Skip to main content

fsguard-mcp

A filesystem + git MCP server that confines every operation to an allowed directory tree using symlink-resolved path containment, not string prefix matching.

Why this exists

Anthropic's own official filesystem and git MCP servers (@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem, part of modelcontextprotocol/servers, 89.7k★) have carried five separate path-confinement CVEs across two servers in ten months, and the pattern is still active:

  • CVE-2025-53109 / CVE-2025-53110 (filesystem, CVSS 8.4/7.3) — the "allowed directory" check used naive startsWith() prefix matching, defeated by symlinks and by sibling directories that merely share a string prefix (e.g. an allowed /home/user-safe also matches /home/user-safe-evil), giving filesystem-wide read/write and a documented RCE path.
  • CVE-2025-68143 / CVE-2025-68144 / CVE-2025-68145 (git) — git_init accepted arbitrary unvalidated paths, git_diff/git_checkout passed user-controlled arguments straight to the git CLI (argument injection), and --repository-confined mode didn't actually verify repo_path stayed inside the confined directory.
  • CVE-2026-27735 (git, disclosed ~2 months before this project started) — git_add, implemented via GitPython's repo.index.add(), doesn't enforce working-tree boundaries for ../-style paths, allowing staging and exfiltrating files outside the repo.
  • A documented RCE chain: git_init in a writable directory → a malicious .git/config with a "clean" filter → a .gitattributes that applies it → git_add triggers the filter → arbitrary shell command runs.

Every one of these was patched with another string/prefix check bolted onto that one function. Nobody moved the boundary enforcement to a place a new tool can't simply forget to include — which is exactly how the fourth CVE landed four months after the first three were "fixed."

How fsguard-mcp is different

  1. One safety primitive, used everywhere. Every tool — filesystem or git — resolves its target path through the same ConfinedRoot (see confined_path.py) before doing anything else. There's no per-tool path check to forget.
  2. Symlink-resolved, component-based containment — not string matching. A path is only inside the root if its fully resolved real path (every symlink followed) is a real ancestor-relative subpath of the root's own resolved real path, checked with Path.is_relative_to() on resolved paths — never startswith() on a string. This alone closes CVE-2025-53109/53110's exact failure mode: /allowed-evil cannot pass a containment check against a resolved root of /allowed, because path-component comparison isn't string-prefix comparison.
  3. No shelling out to git for content, ever. Git operations run through dulwich — a pure-Python git implementation with no subprocess and no argv built from user input for anything content-related, and (critically) no clean/smudge filter execution, which is what the documented RCE chain depends on. There is no argument-injection surface here because there's no argument list being handed to an external process for reading/writing file content. (dulwich does still run pre-commit/commit-msg/post-commit hooks via subprocess.call() if they exist — real process execution, unrelated to content filtering. git_commit always passes no_verify=True to skip them categorically, rather than relying on them happening not to be runnable.)
  4. Write operations validate the parent directory too, not just an existing target — closing the class of bug where a target doesn't exist yet (so "does this path resolve inside the root" was checked against a path that doesn't exist, and therefore couldn't be symlink-resolved) but its parent directory is itself a symlink pointing outside. Non-existent path segments are lexically normalized (./.. collapsed as pure path algebra) before any of this, independent of what happens to exist on disk — an earlier version of this project checked containment before normalizing, which happened to pass all its tests on Windows (whose path APIs normalize .. for you) while being bypassable on Linux/macOS. It's fixed now, and there are tests for the exact case, but it's the reason this project treats "the test suite is green on my machine" with real suspicion.
  5. .git/config can't redirect operations outside the root. dulwich honors a repo's own core.worktree config entry, and every git operation re-opens a Repo from a path string internally — so a caller could write a .git/config with core.worktree pointing anywhere, and every subsequent git tool would silently operate outside the confined root, invisible to the per-path check (which only ever sees the confined repo directory, never wherever dulwich actually redirected itself to). This was found in this project's own second-round security review — a real read/exfiltration primitive using nothing but this server's own exposed tools, more severe than any CVE it was built to fix. Every git tool now refuses to open a repo whose config sets core.worktree at all, and independently re-verifies that the Repo object it actually opened reports its working path as the exact directory that was validated.
  6. UNC paths and cross-drive paths are rejected before touching the network or disk at all. Resolving a \\host\share\... path makes Windows actually attempt an SMB connection — and Windows will try to authenticate that connection as the server process, which is the "forced NTLM auth via UNC path" credential-theft technique, on top of blocking the server for a full connection timeout against an unreachable host. A candidate anchored on a different drive or host than the confined root is now rejected by a cheap string comparison, before any filesystem or network call. NTFS Alternate Data Streams (file.txt:hidden) are also rejected outright — they're invisible to directory listings but fully readable/writable through the same path string, and can forge the absence of Windows' download-warning "Mark of the Web."

Tools

Tool Does
fs_read(path) Read a text file
fs_write(path, content) Create or overwrite a text file
fs_list(path=".") List a directory's entries
fs_search(pattern, path=".") Find files matching a glob pattern, recursively
fs_move(source, destination) Move/rename a file
git_init_repo(repo_path) Initialize a git repository
git_repo_status(repo_path=".") Staged/unstaged/untracked files
git_stage(repo_path, paths) Stage files
git_commit_repo(repo_path, message, author) Commit staged changes
git_diff_repo(repo_path=".", staged=False) Show a diff
git_log_repo(repo_path=".", max_entries=10) Show commit history

Setup

pip install fsguard-mcp
export FSGUARD_ROOT="/path/to/the/one/directory/tree/this/server/may/touch"
fsguard-mcp

FSGUARD_ROOT is required — there is no default, and the server refuses to guess one. Point your MCP client at the fsguard-mcp command with FSGUARD_ROOT set in its env config.

Testing

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest tests/ -v

All 68 tests are self-contained (real temp directories, real symlinks, real git repos) — no external services needed.

Known limitation

Containment is checked, then a filesystem operation runs — there is an inherent TOCTOU (time-of-check-to-time-of-use) gap between the two. A concurrent process with write access to the confined root's own tree could in principle swap a symlink in that window (verified with a working proof-of-concept during review). Closing this fully needs an OS-level primitive (e.g. Linux openat2(RESOLVE_BENEATH), a real mount namespace) rather than anything achievable in portable Python; this project's guarantee is "correct containment logic, checked immediately before use," not "immune to a concurrent attacker who can already write inside the root."

Status

68 passing tests (unit-level, with real symlinks and real git repos created on disk — not just string-logic assertions). Went through two rounds of adversarial security review before its first commit; both found real, working bypasses (a ..-traversal escape through not-yet-existing paths on POSIX, and the core.worktree redirection above, among smaller findings) that are now fixed and covered by tests written directly against the reported exploit. Not yet published to PyPI.

License

MIT

Metadata

Release files for fsguard-mcp 0.1.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for fsguard-mcp 0.1.0
File Size Uploaded Provenance
fsguard_mcp-0.1.0.tar.gz 18.6 kB Without provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for fsguard-mcp 0.1.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
fsguard_mcp-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 34.0 kB

Release files / fsguard_mcp-0.1.0.tar.gz

Download URL fsguard_mcp-0.1.0.tar.gz
Size 18.6 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
9ba10e7b0d3b21645f283b2e6a4fa4426ff36d0538b7ed2434d24edd1962ba21
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
1eff3cdf3f1c97b7984526fa1c324c3ec5cc45ea322b31b99801b500a9459364
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.12.5

Release files / fsguard_mcp-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL fsguard_mcp-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 15.4 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
d2e9f3518b75ca2f9bb6dd78b9044cec9492dc549f8b22396587bc6e5e8eb00c
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2d46237b3c485364e3d43554f4dd27e5e0941af8425f8e7ee65dacbcde190906
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.12.5

Security for fsguard-mcp 0.1.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

0.1.0 This release

2 release files No provenance

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page