endpoints-submission-cli 0.0.1.7

CLI tool for managing MLPerf endpoint submissions

MLCommons Endpoints Submission Tools

This repository contains two tools:

• submission-checker — validates a submission folder against the §9.1 automated compliance rules (see below).
• endpoints-submission-cli — CLI for registering benchmark runs and creating rolling submissions via the PRISM API. See docs/endpoints-submission-cli.md for full usage.

---

submission-checker

CLI tool for validating MLPerf Endpoints submissions against the §9.1 automated compliance checks.

Installation

uv sync --extra dev

Or with pip:

pip install -e ".[dev]"

Usage

Check a submission

submission-checker check /path/to/submission

The tool expects the submission root to contain systems/ and pareto/ subdirectories as specified in §8.1.

Options:

Flag	Description
--strict	Treat warnings as errors (exit 1 on any warning)
--quiet / -q	Suppress INFO-level passing checks
--output FILE / -o FILE	Write full results as JSON to FILE

Exit codes: 0 = all checks passed, 1 = one or more errors (or warnings with --strict).

Show region boundaries

submission-checker regions --max-concurrency 1024

Prints the concurrency ranges for each region given a declared Maximum Supported Concurrency M (§5.5).

Submission structure

<org>/
├── systems/
│   └── <system_desc_id>.json         # §8.2 — hardware + software description
└── pareto/
    └── <system_desc_id>/
        └── <benchmark_model>/
            ├── points/
            │   └── point_<N>.yaml    # §8.3 — one config per measurement point
            ├── results/
            │   └── point_<N>/
            │       ├── mlperf_endpoints_log_summary.json
            │       └── mlperf_endpoints_log_detail.json
            └── accuracy/
                ├── accuracy.txt
                └── accuracy_result.json

What gets checked

Rule	Spec	Description
path-exists	§1	Submission root directory exists
required-dir	§1	systems/ and pareto/ present
system-description-present	§1	At least one *.json file found in systems/
system-description-valid	§1	systems/*.json parses against schema
src-dir	§1	src/ present for Standardized submissions
pareto-dir-exists	§1	pareto/<system_id>/ directory exists
benchmark-model-dir	§1	At least one benchmark-model directory in pareto/<system_id>/
pareto-subdir	§1	points/, results/, accuracy/ present
measurement-points-present	§1	At least one point_*.yaml found
point-config-valid	§1	YAML parses against PointConfig schema
point-filename-concurrency	§1	Filename concurrency matches declared value
result-file-present	§1	Result summary log exists for each point config
result-detail-present	§1	Result detail log exists for each point config
result-file-valid	§1	Result summary log parses against PointSummary schema
point-count	§2, §8	7–32 measurement points
point-cap	§2, §8	Point count does not exceed 32
low-latency-coverage	§3	At least one point in Low Latency region
low-throughput-coverage	§4	At least one point in Low Throughput region
med-throughput-coverage	§5	At least one point in Medium Throughput region
high-throughput-coverage	§6	At least one point in High Throughput region
max-concurrency-declared	§7	max_supported_concurrency field present
region-computation	§7	M > 32 (required for region formula)
concurrency-in-range	§9	Concurrency within region bounds (incl. 10% margin)
load-pattern	§10	load_pattern is concurrency with a positive concurrency level
point-duration	§11	Point meets per-region minimum duration
min-query-count	§12	n_samples_completed meets dataset-specific minimum (§6.4)
streaming-config	§13	stream_all_chunks is True
metric-consistency-duration	§14	duration_ns > 0
metric-consistency-accounting	§14	completed + failed == issued
metric-consistency-output-tokens	§14	total_output_tokens ≥ 0
metric-consistency-system-tps	§9.1	Stored system_tps consistent with derived value
metric-consistency-tps-per-user	§9.1	Stored tps_per_user consistent with system_tps / concurrency
accuracy-file	§15	accuracy.txt and accuracy_result.json present
accuracy-valid	§15	accuracy_result.json parses correctly
accuracy-consistency	§15	passed flag consistent with score >= quality_target
accuracy-gate	§15	Score ≥ quality target
config-consistency-dataset	§16	All points use the same dataset
config-consistency-model	§16	Directory name matches benchmark_model
region-declared	§8.3	Declared region field (if present) is valid and matches computed region

Programmatic API

from submission_checker import SubmissionChecker, Report

checker = SubmissionChecker(Path("/submissions/acme_corp"))
report = checker.run()

if report.passed:
    print("All checks passed")
else:
    for result in report.errors:
        print(f"[{result.rule}] {result.message}")

The Report object also exposes report.warnings and serialises cleanly via report.model_dump_json().

Development

uv run pytest                                          # run tests (189 tests, 100% coverage)
uv run pytest --no-cov -x                             # fast fail on first error
uv run ruff check src/ tests/                         # lint
uv run ruff format src/ tests/                        # auto-format
uv run sphinx-build -W docs docs/_build/html          # build docs

Architecture

cli.py          Entry point — Click commands, Rich table output
checker.py      SubmissionChecker — orchestrates loading and validation
loader.py       File I/O — JSON/YAML loading, returns (model | None, list[CheckResult])
structure.py    Directory structure validators (§8.1)
models/
  results.py         CheckResult, Severity, ok/warn/err helpers
  regions.py         Region boundary computation (§5.5 reference algorithm)
  file/              Per-artifact models — each validates a single file
    system.py          SystemDescription (systems/*.json)
    point_config.py    PointConfig + RuntimeSettings (points/point_<N>.yaml)
    point_summary.py   PointSummary + PercentileStats (mlperf_endpoints_log_summary.json)
    accuracy.py        AccuracyResult (accuracy/accuracy_result.json)
  aggregate/         Cross-artifact models — validate across multiple files
    point_result.py    PointResult — pairs one PointConfig with its PointSummary
    context.py         ModelContext — validates point count, coverage, consistency, accuracy

Validation logic is co-located with the data models: each Pydantic model runs its own @model_validator methods and accumulates results in a private _check_results list. SubmissionChecker.run() orchestrates loading, instantiates models, and collects results into a Report. All loaders return (model | None, list[CheckResult]) — failure surfaces every Pydantic validation error, not just the first.