gabp-sparse-inv 0.3.3

Differentiable selected inverse (plus log-det, Gaussian sampling, and solve) for sparse block-structured SPD and non-symmetric matrices, via Gaussian belief propagation / the Takahashi recurrence.

gabp-sparse-inv

Sparse selected-inverse kernels for block-structured matrices (SPD and structured non-symmetric), in PyTorch, with exact gradients. For each supported pattern the package computes only the blocks of A^-1 that lie on A's own (or its filled) sparsity pattern, without forming the dense inverse.

The organizing principle: when the block structure of A is a tree, selected inversion is a two-pass collect/distribute schedule that is exactly Gaussian Belief Propagation and equals the Takahashi recurrence. See docs/derivations.md for the theorem and proofs.

New to the codebase? docs/ARCHITECTURE.md is the module map, the conventions, and the pattern for adding a kernel.

Statement of need

Matrix inversion increasingly sits inside differentiable models: deep-equilibrium layers, gated linear attention and the delta rule, and other implicit / fixed-point layers place a structured linear solve in the forward pass and its adjoint in the backward pass. The dense inverse is O(N^3); the on-pattern selected inverse of a low-treewidth matrix is O(n) (trees) to O(n^1.5) (2-D grids). Existing selected-inversion libraries (SelInv, PEXSI) target compiled HPC and are not differentiable, and general sparse solvers return factorizations or solves rather than the on-pattern inverse blocks with gradients. gabp-sparse-inv provides drop-in PyTorch operators that return exact on-pattern inverse blocks, plus log-determinant, Gaussian-sampling, and solve operations built from the same factorization machinery, with exact gradients at the same asymptotic cost as the forward pass, across one uniform symmetric / non-symmetric interface. Release 0.3.3 exposes separate function calls rather than a persistent factor object, so cross-call factor reuse is not claimed for that release. The full statement of need is in paper/joss/paper.md.

Implemented and tested kernels:

• Chain (block-tridiagonal; a path). Block LDL^T factorization plus the Takahashi back-recursion. O(L * b^3) time and O(L * b^2) storage for L blocks of size b: linear in N = L * b at fixed block size.

• Star (block-arrowhead; a depth-1 tree). One center block coupled to K leaf blocks with no leaf-leaf coupling. Leaves are eliminated in parallel. O(K * b^3) time, O(K * b^2) storage.

• Tree (arbitrary rooted tree). The general kernel: a node parent array and one edge block per non-root node; collect (leaves to root), then distribute (root to leaves). Chain and star are its path and depth-1 special cases. O(n * b^3) time, O(n * b^2) storage for n nodes.

• Differentiable tree (selinv_tree). The tree selected inverse with a hand-written analytic backward. The reverse two-pass is itself a collect/distribute on the same elimination tree (selected inversion is self-adjoint), so the backward costs O((|V|+|E|) b^3) like the forward. Gradients flow to diag and edge; an optional level-set batched path mirrors the forward batching. Derived in docs/derivations.md §8. The gradient identity itself is classical (Dwyer-Macphail, Giles); this package supplies the PyTorch implementation and tests.

• Junction tree / general sparse SPD (selected_inverse_junction / selinv_junction). An arbitrary block sparsity pattern, symbolically completed to its chordal (filled) pattern S = pattern(L + L^T) by a min-degree elimination order, then the multi-neighbour Takahashi recurrence (sparse block Cholesky plus clique back-substitution). Trees are the zero-fill special case. If w_v is the later-neighbour/front size, numeric factor storage is Θ(F b²) for F = Σ_v(1+w_v), while clique work is Θ(W b³) for W = Σ_v(1+w_v²). They are proportional only at bounded width. Tape-free analytic backwards for the filled-pattern kernels ship as selinv_junction_analytic and selinv_nonsym_junction_analytic (gabp_sparse_inv/junction_autodiff.py), validated against the functional path on the documented finite test grid.

• Non-symmetric chain (selected_inverse_bidiag / selinv_bidiag). The selected inverse of a general (non-symmetric) block lower-bidiagonal matrix M -- the non-symmetric analogue of the chain: G_ii = M_ii^-1 and G_{i+1,i} = -M_{i+1,i+1}^-1 M_{i+1,i} M_ii^-1 on M's pattern, with a hand-written analytic backward (selinv_bidiag). Fully local -- no collect/distribute sweep -- so forward and backward are each one batched block op, O(n * b^3) time, O(n * b^2) storage. The first rung of the non-symmetric ladder; see docs/derivations.md §9.

• Non-symmetric tree (selected_inverse_nonsym_tree). The zero-fill non-symmetric rung between the bidiagonal case and the general LU: a general block matrix whose off-diagonal graph is a tree but whose two directed edge blocks are independent (M_{p,v} != M_{v,p}^T). A two-sided Takahashi recurrence returns each node diagonal and both cross blocks exactly; functional / autograd-traceable (first- and higher-order), and it reduces block-for-block to the SPD tree kernel in the symmetric case. See docs/derivations.md §9.5.

• DeltaNet chunk inverse (selected_inverse_tril / selinv_tril). The dense triangular instance T = (I - A)^-1 for strictly-lower A -- the chunk inverse of DeltaNet / gated linear attention -- with the analytic transpose-form backward bar_A = tril(T^T bar_T T^T, -1) (docs/derivations.md §9.4). Here a blocked triangular solve is the baseline, so the contribution is the explicit analytic backward.

The junction-tree kernel (above) ships the general sparse SPD forward and its autograd adjoint (the §8.4 schedule realized through reverse-mode AD). The tape-free hand-written analytic junction backward is available as selinv_junction_analytic; the non-symmetric counterpart is selinv_nonsym_junction_analytic (gabp_sparse_inv/junction_autodiff.py). They run the explicit reverse clique recurrence (docs/derivations.md §8.5 / §10.3) with no autograd tape and are validated against the functional path. The general non-symmetric selected inverse (LU / Erisman-Tinney; selected_inverse_nonsym_junction / selinv_nonsym_junction, forward + autograd adjoint, no pivoting) and its solve sibling nonsym_junction_solve (A⁻¹b / A⁻ᵀb) are also included. The fixed-point and maze demonstrations are documented in docs/DEQ.md and docs/MAZE.md.

Install

From PyPI:

pip install gabp-sparse-inv

From source (Linux / macOS):

python3.12 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install torch pytest
pip install -e .

From source (Windows / PowerShell):

py -3.12 -m venv .venv; .\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
pip install torch pytest
pip install -e .

GPU paths are used automatically when torch.cuda.is_available().

Quickstart

import torch
from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_chain, selected_inverse_chain

bt = random_spd_chain(num_blocks=8, block_size=4, seed=0, diag_load=2.0)

G_diag, G_lower = selected_inverse_chain(bt.diag, bt.lower, check=True)

inv = torch.linalg.inv(bt.to_dense())
assert torch.allclose(G_diag[0], inv[0:4, 0:4], atol=1e-10)

Inputs support optional leading batch dimensions: [..., L, b, b]. The chain dimension L is sequential; each b x b block operation is batched over the leading dimensions.

The star kernel takes the center block, the stacked leaf blocks, and the center-to-leaf couplings, and returns the center, leaf, and cross inverse blocks:

from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_star, selected_inverse_star

st = random_spd_star(num_leaves=16, block_size=4, seed=0, diag_load=2.0)

# G_center = (A^-1)_00 ; G_leaf[j] = (A^-1)_jj ; G_cross[j] = (A^-1)_{j,0}
G_center, G_leaf, G_cross = selected_inverse_star(
    st.center, st.leaf_diag, st.coupling, check=True
)

inv = torch.linalg.inv(st.to_dense())
assert torch.allclose(G_center, inv[0:4, 0:4], atol=1e-10)

The off-pattern leaf-leaf inverse blocks (A^-1)_{jk} (j != k) are nonzero but outside the selected pattern and are never formed.

The tree kernel takes the stacked node blocks, one edge block per non-root node (edge[v] = A_{parent(v), v}), and the parent array:

from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_tree, selected_inverse_tree

bt = random_spd_tree(num_nodes=12, block_size=3, seed=0, diag_load=2.0, kind="random")

# G_diag[v] = (A^-1)_vv ; G_edge[v] = (A^-1)_{parent(v), v}  (root slot is zero)
G_diag, G_edge = selected_inverse_tree(bt.diag, bt.edge, bt.parent, check=True)

inv = torch.linalg.inv(bt.to_dense())
assert torch.allclose(G_diag[0], inv[0:3, 0:3], atol=1e-10)

kind selects the topology (random/path/star/balanced), or pass an explicit parent array. The path and depth-1 trees reproduce the chain and star kernels block-for-block (a root-invariance check, since the chain roots the path at its last node and the tree roots it at node 0).

General sparse selected inverse (junction tree)

selected_inverse_junction handles an arbitrary block sparsity pattern. Pass the node diagonals, the lower-triangular off-diagonal blocks (edge_index columns (i, j) with i > j, edge_val[k] = A_{i,j}), and an optional elimination order (default: greedy min-degree). It returns the selected inverse on the filled pattern S, a superset of the input pattern wherever elimination creates fill:

import torch
from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_graph, grid_edges, selected_inverse_junction

# A 3x3 grid is loopy (treewidth 3): elimination fills in, unlike a tree.
sp = random_spd_graph(num_nodes=9, edges=grid_edges(3, 3), block_size=2, seed=0)

G_diag, S_index, G_lower = selected_inverse_junction(
    sp.diag, sp.edge_index, sp.edge_val, check=True
)

inv = torch.linalg.inv(sp.to_dense())
assert torch.allclose(G_diag[0], inv[0:2, 0:2], atol=1e-10)   # node-0 diagonal block
assert S_index.shape[1] > sp.edge_index.shape[1]              # fill: S grew past the input

selinv_junction is the autograd-connected form: gradients of any loss over G_diag / G_lower flow to diag and edge_val through the self-adjoint S-local schedule (docs/derivations.md §8.4). It reduces block-for-block to the tree kernel at zero fill. Pass batched=True (to either entry point) for the level-set path: the Python loop runs over elimination levels (O(tree height): ~√n on a 2-D grid) instead of nodes, each level a few batched index_add block ops, the junction analogue of selected_inverse_tree(batched=True). Identical result and gradients (it stays functional, so autograd gives the same backward); it amortizes kernel-launch latency on GPU.

junction_solve is the differentiable sparse SPD linear solve x = A^-1 b on the same pattern using the same LDL^T factorization machinery as the selected inverse. The function call below performs its own factorization; release 0.3.3 does not expose a reusable factor object:

from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_graph, grid_edges, junction_solve

sp = random_spd_graph(num_nodes=9, edges=grid_edges(3, 3), block_size=2, seed=0)
b = torch.randn(9, 2)                                  # [n, b] (or [n, b, k] for k RHS)
x = junction_solve(sp.diag, sp.edge_index, sp.edge_val, b, check=True)
assert torch.allclose(x.reshape(-1), torch.linalg.solve(sp.to_dense(), b.reshape(-1)))

junction_logdet returns log det A from the same factorization machinery (differentiable, the junction sibling of tree_logdet), but a separate call factorizes independently:

from gabp_sparse_inv import junction_logdet

ld = junction_logdet(sp.diag, sp.edge_index, sp.edge_val)
assert torch.allclose(ld, torch.logdet(sp.to_dense()))

Differentiable selected inverse

selinv_tree is the autograd-connected tree kernel: gradients of any loss over the selected blocks flow back to the input blocks diag and edge through the analytic two-pass backward (no autograd tape over the per-node loop).

import torch
from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_tree, selinv_tree

bt = random_spd_tree(num_nodes=64, block_size=3, seed=0, diag_load=2.0, kind="balanced")
diag = bt.diag.clone().requires_grad_(True)
edge = bt.edge.clone().requires_grad_(True)

G_diag, G_edge = selinv_tree(diag, edge, bt.parent)        # or batched=True
loss = torch.diagonal(G_diag, dim1=-2, dim2=-1).sum()       # sum of marginal variances
loss.backward()
# diag.grad, edge.grad are the exact on-pattern cotangents (gradcheck-verified).

First-order only for selinv_tree (the hand-written analytic backward). For Hessian-vector products use the functional junction kernels or selected_inverse_tree(batched=True); both pass gradgradcheck (tests/test_double_backward.py). batched=True uses the level-set path for forward and backward; on CUDA it amortizes kernel-launch latency (timing not benchmarked here).

Non-symmetric selected inverse

The non-symmetric ladder is hot-swappable with the SPD ops above. The block lower-bidiagonal case (selinv_bidiag) is the non-symmetric analogue of the chain: G_ii and G_{i+1,i} on M's pattern, fully local:

from gabp_sparse_inv import random_nonsym_bidiag, selinv_bidiag

M = random_nonsym_bidiag(num_blocks=8, block_size=3, seed=0, diag_load=2.0)
G_diag, G_lower = selinv_bidiag(M.diag, M.lower)          # general blocks, no SPD assumption
inv = torch.linalg.inv(M.to_dense())
assert torch.allclose(G_diag[0], inv[0:3, 0:3], atol=1e-10)

The dense triangular chunk inverse T = (I - A)^-1 for strictly lower A (the DeltaNet-style linear-attention primitive) is selinv_tril, with the analytic backward bar_A = tril(T^T bar_T T^T, -1):

from gabp_sparse_inv import selinv_tril

A = torch.tril(torch.randn(6, 6, dtype=torch.float64), -1)   # a chunk operator
T = selinv_tril(A)                                           # T = (I - A)^{-1}, differentiable
assert torch.allclose(T, torch.linalg.inv(torch.eye(6, dtype=torch.float64) - A), atol=1e-12)

nonsym_junction_solve is the general non-symmetric sparse solve A⁻¹b (and A⁻ᵀb, the DEQ/implicit-differentiation adjoint) on the filled L+U pattern. Pass independent lower and upper edge blocks. On symmetric input (edge_upper = edge_lower.mT) it matches junction_solve:

from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_graph, grid_edges, junction_solve, nonsym_junction_solve

sp = random_spd_graph(num_nodes=9, edges=grid_edges(3, 3), block_size=2, seed=0)
rhs = torch.randn(9, 2, dtype=torch.float64)
x = nonsym_junction_solve(sp.diag, sp.edge_index, sp.edge_val, sp.edge_val.mT, rhs)
assert torch.allclose(x, junction_solve(sp.diag, sp.edge_index, sp.edge_val, rhs), atol=1e-10)

# transpose=True reuses the same LDU factors transposed: the solve A^T u = g.
u = nonsym_junction_solve(sp.diag, sp.edge_index, sp.edge_val, sp.edge_val.mT, rhs, transpose=True)

The full selected inverse on the L+U pattern is selinv_nonsym_junction (forward + adjoint), and the zero-fill tree rung is selected_inverse_nonsym_tree; both keep the two directed edge blocks independent. See docs/derivations.md §9-§10.

Gaussian sampling

sample_gaussian_tree / sample_gaussian_junction draw x ~ N(0, A^-1) from any tree- or junction-structured SPD precision A, using the same factorization family (covariance is exactly A^-1, verified by the deterministic transform on the standard basis). The public function calls factor independently.

from gabp_sparse_inv import random_spd_tree, sample_gaussian_tree

bt = random_spd_tree(num_nodes=16, block_size=2, seed=0, diag_load=2.0, kind="balanced")
x = sample_gaussian_tree(bt.diag, bt.edge, bt.parent, num_samples=8)   # [num_samples, n, b]

junction_logdet / tree_logdet (above) and these samplers are the statistical ops that fall out of the shared LDL^T factorization. See docs/APPLICATIONS.md.

Application: hierarchical tree-GMRF learning

gabp_sparse_inv/gmrf.py builds on selinv_tree to learn the hyperparameters of a hierarchical (tree-structured) Gaussian Markov random field by exact marginal likelihood and a posterior-variance objective, all O(n), where a dense-autograd baseline is O(N^3) time / O(N^2) memory. The batched schedule (batched=True) beats a naive dense-autograd baseline at every measured size on CPU (113× at n=1023 in one fp64 / 1-thread run with 16 fields; a diagnostic, not CI-gated; see docs/APPLICATIONS.md). The per-node reference loop is slower than dense at small n; batched is the path intended for scale.

from gabp_sparse_inv import sample_tree_gmrf, fit_marginal_likelihood

parent = [-1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2]
y = sample_tree_gmrf(parent, a=0.7, kappa=1.5, root_prec=2.0, seed=0)[None]  # one field
theta = fit_marginal_likelihood(parent, y, steps=300)   # recovers a, kappa, root_prec, sigma2

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.gmrf_scaling --values 127 255 511 1023 2047

The loopy/grid counterpart (gabp_sparse_inv/gmrf_grid.py) ports the same model to an arbitrary graph via the junction kernel: a CAR precision Q = kappa (I + a L) with exact marginal likelihood (junction_marginal_log_likelihood) and posterior marginal variances (junction_posterior_marginal_variances). The cycles are handled exactly, not iteratively.

from gabp_sparse_inv import grid_gmrf_precision, fit_grid_marginal_likelihood

diag, edge_index, edge_val = grid_gmrf_precision(rows=8, cols=8, kappa=1.5, a=0.6)
# ... sample/observe y of shape [..., n, 1] ...
theta = fit_grid_marginal_likelihood(8, 8, y, steps=200)   # recovers kappa, a, sigma2

Demonstration: a solve layer as the only long-range operator (maze, trees and grids)

gabp_sparse_inv/demos/maze_tree.py is the clean-room experiment behind the headline: a source-routing task on trees where a single differentiable tree_solve layer is the only operator that can move information across the graph. A model with that layer routes the source near-exactly (test MSE ~1e-5); an otherwise-identical model with only K-hop local message passing cannot, and the gap widens with the tree diameter. The learned precision is kept SPD and well-conditioned (kappa ~ 200) by construction, handling the maze-conditioning risk. It is the tree proxy for the loopy grid maze (Phase 4). See docs/MAZE.md.

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.demos.maze_tree     # depth-sweep table: gabp vs local vs baseline

Demonstration: the junction inverse on a loopy grid

gabp_sparse_inv/demos/maze_grid.py is the direct analogue: each cell is a node on a 2-D lattice, the precision is a grid Laplacian built from learned local features, and a single differentiable junction_solve layer is the only long-range operator (convolutions are strictly local). The loopy graph needs the junction-tree kernel; a tree kernel cannot represent cycles. Same clean-attribution story as the tree proxy; see docs/MAZE.md (grid section).

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.demos.maze_tree     # depth-sweep table: solve layer vs local vs baseline
python -m gabp_sparse_inv.demos.maze_grid     # size-sweep table: junction vs local vs baseline

Demonstration: the non-symmetric inverse as the exact DEQ backward

gabp_sparse_inv/demos/deq_fixedpoint.py is the real-impact rung. A deep-equilibrium layer z* = f(z*, x) has, by the implicit function theorem, a backward that is a non-symmetric solve with the equilibrium Jacobian, (I − J)ᵀ u = ∂L/∂z*. When J is graph-structured this is exactly nonsym_junction_solve(…, transpose=True) on A = I − J: one block LDU, Θ(W) structural block work, with transposed factor roles. The structured backward is algebraically exact up to rounding. On the four-cell fp64 diagnostic it stays within 1.1e-12 of a dense implicit-differentiation oracle, while the finite Neumann backward degrades sharply at the tested ρ(J) ∈ {0.99, 0.999}. This is a finite low-treewidth mechanism check, not a condition-independent stability theorem or a state-of-the-art claim. See docs/DEQ.md.

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.demos.deq_fixedpoint   # rho-sweep: exact backward vs iterative

Demonstration: the DeltaNet chunk inverse as a drop-in op

gabp_sparse_inv/demos/deltanet_chunk.py shows the differentiable triangular chunk inverse selinv_tril (T = (I − A)⁻¹) is a drop-in inside a real chunked linear-attention layer; no new kernel. DeltaNet's within-chunk delta rule is the triangular solve W = (I − A)⁻¹ delta (A = −tril(diag(β) K Kᵀ, −1)); the minimal layer built around it reproduces the token-by-token delta rule exactly (validated vs an O(L) sequential oracle at every chunk size). Forming T with selinv_tril (analytic transpose-form backward) vs the stock solve_triangular baseline (autograd) gives the same forward and the same gradients through the whole multi-chunk layer (~3e-15), and a layer trains identically either way. A capability / drop-in result, not a DeltaNet reimplementation or a SOTA claim. See docs/DELTANET.md.

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.demos.deltanet_chunk   # drop-in equivalence + train-both-ways table

Benchmarks

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.run --problem chain --sweep L --b 8 --precisions fp64 fp32 bf16
python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.run --problem star  --sweep K --b 8 --precisions fp64 fp32
python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.run --problem tree  --sweep n --b 8 --tree-kind random
python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.run --problem tree  --sweep n --b 8 --grad   # fwd+bwd

--grad benchmarks the differentiable kernel: forward+backward time scaling vs n (linear), loop-vs-batched timing, gradient correctness vs dense autograd (machine precision), and the structured-vs-dense-autograd backward-memory ratio (O(n b^2) vs O((n b)^2)).

The benchmark writes CSV and JSON records keyed by (seed, config). It reports log-log timing slope, dense crossover, forward error, independent residuals, and analytic structured-vs-dense memory as diagnostics: these depend on the BLAS backend, device, and thread count, so they are recorded rather than asserted. Measured CPU peak RSS is secondary and noisy.

Precision study

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.precision --problem tree --size 64 --b 4
python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.precision --problem chain --precisions fp32 bf16
python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.precision --compare-orders --size 64 --b 4   # ordering study

Puts the kernel head-to-head with a dense inverse at the same precision, both scored against an fp64 oracle on the pattern, swept over condition number. Reports each method's on-pattern error and the selinv/dense advantage ratio; a low-precision factorization breakdown is recorded as inf rather than aborting the sweep. The honest bottom line (diagnostics, not asserted): no penalty, and no robust win. The apparent fp32 edge on ill-scaled random trees is modest (~1.5-2.3× median, heavy-tailed) and mostly an elimination-ordering effect (--compare-orders shows a same-order dense Cholesky matches the kernel to ~1× in the median); the well-scaled grid Laplacian shows parity at every κ. Precision is not the differentiator; linear tree cost, sparse factor storage, and differentiability are. For junction graphs the current level-set path additionally materializes Θ(W) symbolic index metadata; it is not a memory-optimal supernodal implementation.

No-pivot stability boundary (non-symmetric)

python -m gabp_sparse_inv.bench.nonsym_stability     # sweep block-diagonal dominance

The non-symmetric kernel eliminates with no pivoting, so the static-pattern factorization is only safe while block-diagonally dominant (docs/derivations.md §10.4). This sweeps the dominance ratio and reports the Schur-pivot floor and the fp32 no-pivot error against a dense fp64 oracle, alongside the fp32 pivoted dense LU on the same blocks. Diagnostic finding: at parity with pivoted LU while dominant (α ≳ 1), the Schur floor collapsing and the no-pivot error departing from κ·u below the dominance boundary, quantifying where the static-pattern regime ends.

Tests

pytest -q

The test suite covers every kernel against dense fp64 oracles: chain, star, tree, the differentiable tree (selinv_tree), junction tree, the non-symmetric bidiagonal / DeltaNet chunk / non-symmetric tree, the tree- and grid-GMRF applications, Gaussian sampling, and the elimination-ordering helpers. Per kernel: dense-oracle accuracy, condition-aware ill-conditioned cases (where implemented), independent residual checks (SPD kernels), SPD/symmetry properties, edge cases, leading batch dimensions, compute_dtype (strongest on junction; bf16 sanity elsewhere), first-order autograd (gradcheck / analytic-vs-dense adjoint), and, where applicable, second-order autograd (gradgradcheck on junction, selected_inverse_tree(batched=True), and selected_inverse_nonsym_tree only; not on selinv_tree, selinv_bidiag, or selinv_tril). Also: order-invariance, fill, trace identities (junction), and HVP checks (tests/test_double_backward.py). CI runs on Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS with Python 3.12 and 3.13.

Citation

If you use gabp-sparse-inv in your research, please cite it. Machine-readable metadata is in CITATION.cff (GitHub's "Cite this repository" reads it), and a software paper is in preparation for the Journal of Open Source Software (paper/joss/paper.md).

Contributing and support

Contributions, bug reports, and usage questions are welcome. CONTRIBUTING.md covers how to contribute, report issues, and get support; CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md sets the community standards. The package scope and deliberate exclusions are summarized above and in the package docstring.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.