fitz-sage
Fully local governed RAG for code, documents, and tables.
No LLM API key or GPU required.
Benchmarks • EvidencePack • Why fitz-sage? • Retrieval Intelligence • Governance • Limitations • Documentation • GitHub
Q: "Who won the 2024 FIFA World Cup?" (There was no World Cup in 2024.) |
|
❌ Uncalibrated RAG systems
A: "Germany won the 2024 FIFA World Cup,
defeating Argentina 1-0 in the final."
|
🛡️ fitz-sage
A: "I don't have enough information
to answer this question."
Related topics in the knowledge base:
- FIFA tournament history
- 2022 World Cup coverage
To answer this, consider adding:
- Documents covering 2024 FIFA events.
|
→ fitz-sage returns governed evidence, explains insufficiency, and shows what source coverage is missing.
Where to start 🚀
[!IMPORTANT]
fitz retrieveruns locally by default. SQLite stores the index; local models handle semantic query terms, reranking, Pyrrho governance, and optional background enrichment. An OpenAI-compatible endpoint is only needed for an explicitly configured endpoint-backed role such as generated prose.
pip install fitz-sage
# From a docs folder, --source is optional.
fitz retrieve "What is our refund policy?" --source ./docs
The result is an EvidencePack: relevant source units, provenance, a governance verdict, and the signals needed to decide
what your application should do next.
About
fitz-sage is a retrieval engine for local knowledge bases. It indexes code, documents, and tables into typed source units,
retrieves the units relevant to a question, reranks them, and returns a governed EvidencePack that downstream software can
inspect, display, store, or pass to a synthesizer.
⭐ The retrieval architecture is KRAG (Knowledge Routing Augmented Generation). Code is parsed as symbols, documents as sections, and tables as SQLite-backed data. Queries are routed across those typed surfaces with retrieval strategies that match the source structure.
⭐ Governance is enforced by Pyrrho in local CPU forward passes. Fitz starts with the
first three ranked sources and adds two only while Pyrrho returns INSUFFICIENT.
Yan Fitzner — (LinkedIn, GitHub, HuggingFace).
Why fitz-sage?
EvidencePack as the contract 🧾
Every query returns ranked source evidence, provenance, governance reasons, and retrieval metadata. Use it directly in APIs, CLIs, dashboards, agents, or pass it to an LLM for answer generation with explicit governance metadata.
Asymmetric indexing 🗂️ → KRAG (Knowledge Routing Augmented Generation)
Source files become typed retrieval units: code symbols, document sections, and tables. Each unit type keeps the structure needed to retrieve it well.
Query-ready indexing 🐆 → Searchable Index
point()parses and stores supported files before returning. Retrieval can start immediately afterward while the background worker adds optional entity and hierarchy metadata.
Pyrrho-governed retrieval 🧭 → Pyrrho docs
Fitz combines deterministic query shape with Pyrrho PRE obligations before retrieval, then Pyrrho judges the selected evidence after reranking. The retrieval profile, reasons, and missing-evidence signals travel with the
EvidencePack, so callers know whether to answer, show conflict, retrieve more, or ask for more source material.
Queries that actually work 📊
Exact identifiers, temporal scopes, comparisons, aggregation requests, code lookups, table questions, and broad overview queries all flow through retrieval intelligence built into the engine.
Tabular data that is actually searchable 📈 → Unified Storage
Native CSV/TSV rows live in SQLite with schema detection, row-value BM25, and deterministic row grounding. Optional configured chat tiers can generate SQL for one retrieved table. Embedded document tables remain section text.
Fully local execution possible 🏠
SQLite storage, ONNX reranking, managed Qwen query/background work, and ONNX Pyrrho governance all run locally. Optional synthesis can use any local or cloud OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
[!TIP] Try fitz on itself:
fitz retrieve "How does the retrieval pipeline work?" --source ./fitz_sage
What You Can Search
Traditional documents, source code, and tables have different structure. FitzKRAG preserves that structure during indexing and retrieval.
| Retrieval Unit | Extracted From | How It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Symbols 🖌️ | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java | AST/tree-sitter strategies extract addressable names, ranges, references, and file import edges. |
| Sections 📑 | PDF, DOCX, PPTX, Markdown, text, config, markup | Parsed source text becomes sections with headings, ranges, and parent/child context; summaries are optional background metadata. |
| Tables 📅 | Configured delimited files (.csv, .tsv by default) |
Native SQLite rows with schema lookup, row-value BM25, deterministic grounding, and optional generated SQL. |
[!NOTE] All retrieval units share the same retrieval intelligence: query profiling, temporal handling, comparisons, aggregation, keyword expansion, reranking, progressive evidence delivery, and Pyrrho governance.
Retrieval Intelligence
Retrieval Docs • Three-Stage Strategy • Retrieval Pipeline • Evidence Signals
fitz-sage runs retrieval as a typed, governed pipeline:
| Stage | What happens |
|---|---|
| 0. User Query ❓ | User asks:"What are the company policies?" |
| 1. Broad Recall 🔎 | Finds candidate evidence:Doc B, Doc C, Doc E, Doc H, Doc L |
| 2. Rerank 🎯 | Reorders by relevance:Doc E, Doc B, Doc H, Doc L, Doc C |
| 3. Sufficiency Check 🛡️ | Adds evidence until the user query is sufficiently supported:User query + Doc E → ❌User query + Doc E + Doc B → ❌User query + Doc E + Doc B + Doc H → ✅ |
| 4. Synthesis (optional) 💡 | Verified evidence can be passed to an LLM: LLM( User query, Doc E, Doc B, Doc H) |
The query-ready path is keyword-first: exact query terms, Qwen semantic keywords, and BM25. Enriched collections can additionally use hierarchy summaries, entity links, and broader context expansion.
Built-in intelligence handles the edge cases that break simple search:
| Feature | Query | What Fitz Uses |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ epistemic-honesty | "What was our Q4 revenue?" | Pyrrho verdict and insufficient-evidence reasons |
| ✅ keyword-vocabulary | "Find TC_1000" | Literal identifier search |
| ✅ sparse-search | "error code E_AUTH_401" | SQLite FTS5 + native bm25() |
| ✅ hierarchical-rag | "What are the design principles?" | Hierarchical summaries when enrichment has produced them |
| ✅ multi-query | [User pastes 500-char test report] "What failed and why?" | Multi-query decomposition |
| ✅ comparison-queries | "Compare React vs Vue performance" | Multi-entity retrieval coverage |
| ✅ entity-graph | "What else mentions AuthService?" | Entity links for enriched source files |
| ✅ temporal-queries | "What changed between Q1 and Q2?" | Temporal scope detection |
| ✅ aggregation-queries | "List all the test cases that failed" | Exhaustive/list query handling |
| ✅ freshness-authority | "What's the latest status on feature X?" | Content-grounded temporal scope; no filesystem-age scoring |
| ✅ semantic-keywords | "How do I fetch the db config?" | Managed-Qwen recall terms merged with literal query terms |
| ✅ query-rewriting | "Tell me more about it" (after discussing TechCorp) | Configured query-intelligence provider plus caller-supplied history |
| ✅ reranking | "What's the battery warranty?" | ONNX cross-encoder reranker |
[!IMPORTANT] Retrieval intelligence is baked in. Configuration declares providers; the engine decides which retrieval capabilities a query needs.
📦 Benchmarks
Full Benchmark Report • Reproduce the Benchmarks • Production Readiness • Measured Limitations
Benchmarks start with source files and report retrieval, delivery, ingestion, and latency separately.
| Area | Scale | Current measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Production retrieval and delivery | 192 required contracts | 190/192 compiled; 172/192 delivered |
| Query-shape recognition | 60 cases | 60/60 |
| Intentional limitations | 52 evidence-asserted cases | 51/52 compiled; 48/52 delivered |
| Broad BEIR | 66,454 documents, 1,271 queries | 0.4239 delivered nDCG@10 |
| Frozen semantic BEIR | 531,605 documents, 240 queries | 0.6519 delivered nDCG@10 |
| EnterpriseRAG-Bench | 511,961 documents, 328 holdout queries | 0.5780 delivered nDCG@10 |
| Local source indexing | 18 core / 93 mixed files | 60.8 / 51.6 files/s |
| NapierOne scale ingestion | 5,005 real files | 4,994 indexed at 7.27 files/s; recovery passed |
| SciFact query latency | 60 matched queries | 7.43s mean; 6.77s p50; 12.56s p95 |
| Enterprise warm query probes | 511,961-file index | 13.092s and 19.889s |
nDCG@10 measures ranking quality in the first ten results; it is not an accuracy percentage. Full methodology, component results, timings, and interpretation are in the benchmark report.
📦 EvidencePack → Full Contract
Evidence Pack Contract • Evidence Signals
EvidencePack is the output contract of fitz-sage.
It gives you the relevant sources and the governance signals around them. You can show it directly, pass it to a model, trigger a workflow from it, or store it as an audit artifact.
The source items are the evidence. The signals around them explain how Fitz searched before retrieval and what Pyrrho judged after retrieval.
Pre-retrieval 🔎
Before retrieval, Fitz builds a search plan from deterministic query analysis, managed Qwen query keywords, and optional query intelligence.
| Signal | What it means | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
query_type / analysis_type |
Narrow lookup, comparison, temporal, aggregation, broad overview, or general query shape. | Sets recall breadth and evidence coverage. |
keywords |
Managed Qwen suggestions and literal deterministic query terms. | Adds best-effort lexical candidates without embeddings. |
strategy_weights |
Relative weight for code, section, and table retrieval. | Makes the first pass search the right evidence surfaces. |
top_k / top_read |
How much candidate evidence Fitz should collect and read. | Keeps narrow lookups fast while giving broad or comparative questions enough coverage. |
rerank_candidates |
How many recalled candidates the cross-encoder scores. | Bounds neural CPU cost without shrinking the BM25 recall pool used by evidence rescue. |
Post-retrieval 🛡️
After retrieval, reranking, closure, and compilation, Fitz sends Pyrrho the
first three ranked items. An exact INSUFFICIENT verdict adds the next two;
SUFFICIENT or DISPUTED stops immediately. These signals tell you whether
the result is usable.
| Signal | What it means | What you can do with it |
|---|---|---|
mode |
Mechanical Fitz-Sage mapping of Pyrrho's SUFFICIENT, DISPUTED, or INSUFFICIENT verdict. |
Gate generated answers, UI display, automation, or human review. |
reasons |
Plain-language explanation for the verdict. | Show users why Fitz judged evidence sufficient, disputed, or insufficient. |
evidence_verdict |
Verdict: SUFFICIENT, DISPUTED, or INSUFFICIENT. |
Inspect the evidence judgment. |
failure_mode |
Reason when evidence is insufficient or disputed. | Explain why the evidence cannot safely support a clean answer. |
retrieval_intents |
Evidence intent metadata such as lookup, temporal resolution, comparison, or broad coverage. | Decide whether another retrieval pass should focus on coverage, time, lookup, or comparison. |
evidence_kinds |
Evidence-surface metadata such as text, table, code, config, logs, or document layout. | Decide which evidence surface is missing or should be emphasized. |
This is why fitz-sage is useful as infrastructure: the package returns source evidence plus enough judgment to decide the
next action.
Retrieval execution records
When an EvidencePack is not enough to diagnose a result, RetrievalRun
records the actual query plan, term origins, candidate stages, compiled ranking,
evaluated evidence prefixes, exact Pyrrho outputs, and runtime fingerprints
from the same execution.
fitz retrieve "Which test failed?" -c reports --trace run.json
fitz explain run.json
Trace exports redact source bodies by default. Content-bearing traces are an explicit opt-in and enable Pyrrho-only replay over frozen evidence. See Retrieval Execution Records.
📦 Governance — Pyrrho → Feature Docs
Feature docs • Pyrrho on Hugging Face • fitz-gov on Hugging Face
Pyrrho is the local governance model behind fitz-sage. Its default CPU-local
ONNX ModernBERT model
yafitzdev/pyrrho-v2-nano-g1
is pinned to an immutable Hub revision and cached by Fitz-Sage through the
standard Hugging Face cache.
Query
│
▼
RetrievalProfile → broad recall → rerank
│
▼
Ranked evidence prefix (first 3)
│
▼
Pyrrho authoritative decision
├── SUFFICIENT / DISPUTED ───────────────────────→ EvidencePack
├── INSUFFICIENT + exhausted ────────────────────→ EvidencePack
└── INSUFFICIENT + evidence remains → add next 2 ──┐
▲ │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
| Signal | Purpose |
|---|---|
evidence_verdict |
Evidence judgment: SUFFICIENT, DISPUTED, or INSUFFICIENT. |
failure_mode |
Reason when evidence is insufficient or disputed. |
retrieval_intents |
Evidence intent metadata, such as lookup, temporal resolution, comparison, or broad coverage. |
evidence_kinds |
Evidence-surface metadata, such as text, table, code, config, logs, or document layout. |
Fitz-Sage passes every ranked prefix to Pyrrho unchanged. Its managed ONNX
adapter applies the model's fixed input and head-decoding contract, maps the
resulting verdict into AnswerMode, and returns the stopping prefix plus the
exact serialized decisions with the EvidencePack. Applications can answer,
retry, show conflict, or request more source material.
[!NOTE] Governance is a source-evidence judgment. Pyrrho is trained to decide whether retrieved evidence is sufficient, disputed, or insufficient, and Fitz records that judgment in the returned metadata.
The model adapter fails closed on known contract violations 🛡️
Fitz-Sage's managed Pyrrho adapter checks the model artifact, label order, ONNX width, token limits, graph parity, and verdict/failure compatibility before or during inference. These checks reduce unsafe failure modes; they are not a substitute for clean-data evaluation or threshold calibration.
No LLM on the governance path ⏱️
Pyrrho is a local encoder forward pass. Governance does not require an external chat model.
📦 Limitations → Full Measured Contract
Fitz-Sage targets reasonably clean, supported documents. The complete contract and case-level evidence are in docs/LIMITATIONS.md.
| Boundary | Current behavior | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Identifier variants | ATX-123, ATX_123, and ATX 123 remain distinct |
User data preparation |
| Private vocabulary | Managed semantic terms are best effort; private mappings are not inferred | User data preparation |
| Raw logs and scans | Logs need compression; scans need an OCR/vision parser | User input pipeline |
| Long or unrelated requests | Retrieval and evidence budgets are finite | Shared boundary |
| Multi-document ranking | Weaker than single-document ranking on the enterprise holdout | Fitz-Sage |
| Extreme file counts | Public re-pointing still walks and hashes every source file | Fitz-Sage |
| Governance context | Pyrrho currently accepts up to 2,048 tokens | Pyrrho |
📦 Quick Start
governance: pyrrhouses the accepted immutable default. Advanced users may instead configurepyrrho/<absolute-local-path>or an explicitly pinnedpyrrho/<owner/repo@40-character-commit>.
CLI
pip install fitz-sage fitz retrieve "Your question here" --source ./docs
fitz-sagecreates a local retrieval config on first run:
- SQLite storage for collections.
- Managed local models for semantic query terms, reranking, governance, and optional background enrichment.
- Pyrrho query planning plus one authoritative evidence decision.
For generated prose from the governed evidence:
fitz answer "..." --endpoint http://localhost:8080/v1 \ --synthesizer endpoint/gpt-oss-20b fitz answer "..." --endpoint https://api.together.xyz/v1 \ --synthesizer endpoint/meta-llama-3.1-70b \ --api-key-env TOGETHER_API_KEY
Python SDK
import fitz_sage pack = fitz_sage.evidence("Where is Pyrrho governance implemented?", source="./fitz_sage") print(pack.mode) for item in pack.items: print(item.file_path, item.address_location)The SDK provides:
- Module-level
evidence()matchingfitz retrieve- Module-level
answer()for generated prose from evidence- Local config creation
- Full provenance tracking
- Governance metadata
For advanced use with multiple collections:
from fitz_sage import fitz physics = fitz(collection="physics") pack = physics.evidence("Explain entanglement", source="./physics_papers")
Fully Local (Managed ONNX)
pip install fitz-sage fitz retrieve "Your question here" --source ./docsWith the default retrieval-only config, reranking, governance, query-time expansion, and optional background enrichment run locally, so
fitz retrievedoes not send data to an endpoint. Explicitly configured query intelligence, chat tiers, or vision parsing can send query or source content to that endpoint.Optional synthesis can use vLLM, LM Studio, Ollama in
/v1/mode, TabbyAPI, OpenAI, Together, Groq, Fireworks, OpenRouter, or any endpoint that speaks the OpenAI HTTP protocol.
📦 Real-World Usage
fitz-sage is a retrieval foundation. It manages indexing, search, reranking,
Pyrrho integration, and provenance so products can
build on source evidence.
Chatbot Backend 🤖
Connect fitz to Slack, Discord, Teams, or your own UI. The bot can show source-backed evidence, ask for more documents when Pyrrho marks evidence insufficient, or call
fitz answerfor generated prose.Example: A support bot retrieves policy sections, shows links to the relevant docs, and only synthesizes when the evidence verdict is sufficient.
Internal Knowledge Base 📖
Point fitz at your wiki, policies, runbooks, and repos. Employees ask natural-language questions and get source units with provenance.
Example: New hires ask "How do I request PTO?" and receive the exact policy section plus the governance verdict.
Continuous Intelligence & Alerting (Watchdog) 🐶
Run scheduled queries over changing folders, logs, reports, or exports. Trigger alerts when the evidence pack contains sufficient sources, disputes, or missing-coverage signals.
Example: A nightly job asks "Were there failed logins from unusual locations?" and sends the evidence pack to the on-call channel.
Web Knowledge Base 🌎
Scrape web pages to disk, point fitz at the folder, and query the resulting corpus with provenance.
Example: A research workflow scrapes reports, stores them locally, and asks comparative or temporal questions across the collected source set.
Codebase Search 🐍 → Code Symbol Extraction • KRAG
Code retrieval:
Tree-sitter parses your codebase into symbols with qualified names, references, and import graphs. Function and class lookup is address-based, and dependency questions can use graph expansion.
Example: A team asks "Where is user authentication handled?" and receives specific functions, files, and symbol addresses rather than generic file snippets.
📦 Architecture → Full Architecture Guide
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ fitz-sage │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ User Interfaces │
│ CLI: retrieve | explain | replay | answer | collections | serve│
│ SDK: fitz_sage.evidence(source=...) │
│ API: /answer | /evidence | /chat | /collections | /health │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Engine │
│ FitzKRAG: typed retrieval over code, documents, and tables │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Evidence Contract │
│ EvidencePack: items | mode | reasons | timings | metadata │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Pyrrho │
│ evidence verdict | failure mode | evidence metadata │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Local CPU Models │
│ ONNX reranker | managed Qwen query/background | Pyrrho │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Storage │
│ SQLite + FTS5, one .db per collection │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Optional OpenAI-Compatible Endpoint │
│ answer synthesis | query intelligence | vision │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
📦 CLI Reference → Full CLI Guide
fitz retrieve "question" --source ./docs # Return governed evidence
fitz retrieve "question" # Use current folder or existing collection
fitz retrieve "question" --format json # Evidence with script-friendly controls
fitz answer "question" --synthesizer ... # Generated prose from evidence
fitz collections # List and delete knowledge collections
fitz serve # Start REST API server
Config: .fitz/config.yaml in the current workspace - auto-created on first run. Edit it for optional synthesis, query intelligence,
vision, or custom model/provider choices.
📦 Python SDK Reference → Full SDK Guide
Simple usage (module-level, matches CLI):
import fitz_sage
pack = fitz_sage.evidence("What is the refund policy?", source="./docs")
print(pack.mode)
Advanced usage (multiple collections):
from fitz_sage import fitz
# Create separate instances for different collections
physics = fitz(collection="physics")
legal = fitz(collection="legal")
# Retrieve evidence from each collection
physics_pack = physics.evidence("Explain entanglement", source="./physics_papers")
legal_pack = legal.evidence("What are the payment terms?", source="./contracts")
Working with evidence:
pack = fitz_sage.evidence("Where is Pyrrho governance implemented?", source="./fitz_sage")
print(pack.mode) # runtime AnswerMode: SUFFICIENT, DISPUTED, or INSUFFICIENT
print(pack.reasons)
for item in pack.items:
print(item.file_path, item.address_location, item.line_range)
📦 REST API Reference → Full API Guide
Start the server:
pip install fitz-sage[api]
# Initialize the workspace and collection once
fitz retrieve "What is indexed?" --source ./docs
fitz serve # localhost:8000
fitz serve -p 3000 # custom port
$env:FITZ_API_KEY = "replace-with-a-random-secret"
fitz serve --host 0.0.0.0 # remote access requires the API key
Interactive docs: Visit http://localhost:8000/docs for Swagger UI.
Endpoints:
| Method | Endpoint | Description |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /answer |
Return an optional synthesized answer |
| POST | /evidence |
Return governed evidence without synthesis |
| POST | /chat |
Return generated prose from retrieved evidence |
| GET | /collections |
List all collections |
| GET | /collections/{name} |
Get collection stats |
| POST | /collections/{name}/documents |
Build/update the searchable source index |
| GET | /collections/{name}/status |
Inspect source-index and enrichment status |
| DELETE | /collections/{name} |
Delete a collection |
| GET | /health |
Health check |
Example request:
/answer and /chat require a configured synthesizer. /evidence does not.
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/answer \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"question": "What is the refund policy?", "collection": "default"}'
📦 FAQ / Troubleshooting
fitz command not found after install
Your Python Scripts directory is not on PATH. Use
python -m fitz_sage.cli.cli, or add the Scripts directory to PATH.
PDF/DOCX/PPTX files are being skipped
The base install reads embedded text from these formats. Image-only files need an OCR-capable parser.
parser: glm_ocrexpects a local Ollamaglm-ocrmodel; installfitz-sage[docs]only when you explicitly select a Docling parser.
"Connection refused at localhost:8080" error
This applies to optional endpoint-backed synthesis or query intelligence.
fitz retrieve "..."returns evidence without an endpoint server. For generated prose:fitz answer "..." --synthesizer openai/gpt-4o.
"Model not found" error
The model name in your config does not match what your server has loaded. Check
/v1/modelson your server:curl http://localhost:8080/v1/models. Then updatesynthesizerin.fitz/config.yaml.
First query is slow
First run initializes storage, downloads managed local models if needed, and builds the query-ready index. Later queries reuse the collection.
How do I change my LLM endpoint or model?
Edit
.fitz/config.yaml:synthesizer: endpoint/gpt-oss-20b chat_base_url: http://localhost:8080/v1Or override at the CLI:
fitz answer "..." --endpoint http://localhost:8080/v1 --synthesizer endpoint/gpt-oss-20b
How do I use a cloud provider?
Either use the
openaipreset:synthesizer: openai/gpt-4o # OPENAI_API_KEY in envOr any OpenAI-compatible cloud via the
endpointprovider:synthesizer: endpoint/meta-llama-3.1-70b chat_base_url: https://api.together.xyz/v1 chat_api_key_env: TOGETHER_API_KEY
How do I reset everything?
Delete the
.fitz/directory in your project root. Next run will initialize a fresh workspace.
License
MIT
Links
- GitHub
- PyPI
- Changelog
- Benchmark Report
- Benchmark Methodology
- Production Readiness
- Evaluation Reports
- Measured Limitations
Documentation:
- Docs Index
- Evidence Pack Contract
- Evidence Signals
- Three-Stage Retrieval Strategy
- Query UX
- Managed Models
- CLI Reference
- Python SDK
- REST API
- Configuration Guide
- Architecture
- Unified Storage (SQLite + FTS5)
- Searchable Index & Background Enrichment
- Ingestion Pipeline
- Enrichment (Hierarchies, Entities)
- Epistemic Governance (Pyrrho)
- Extension Points
- Feature Control
- KRAG — Knowledge Routing Augmented Generation
- Code Symbol Extraction
- Tabular Data Routing
- Enterprise Gateway
- Engines
- Configuration Examples
- Custom Engines
- Troubleshooting
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file fitz_sage-0.16.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: fitz_sage-0.16.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 333.3 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via:
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
806d6027a772c018f2deac15ce381b024086d5b35853a74a68f6b10e82d6c0a5
|
|
| MD5 |
98372193718e1ae31c7ba4590a22d8fe
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
87ad2791e9527e1b43ead8264bdeafac34e71189e48ed047e643253675992306
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for fitz_sage-0.16.0.tar.gz:
Publisher:
release.yml on yafitzdev/fitz-sage
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
fitz_sage-0.16.0.tar.gz -
Subject digest:
806d6027a772c018f2deac15ce381b024086d5b35853a74a68f6b10e82d6c0a5 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2387198216
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
yafitzdev/fitz-sage@4fc32405db0d06beb7fc404c6cbd80d9aba4fd9c -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v0.16.0 - Owner: https://github.com/yafitzdev
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
release.yml@4fc32405db0d06beb7fc404c6cbd80d9aba4fd9c -
Trigger Event:
release
-
Statement type:
File details
Details for the file fitz_sage-0.16.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: fitz_sage-0.16.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 396.1 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
- Uploaded via:
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
f44562d3fd629535eb2469f9913e58879ca92e5afc7fca337aa5d027e8d5f9d2
|
|
| MD5 |
4e01dca4d9bded3c8632d96ac5f53526
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
f088e3ec8e4eaa368b4089ef28a1db9b304ebe33a411e778507014bf790a82f2
|
Provenance
The following attestation bundles were made for fitz_sage-0.16.0-py3-none-any.whl:
Publisher:
release.yml on yafitzdev/fitz-sage
-
Statement:
-
Statement type:
https://in-toto.io/Statement/v1 -
Predicate type:
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 -
Subject name:
fitz_sage-0.16.0-py3-none-any.whl -
Subject digest:
f44562d3fd629535eb2469f9913e58879ca92e5afc7fca337aa5d027e8d5f9d2 - Sigstore transparency entry: 2387198298
- Sigstore integration time:
-
Permalink:
yafitzdev/fitz-sage@4fc32405db0d06beb7fc404c6cbd80d9aba4fd9c -
Branch / Tag:
refs/tags/v0.16.0 - Owner: https://github.com/yafitzdev
-
Access:
public
-
Token Issuer:
https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com -
Runner Environment:
github-hosted -
Publication workflow:
release.yml@4fc32405db0d06beb7fc404c6cbd80d9aba4fd9c -
Trigger Event:
release
-
Statement type: