f-yeah 0.5.0

Reusable f-strings

Reusable f-strings

Unify on one format style. With F-yeah Just add parentheses and be on your way.

Usage

Keep using f-string formatting, but when you need to re-use a template, use the f function instead of the f literal

These two lines are equivalent

print(f'about to put {os.getpid()} to sleep')
print(f('about to put {os.getpid()} to sleep'))
# "about to put 421 to sleep"

No longer choose between copying around f-string literals or continuing to use old-style format() calls.

Instead of this

def mul(value):
    assert isinstance(value, int), 'Expected value to be an integer, got {type(value)} instead'
    return value * value

def pow(value):
    assert isinstance(value, int), 'Expected value to be an integer, got {type(value)} instead'
    return value ** value

Or this

bad_check = 'expected value to be an integer, got {type(value)} instead'

def mul(value):
    assert isinstance(value, int), bad_check.format(value=value)
    return value * value

def pow(value):
    assert isinstance(value, int), bad_check.format(value=value)
    return value ** value

You can write the template once to get consistent strings that stay in sync.

from fyeah import f
bad_check = 'Expected value to be an integer, got {type(value)} instead'

def mul(value):
    assert isinstance(value, int), f(bad_check)
    return value * value

def pow(value):
    assert isinstance(value, int), f(bad_check)
    return value ** value

Why would I use a function over the literal?

f-string literals are evaluated when they are created. This makes situations like the following impossible.

class BaseListRunner:
    command = ['ls']
    args = []
    notify_running = '{self.__class__.__name__} is executing {self.command} with "{" ".join(self.args)}"'

    def run(self):
        log.debug(f(self.notify_running))
        subprocess.call(self.command + args)

class AllListRunner:
    def __init__(self):
        self.args.append('-A')

AllListRunner().run()
# DEBUG: AllListRunnner is executing ls with "-A"

Why would I use F-yeah instead of the format() builtin?

Although the format mini-language and f-strings share a lot of syntax, they have diverged somewhat. You could use only format() for all your strings, but format() is more verbose and less flexible as compared to f-strings; enough so that f-strings were adopted into the language. Using F-yeah makes the following possible.

G_COUNT = 0
count_tracker = '{G_COUNT=} at {datetime.datetime.utcnow():%H:%M:%S}'

def acquire():
    G_COUNT += 1
    log.debug(f(count_tracker))

def release():
    G_COUNT -= 1
    log.debug(f(count_tracker))

def check():
    log.debug(f(count_tracker))
    return G_COUNT