fleet-sensor-baseline

Which units differ from their cohort, and what changed on this unit across time.

bmc-sensor-audit judges one machine against one declaration. This layer holds the list of machines and the history of captures, and answers the two questions the referee cannot.

Released — 0.1.2, tagged v0.1.2, Apache-2.0, on PyPI as fleet-sensor-baseline.

---

The problem

A tray reported forty-five sensors before a firmware update and forty-two after it. Every remaining sensor is healthy. Every threshold is in range. A single-machine audit finds nothing, because the machine agrees with itself — only the previous capture disagrees, and nothing was holding it.

Scale that sideways: five trays in a rack of two thousand quietly stopped exposing a fan sensor after a board revision. Each one, audited alone, looks fine.

Those are the two axes here. Vertical is one unit across time. Horizontal is one unit against its cohort.

Install

pip install fleet-sensor-baseline

The core has no dependencies. Ingest, baseline, outliers, drift, verdict and validate are JSON and arithmetic, so the vertical and horizontal axes run on a jump host with nothing provisioned. The collector needs the referee on PATH:

pip install "fleet-sensor-baseline[collect]"

Use

# file the captures somebody gathered
fleet-sensor-baseline ingest --store fleet-store --payloads walks/ records/*.json

# what changed on one unit, across time and firmware
fleet-sensor-baseline drift --store fleet-store --unit h-0042

# derive a cohort baseline, then find the units that differ from it
fleet-sensor-baseline baseline --store fleet-store --model GB200-NVL-tray \
    --firmware-range ">=1.4,<1.5" --out baseline.json
fleet-sensor-baseline outliers --store fleet-store --baseline baseline.json

# the fleet run: every expected unit must have reported
fleet-sensor-baseline verdict --store fleet-store --expect-units racks.txt

# check any artifact against the format it declares
fleet-sensor-baseline validate baseline.json

# walk a rack of BMCs yourself, serially, and file what comes back
fleet-sensor-baseline collect --targets rack-17.json --store fleet-store \
    --collector-id rack-17

Asking before walking

fleet-sensor-baseline collect --targets rack-17.json --store fleet-store \
    --collector-id rack-17 --etag-cache

The referee keeps one collection-ETag cache per BMC surface in the store and asks each machine whether its sensor set changed before walking it — a handful of requests instead of one per sensor.

It proves membership, and a record filed from a skip says so. The record reuses the previous capture's payload and carries {"basis": "collection-etag", "proves": "membership"}. That is exactly what drift, outliers and verdict need, since all three read the name set; it is not enough for a threshold audit, and the record is explicit rather than looking like a fresh walk. A BMC that does not implement ETags is walked every time.

Needs bmc-sensor-audit>=0.1.2.

collect is the only subcommand that needs the referee on PATH. It walks one BMC at a time with exponential backoff, because AST2600-class BMCs measure a Redfish walk in seconds and a central plane that fans out to ten thousand of them is a denial of service with a scheduler. A walk that fails is a record, emitted — a unit that could not be walked reports as could-not-walk and keeps its place in the denominator.

Credentials are named, never stored: a target carries password_env, the name of an environment variable, and a password key in a targets file is refused rather than ignored.

Exit codes

code	means
0	clean
1	findings, and they are named
2	the check could not be completed, and it says which part

Precedence is max, and 2 beats 1 deliberately. A run that found three outliers and could not reach a fourth unit has not found three outliers; it has found three and does not know about the fourth. Anything outside {0,1,2} from a subprocess is read as 2 with the raw code kept beside it — "exited 127" is the useful half of that sentence.

"N units could not be walked" is printed, never omitted. A fleet report that renders incompleteness as silence renders a dead collector as a clean rack.

What this is not

1. Never a dashboard. The verdict is an exit code. Visualisation may exist and is never the source of judgment. Silence cannot impersonate a pass.
2. Never metric values. This audits presence and configuration, not readings.
3. Never majority-truth over declarations. A fleet-derived baseline is an additional, labeled, downgraded declaration source. Wherever a manufacturer declaration exists, it wins.
4. Never identity inside the referee's artifacts. The walk payload carries no unit_key. Identity binds here.

Point 3 is the one that matters

A baseline derived from a fleet cannot see an absence the whole cohort shares. Two thousand trays that all lost the same sensor in the same firmware agree with each other perfectly, and consensus reports them clean.

So every fleet-baseline/1 carries this sentence as part of the format, and every consumer prints it verbatim:

This baseline was derived from the fleet, not declared by a manufacturer. It cannot see an absence the whole cohort shares.

tests/test_scenarios.py::TestS2CommonModeBlindness demonstrates the blindness on purpose, and pairs it with bmc-sensor-audit coverage finding the same absence against a manufacturer declaration. The pair of assertions is the precedence rule, made executable.

Formats

Four, each versioned and each with a shipped validator, because the person who receives the file is the one who needs to check it:

format	is
fleet-sensor-baseline/fleet-record/1	one capture of one unit
fleet-sensor-baseline/fleet-baseline/1	a derived declaration, labeled as such
fleet-sensor-baseline/summary/1	a verdict, in the family's one vocabulary
fleet-sensor-baseline/targets/1	the collector's rack list

fleet-sensor-baseline validate PATH checks any of them, dispatching on the format key the file declares rather than on a shape guessed from the fields present.

See docs/formats.md.

Storage

An append-only JSONL index and a content-addressed store. Corrections are new lines, never edits; the reader takes the latest per surface and capture time. The store does not deduplicate captures, and an earlier version of this line said it did. A walk/1 carries per-fetch latencies and a capture time, so two walks of one unchanged machine never share a digest. What avoids re-storing an unchanged walk is not walking it — see collect --etag-cache below.

No time-series database in 0.x, and that is a measurement rather than a preference: configuration drift is per-boot and per-firmware-event, not per-second. Revisit when cross-month queries exist and are slow.

A unit is a tuple

On NVIDIA-class platforms one physical unit answers on more than one BMC — a host BMC and an HMC behind bmcweb aggregation. Two records differing only in satellite are two surfaces of one machine, not two machines. Pairing across time is surface to surface; presence across the cohort is the union across a unit's surfaces.

The boundary

This package never imports bmc_sensor_audit. It reads exit codes, stdout and the files the tool writes. One module is exempt — collect/backends/mock.py, which imports the referee's MockBMC, and the distinction is the design: that is a fake machine, standing in for the thing being walked, not the thing doing the walking.

tests/test_boundary.py asserts both halves by reading the source: that nothing else imports it, and that the mock backend still does. Without the second, the first would pass by finding nothing.

Tests

	count
tests collected	229
of those, requiring bmc-sensor-audit	27

The predicate: pytest --collect-only over the test files git tracks, and the same again with -m seam for the second row. Collection rather than a pass tally, because a skip count is true only on the machine that measured it — tests/test_readme_counts.py derives both and fails if either drifts.

Run it dependency-free and the 27 skip. Install the referee and they run.

No pass/skip tally is quoted here on purpose. The first version of this section did, and both numbers were wrong within a day — not because tests changed, but because the repository gained a tag and one check stopped skipping. A tally is a fact about the machine that measured it; the collected counts above are facts about the suite, and something derives them.

Every skip says in prose why it could not run, and exits clean. Could not check is a different answer from found nothing, and a suite that reported the two identically would let a missing dependency read as a green seam.

The dependency-free lane's walk fixtures are hand-built, which is a liability this suite names rather than hides: a fixture written from a reading of a format agrees with that format by construction. tests/test_seam.py is the answer — it generates a walk with the referee's own reader and asserts the fixture still matches.

Upstream

Pinned at bmc-sensor-audit>=0.1.2,<0.2, and the floor is derived, not chosen. It was >=0.1.1 — enough for validate-walk and the handle from capture --print-digest. It moved because the collector now passes --password-env, so a credential never crosses argv, and declares an added aggregation prefix in one entry. Neither exists in 0.1.1.

Four gaps reported from here were fixed there, and 0.1.2 is where they landed: conditional requests, certificate pinning, a password off argv, and a prefix that was added being declarable at all. Raising the floor is what turns them from a note into a capability. See docs/upstream-asks.md.

None of the four was a bug. Each was a surface that was never there — which a test suite cannot find, because it asks whether what exists is correct. Only a second program with a real job discovers that what it needed was missing.

Licence

Apache-2.0. See LICENSE and NOTICE.