Skip to main content

Furones: Approximate Dominating Set Solver

In Loving Memory of Asia Furones (The Grandmother I Never Knew)

This work builds upon The Furones Algorithm.


Overview of the Minimum Dominating Set (MDS)

Definition

A dominating set in a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a subset $D \subseteq V$ such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The minimum dominating set (MDS) is the smallest possible dominating set in terms of the number of vertices.

Computational Complexity

  • NP-Hard: Finding the minimum dominating set is NP-hard; no polynomial-time exact algorithm is known for general graphs.
  • Approximation: The greedy Set Cover heuristic gives a ratio $H(\Delta+1) \le 1 + \ln(\Delta+1) = \mathcal{O}(\log \Delta)$, where $\Delta$ is the maximum degree. This is tight and matches the $o(\ln n)$-in-$n$ inapproximability threshold (Dinur–Steurer).

Applications

  • Network monitoring and wireless sensor coverage
  • Influence maximisation in social networks
  • Facility placement and logistics
  • Protein–protein interaction modelling

The Furones Algorithm

Furones v0.3.8 is a linear-time candidate-comparison solver for MDS. It builds a portfolio of dominating-set candidates on the input graph and returns the smallest validated one.

New in v0.3.8: a max-cut double-cover candidate ($C_X$) — it computes an exact min-side maximum cut of the bipartite double cover of the working graph and decodes it into a validated dominating-set candidate (see below). The pseudocode, gadget, correctness, and runtime are documented in the manuscript.

The pipeline consists of:

  1. Preprocessing: self-loop removal, isolated-vertex separation.
  2. TSCC-style pendant cascade (ReduceToTSCCForDS): iteratively commits pendant supports and isolated vertices to a forced set $F$, producing a reduced residual.
  3. Baker-style reduced solve on the residual (treated as planar by construction): used only as a validated candidate generator — its output enters the pool and is admitted only after passing the domination check; none of the unconditional guarantees depend on it.
  4. Lifted candidate $C_L = F \cup \ell(D_R)$: lifts the reduced solution back to original labels.
  5. Original-graph linear candidates (all computed in $\mathcal{O}(n+m)$):
    • $C_G$ — greedy maximum-coverage (certifies the $H(\Delta+1)$ ratio)
    • $C_D$ — closed-degree coverage sweep
    • $C_W$, $C_M$ — low- and medium-degree witness sweeps
    • $C_O$ — order-ownership candidates (early and late)
    • $C_S$ — seed-and-complete
    • $C_B$ — Salvador-style bipartite auxiliary
    • $C_X$ — max-cut double-cover (min-side maximum cut of the bipartite double cover $B(H)$, decoded by first coordinate; validated)
    • $C_R$ — reverse-delete (multiple deterministic orders)
  6. Pruning (PruneRedundantDominating): each candidate is made inclusion-minimal.
  7. Portfolio minimum: the smallest valid (dominates the original graph) pruned candidate is returned.

Unconditional guarantees

  • Feasibility (Theorem): every normal return is a dominating set of the input graph.
  • Approximation ratio (Theorem): because the portfolio contains $C_G$, every returned set $D$ satisfies $|D| \le H(\Delta+1),\gamma(G) \le (1+\ln(\Delta+1)),\gamma(G) = \mathcal{O}(\log \Delta)$.
  • Constant factor on bounded-degree graphs (Corollary): for any fixed $\Delta$, the ratio is at most $1 + \ln(\Delta+1)$.

Near-threshold ratio hypothesis

Furones is conjectured to satisfy $|D| \le \max\{4,,\frac{1}{2}\ln n\}\cdot\gamma(G)$ on every graph. Proving this for all graphs would imply P = NP (via Dinur–Steurer). The hypothesis is already proved unconditionally for all graphs of maximum degree $\Delta \le \sqrt{n}/e$.

Runtime

$\mathcal{O}(n+m)$ for fixed parameters (large hidden constant). The Baker reduced-solve uses the default $\varepsilon = 1$ (shift $k = 1$), a constant factor; the max-cut double-cover candidate $C_X$ is also $\mathcal{O}(n+m)$ (build the double cover with $2n$ nodes and $2m$ edges, then one BFS min-side cut).


CAR Benchmarks

The car/ folder contains three reproducible exact-optimum studies. Every study imports the installed Furones package and compares it against the exact domination number $\gamma(G)$ computed by exhaustive search.

CAR-001: Core Exact Benchmark (run_integrity_measurements.py)

  • 1 000 instances, at most 14 vertices, seven graph families (Erdős–Rényi sparse/medium/dense, random bipartite, random trees, perturbed paths/cycles, small structured).
  • Exact $\gamma(G)$ by exhaustive search for every instance.
  • Result: Furones is optimal on all 1 000 instances (100.0 %); observed ratio $\hat{\rho} = 1.000$.
Family Instances $n$ $\gamma$ Optimal Mean ratio Max ratio
Erdős–Rényi sparse 200 6–14 2–10 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Erdős–Rényi medium 200 6–14 2–5 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Erdős–Rényi dense 150 6–14 1–4 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Random bipartite 150 6–14 2–9 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Random trees 100 6–14 2–6 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Perturbed paths/cycles 100 6–14 2–5 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Small structured 100 6–14 1–4 100.0 % 1.000 1.000
Overall 1000 6–14 1–10 100.0 % 1.000 1.000

CAR-002: Per-Strategy Ablation (run_integrity_measurements.py)

Each exposed strategy is measured independently on the same 1 000-instance benchmark.

Strategy Valid Optimal Mean ratio Max ratio
Seed-and-complete 100.0 % 99.8 % 1.000 1.250
Greedy max-coverage ($C_G$) 100.0 % 92.7 % 1.023 1.500
Closed-degree coverage 100.0 % 89.0 % 1.048 2.500
Reverse delete, low-degree 100.0 % 88.7 % 1.049 2.500
Medium-degree witnesses 100.0 % 88.3 % 1.054 2.500
TSCC/Baker/lift 100.0 % 87.8 % 1.052 2.000
Salvador auxiliary 100.0 % 84.9 % 1.107 5.000
Low-degree witnesses 100.0 % 84.8 % 1.080 3.000
Order ownership, late 79.2 % 65.8 % 1.060 2.000
Order ownership, early 79.2 % 64.5 % 1.065 2.000
Reverse delete, reverse 100.0 % 61.2 % 1.176 3.500
Max-cut double cover ($C_X$) 100.0 % 58.4 % 1.217 5.000
Reverse delete, input order 100.0 % 57.9 % 1.241 5.000
Reverse delete, high-degree 100.0 % 27.9 % 1.428 5.000

No single strategy is universally optimal; the portfolio minimum combines them to achieve 100 % optimal on every instance.

CAR-003: High-Degree / Dense Regime (run_high_degree_experiment.py)

Probes the regime $\Delta > \sqrt{n}/e$ left open by the low-degree proposition. Base seed 12 345, 1 000 instances from seven dense families (complete, cocktail-party, dense circulant, random regular, dense Erdős–Rényi, perturbed hypercube, perturbed Paley), including perfect-code stress cases ($\tau(G) = 1$).

Family Inst. $n$ $\Delta$ $\tau$ Mean ratio Max ratio ≤ ρ(n)
Complete 143 6–16 5–15 1.00 1.000 1.000 100 %
Cocktail party 143 6–16 4–14 1.67–1.88 1.000 1.000 100 %
Dense circulant 143 8–16 4–15 1.00–1.88 1.000 1.000 100 %
Random regular 143 8–16 2–8 1.00–1.69 1.000 1.000 100 %
Dense Erdős–Rényi 143 8–16 4–15 1.00–2.44 1.000 1.000 100 %
Hypercube (perturbed) 143 8–16 3–6 1.00–1.75 1.000 1.000 100 %
Paley (perturbed) 142 5–13 2–7 1.00–1.85 1.000 1.000 100 %
Overall 1000 5–16 2–15 1.00–2.44 1.000 1.000 100 %

Furones is optimal on all 1 000 high-degree instances, including every $\tau(G) = 1$ perfect-code case. Zero violations of $\rho(n) = \max\{4, \frac{1}{2}\ln n\}$.

CAR-004: Adversarial Stress Test (run_adversarial_experiment.py)

Actively searches for worst-case instances. Base seed 1 000, 10 000 instances from seven adversarial families: greedy traps, geometric set-cover gadgets, perturbed perfect-code graphs, near-efficient circulants, cocktail-party/multipartite graphs, dense random-regular, and dense Erdős–Rényi. Exact $\gamma(G)$ by exhaustive search on every instance.

Adversarial family Inst. $n$ $\gamma$ Mean ratio Max ratio Optimal ≤ ρ(n)
Greedy trap 1 429 6–16 2–4 1.000 1.000 100.0 % 100 %
Geometric set-cover 1 429 10–16 3–5 1.000 1.000 100.0 % 100 %
Perfect-code perturbed 1 429 7–16 1–4 1.000 1.000 100.0 % 100 %
Efficient circulant 1 429 10–16 2–4 1.000 1.000 100.0 % 100 %
Cocktail / multipartite 1 428 4–16 2 1.000 1.000 100.0 % 100 %
Random dense 1 428 8–16 1–5 1.000 1.000 100.0 % 100 %
Random regular 1 428 8–16 2–5 1.001 1.333 99.7 % 100 %
Overall 10 000 4–16 1–5 1.000 1.333 99.95 % 100 %

Zero violations of $\rho(n)$ across all 10 000 adversarial instances. The worst observed ratio was 1.333 (a dense random-regular graph, $n = 16$, $\gamma = 3$, returned size 4), well below $\rho = 4$.


Problem Statement

Input: A Boolean Adjacency Matrix $M$.

Answer: Find a Minimum Dominating Set.

Example Instance: 5 × 5 matrix

c1 c2 c3 c4 c5
r1 0 0 1 0 1
r2 0 0 0 1 0
r3 1 0 0 0 1
r4 0 1 0 0 0
r5 1 0 1 0 0

The input for undirected graphs is provided in DIMACS format:

p edge 5 4
e 1 3
e 1 5
e 2 4
e 3 5

Example Solution:

Dominating Set Found 1, 2: nodes 1 and 2 constitute an optimal solution.


Compile and Environment

Prerequisites

  • Python ≥ 3.12

Installation

pip install furones

Execution

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone https://github.com/frankvegadelgado/furones.git
    cd furones
    
  2. Run the script:

    asia -i ./benchmarks/testMatrix1
    

    Example Output:

    testMatrix1: Dominating Set Found 1, 2
    

Dominating Set Size

Use the -c flag to count the nodes in the Dominating Set:

asia -i ./benchmarks/testMatrix2 -c

Output:

testMatrix2: Dominating Set Size 4

Command Options

asia -h

Output:

usage: asia [-h] -i INPUTFILE [-a] [-b] [-c] [-v] [-l] [--consistency] [--version]

Solve the Approximate Minimum Dominating Set for undirected graph encoded in DIMACS format.

options:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -i INPUTFILE, --inputFile INPUTFILE
                        input file path
  -a, --approximation   enable comparison with a polynomial-time approximation approach within a logarithmic factor
  -b, --bruteForce      enable comparison with the exponential-time brute-force approach
  -c, --count           calculate the size of the Dominating Set
  -v, --verbose         enable verbose output
  -l, --log             enable file logging
  --consistency         require a linear-time certificate for the Furones approximation bound
  --version             show program's version number and exit

Batch Execution

batch_asia -h

Output:

usage: batch_asia [-h] -i INPUTDIRECTORY [-a] [-b] [-c] [-v] [-l] [--consistency] [--version]

Solve the Approximate Minimum Dominating Set for all undirected graphs encoded in DIMACS format and stored in a directory.

options:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -i INPUTDIRECTORY, --inputDirectory INPUTDIRECTORY
                        Input directory path
  -a, --approximation   enable comparison with a polynomial-time approximation approach within a logarithmic factor
  -b, --bruteForce      enable comparison with the exponential-time brute-force approach
  -c, --count           calculate the size of the Dominating Set
  -v, --verbose         enable verbose output
  -l, --log             enable file logging
  --consistency         require a linear-time certificate for the Furones approximation bound
  --version             show program's version number and exit

Testing Application

usage: test_asia [-h] -d DIMENSION [-n NUM_TESTS] [-s SPARSITY] [-a] [-b] [-c] [-w] [-v] [-l] [--consistency] [--version]

The Furones Testing Application using randomly generated, large sparse matrices.

options:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -d DIMENSION, --dimension DIMENSION
                        an integer specifying the dimensions of the square matrices
  -n NUM_TESTS, --num_tests NUM_TESTS
                        an integer specifying the number of tests to run
  -s SPARSITY, --sparsity SPARSITY
                        sparsity of the matrices (0.0 for dense, close to 1.0 for very sparse)
  -a, --approximation   enable comparison with a polynomial-time approximation approach within a logarithmic factor
  -b, --bruteForce      enable comparison with the exponential-time brute-force approach
  -c, --count           calculate the size of the Dominating Set
  -w, --write           write the generated random matrix to a file in the current directory
  -v, --verbose         enable verbose output
  -l, --log             enable file logging
  --consistency         require a linear-time certificate for the Furones approximation bound
  --version             show program's version number and exit

Code

  • Python implementation by Frank Vega.

Complexity

+ We present a linear-time portfolio algorithm for MDS with an unconditional H(Δ+1) approximation guarantee and exact performance across the CAR benchmarks: optimal on all 1 000 core and 1 000 high-degree instances, and zero factor-4 violations across 10 000 adversarial instances.

License

  • MIT License.

Metadata

Release files for furones 0.3.8

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for furones 0.3.8
File Size Uploaded
furones-0.3.8.tar.gz 55.5 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for furones 0.3.8
File Interpreter ABI Platform
furones-0.3.8-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 109.1 kB

Release files / furones-0.3.8.tar.gz

Download URL furones-0.3.8.tar.gz
Size 55.5 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ac65778b61bce4e71446c53b60e1f3e033acbcceef46a1d41ab509eaeac61fbd
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
9e48b9b51f2133e990d37cf4111eba2e1d12b25a32beed1d953414b2190a6a8a
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 4, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / furones-0.3.8-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL furones-0.3.8-py3-none-any.whl
Size 53.6 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
3b9c63f648dab9b9c2c61d431275015abcd7131d34d9e022abb99c04980466b7
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5f765e020bb2eba77f97702a708635375c821c1464680ef381a00aa6881fde9f
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 4, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

0.3.8 This release

2 release files

0.3.7

2 release files

0.3.6

2 release files

0.3.5

2 release files

0.3.4

2 release files

0.3.3

2 release files

0.3.2

2 release files

0.3.1

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

0.2.9

2 release files

0.2.8

2 release files

0.2.7

2 release files

0.2.6

2 release files

0.2.5

2 release files

0.2.4

2 release files

0.2.3

2 release files

0.2.2

2 release files

0.2.1

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

0.1.9

2 release files

0.1.8

2 release files

0.1.7

2 release files

0.1.6

2 release files

0.1.5

2 release files

0.1.3

2 release files

0.1.2

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

0.0.9

2 release files

0.0.8

2 release files

0.0.7

2 release files

0.0.6

2 release files

0.0.5

2 release files

0.0.4

2 release files

0.0.3

2 release files

0.0.2

2 release files

0.0.1

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page