Skip to main content

Feature Flow

A ticket-graph workflow for coding agents. Works with Claude Code and Codex.

tests

Plan a feature as a graph of small tickets, then build them in the session you are already in. One command, /feature-flow, does both. Every ticket is built by one fresh subagent and checked by another that never saw the builder's reasoning. A script, not the agent, decides the order of the steps, runs the build and tests, and watches for work that weakens the checks, and the whole run has limits.

One skill, 4 agent roles, a Python conductor, 6 Python scripts (flow, flow-trust, flow-status, flow-view, gate, floor-guard), an installer for both agents, a demo and a test suite. All of it is Python (standard library only), so it runs on Linux, macOS and Windows. MIT licensed.

Quick start

You need git and python3 (3.9 or later, standard library only), and Claude Code or Codex. No bash or awk is needed to run feature-flow: every script is Python. On Windows use python where this page says python3.

git clone https://github.com/hamilton-sky/feature-flow.git
cd feature-flow

python3 install.py /path/to/your/repo                  # for Claude Code
python3 install.py /path/to/your/repo --agent codex    # for Codex
python3 install.py /path/to/your/repo --agent all      # both, side by side

# `bash install.sh ...` still works on Linux and macOS: it only runs install.py

Without a clone, the same installer runs from PyPI:

uvx feature-flow-cli install /path/to/your/repo --agent all   # or: pipx run feature-flow-cli install ...

The package puts a feature-flow command on your PATH with install, uninstall, status <feature>, view <feature>, reset <feature> and report <feature>. It installs the same files, byte for byte, as install.py from a clone.

The installer lists what it wrote in .feature-flow/installed.txt, with each file's hash in .feature-flow/installed.sha256. Commit those files (git add --pathspec-from-file=.feature-flow/installed.txt); until you do, the flow does not count them as uncommitted changes. Installing a newer version over an older one updates every file nobody edited since it was installed, and keeps (and names) the ones you changed; --force replaces those too.

To keep the install out of git, so only your plans and tickets get committed, install with --private. It lists the installed files in .git/info/exclude, which git reads like .gitignore but never commits, and later installs keep that list up to date. If you already committed the install, it prints the git rm --cached command that untracks it and keeps the files. Every clone then needs its own install.

To remove it, run feature-flow uninstall (or uvx feature-flow-cli uninstall) in the repo. It removes exactly the files listed in .feature-flow/installed.txt, and only while they still hold the bytes the installer wrote: a file you edited is kept and named, and --force removes it too. It also drops the --private block from .git/info/exclude. Your plans/, your tickets and the run logs in .feature-flow/state/ are never touched. --dry-run shows what would go. If you installed with --user, feature-flow uninstall --user removes the personal copy in ~/.claude and ~/.agents, and ~/.feature-flow, the same way (the repo's own install is separate and needs its own uninstall).

Then, in your repo, in the agent:

Claude Code Codex
Plan a feature (no plan yet) /feature-flow csv-export $feature-flow csv-export
Plan and build what you just talked through /feature-flow $feature-flow
Build its tickets (a plan exists) /feature-flow csv-export $feature-flow csv-export
The same, asking nothing /feature-flow csv-export auto $feature-flow csv-export auto
Watch the graph, animated /feature-flow csv-export show $feature-flow csv-export show

The same command plans when plans/csv-export/ does not exist yet and builds when it does. After your second yes it commits the new plan folder, and only that folder, then goes straight on to building it; say so if you want it to stop after planning.

Planning asks you twice. First the session shows a short feature brief, written from your conversation (what, why, scope, the bar, and anything it had to assume), and waits for yes, edit or cancel. Then a fresh feature-planner subagent, given only that brief, reads the code, looks up outside docs where the code cannot answer, and writes a draft plan into the git-ignored .feature-flow/state/draft/. The planner folds changes too small to stand alone into the ticket they belong to, and sets Review: full on a ticket that deserves both reviews whatever its size. A fresh plan-reviewer checks the draft against the brief. The session shows you the goal, the commands, the ticket graph, what was dropped and the review result, and waits for a second yes. Only then does flow.py plan-accept copy the draft into plans/<feature>/, and the session commits it and starts the build.

Try the graph first, with no setup and no agent: bash examples/demo.sh --open.

Two ways to install

  • feature-flow install --user: once, for every repo. Skills and roles go to ~/.claude / ~/.agents, the conductor, guides and package to ~/.feature-flow/. FEATURE_FLOW_HOME moves that folder. No repo files are written.
  • feature-flow install <repo>: one repo. When a repo has its own copy, that copy wins over the user install.

What the installer does

Claude Code (--agent claude, the default) Codex (--agent codex)
The skill goes to <repo>/.claude/skills/ (--user: ~/.claude/skills/) <repo>/.agents/skills/ (--user: ~/.agents/skills/)
Roles go to <repo>/.claude/agents/ <repo>/.agents/flow-roles/, put in front of each subagent's prompt
Scripts go to <repo>/scripts/ <repo>/scripts/
Guides, roles and the conductor go to <repo>/.feature-flow/ <repo>/.feature-flow/

Next to the feature-flow skill it installs architect-review and automation-design. The installer never deletes anything. A file that already exists and differs is kept and reported; --force replaces it. --dry-run shows what would change and writes nothing. CLAUDE_HOME and AGENTS_HOME move the user folders. With --user the skill and roles go to the user folders, and the scripts, guides, conductor and package go to ~/.feature-flow/ (FEATURE_FLOW_HOME moves it); nothing is written into a repo.

The Claude Code skill is skills/feature-flow/. The Codex skill is written by hand in adapters/codex/feature-flow/, with an agents/openai.yaml that sets allow_implicit_invocation: false, so it runs only when you name it. The steps are the same; only the way a subagent is started differs. Your own AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md are never touched.

How a ticket flows

 smoke command (script): is the base healthy?   no ─► stop, spend nothing
        │ yes
        ▼
 pick ticket ─► builder subagent: claim, build, prove it (run fresh, read the output), commit
                                              │
                                              ▼
 gate (script):  Build, Test, Lint from commands.md           fail ─┐
                                              │ pass                │
                                              ▼                     │
 floor guard (script, no AI):                                       │
   tests skipped or deleted? checks silenced? empty catches?        │
   thresholds lowered? lint/test/CI config edited?             fail ─┤
   plan touched beyond own Status + Answer + appended lines?        │
                                              │ clean               │
                                              ▼                     │
 Done when checks (script): runs every ```check block          fail ─┤
 test-first check (script): Test first: yes needs a test-only        │
   commit that failed Test before the code                     fail ─┤
                                              │ pass                │
                                              ▼                     │
 spec review: fresh reviewer subagent, sees only the ticket         │
 + diff, re-runs every Done when                              FAIL ─┤
                                              │ PASS                │
                                              ▼                     │
 quality review: a second fresh reviewer subagent             FAIL ─┤
   (a small ticket whose check block passed gets one combined
    review instead of these two; see below)
                                              │ PASS                ▼
                                              ▼        findings written into the ticket,
                                     next ticket       reopened, built again (3 rounds max);
                                                       the builder's prompt then carries
                                                       a root-cause debugging guide

scripts/flow.py is the conductor. The session asks it next, and it answers with one line: BUILD, REVIEW, DONE, STOP or HANDOFF. It prints the full prompt for each subagent from runtime-neutral guides, so the session never writes one itself.

What the script checks and what it trusts. The conductor verifies the build from the repo: the ticket file must say resolved, the tree must be clean and committed, and it runs the gate and the floor guard itself. It also runs the check block under each ticket's Done when and compares the exit code and printed text, and for a Test first: yes ticket it proves the red test commit itself: it checks out the test-only commit, runs Test, and requires it to fail before the code. A failure of either goes back to the builder before any reviewer is started. It also checks that the reviewer changed no tracked file and made no commit. The review verdicts are different: each reviewer's reply (spec review, then quality review) is relayed by the session, which saves it to a file and hands it to flow.py verdict. The script reads REVIEW: PASS or REVIEW: FAIL from that reply; it cannot prove the session passed it on unedited. A ticket moves on only after two PASS verdicts, or one for a ticket the conductor judged small. The size is measured from the repo (git diff against the commit the ticket started from), never taken from the builder.

The gate: full or quick. The gate runs Build, Test and Lint after every ticket. With an optional Quick: line in commands.md (a faster subset of Test), it runs Build, Quick and Lint after the tickets in the middle of a plan, and the full Build, Test and Lint after the last ticket, before a handoff, and under FLOW_GATE_FULL=1. A plan without Quick: runs the full gate every time. The test-first proof still runs the full Test command.

One review for a small ticket. A ticket whose built diff is 3 files and 60 changed lines at most (the plan folder left out), and whose check block ran and passed, gets one combined review instead of the spec and quality reviews. The conductor measures the diff itself. Review: full in the ticket (as it was at the start), Type: convert, no check block, or FLOW_GATE=off keep both reviews. Every other conductor check still runs on every ticket.

The skill and the roles

Skill What it does
feature-flow Plan: turns the conversation (or your answers) into a feature brief and waits for a yes, has a planner and a plan reviewer subagent draft and check plans/<feature>/ (a spec, a map, commands, learnings and tickets), shows you the graph, and writes it after a second yes. Build: runs the tickets one by one, a builder and a reviewer subagent each, with flow.py deciding every step. Show: the animated ticket graph and a summary of what is ready and what blocks the finish.
architect-review Architecture review of a file, diff or feature, with severity rated findings. Reads CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md for the project's own rules.
automation-design Blueprint for an automation pipeline. Hands off to feature-flow for the plan.
Role Tools Job
ticket-builder Read, Glob, Grep, Edit, Write, Bash Builds one ticket by the build guide in its prompt.
ticket-reviewer Read, Glob, Grep, Bash (no Edit, no Write) Reviews one ticket by the review guide in its prompt and ends with REVIEW: PASS or REVIEW: FAIL.
feature-planner Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Write, Edit, WebSearch, WebFetch Plans one feature from the approved brief by the plan guide, writes only the draft, cites outside sources, and ends with PLAN: READY or PLAN: QUESTIONS.
plan-reviewer Read, Glob, Grep, Bash (no Edit, no Write) Checks the draft against the brief by the plan review guide and ends with PLAN-REVIEW: PASS or PLAN-REVIEW: FAIL.

In Claude Code the reviewers' tool lists are enforced, so they cannot edit. A Codex subagent cannot be limited that way, so there the reviewers work from their instructions: the conductor stops the run if a ticket reviewer changed anything, and a planner's draft reaches plans/ only through plan-accept. On Codex the planner can research the web only if web search is on; otherwise it plans from the code and says so. The Codex planning path has not been run by hand.

The guides in guides/ (installed to .feature-flow/guides/) hold the protocol: how to build, review, write the brief, plan, review a plan and show. The skill holds only what differs per agent.

Plans and tickets

plans/
└── csv-export/
    ├── spec.md          what and why
    ├── map.md           destination, the bar, decisions so far     (workers append only)
    ├── commands.md      build, test, lint, smoke commands           (frozen once approved)
    ├── learnings.md     traps workers found                         (workers append only)
    └── tasks/
        ├── 01-types.md
        ├── 02-service.md
        └── 03-acceptance.md

commands.md and learnings.md are separate from the map because they follow different rules. Commands are approved by a human and read by the scripts, so they are frozen. Learnings grow with every ticket, so they are append only and a human prunes them (--check warns past 40 lines). The map stays short.

One markdown file per ticket in plans/<feature>/tasks/NN-slug.md:

# Add the retry policy to the job runner

Type: task                 task | settle | convert
Status: open               open | claimed | resolved | parked
Blocked by: 01, 02         or —
Test first: yes            yes | no
Floor: allow config        optional, only when a human decides the guard may let it through

...what to do and why...

## Not in this ticket
## Done when                 commands and the results they print
```check
$ python3 -m unittest discover -s tests/py
exit 0
prints OK
```
## Reference
## Answer                    Built, Proof, Decisions, Shortcuts taken, Review fixes, For later tickets
  • Order comes from Blocked by, not from numbers. A ticket is ready when it is open and every ticket it is blocked by is resolved. Lowest number wins.
  • Status lives only in the ticket files. map.md never repeats it.
  • The Answers are the handoff between subagents. The next builder reads the Answers of the tickets it depends on.
  • settle tickets record a decision. convert tickets migrate something and must be safe to run twice.
  • A worker may change only its own Status line and Answer, lines appended to map.md and learnings.md, and the code the ticket calls for. Rewriting its own Done when, editing another ticket, or touching commands.md fails the guard.
  • Floor: categories: skip, suppress, empty-catch, test-delete, threshold, trivial-assert (an assertion that cannot fail, added to a test file: assert True, assertEqual(x, x), expect(v).toBe(v)), config, ticket-edit, commands-edit, and flow-edit (allows the conductor's code check below, for the build only). skip covers skipped, expected-fail and focused tests (.only(, fit(, fdescribe( on test paths); config covers more lint and test config files, the lint and test sections of pyproject.toml and setup.cfg, scripts and test keys in package.json, new skip or xfail words in conftest.py, and a Makefile only when commands.md uses make. A test file that loses assertions is shown to the reviewer as a warning, not a finding. The line is read from the ticket as it was before the work started, so a worker cannot excuse itself.
  • The guard needs the plan to be tracked by git. If you keep tickets in an ignored folder, it cannot see changes to them.
  • The commands in commands.md run with nobody watching and must exit non zero on failure.

See the graph

The animated ticket graph for the demo plan: five of ten tickets resolved, two ready, one in progress

The page flow-view writes, shown for the demo plan from examples/demo.sh: resolved tickets in green, ready ones in amber, the one being worked in blue, the rest waiting. Press Replay to watch the run back from git history.

python3 scripts/flow-view.py csv-export            write the page and open it (or: feature-flow view csv-export)
python3 scripts/flow-view.py csv-export --watch    keep it updating while tickets are built
bash examples/demo.sh --open                    try it on a made up project, no setup needed

One self contained HTML file: no server, no libraries, no network, light and dark. It is written to .git/flow-<feature>.html, so it never dirties the tree (--out FILE writes it elsewhere).

  01 types ──► 02 service ──► 04 acceptance        ● resolved  ◉ ready (pulses)
        └────► 03 wire ──────────┘                 ◌ being worked (spins)  ○ waiting
  ▶ replay ──●──────●─────○──────────   drag to scrub through the run
  • Layered left to right, so the order of work is visible. Dashes flow along the edges into tickets that are ready to start.
  • Replay plays the run back from git history: tickets turn green in the order they resolved, and a ticket sent back by the gate, the guard or the reviewer flashes red.
  • Hover or click a ticket for its blockers, Done when, Answer, and the rounds it was sent back.
  • Keys: space plays or pauses, the arrows step, End shows now, t switches theme. Reduced motion is respected.
  • Safe by construction: ticket text comes from files an agent wrote, so it is escaped when embedded and only ever inserted as text.
  • flow-status.py <feature> --json prints the same data for other tools. Mermaid (--mermaid) remains the choice for pull requests, because GitHub renders it.

Long features and handoff

A session's context fills up, so the flow moves to a fresh session every few tickets. After FLOW_TICKETS_PER_SESSION tickets (default 4) pass review, next prints a HANDOFF line instead of the next ticket, for example HANDOFF /feature-flow csv-export 3f9c0a1b2c3d4e5f.0a1b2c3d4e5f6a7b (the last word is the runner's digest, which lets the new session check that the flow's files did not change in between). The session stops and tells you to open a new session and type that line. The new session picks up exactly where the last one stopped. Set FLOW_TICKETS_PER_SESSION=0 to never hand off.

  • One owner at a time. start gives the session a token, and every later call must carry it, so two sessions can never drive the same feature. HANDOFF and DONE release it.
  • Resuming after a closed session. If a session ended without HANDOFF (you closed it, it crashed, it ran out of budget), the feature is still owned by it, and a new session stops and says so. Once you are sure the old session is gone, answer yes when the new session asks, or start it with FLOW_TAKEOVER=1. With auto the skill never takes over on its own.
  • Stuck on a ticket. python3 scripts/flow.py <feature> reset (or feature-flow reset <feature>) reopens a ticket left claimed or in-progress, commits that, and clears the conductor's run state, so the next /feature-flow <feature> starts clean from the ticket files. reset <NN> reopens that one ticket, even a resolved one, to build it again. While a session owns the feature it needs FLOW_TAKEOVER=1. A mistyped command or feature name gets a did you mean hint.
  • Relay mode. FLOW_RELAY=1 hands off after every build and every review, so each phase gets a session of its own.
  • Nobody needs to watch. With auto the skill asks nothing, and a Claude Code cloud session keeps working while you are away. You only come back to type the HANDOFF line.

The state lives in .feature-flow/state/ (the state, a log of every step, and the last review reply). That folder ignores itself, so it never shows up in git status, and a normal Codex session can write it, which it cannot do under .git.

Commands and settings

python3 scripts/flow.py <feature> start|reset [NN]          the conductor (the skill runs it; also plan-prompt, plan-review-prompt, plan-accept)
FLOW_TRUST=<digest|new> FLOW_SESSION=<token> python3 -I scripts/flow-trust.py <feature> next|prompt|verdict <file>   loop commands by hand, through the runner: prints TRUST <digest> first (no hash check, see below)
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature>                  table of tickets and which are READY
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature> --next           path of the next ready ticket (exit 10 = done, 11 = stuck)
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature> --counts         one line of counts
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature> --check          cycles, missing blockers, missing Done when, unordered mentions
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature> --lint           --check plus: a check block (or `Check: none <why>`) on every ticket, a Test command
feature-flow report <feature>                             what a run did, from its log: builds, reviews, failed checks, stops
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature> --mermaid        the ticket graph, coloured by status (add "plain" for none)
python3 scripts/flow-status.py <feature> --json           every ticket with status, blockers and readiness
python3 scripts/flow-view.py <feature> [--watch]          the animated graph page, opened in your browser
python3 scripts/gate.py <feature>                         run Build, Test and Lint from commands.md
python3 scripts/floor-guard.py <feature> <NN> [base]      check a ticket's diff, run from the repo root

next, prompt and verdict run directly stop with STOP run the conductor through scripts/flow-trust.py, as the skill says. Pass FLOW_TRUST=new on a first call, then the digest from the last TRUST line. Run by hand like this, nothing checks flow-trust.py itself, so it is for trying things out, not a protected run. The skills never run it this way: they start it through a loader line that first checks the file against the sha256 the skill pins, and stops with flow-trust.py does not match this skill if it differs (see ## Calling the conductor in the skill). For a --user install the scripts are in ~/.feature-flow/scripts/ (or $FEATURE_FLOW_HOME/scripts/).

The commands in commands.md run through bash -c on Linux and macOS and through the system shell (cmd.exe) on Windows, so write them for the platform your team uses, or call python as in the examples.

flow-status.py also understands the .scratch/<feature>/issues/ layout and the statuses done, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human and closed: FLOW_DIR=.scratch FLOW_TICKETS=issues.

Variable Default Meaning
FLOW_TICKETS_PER_SESSION 4 tickets per session before HANDOFF; 0 never hands off
FLOW_RELAY 0 1 hands off after every build and every review
FLOW_TAKEOVER unset 1 lets start take a feature over from a session that is gone
FLOW_MAX_RETRIES 2 builds or reviews per step before the run stops
FLOW_MAX_REVIEW_ROUNDS 3 times a ticket may be sent back before the run stops
FLOW_GATE on off skips Build, Test and Lint after each ticket, and also the Done when and test-first checks
FLOW_GATE_FULL unset 1 runs the full Build, Test and Lint after every ticket, even when commands.md has a Quick: line
FLOW_SMALL_FILES 3 most files a ticket may change and still get the single review
FLOW_SMALL_LINES 60 most changed lines for the single review; 0 turns the single review off
FLOW_GATE_TIMEOUT 30 minutes each gate command and the smoke test may run; 0 means no limit. A failed smoke test writes .feature-flow/state/<feature>.smoke.log
FLOW_SMOKE the Smoke: line of commands.md command run before every ticket; the run stops if it fails
FLOW_DIR, FLOW_TICKETS plans, tasks where the plans and the ticket folder live
FLOW_NO_OPEN unset 1 makes flow-view.py never open a browser
FLOW_WATCH_SECONDS 3 how often flow-view.py --watch rewrites the page

The run also stops on its own after a number of phases (BUILD and REVIEW hand-outs, the spec review and the quality review each counting as one, a single review counting as one) that grows with the ticket count, recomputed at every pick, so a loop of failures cannot go on forever.

What is tested

Path Tested
Claude Code The offline suite, and one real run of the bar: the two-ticket demo in two /feature-flow hello auto sessions with one HANDOFF between them, each ticket built by a builder subagent and passed by a reviewer subagent, with all 16 acceptance checks ok. It used about 23k output tokens and 2M cached input tokens on Sonnet.
Codex The install, offline, in CI on Linux and macOS. A probe in the Codex app showed that subagents with separate contexts work and that a reviewer's verdict reaches the session. The full flow is not yet tested with a real run.
Claude Code on the web Documented, untested: commit .claude/, scripts/ and .feature-flow/ into the repo, because cloud sessions read only the repo's .claude/.
Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cursor Not tested. Some read .agents/skills, so --agent codex may already work.

Trying it by hand

bash tests/smoke-real.sh --prepare /tmp/hello-try                    # the demo project, for Claude Code, no model is called
FLOW_AGENT=codex bash tests/smoke-real.sh --prepare /tmp/hello-codex # the same, for Codex

Then cd into it, start the agent and type /feature-flow hello (Codex: $feature-flow hello).

Tests

bash tests/run.sh
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests/py

Offline and free: no model is called. The suite covers the conductor's every answer and how a run stops, sessions, handoff and takeover, a .git the agent cannot write, the gate, the floor guard, plan protection, the prompts and guides, both skills, the installer for both agents, the graph page and its data, the Done when checks, the test-first check, the two reviews and the debugging guide on a send-back, and the acceptance harness. tests/run.sh also drives a prepared demo with no model through both checks and both reviews. The page's layout and replay logic are also tested under Node (tests/viewer-logic.test.js, skipped when Node is absent). .github/workflows/tests.yml runs it on every push to main and every pull request, on Ubuntu and on macOS. A fourth job runs the Python unit tests on Windows, including a fixture drive that takes a two-ticket plan through python scripts/flow.py f start and next to BUILD and then REVIEW, with FLOW_TRUSTED=1 set as the runner sets it. tests/run.sh itself is a bash harness and does not run on Windows. Windows is tested this way only: no real agent run has been done there.

A package job builds the wheel and the sdist and runs tests/package_smoke.py on Ubuntu (Python 3.9 and the latest), macOS and Windows: it installs the wheel in a fresh virtual environment, runs feature-flow install, and checks that the repo gets the same files as from install.py in a clone. Run it locally with python3 -m pip install build && python3 tests/package_smoke.py.

RUN_REAL=1 bash tests/smoke-real.sh --interactive is the acceptance run with Claude Code. It runs real sessions on the demo project and spends money, which is why it asks for RUN_REAL=1.

Limits

feature-flow's layers are tripwires, not a security boundary. They catch accidents and lazy shortcuts by an agent; a determined agent that controls the session could still get around them.

  • The verdict relay is trusted. The session saves a reviewer's reply and hands it to flow.py verdict. The conductor reads REVIEW: PASS or REVIEW: FAIL from that file and cannot prove the session passed it on unedited.
  • The floor guard reads diffs with patterns. It does not see a test made trivially true by other means (a mock that returns the expected answer, an assert on something that is always set, a test that no longer exercises the code), or an assertion weakened without being deleted. It does catch assertions that cannot fail (trivial-assert) and warns the reviewer when a test file loses assertions. A new test with no assertion at all is not caught. The red-first proof only covers tickets with Test first: yes.
  • A plan can be wrong and still pass. The plan lint checks that every ticket has a way to be proven and that commands.md has a Test command. It cannot tell whether the plan builds the right thing; the second yes is yours.
  • The trust runner stops accidents, not the session. It catches a builder editing the conductor mid-run. The session that runs it is the thing it cannot check; a hand-run flow-trust.py is unprotected (see above).
  • Little real-world use so far. Almost everything has been built by feature-flow on its own repo. The Codex skill and the Codex planner have not been run by hand, and the Quick gate has only been run by tests. See docs/field-run.md for how to try it on your own repo and what to send back.
  • One ticket at a time, with a handoff to a new session every few tickets.

Upgrading

Earlier versions had seven skills and an unattended loop. The five flow skills are gone, and /feature-flow replaces them:

  • plan-feature → /feature-flow <feature> before a plan exists.
  • /next-phase and /review-ticket → /feature-flow <feature>, which runs a builder and a fresh reviewer subagent for every ticket.
  • show-flow → /feature-flow <feature> show.
  • /run-flow and scripts/auto-flow.sh → /feature-flow <feature> auto, with a HANDOFF every few tickets. There is no cost log any more.

The installer never deletes the old skill folders, but it names any it finds. Delete them from .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ yourself.

Releasing to PyPI

The package is feature-flow-cli (the shorter feature-flow is likely refused by PyPI as too close to the existing featureflow). Its version is __version__ in feature_flow/__init__.py.

To release, bump __version__, merge it to main, then tag that commit and push the tag:

git tag v0.1.1 && git push origin v0.1.1

.github/workflows/release.yml checks that the tag matches __version__, builds the wheel and the sdist, runs tests/package_smoke.py on them and publishes them to PyPI. PyPI trusts the workflow as a trusted publisher (owner hamilton-sky, repository feature-flow, workflow release.yml, environment pypi), so no token is stored. PyPI never accepts the same version twice.

Caution

The builder subagent has edit and shell access and commits after each ticket. Each ticket costs at least two subagents. Build on a branch you can throw away. Ignore build output in .gitignore, because the conductor stops if the tree is dirty after a ticket. The gate and the smoke test stop after 30 minutes (FLOW_GATE_TIMEOUT). The session runs every conductor call through scripts/flow-trust.py, which sits beside the conductor it runs (scripts/ in the repo, or ~/.feature-flow/scripts/ for a --user install). The skill pins the runner's sha256 and starts it with a one-line loader that checks and runs those same bytes, so a subagent cannot change the check. The runner prints TRUST <code>.<state> before the conductor's output, and the session passes that digest to the next call as FLOW_TRUST.

Protected: edits by the builder, reviewer or planner subagents during a session to feature-flow's own files (its feature_flow package, its files in scripts/ (flow.py, flow-status.py, gate.py, floor-guard.py, flow-view.py, flow-trust.py), the guides, the roles and the skill folders, in the repo and in the install folders) and to the run state in .feature-flow/state/. That includes edits made by code the conductor runs during a step, such as tests, check commands and git hooks. Any of these makes the runner print a STOP instead of TRUST, naming the changed files where it can, and the session stops. It also holds between sessions when the HANDOFF line carries its digest (HANDOFF /feature-flow <feature> <digest>). Floor: allow flow-edit on a ticket allows its build to change the flow's code (never the run state, and never scripts/flow-trust.py, whose hash the skill pins: change the runner outside the flow, or build it with a conductor from another install, then update the pinned sha in both skills); the runner then prints FLOW-EDIT <files>, and a session run without auto tells you which flow files changed.

Not protected: a subagent that changes python3 on PATH or the system Python, the agent itself, or anything outside the repo and the install folders. The session's very first conductor call: whatever is on disk then is trusted. A background process left running by a step's own commands: it can swap a flow file in the instant between the runner's check and the conductor loading it, then put it back. A session that stops passing its digest, or a resume from a HANDOFF line without one (the session warns). The conductor's own code check (STOP flow code changed while building <ticket>: <files>) stays as a second line that catches accidental edits; on its own it cannot stop deliberate tampering.

The floor guard is pattern matching: it can miss things and it can raise false alarms, and Floor: allow is the release valve. The run stops on its own when a ticket stays unresolved, when the smoke test or the gate keeps failing, when a ticket keeps failing review, or when it reaches its phase limit.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

Metadata

Release files for feature-flow-cli 0.8.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for feature-flow-cli 0.8.0
File Size Uploaded
feature_flow_cli-0.8.0.tar.gz 139.9 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for feature-flow-cli 0.8.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
feature_flow_cli-0.8.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 281.2 kB

Release files / feature_flow_cli-0.8.0.tar.gz

Download URL feature_flow_cli-0.8.0.tar.gz
Size 139.9 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
eadbbe4917c189d29f52e36f75ca82914ad9b4af9ae73152f2ed41502367932f
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
39b8f1286332aa6fa626d9222d077e2192d133d62819025cc683d0926d46b7f0
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 12, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / feature_flow_cli-0.8.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL feature_flow_cli-0.8.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 141.3 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
02236813fa8f01c847ad73dde666ee0dba572480849d7fe65ac60a38c19b3992
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
be976504e1e04699607a76ccb43b4814a0683a58440df1b4546b4c61e07185d5
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 12, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

0.8.0 This release

2 release files

0.7.0

2 release files

0.5.0

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

0.1.6

2 release files

0.1.5

2 release files

0.1.4

2 release files

0.1.3

2 release files

0.1.2

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page