Skip to main content

django_scoped_rbac

https://gitlab.com/openteams/django-scoped-rbac/badges/master/pipeline.svg

A rich and flexible Django application for role-based access control within distinct access control scopes supporting Django Rest Framework.

Motivation

  • Support multiple security contexts within an application, rather than having the application serve as the single security context.

  • Support a model of security context that can be enforced at the query level within the database. For example - list all resources within the contexts the user is authorized to list resources.

  • Support assignment of roles within a security context.

  • Support an extensible mechanism for conditional policy expressions for permissions.

  • Support a JSON representation of the total permissions granted to a user for all security contexts that can be shared with browser and other clients to enable permissions-informed disclosure UI and UX

Support multiple security contexts within an application

Most RBAC systems provide a simple permission model to answer permissions. For example, is the user authorized to POST a comment. In an application that supports multiple security contexts the relevant context is an additional parameter required to determine if the user is authorised; that is is the user authorized to POST a comment to this project vs another project. A user may be authorized to POST a comment to one project, but not another.

Support for security contexts at the query level

If every object has a security context property it’s possible to always secure the queries executed for a user request by adding the user’s authorized security contexts as an “IN” condition restricting the scope of the query.

Support assignment of roles within a security context

In most RBAC systems a user is assigned a role that is applicable across the entire application. For example, a user may have a Commenter role granting the user the permission to post comments anywhere comments may be posted within the application. An application that supports the assignment of a role within the scope of a specific security context can restrict the assignment of the Commenter role to specific areas of an application. For example, a user may be assigned the Commenter role in Project 1 but not Project 2.

Support an extensible mechanism for conditional policy expressions

Another limitation of most RBAC systems is the simplicity of their permissions - you are either authorized to perform an action or not. Supporting an extensible mechanism for conditional policy expression means that a permission may be conditionally granted dependant upon a variety of factors. For example, you may be granted the permission to comment within a project only when a target resource within the scope of that project is “open for community comments” vs “open for drafter comments”.

Support JSON representation of total permissions granted

If a user has permission to perform an action, such as update a resource, it should be possible for a client to determine that this is the case and be able to decide whether to disclose editing capabilty for the resource to the user. That is, if I’m not authorised to edit a resource the UI shouldn’t offer me the opportunity to edit the resource.

Providing a JSON representation of the user’s total permissions, and a Javascript implementation of the permissions policy engine, can provide a much richer user experience.

Installation

Requires Python 3.11+, Django 5.2+ and Django REST Framework 3.15+.

uv add django-scoped-rbac   # or: pip install django-scoped-rbac

Add "scoped_rbac" to INSTALLED_APPS and configure policies with the SCOPED_RBAC setting.

Conditional policy expressions

Policy conditions are written in the Common Expression Language and evaluated with Google’s cel-expr-python runtime. Each top-level key of the resource being authorized is available as a variable, for example content.status == "open". An expression that fails to evaluate denies access.

Custom functions are registered with CEL_FUNCTIONS. Because the CEL runtime dispatches on argument types, each function’s parameters must be annotated with bool, int, float, str, bytes, dict or list; a function that needs several signatures can be given as a cel_expr_python.cel.FunctionDecl instead:

# myapp/workflow.py
def is_allowed_transition(current: str, proposed: str) -> bool:
    ...

# settings.py
SCOPED_RBAC = {
    "CEL_FUNCTIONS": {
        "is_allowed_transition": "myapp.workflow.is_allowed_transition",
    },
}

Development

The project is managed with uv:

uv sync                              # create .venv with the dev dependencies
uv run pytest                        # run the tests with coverage
uv run ruff check && uv run ruff format --check
uv run --group docs make -C docs html   # build the docs into build/sphinx/html

Metadata

Release files for django-scoped-rbac 0.10.1

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for django-scoped-rbac 0.10.1
File Size Uploaded Provenance
django_scoped_rbac-0.10.1.tar.gz 30.4 kB Without provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for django-scoped-rbac 0.10.1
File Interpreter ABI Platform
django_scoped_rbac-0.10.1-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 67.5 kB

Release files / django_scoped_rbac-0.10.1.tar.gz

Download URL django_scoped_rbac-0.10.1.tar.gz
Size 30.4 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
05d9d92df14651a98c14ff5bdfcefcf15b45aebee5f5030e6e9deb3e649b0d79
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
b3471420ff6ff1e6da4f25a41298889239386eb0f6baf8cf5aa839b967cd1705
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via uv/0.9.30 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.9.30","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Debian GNU/Linux","version":"12","id":"bookworm","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

Release files / django_scoped_rbac-0.10.1-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL django_scoped_rbac-0.10.1-py3-none-any.whl
Size 37.1 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
39fd310d92347bac14bd8fbec0854f5d43747336383654fc5ae7f5e065bc2ab2
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
c8547ebcc43c6d3ce4208674a6c95cec999996ca070fbe99f290aa84a8f80964
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via uv/0.9.30 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.9.30","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Debian GNU/Linux","version":"12","id":"bookworm","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

Security for django-scoped-rbac 0.10.1

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page