folbench 0.1.2

FOLBench: A Logic-Grounded Evaluation Suite for Evaluating Open-Ended Responses using Graph-Based Semantic Metrics on First-Order Logic form of Natural Language

FOLBench: A Logic-Grounded Evaluation Suite for Evaluating Open-Ended Responses using Graph-Based Semantic Metrics on First-Order Logic form of Natural Language

FOLBench is an evaluation suite for assessing the quality of Logical Coherence and Correctness by feeding First-Order Logic (FOL) of the corresponding Natural Language. It provides a deterministic, reproducible, and multi-faceted framework for measuring how well logically aligned are they in graph structures.

🎯 Key Features

• Multi-Metric Evaluation: Uses 6 core metrics to evaluate different aspects of logical coherence and correctness quality:

  • PAAS: Predicate-Argument Alignment Score (Semantic matching)
  • QSS: Quantifier Scope Similarity (Structural accuracy)
  • VBC: Variable Binding Consistency (Binding accuracy)
  • CLE: Canonicalized Logical Equivalence (Identity testing)
  • TED: Tree Edit Distance (Structural Edits)
  • HS: Hungarian Similarity (Structural Matching)

• Composite Score: Combines individual metrics into a single FOLBench Score (0–1).

• Visualization Tools: Built-in functions to visualize FOL graphs and debug translations.

📚 Metrics Overview

Metric	Description	Range	Use Case
PAAS	Measures alignment between predicate arguments	0–1.0	Semantic correctness
QSS	Measures quantifier scope structure	0–1.0	Structural accuracy
VBC	Measures variable binding consistency	0–1.0	Binding accuracy
CLE	Checks logical equivalence of graphs	0–1.0	Equivalence testing
TED	Checks structural edits needed for logical equivalence of graphs	0–1.0	Equivalence testing
HS	Checks matching cost for logical equivalence of graphs	0–1.0	Equivalence testing
FOLBench Score	Composite metric (0–1)	0–1	Comprehensive logical coherence and correctness score

🚀 Installation

pip install folbench

🔧 Usage

Basic Evaluation

from FOLBench.metrics import folbench_score, predicate_argument_alignment_score, quantifier_scope_similarity, variable_binding_consistency, equivalence_score, ted_structural_similarity, predicate_alignment_hungarian_similarity, visualize_fol_graph

graph_pred = ...  # Your predicted First-Order Logic formula
graph_gold = ...  # The gold standard First-Order Logic formula

# Calculate composite score
score = folbench_score(graph_pred, graph_gold)
print(f"FOLBench Score: {score:.2f}")

# Individual metrics
paas = predicate_argument_alignment_score(graph_pred, graph_gold)
qss = quantifier_scope_similarity(graph_pred, graph_gold)
vbc = variable_binding_consistency(graph_pred, graph_gold)
cle = equivalence_score(graph_pred, graph_gold)
ted_score = ted(graph_pred, graph_gold)

# Visualize graphs
visualize_fol_graph(graph_pred, title="Predicted Graph")
visualize_fol_graph(graph_gold, title="Gold Graph")

📊 Composite Score Calculation

The final score is a weighted average of the individual metrics:

FOLBench Score = (w1*PAAS + w2*QSS + w3*VBC + w4*CLE + w5*TED + w6*HS)

By default, all metrics have equal weight (0.16) but are customizable.