dna-segmentation-benchmark 0.1.0

Metrics for nucleotide-level DNA segmentation benchmarking

DNA Segmentation Benchmark

Diagnostic evaluation toolkit for nucleotide-level DNA segmentation models (gene finders like Augustus, Helixer, Tiberius, SegmentNT) against reference annotations (e.g., GENCODE).

Goes beyond standard precision/recall with an 8-type INDEL error taxonomy, boundary bias/reliability landscapes, gap chain analysis (label-agnostic intron chain comparison), transcript match classification, junction error diagnosis, and state transition analysis -- metrics not available in gffcompare, Mikado, or EGASP.

pip install dna-segmentation-benchmark

Quick Start

From GFF/GTF files

from dna_segmentation_benchmark import (
    LabelConfig, EvalMetrics, benchmark_from_gff, compare_multiple_predictions,
)

label_config = LabelConfig(
    labels={0: "CDS", 2: "INTRON", 8: "NONCODING"},
    background_label=8,
    coding_label=0,
)

results = benchmark_from_gff(
    gt_path="ground_truth.gtf",
    pred_paths={"augustus": "predictions.gff"},
    label_config=label_config,
    classes=[0],
    metrics=[EvalMetrics.REGION_DISCOVERY, EvalMetrics.NUCLEOTIDE_CLASSIFICATION],
    exclude_features=["gene"],
)

figures = compare_multiple_predictions(
    per_method_benchmark_res=results,
    label_config=label_config,
    classes=[0],
    metrics_to_eval=[EvalMetrics.REGION_DISCOVERY, EvalMetrics.NUCLEOTIDE_CLASSIFICATION],
)

From label arrays

import numpy as np
from dna_segmentation_benchmark import (
    LabelConfig, EvalMetrics, benchmark_gt_vs_pred_multiple, compare_multiple_predictions,
)

label_config = LabelConfig(
    labels={0: "EXON", 2: "INTRON", 8: "NONCODING"},
    background_label=8,
    coding_label=0,
)

results = benchmark_gt_vs_pred_multiple(
    gt_labels=gt_arrays,       # list[np.ndarray]
    pred_labels=pred_arrays,   # list[np.ndarray]
    label_config=label_config,
    classes=[0],
    metrics=[
        EvalMetrics.INDEL,
        EvalMetrics.REGION_DISCOVERY,
        EvalMetrics.BOUNDARY_EXACTNESS,
        EvalMetrics.NUCLEOTIDE_CLASSIFICATION,
        EvalMetrics.STRUCTURAL_COHERENCE,
        EvalMetrics.DIAGNOSTIC_DEPTH,
    ],
)

CLI

dna-benchmark run \
    --gt ground_truth.gtf \
    --pred augustus:predictions.gff \
    --config label_config.yaml \
    --classes 0 \
    --exclude-features gene \
    --output results.json

---

Metrics

Seven metric groups, each answering a distinct question about prediction quality:

Group	Question
NUCLEOTIDE_CLASSIFICATION	Per-base, how accurate is it?
REGION_DISCOVERY	Did we find the right regions?
BOUNDARY_EXACTNESS	How precise are the boundaries?
INDEL	What structural errors exist?
FRAMESHIFT	Is the reading frame preserved?
STRUCTURAL_COHERENCE	Is the overall segment arrangement correct?
DIAGNOSTIC_DEPTH	Why is the prediction structurally wrong?

---

Nucleotide Classification

Per-base TP/TN/FP/FN with precision, recall, and F1. The most basic metric -- treats each position independently.

---

Region Discovery (4-level Precision/Recall)

Evaluates section matching at increasing strictness using 1:1 greedy matching by overlap length:

Level	TP condition	What it forgives
neighborhood_hit	Any overlap	Over- and under-prediction
internal_hit	Prediction inside GT	Over-prediction
full_coverage_hit	Prediction covers GT	Under-prediction
perfect_boundary_hit	Exact match (sweep-based)	Nothing

---

Boundary Exactness

How precise are predicted boundaries? Includes IoU distributions and two diagnostic matrices:

• Bias matrix (21x21): Signed boundary residuals revealing systematic directional errors (e.g., "predictions consistently start 2bp early")
• Reliability matrix (11x11): Cumulative recall at tolerances 0--10 bp, showing how quickly recall degrades as boundary tolerance tightens

---

INDEL Error Taxonomy

Classifies every contiguous mismatch region into one of 8 structural error types:

Insertions (pred has class, GT does not)	Deletions (GT has class, pred does not)
5' extension	5' deletion
3' extension	3' deletion
Joined (merges two GT sections)	Split (splits one GT section)
Whole insertion (new section)	Whole deletion (missing section)

---

Structural Coherence

Evaluates the predicted segment chain as a whole -- not per-section, but as a complete ordered arrangement.

Gap Chain Comparison

Compares ordered gaps between consecutive segments. For exons, gaps = introns -- making this the label-agnostic equivalent of intron chain comparison (gffcompare's key metric).

• gap_chain_match_rate: Fraction of sequences with identical gap chains
• gap_count_match_rate: Fraction with the same number of gaps
• gap_chain_lcs_ratio: LCS-based partial credit (0--1), ordering-aware

Transcript Match Classification

Holistic structural classification of each (GT, prediction) pair into one of 6 categories:

Class	Condition
exact	Identical segment chains
boundary_shift	Same segment count, shifted boundaries
missing_segments	Prediction is ordered subset of GT (segments skipped)
extra_segments	GT is ordered subset of prediction (segments inserted)
structurally_different	None of the above
missed	No prediction for this class

Segment Count Delta

Over-segmentation (positive) vs under-segmentation (negative).

---

Diagnostic Depth

Causal diagnosis of structural errors -- answering why the prediction is wrong, not just that it is wrong.

Junction Error Taxonomy

Error type	Description
Exon skip	GT segments merged (intervening segment absent)
Segment retention	GT segment absorbed by neighbours
Novel insertion	Extra segment splits a GT segment
Cascade shift	Boundary error propagates across 3+ segments
Compensating errors	Paired errors that cancel out

Position Bias

Match rate stratified by genomic position (5' / interior / 3'), revealing whether errors concentrate at sequence ends.

---

Frameshift

Reading frame deviation (mod-3) between GT and predicted coding exons. Only valid on single-transcript sequences with coding_label configured.

---

State Transitions (always computed)

Two analyses run on every benchmark call:

• GT Transition Confusion Matrices: At every position where GT changes label, what did the predictor do? One heatmap per source label.
• False Transition Analysis: At positions where GT is stable (no label change), did the predictor introduce a spurious transition?

---

Label Configuration

All metrics are label-agnostic. Define your own token mapping:

from dna_segmentation_benchmark import LabelConfig

config = LabelConfig(
    labels={0: "EXON", 1: "DONOR", 2: "INTRON", 3: "ACCEPTOR", 8: "NONCODING"},
    background_label=8,
    coding_label=0,           # Required for FRAMESHIFT
    splice_donor_label=1,     # Reserved for future splice metrics
    splice_acceptor_label=3,  # Reserved for future splice metrics
    intron_label=2,
)

A pre-built config for the BEND benchmark is available as BEND_LABEL_CONFIG.

---

W&B Integration

Log metrics during training and full diagnostic reports after:

from dna_segmentation_benchmark import init_wandb_with_presets, log_benchmark_scalars, log_benchmark_full

run = init_wandb_with_presets("my-project", "run-name", label_config, classes=[0])

# During training -- lightweight scalar logging per epoch
log_benchmark_scalars(val_results, label_config, step=epoch, method_prefix="val")

# After training -- full report with figures
log_benchmark_full({"my_model": final_results}, figures, label_config)

Install with: pip install dna-segmentation-benchmark[wandb]

---

Examples

See the examples/ folder:

• GTF programmatic example -- end-to-end GFF/GTF evaluation
• Array benchmark example -- starting from numpy label arrays
• W&B training loop -- integration with Weights & Biases

---

Documentation

• Metrics Reference -- complete documentation of every metric with formulas and aggregation details
• Design Rationale -- architectural decisions and comparison with gffcompare, Mikado, EGASP

---

Updating README Plots

The plots in this README are auto-generated from synthetic data. To refresh them:

python scripts/generate_readme_plots.py

This writes PNGs to docs/images/ which are referenced by the README.