domainwalk
Audit the public surface of a domain and see what is set up correctly and what is
not. DNS records, DNSSEC, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, TLS certificates, HTTP security
headers, security.txt and robots.txt, in a single pass and a single report.
pip install "domainwalk[crypto]"
domainwalk example.com
Point it at a domain and you get a graded list of findings. Green for what is fine, yellow and red for what is not, and for every problem the exact line you need to publish to close it.
Everything domainwalk reads is already public. Anyone can query your DNS. Your TLS certificate goes to whoever connects. Your response headers ship with every page. It is a passive audit of visible configuration, which is why you can run it against your own domain or against one you are just checking out.
Install
Python 3.11 or newer.
pip install "domainwalk[crypto]"
If your system blocks that with externally-managed-environment, which happens on
Debian, Ubuntu and recent Fedora, you have two clean options.
pipx, recommended for a command line tool. It creates an isolated environment
for you and puts domainwalk on your PATH.
sudo apt install pipx # or: brew install pipx
pipx install "domainwalk[crypto]"
A virtualenv, if you prefer to manage it yourself.
sudo apt install python3-venv # Debian and Ubuntu only
python3 -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install "domainwalk[crypto]"
Check it landed.
domainwalk --version
domainwalk example.com
Why the [crypto] extra
pip install domainwalk works too, with dnspython and rich as the only
dependencies. The extra adds cryptography, which is used to read certificates
that OpenSSL rejects. Without it that path falls back to a private CPython API
that works today but carries no stability promise. Both produce identical
results, and a test enforces that, so the extra is about durability rather than
features.
From source
For hacking on it, or to run the tests.
git clone https://github.com/FrancisEspejo/Domainwalk.git
cd Domainwalk
python3 -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
What it checks
Four collectors run against the domain. Each produces findings with a severity
(fail, warn, info, ok), a stable id, and the concrete fix when something
is wrong.
DNS and email authentication
Resolves A, AAAA, MX, NS, TXT, CAA, DS and DNSKEY, plus _dmarc
and twelve common DKIM selectors including default, google, selector1 and
protonmail.
SPF is parsed properly, so a hard fail (-all) and a softfail (~all) are not
the same finding. DMARC reports its real policy, because p=none monitors
nothing while p=reject is the one that actually stops spoofed mail. DKIM lists
which selectors are really published, not just whether a record exists.
DNSSEC has three states and domainwalk separates all three. No signing at all.
Signed with a DS record in the parent zone. And the trap in the middle, a
DNSKEY published without a DS, which means the zone is signed but nobody
validates the signature.
Every query runs in parallel, one resolver per thread.
TLS certificates
Connects on port 443 and reads issuer, subject, SANs, validity window and negotiated protocol version.
The interesting part is what happens when OpenSSL rejects the certificate. Most tools stop there and hand you a cryptic handshake error. domainwalk reconnects without verification, only to read the certificate anyway and explain what went wrong. An expired certificate tells you how many days ago it died and who issued it. A hostname mismatch tells you which names the certificate does cover.
Wildcard matching follows the real rules. *.example.com covers a.example.com
but not example.com and not a.b.example.com.
Expiry thresholds scale with the lifetime of the certificate. A fixed 45 day warning flags every healthy 90 day ACME certificate for half its life, since normal renewal passes through that window on every cycle. A 90 day certificate warns under 14 days and fails under 6. A 398 day certificate keeps the classic 45 and 21.
HTTP and security headers
Checks whether port 80 redirects to HTTPS without following the redirect. That detail matters. If you follow it, a broken certificate on the HTTPS side gets reported as "port 80 did not answer", which is false and sends you looking in the wrong place. Two different problems, two different findings.
Then it fetches over HTTPS and evaluates Strict-Transport-Security,
Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options (a CSP
frame-ancestors directive counts as equivalent), Referrer-Policy and the
cross-origin family.
Well-known paths
Looks for /.well-known/security.txt and verifies it carries a Contact: line
instead of trusting a bare 200. Also checks /robots.txt.
When TLS fails to verify, every HTTPS request would fail with the same error, so those checks come back marked as not evaluated. One problem, one line, instead of the same OpenSSL message copied across four findings.
Usage
domainwalk example.com
domainwalk example.com --json
domainwalk example.com --json -o report.json
domainwalk example.com --timeout 8
Input is normalized, so all of these end up the same. A bare domain, a full URL
with path and query string, a host:port pair, a trailing dot, or an
internationalized name like dominó.es, which becomes xn--domin-4ta.es.
Every run makes real DNS queries and real HTTP requests against the domain you pass. Nothing else, and nothing an ordinary browser would not do.
A domain that is in good shape
domainwalk cloudflare.com OK
ok=19 warn=0 fail=0 info=1 | 2026-08-30T08:54:47+00:00
level id detail
INFO tls.san Covers cloudflare.com but not www.cloudflare.com
OK dns.address A=2 AAAA=2
OK dns.caa 0 iodef "mailto:tls-abuse@cloudflare.com"; 0 issue "comodoca.com"; ...
OK dns.dnssec DS published (1), DNSKEY=2
OK dns.mx 4 MX
OK hdr.frame SAMEORIGIN
OK hdr.hsts max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
OK hdr.referrer strict-origin-when-cross-origin
OK hdr.xcto nosniff
OK http.redirect HTTP 301 -> https://www.cloudflare.com/
OK https.status HTTPS 200
OK mail.dkim Selectors: k1, s1
OK mail.dmarc v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; ...
OK tls.expiry Expires in 37 days (2026-10-06T22:47:27+00:00) - 90d lifetime
OK tls.version TLSv1.3
OK wk.robots_txt https://cloudflare.com/robots.txt
OK wk.security_txt https://cloudflare.com/.well-known/security.txt
A well configured domain comes back clean, because facts never count as problems. That is what makes the red mean something when it does show up.
A domain with work to do
domainwalk example.com FAIL
ok=11 warn=6 fail=1 info=1 | 2026-08-30T09:12:04+00:00
level id detail
FAIL hdr.hsts No Strict-Transport-Security
WARN dns.caa No CAA
WARN dns.dnssec No DNSSEC
WARN hdr.csp No Content-Security-Policy
WARN mail.spf SPF softfail: v=spf1 include:_spf.example.net ~all
WARN wk.security_txt https://example.com/.well-known/security.txt -> 404
OK tls.expiry Expires in 89 days (2026-11-27T11:37:46+00:00) - 90d lifetime
OK tls.san example.com, www.example.com
How to fix
hdr.hsts Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
dns.caa Add CAA: 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" (adjust for your CA) to limit who can issue.
dns.dnssec Enable it at your registrar and publish the DS in the parent zone.
hdr.csp Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'
mail.spf Switch ~all to -all once you confirm all legitimate mail passes.
wk.security_txt Publish /.well-known/security.txt with Contact: and Expires: lines.
The How to fix section is the point. "Missing Referrer-Policy" sends you to a search engine. The literal header value is something you paste into a config.
A broken certificate
domainwalk expired.badssl.com FAIL
level id detail
FAIL tls.expiry Expired 4157 days ago (2015-04-12T23:59:59+00:00)
FAIL tls.verify Invalid chain: certificate has expired
INFO https.skipped Not evaluated, the certificate does not validate
INFO wk.skipped Not evaluated, the certificate does not validate
OK http.redirect HTTP 301 -> https://expired.badssl.com/
Knowing that a handshake failed is nearly useless. Knowing the certificate expired
4,157 days ago and who issued it is the whole story. Note that http.redirect is
still green, because port 80 answered correctly. The failure is on the HTTPS side.
Comparing two runs
Save a report now, compare against it later. Useful while you are fixing a domain and want to confirm what actually moved, or when you revisit one you audited months ago.
domainwalk example.com -o audits/example-2026-08.json
domainwalk example.com --diff audits/example-2026-08.json
domainwalk diff example.com
2026-08-01T07:00:11+00:00 -> 2026-09-01T07:00:09+00:00
Severity changes
^ dns.caa warn -> ok 0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
v mail.dmarc ok -> warn DMARC p=none: v=DMARC1; p=none
DNS records
+ caa 0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
- dmarc v=DMARC1; p=quarantine
The comparison works on severity levels, not text, so a certificate renewal that
leaves tls.expiry green produces nothing while a DMARC policy dropping from
reject to none shows up as a regression.
Output is deterministic. Record lists are sorted and hostnames normalized, so the
RRset rotation your resolver performs on every query never appears as a fake
change. -o always writes the plain report, even alongside --diff, so any saved
report works as a baseline later. The comparison itself goes to --diff-output,
or to stdout with --json.
Muting findings you cannot fix
Some findings are real but unfixable in a given setup. You cannot set custom response headers on GitHub Pages, for example, and a red flag you can never clear is noise you learn to ignore.
Drop a .domainwalk.toml in the working directory, or in
~/.config/domainwalk/config.toml.
timeout = 8.0
[mute]
"hdr.*" = "GitHub Pages does not allow custom response headers"
Muted findings fall to INFO, stop counting toward the grade, and print with
their reason attached, so months later you know why they are quiet. Patterns work,
so hdr.* covers every header check. Use --no-config to ignore configuration
entirely.
JSON output
--json prints the full report, including everything the terminal view trims.
Complete header values, all SANs, every TXT record. Finding ids are stable and
language independent, so they are what a script should key off.
domainwalk example.com --json | jq '.summary'
domainwalk example.com --json | jq '.dns.findings[] | select(.level == "fail")'
Exit codes
0nothing red1at least one failure2usage error, unreadable config, or the domain does not resolve
What this is not
domainwalk is not a vulnerability scanner, a port scanner or a fuzzer. It does not read code, audit dependencies or hunt CVEs, and it never sends a request a browser would not send. It checks configuration, meaning things you fix by publishing a DNS record or adding a line to a server config.
Tests
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
Nothing touches the network. The TLS and redirect tests spin up local servers on
ephemeral ports. The certificate in tests/fixtures/ is self signed and exists
only for that, and its private key protects nothing.
The suite covers domain normalization, wildcard SAN matching, expiry threshold scaling, record sorting, mute semantics, diff behavior, and three integration paths. Reading a certificate OpenSSL rejected, reporting a redirect without following it, and checking that both certificate decoders agree so results do not depend on which extras are installed.
Implementation notes
- Certificates are decoded with
cryptographywhen available. The fallback isssl._ssl._test_decode_cert, a private CPython API that works on 3.11 to 3.13 with no promises beyond that. A test asserts both paths return identical fields. - Certificate dates use
ssl.cert_time_to_seconds, which hardcodes month names and ignores the locale. Parsing withstrptimeand%braisesValueErrorunder a non EnglishLC_TIME, which is a fun one to debug in production. - DNS queries and the two network phases run in parallel. Finding order is computed at print time, so it never depends on which check finishes first.
- Hostnames are lowercased for
MX,NS,CNAME,DSandPTR.CAAvalues are left alone since their parameters can be case sensitive.
Contributing
Issues and pull requests are welcome. New checks should follow the existing shape,
a stable id, a severity that reflects real impact, and a fix that tells the user
exactly what to publish. If a finding cannot be acted on, it is probably info.
License
MIT, see LICENSE.
Metadata
Release files for domainwalk 0.3.2
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| domainwalk-0.3.2.tar.gz | 31.8 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| domainwalk-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 56.0 kB
Release files / domainwalk-0.3.2.tar.gz
| Download URL | domainwalk-0.3.2.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 31.8 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
3b0fa764daf87696402022c2a7eda18a0ab36b45e763da3f7ffd9c998382edd6
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d417578963e210aa1191be855c2ade0bcc7a4ad958467557c01f7c0def3d0306
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.5
|
Release files / domainwalk-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | domainwalk-0.3.2-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 24.2 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4c86959e11e0a813e44c9bc997a4069e0af59c374a98d43f36e4b830884e9498
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
0de45093ecf124205b29bff69e316be45b1f6e2791b02d891883c1d6a6831352
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.5
|