LLM FitLab
An evidence-based compatibility radar for running open LLMs on the hardware you actually have.
FitLab answers the three questions every engineer asks before pulling a local model — and it answers them with regenerated data, not a hand-maintained list. Every claim on the page is produced by a script, validated against a JSON Schema, and merged through a reviewed pull request.
| Lane | Question it answers | Method | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| FITS | Will this model fit my GPU? | Deterministic VRAM arithmetic from the model's own config.json — weights + KV cache + runtime overhead, per quantization and context length |
Computed, reproducible |
| RUNS | How fast is it, really? | A real benchmark on a free T4 16 GB GPU every week, plus community-submitted runs on real consumer hardware | Measured, with raw data retained |
| PLUGS | Does it work with my stack? | Weekly end-to-end probes installing the latest released Ollama, OllaBridge, LangGraph, CrewAI, Langflow, Langfuse and DeepAgents, then issuing a genuine request through the whole chain | Verified, with exact versions recorded |
| HOSTED | Which hosted models can HomePilot run today, and which do people like most? | Hugging Face Hub data (published weekly; HomePilot reads it live): models a provider serves live through Inference Providers for chat, vision, images and video, ranked by likes, downloads, trend and freshness | Observed, with raw counts kept |
Source of truth: data/registry.json · Design rationale: ARCHITECTURE.md
Table of contents
- Why FitLab exists
- Installation
- Quick start
- CLI reference
- Configuration
- Running FitLab inside an organization
- Data contract
- How the numbers are produced
- Media lane
- Using FitLab from HomePilot
- Secrets
- Automation
- Development
- Contributing
- Security
- Support and versioning
- Related projects
- License
Why FitLab exists
Curated "best model for X GB" lists go stale within a quarter. FitLab is built so that the data outlives any individual model:
- Nothing is hand-ranked. A weekly job pulls the leading models per Hugging Face pipeline tag through the public API, runs each one through the FITS engine, scores them with a versioned formula, and opens a review PR. Humans review; automation refreshes.
- Claims are tested, not copied. One model per week receives a real benchmark on a free T4 16 GB — the same GPU class the Colab free tier allocates — so the numbers transfer directly.
- The community is the sensor network. Anyone can run the one-click Colab notebook or the local benchmark script; the result is schema-validated and sanity-bounded by CI before it is merged, with attribution.
- Writes are gated. Every JSON is validated against
data/schema/, and all automation writes through pull requests — never directly to the default branch. - Compatibility is re-verified, not assumed. A green PLUGS cell means the integration worked this week, at version pins recorded alongside the result.
Installation
Requirements: Python 3.10 or newer. Ollama is required only for the
bench command and the wizard's benchmarking step — fit checks need no GPU and no runtime.
FitLab is published to PyPI from tagged GitHub releases via Trusted Publishing:
pip install fitlab
Until the first release lands on PyPI, install from source. The Makefile bootstraps
uv, creates ./.venv and installs everything:
git clone https://github.com/ruslanmv/fitlab && cd fitlab
make install
make run
Or without make, using any tool that reads pyproject.toml:
pip install . # or: uv sync
fitlab --version
The model list refreshes itself at runtime: the CLI fetches the weekly registry.json, caches it
for 24 hours, and falls back to a bundled seed when offline. Upgrading the package is not required
to see new models.
Quick start
Run the wizard with no arguments — it detects your hardware, shows what fits, and offers to benchmark your selection:
fitlab
// llm fitlab — fit-check console · v0.1.0
your rig: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 · 12.0 GB VRAM · ~360 GB/s
registry 2026-08-24 · 22 models · live (weekly)
1 homepilot-12gb — HomePilot — most liked chat models on 12 GB
2 homepilot-16gb — HomePilot — most liked chat models on 16 GB
3 homepilot-vision — HomePilot — most liked vision models on 16 GB
4 local-12gb — Top 10 — local inference, low-end GPU (12 GB)
5 colab-free — Top 10 — Colab free / Kaggle (T4 16 GB)
6 multimodal — Top multimodal (vision-language) for 12–16 GB
7 all — everything, deduplicated
? Category 1-4 (1)
Or check a specific GPU profile without running anything:
fitlab check --gpu rtx3060-12 --category local-12gb --limit 6
fit check · RTX 3060 12GB · Q4_K_M · 8K ctx
┏━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ # ┃ model ┃ params ┃ est GB ┃ verdict ┃ ~tok/s ┃ ollama tag ┃
┡━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ 1 │ Qwen/Qwen3-8B │ 8.2B │ 7.2 │ FITS │ ~44.8 │ qwen3:8b │
│ 2 │ ibm-granite/gran… │ 8.1B │ 7.3 │ FITS │ ~45.4 │ granite3.3:8b │
│ 3 │ meta-llama/Llama… │ 8.0B │ 7.0 │ FITS │ ~45.9 │ llama3.1:8b │
│ 4 │ mistralai/Minist… │ 8.0B │ 7.1 │ FITS │ ~45.9 │ ministral-8b │
│ 5 │ Qwen/Qwen3-14B │ 14.8B │ 11.5 │ TIGHT │ ~24.8 │ qwen3:14b │
│ 6 │ deepseek-ai/Deep… │ 14.8B │ 11.8 │ TIGHT │ ~24.8 │ deepseek-r1:14b │
└───┴───────────────────┴────────┴────────┴─────────┴────────┴─────────────────┘
After a benchmark, the CLI prints a prefilled submission link so your result can join the public dataset. Submitting is entirely optional; nothing is transmitted automatically.
CLI reference
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
fitlab |
Interactive wizard: detect → fit table → select → benchmark |
fitlab detect |
Print detected hardware (NVIDIA via nvidia-smi, Apple Silicon via sysctl, CPU fallback) |
fitlab check |
Fit table for a GPU profile. No model download, no GPU required |
fitlab bench |
Benchmark one model non-interactively; writes a schema-valid JSON result |
fitlab update |
Force a registry refresh, bypassing the 24-hour cache |
fitlab --version |
Print the installed version |
fitlab check
| Flag | Default | Values |
|---|---|---|
--gpu |
auto |
auto, rtx3060-12, t4-16, rtx4070-12, rtx4060ti-16, apple-m-16, cpu-only |
--quant |
Q4_K_M |
Q2_K, Q3_K_M, Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q5_K_M, Q6_K, Q8_0, MXFP4, F16 |
--ctx |
8192 |
4096, 8192, 16384, 32768 |
--category |
all |
A registry category id, or all |
--limit |
unset | Maximum rows to print |
fitlab bench
| Flag | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|
--model |
required | Ollama tag (qwen3:8b) or registry slug (qwen3-8b) |
--reps |
3 |
Repetitions; gen_tps is reported as the median |
--context |
4096 |
Context length for the run |
--out |
fitlab-results |
Output directory for the result JSON |
--source |
community-local |
ci-kaggle, ci-actions-cpu, community-colab, community-local, maintainer |
--submitter |
empty | GitHub handle recorded for attribution |
--dry-run |
off | Print the fit verdict and execution plan without running |
Benchmarks are seeded and fixed-length (fitlab-v1-256 prompt, num_predict 256, seed 42) so
runs are comparable across machines and across time.
Configuration
All configuration is by environment variable — no config file, no implicit state beyond the cache.
| Variable | Default | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL |
registry-latest, then master |
Point the CLI at a different registry — an internal mirror, a pinned commit, or a file:// path. Set, it is tried first and the defaults still follow. |
FITLAB_CACHE |
~/.cache/fitlab |
Cache directory for the fetched registry (24-hour TTL) |
FITLAB_REPO |
ruslanmv/fitlab |
Repository used to build benchmark submission links |
OLLABRIDGE_URL |
http://127.0.0.1:11435/v1 |
Gateway endpoint used by the PLUGS compatibility probes |
KAGGLE_USERNAME, KAGGLE_KEY |
unset | Required only by the weekly GPU benchmark workflow |
Network behaviour is deliberately narrow and predictable:
check,detectand the wizard's fit stage perform one HTTPS GET per published ref until one answers (normally the first).- Nothing is uploaded. Benchmark results are written to local disk; sharing is a manual step.
- With no network, the CLI degrades in a defined order: fresh cache → stale cache → bundled seed,
and the active source is printed on every run. Until 2026-09 the default URL was an unreplaced
placeholder (
OWNER/llm-fitlab@main) that 404s, so every installed copy quietly served the bundled seed and reportedbundled-seed; if you see that on a networked machine, upgrade.
Running FitLab inside an organization
Internal registry mirror. Fit verdicts and rankings are just data. To decouple from the public
repository — for change control, or to publish an approved-model list — host your own
registry.json and point clients at it:
export FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL="https://models.internal.example.com/fitlab/registry.json"
fitlab check --gpu rtx4060ti-16
Pinned, reproducible data. Because every registry carries schema_version, ranking_version
and generated_at, you can pin clients to a specific commit and get byte-identical results:
export FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ruslanmv/fitlab/<commit-sha>/data/registry.json"
Air-gapped use. Ship a registry file with your image and reference it directly; no egress is required for fit checks:
export FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL="file:///opt/fitlab/registry.json"
Custom hardware fleet. Add your GPUs to data/hardware.yaml — including
capability flags such as bf16, flash_attn2 and marlin — and regenerate the registry to get a
fit matrix for your own fleet rather than the public reference profiles.
Extending the compatibility matrix. Add a component to data/stack.yaml
with a probe that exercises it end to end, and it will be verified on the same weekly cadence as
the rest of the stack.
Data contract
Everything downstream depends on data/, and only on data/. The site is a renderer; the CLI is a
client. Both read the same documents.
data/
registry.json generated — the published source of truth (do not hand-edit)
ollama_catalog.json generated — the Ollama library index, every model and tag
models.seed.yaml human-curated seeds and editorial notes
media.seed.yaml image + video models: declared VRAM (with source), workflow cost, install ids
media_registry.json generated — the media lane's published document (do not hand-edit)
hardware.yaml GPU profiles: VRAM, bandwidth, architecture capability flags
stack.yaml ecosystem components and version-discovery rules
benchmarks/ append-only measured results, one JSON per run
schema/
model.schema.json registry model entries
benchmark.schema.json benchmark result submissions
media.schema.json the media registry document
registry.json top-level keys: schema_version, generated_at, ranking_version, models,
categories, benchmarks_latest, compat, calibration.
calibration records how the bandwidth estimate compares with the measurements collected so
far, rather than tuning the constant to fit them. As of 2026-09-12 it reads 2.45× over two
pairs (qwen3:0.6b on an Actions CPU runner, qwen3:8b on a Kaggle P100) — the estimate is a
consistently optimistic ceiling, and the leaderboard says so. Two points is not a refit; it is
a warning label that gets sharper each week.
Where the published registry lives
| Ref | Written by | Use it for |
|---|---|---|
registry-latest |
weekly-sync, every run, no review needed |
The freshest data. What the CLI and the leaderboard read first. |
master |
a merged review PR | The reviewed copy, and the fallback when registry-latest is missing. |
| bundled seed | a release | Offline fallback inside the installed package. |
Publishing to a branch is deliberate: a review gate nobody can open is a freeze. Every weekly-sync
run between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-09 rebuilt the registry correctly and then failed at PR creation
with "GitHub Actions is not permitted to create or approve pull requests", so the published data
sat at its seed date while the job reported failure. Data refresh is not code — the branch publishes
itself, and the PR still carries it into master for review. To enable the PR too, turn on Allow
GitHub Actions to create and approve pull requests in Settings → Actions → General.
Stability guarantees:
- Every document carries
schema_version, so historical data stays parseable indefinitely. data/benchmarks/is append-only; results are never rewritten or deleted.- Models withdrawn from Hugging Face are marked
staleand hidden after 60 days — never removed. - Fit values are labeled
estimateduntil a real benchmark upgrades them tomeasured. ollama_tagis only ever a tag that exists inollama_catalog.json.make validatefails the build on a tag that has left the Ollama library, so the page never tells you to run something that is not there.- Every benchmark result must attach to a registry model by
model_idorollama_tag; an unattributable result failsmake validaterather than being silently dropped on join. - One Ollama tag belongs to one model. A speech or quantised variant that resolves onto a text model's tag has the tag cleared, with a warning in the sync log.
licenseandcapabilitieson an auto-discovered entry are derived:license:*and capability tags come from the Hugging Face model card, the rest from repo naming (-Coder-,-VL-,R1,-A3B). Curated seed values always win.
How the numbers are produced
FITS is arithmetic, not opinion:
est_vram = weights(params × bpw / 8 × 1.03)
+ kv_cache(2 × layers × kv_heads × head_dim × context × 2 bytes)
+ runtime_overhead
Verdicts are thresholds against the profile's VRAM: fits at ≤ 92%, tight at ≤ 100%,
offload at ≤ 160% (partial GPU offload viable), otherwise no. Mixture-of-experts models are
sized by total parameters for memory and by active parameters for speed; the registry stores
both.
RUNS measures load time, time-to-first-token, generation tokens/second and peak VRAM through
Ollama's /api/generate timing fields — chosen because Ollama is what the target audience actually
runs. The weekly rotation is week_number % queue_length, so every model is measured and
periodically re-measured.
Ranking is a transparent, versioned sort (currently ranking_version 1.2, as computed
in scripts/sync_hf.py). The published order is Hugging Face likes among
models that fit the reference GPU. The score breaks ties:
score = 0.30·fit + 0.20·capability + 0.35·popularity + 0.10·speed + 0.05·plugs
popularity = 0.75·log likes + 0.25·log downloads
Likes are people's votes. Downloads only corroborate a model that has not been liked yet. capability
is log-scaled parameter count, and speed uses a measured value when one exists and a bandwidth-model
estimate discounted by 0.5× otherwise. HomePilot lists keep only models it can install. Changing the
weights or the order requires a version bump, making every rank shift visible in the pull request diff.
MEDIA (image and video generation) has its own lane — see Media lane.
Secrets
All secrets live in GitHub — Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions → New repository
secret. Nothing is configured on the Hugging Face side: a static Space has no secrets and
needs none, because the page is a static file that fetches a public registry.json. The
Space never calls Kaggle or Hugging Face with a token; the GitHub workflow holds the
credentials, builds the data, and pushes the finished page to the Space.
| Secret | Needed by | Where to get it | Without it |
|---|---|---|---|
HF_TOKEN |
sync-hf-space |
huggingface.co → Settings → Access Tokens → Write | The Space is never updated |
KAGGLE_USERNAME |
weekly-benchmark GPU lane |
your Kaggle username | GPU lane skips, CPU lane still runs |
KAGGLE_API_TOKEN |
weekly-benchmark GPU lane |
kaggle.com → Settings → API → Generate New Token | GPU lane skips, CPU lane still runs |
KAGGLE_API_TOKEN is the variable the current Kaggle CLI reads and the only one that accepts
a KGAT_… token; KAGGLE_KEY is interpreted as a legacy API key and fails against one. The
workflow passes both, so an older KAGGLE_KEY still works if that is what you have.
Also enable Allow GitHub Actions to create and approve pull requests (Settings → Actions →
General → Workflow permissions). Without it the weekly review PRs cannot be opened; data still
publishes to registry-latest, so the leaderboard stays current either way.
GitHub repo secrets ──> weekly-sync ────────> registry-latest branch ──┐
│ ├──> leaderboard + CLI
├──> weekly-benchmark ──> Kaggle T4 ──> data/ ──────┘
└──> sync-hf-space ─────> Hugging Face Space (static, no secrets)
Automation
| Workflow | Schedule | What it does |
|---|---|---|
weekly-sync |
Wed 04:41 UTC | Refreshes the Ollama library catalogue, pulls the leading models per Hugging Face pipeline tag by trend, downloads and last-modified, re-runs the FITS engine, resolves every entry to a verified Ollama tag, rebuilds the media lane, validates, publishes to registry-latest, and opens a review PR |
weekly-benchmark |
Mon 03:17 UTC | Benchmarks the rotation model on a free T4 via the Kaggle Kernels API, with a CPU lane as fallback, and runs the PLUGS probes. The rotation passes the registry id through as --model-id, so the result attaches to the model it measured |
sync-hf-space |
On push + Thu 06:20 UTC | Deploys the leaderboard to the Hugging Face Space, committing on top of the Space's history |
community-submission |
On labeled issues | Extracts, schema-validates and sanity-bounds a submitted result, then merges it via PR with attribution |
publish-pypi |
On release | Builds, smoke-tests and publishes the package using PyPI Trusted Publishing (OIDC, no long-lived token) |
Operational properties: workflows use concurrency groups to prevent overlapping writes, every
script is idempotent and safe to re-run, and degradation is graceful — if Hugging Face is
unreachable the sync PR is simply not opened and the last-good registry stands; if Kaggle is
unavailable the CPU lane still lands a datapoint.
Development
The repository is driven by a Makefile backed by uv. From a clean clone, two commands give you a working environment and a running CLI — uv is bootstrapped automatically if it is not already installed:
git clone https://github.com/ruslanmv/fitlab && cd fitlab
make install # creates ./.venv and installs fitlab + all tooling
make run # launches the fit-check wizard
make run depends on make install, so make run alone is enough on a fresh clone. Run
make help to list every target.
| Target | What it does |
|---|---|
make install |
Create ./.venv and install the package plus the dev extra (uv sync --extra dev) |
make run |
Launch the interactive wizard |
make detect / make check / make bench / make update |
The corresponding fitlab subcommands |
make registry |
Rebuild data/registry.json from Hugging Face (FITS + sync) |
python scripts/ollama_catalog.py |
Refresh data/ollama_catalog.json from the Ollama library |
python scripts/ollama_catalog.py --check <hf_id>… |
Show the Ollama tag a Hugging Face repo resolves to |
make estimate |
Full FITS verdict matrix across seed models × reference GPUs × quantizations |
make probe |
Run the PLUGS end-to-end stack probes |
make validate |
Schema-validate every document in data/ |
make lint / make format |
Ruff check / safe auto-fix |
make smoke |
Exercise the CLI end to end without downloading a model |
make test |
lint + validate + smoke |
make build |
Build sdist and wheel into dist/, then twine check them |
make site |
Serve the static site on http://127.0.0.1:8000 |
make clean / make distclean |
Remove artifacts / also remove ./.venv |
Targets accept overrides on the command line:
make check GPU=t4-16 CATEGORY=colab-free LIMIT=5
make bench MODEL=qwen3:14b REPS=5
Available variables: GPU, QUANT, CTX, CATEGORY, LIMIT, MODEL, REPS, OUT.
In a checkout, the Makefile points FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL at the repository's own
data/registry.json, so every target reads the registry you are editing and works offline.
Override it to exercise a remote fetch:
make run FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL=https://example.com/fitlab/registry.json
Dependency groups live in pyproject.toml: the maintainer extra carries what the scripts/
engines need (pyyaml, jsonschema), and dev adds ruff, build and twine on top. uv.lock
is committed, so make install resolves to identical versions on every machine.
The engines can also be invoked directly, without make:
# FITS — verdict for one model on one GPU
python scripts/estimate_vram.py --model Qwen/Qwen3-14B --gpu rtx3060-12 --quant Q4_K_M
# Registry refresh from Hugging Face (writes data/registry.json locally)
python scripts/sync_hf.py
# RUNS — benchmark on whatever hardware you are on (local, Colab, or Kaggle)
python scripts/bench_gguf.py --model qwen3:8b --out data/benchmarks/
# PLUGS — end-to-end stack probes (CPU is sufficient)
python scripts/compat_probe.py --report data/compat_report.json
# Schema validation
python scripts/validate_data.py
compat_probe.py and validate_data.py both exit with the number of failures, so CI fails
honestly rather than reporting a green matrix built on skipped probes.
There is no unit-test suite yet; make test runs linting, schema validation and a CLI smoke test.
The published site is static and reads data/*.json directly; serve site/ through GitHub Pages
or any static host.
Contributing
Benchmark results are the most valuable contribution and take about three minutes on free infrastructure:
- Open
colab/benchmark_colab.ipynbin Colab, select a T4 runtime, and run all cells — or runpython scripts/bench_gguf.py --model <tag> --source community-localon your own machine. - The final cell prints your result and a link that opens a prefilled GitHub issue.
- CI validates the JSON and merges it; your GPU and handle appear on the page.
Model suggestions belong in data/models.seed.yaml only — never in the generated registry.json.
Ranks are computed rather than negotiated: to change a rank, change the formula in
scripts/sync_hf.py and bump ranking_version. Full guidelines are in
CONTRIBUTING.md.
Security
- Community submissions are data, never code. Submitted JSON is parsed and validated; it is never executed.
- Untrusted code paths are isolated. The weekly stack probes install unpinned latest releases
and run inside ephemeral CI runners, optionally under
MatrixLab Docker isolation for local maintainer runs
(see
docker-compose.matrixlab.yml). - Secrets never reach fork-triggered workflows.
pull_request_targetis deliberately avoided. - Publishing uses OIDC. PyPI Trusted Publishing means no long-lived API token exists to leak.
Please report suspected vulnerabilities privately through GitHub Security Advisories rather than in a public issue.
Support and versioning
This is a community open-source project maintained on a best-effort basis; no service level is implied. Questions and bug reports belong in GitHub Issues.
Three version numbers move independently, and only the first is a package concern:
- Package version (
fitlab) follows semantic versioning. schema_versionchanges only for breaking data-format changes; consumers should pin it.ranking_versionchanges whenever scoring weights change, so ranking shifts are auditable.
Benchmark results are point-in-time measurements on specific hardware and driver versions. They are a comparative signal, not a guarantee of what your machine will do.
Related projects
- OllaBridge — one OpenAI-compatible URL for all your local models
- HomePilot — local-first chat, image and video studio
- GitPilot — Git workflow automation
- MatrixLab — Docker isolation sandbox used for untrusted probes
- Best-of-the-Best — the auto-curation pattern this repository generalizes
License
Code is licensed under Apache-2.0. Data in data/ and all published registries
are licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
Benchmark results are point-in-time measurements. Models referenced remain the property of their respective authors and are subject to their own licenses.
Media lane
Image and video generation models have no single config.json to size from, so FITS arithmetic
does not apply. The media lane keeps FitLab's rules — every number has a recorded source, and
nothing is hand-ranked — with a different input:
data/media.seed.yamldeclares each base checkpoint's VRAM need (min= runs with offload / low-VRAM mode,recommended= native resolution without offload), where each number came from (homepilot-presets,editorial, latermeasured), and the work its default workflow does (steps × megapixels × frames).scripts/build_media.pyadds live Hugging Face likes and downloads, derives a verdict per GPU and ranks undermedia_ranking_version1.1. Tops are ordered by likes and only include checkpoints HomePilot can install:
score = 0.40·fit + 0.25·capability + 0.25·momentum + 0.10·speed
momentum: 0.75·log likes + 0.25·log downloads
fit: fits ≥ recommended · tight ≥ min · offload ≥ 0.7·min · otherwise no
The output, data/media_registry.json, publishes Top-10 lists for
12, 16 and 24 GB GPUs (image and video), and — so a client can rank for any VRAM without
re-implementing the formula — each model's GPU-independent components (capability, momentum,
speed) alongside the scoring weights. A client computes only the fit verdict for its own GPU:
score = Σ weight · component, with fit = fit_score[verdict].
make media # refresh HF stats and rebuild
python scripts/build_media.py --offline # rebuild from the seed, keeping previous stats
The LLM registry.json is unchanged by this lane: its schema, keys and consumers stay as they were.
Using FitLab from HomePilot
HomePilot reads FitLab to suggest the top models for the
GPU it is running on — chat and vision from registry.json, image and video from
media_registry.json — under Models → Suggested for your GPU. Suggestions are the models
HomePilot can install that fit the machine, ordered by Hugging Face likes, so the first row is the
one people have ranked highest. The contract it relies on:
| Field | Used for |
|---|---|
models.*.arch, params_b, active_params_b |
FITS verdict and speed for the detected GPU (same arithmetic as fitlab check) |
models.*.ollama_tag |
One-click install through HomePilot's Ollama pull |
media_registry.json models.*.homepilot |
{provider, model_type, model_id} for HomePilot's ComfyUI install |
inference_registry.json kinds.<type>.lists.<order> |
Models → Hugging Face: hosted models to pick for chat, vision, images and video |
Inference lane — hosted models, ranked by people
scripts/sync_inference.py publishes data/inference_registry.json: for each HomePilot model type
(chat, vision, image, video) the models Hugging Face Inference Providers serve live for the
task HomePilot calls (adapters and GGUF repos excluded), in five orders:
| Order | Meaning |
|---|---|
popular |
0.55·likes + 0.15·downloads + 0.20·trending + 0.10·recency (each log-scaled 0..1; recency has a one-year half-life). The default suggestion. |
likes |
Most liked first — ranked by the people |
trending |
The Hub's trending score |
newest |
Most recently created |
rising |
Created in the last 120 days, by trending — newer models a likes order would bury |
Every row keeps its raw likes, downloads and trending_score beside the score, plus the
live_providers serving it. Each type also reports diversity.top_publisher_share, to watch one
publisher crowding the list. Popularity guides; it does not measure quality on your task.
The ranking is the pure module fitlab.inference; HomePilot ranks live Hub data with the same rules
and falls back to this feed, then to the copy it ships with.
| media_registry.json scoring + models.*.components | Ranking for any VRAM, identical to the published lists |
| generated_at, ranking_version, media_ranking_version | Shown with every suggestion |
HomePilot fetches when the user presses Fetch definitions — and, if the user leaves it on, in a
daily background check — reading registry-latest first and master second with If-None-Match,
so an unchanged registry costs a 304 and no download. Offline it falls back to its last cached
copy, then to a snapshot bundled in the release — the same order as the fitlab CLI.
FITLAB_REGISTRY_URL points it at a mirror.
NVIDIA GPU catalog
Search 85 hardware profiles across desktop and laptop GeForce generations, or enter
a custom GPU and VRAM capacity in either web interface. The CLI shares the same
offline inventory (fitlab gpus, fitlab check --gpu 'RTX 4060 Ti 8GB'). Monthly
NVIDIA source refreshes open review PRs; unknown specs and source conflicts stay explicit.
See GPU catalog usage and maintenance for sources, custom
hardware, launch guidance, validation, deployment and rollback.
Metadata
Release files for fitlab 0.1.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fitlab-0.1.1.tar.gz | 62.4 kB | With provenance | Details for fitlab-0.1.1.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fitlab-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for fitlab-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 115.9 kB
Release files / fitlab-0.1.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | fitlab-0.1.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 62.4 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
62999f92d86852f08ea933a7c6b52e7924da5754ca49ac6ec45bf1a9df5292ac
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4b33642e9e3d9afa32a5fd2a121e5d3e81d40b48a6a4285f8c660e4c7dd7013f
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / fitlab-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | fitlab-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 53.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
0b1954e07aee3335d1e6d0eea622f8c93aff27e26094a73bca57d078ab4ece4a
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
0c1b0a2d61566eb718f57b33b2f51aee95eed343a1f28d2f7f994b28fa086085
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for fitlab 0.1.1
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
Both files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for fitlab-0.1.1.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.