny rules take precedence over allow rules:
from dibox import DIBox, MissingBindingPolicy
from pydantic import BaseModel
policy = MissingBindingPolicy.from_preset("closed")
policy.allow_package("my_app")
policy.deny_if(
lambda type_to_check: issubclass(type_to_check, BaseModel),
name="Pydantic DTOs",
)
box = DIBox(policy=policy)
box.bind(AppConfig, instance=load_config())
box.bind(StorageClient, S3StorageClient)
box.bind(ReportService) # root bindings are still required
Here, unbound dependencies defined in my_app may be inferred, except Pydantic models. Other unmatched dependencies require an explicit binding. Allow rules do not authorize roots under "explicit-roots" or "closed"; roots remain visible through their bindings.
Rules can be added with allow_type(), deny_type(), allow_package(), deny_package(), allow_if(), and deny_if(). Configure the policy before the first resolution because compiled dependency graphs are cached.
Binding Modules
A BindingBox is a portable set of binding rules. Define it once, compose it wherever that context is needed — a pipeline stage, a background worker, a CLI command, a test.
Organizing bindings by feature
# storage/deps.py
from dibox import BindingBox
storage_bindings = BindingBox()
storage_bindings.bind(StorageClient, S3StorageClient)
storage_bindings.bind(BlobIndex)
# ml/deps.py
from dibox import BindingBox
ml_bindings = BindingBox()
ml_bindings.bind(ModelRegistry)
ml_bindings.bind(Classifier)
# main.py
from dibox import DIBox
from storage.deps import storage_bindings
from ml.deps import ml_bindings
async with DIBox() as box:
box.bind(AppConfig, instance=load_config()) # raw config — bound directly
box.add_bindings(storage_bindings)
box.add_bindings(ml_bindings)
classifier = await box.provide(Classifier)
Reusing modules across contexts
A BindingBox holds binding rules, not live resources — it's a plain Python object, independent of any specific container. The same module can be composed into different containers in different contexts without duplication, and because it carries no open connections or handles, it can be imported in any process. This makes it the natural contract between an orchestrator and its workers.
To make this concrete, here's a pipeline stage running as a Ray remote function — a function dispatched to a separate worker process by the framework.
Without modules, every worker duplicates the same setup:
# pipeline/stages.py — defined once, importable from anywhere
enhance_bindings = BindingBox()
enhance_bindings.bind(GPUContext)
enhance_bindings.bind(Enhancer)
@ray.remote # runs this function in a separate worker process
def enhance_v1(config: AppConfig, tiles: list[bytes]) -> list[bytes]:
async def _run() -> list[bytes]:
box = DIBox()
box.bind(AppConfig, instance=config)
box.bind(GPUContext) # repeated in every worker
box.bind(Enhancer) # and again here
async with box:
enhancer = await box.provide(Enhancer)
return await enhancer.enhance(tiles)
return asyncio.run(_run())
With modules, the worker declares what context it needs in one line:
@ray.remote # runs this function in a separate worker process
def enhance_v2(config: AppConfig, tiles: list[bytes]) -> list[bytes]:
async def _run() -> list[bytes]:
box = DIBox()
box.bind(AppConfig, instance=config)
box.add_bindings(enhance_bindings) # same module — no duplication
async with box:
enhancer = await box.provide(Enhancer)
return await enhancer.enhance(tiles)
return asyncio.run(_run())
Resolution order
Direct container bindings take precedence over module bindings. Among modules, last registered wins.
If no binding matches at all, DIBox can fall back to using the requested type as its own factory — this is what makes await box.provide(SomeService) work without an explicit box.bind(SomeService). The missing-binding policy controls whether that fallback is available at the request root and for transitive dependencies. See Missing-Binding Policy.
Why use DIBox?
Infer construction, declare intent
Constructor annotations often contain the complete recipe for building a concrete service. Requiring a registration that merely repeats that recipe adds boilerplate and couples the composition root to every internal class.
When no binding matches, DIBox can derive an implicit self-binding: the requested class becomes its own factory, and its annotated dependencies are resolved recursively. Explicit bindings remain focused on decisions that type hints cannot express — configured values, implementation choices, named variants, custom factories, and accepted request roots.
This inference is governed rather than unconditional. The missing-binding policy independently controls which roots and transitive dependencies DIBox may construct, from an open zero-configuration default to explicit roots and allowlisted internals. The combination of inferred construction and explicit boundaries keeps small graphs simple without giving up control as an application grows.
Comparison with Other Frameworks
Python has several excellent dependency-injection tools with different priorities. This is a high-level orientation, not a feature benchmark. These projects evolve, so details may become outdated or contain mistakes; consult the linked documentation when choosing a library, and please report corrections.
-
Manual dependency injection keeps construction explicit and introduces no framework dependency. It is often the clearest choice for small graphs. DIBox becomes useful when recursive assembly, repeated composition, and resource lifecycle coordination start adding glue code.
-
Dependency Injector uses explicit containers and providers, with extensive support for configuration, overrides, resources, asynchronous providers, and application wiring. DIBox instead derives eligible concrete bindings from constructor annotations, allowing applications to reserve explicit bindings for choices and boundaries that annotations cannot express.
-
Injector is a Pythonic, Guice-inspired container with transitive injection, modules, scopes, provider methods, and optional automatic binding of missing types. Regular constructors use
@injectorInject[...]to identify injectable parameters, while provider callables infer annotated parameters. DIBox does not require markers on constructors and centers async resource lifecycle and missing-binding authorization in the container. -
Punq is intentionally small and unintrusive, with constructor injection, explicit registration, transient and singleton scopes, and no decorators or global state. DIBox shares the emphasis on ordinary Python classes while adding async lifecycle management, named and predicate bindings, and policy-governed implicit self-binding.
-
Dishka provides first-class scopes, finalization, modular providers, validation, dependency-graph plotting, and integrations with many frameworks. It is a strong choice when rich lifetime modeling and ecosystem integrations are priorities. DIBox takes a smaller constructor-driven approach in which the missing-binding policy can infer concrete internals without provider declarations for each class.
Inspiration: FastAPI
FastAPI is a web framework rather than a standalone DI library, but its broader design was the primary inspiration for DIBox: define an endpoint as an ordinary function, describe what it needs through its signature and type hints, and let the framework handle the surrounding plumbing.
DIBox applies the same idea to object construction. Constructors and factories describe their dependencies through ordinary Python signatures, while the container assembles the graph and manages resource lifecycles. This brings FastAPI's signature-driven developer experience to an application-neutral container for web handlers, workers, CLIs, and other entrypoints — including applications built with FastAPI.
Contributing
The project is in early stages, and contributions are welcome! Please contact me (Alex Z.) via GitHub issues, LinkedIn or email for any questions, suggestions, or contributions. The source code is hosted both on GitHub (https://github.com/mxAlexZ/dibox) and GitLab (https://gitlab.com/AlexZee/dibox). The actual development happens on GitLab, while GitHub is used for better visibility.
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file dibox-0.1.14.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: dibox-0.1.14.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 35.4 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: uv/0.9.30 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.9.30","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Debian GNU/Linux","version":"12","id":"bookworm","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
3f20aa03400a6f05a78c304980d7e0b2e1a45dfdd6f0958eda1e2e2fbb91d1fc
|
|
| MD5 |
05ae8bea7afa2e4c09f7f319a2b29331
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
018297b0e537f22a31f0cf3bebf4c4b4bc561aa295f9808e20159e33be888c2e
|
File details
Details for the file dibox-0.1.14-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: dibox-0.1.14-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 31.4 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via: uv/0.9.30 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.9.30","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Debian GNU/Linux","version":"12","id":"bookworm","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
79388813636198ee0e6edf556b00fca82b625b1015ab6765c1845cbe59b4973c
|
|
| MD5 |
133367132f08458b32d5a218c9f067ff
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
d889e18ede6ce6f4955428968fb35a16328310d9023694414534777fd0a150bb
|