game-of-cards 0.0.1

Backlog tracking as a folder of markdown story-cards in your repo. Agent-readable. No proprietary state.

Game of Cards

A small command-line tool that keeps your project's to-do list as a folder of markdown files inside your repo. Each item is a card — a directory under deck/ with a frontmatter header, a body, and a checklist that decides when it's done.

That's it. The rest of this README is why that turns out to be a useful shape.

The agile thinking behind it

Three ideas from the 1990s, none of them ours, all still in use:

• One card, one thing — XP, Beck 1999. Small enough to fit on an index card. Enough context that anyone, or anything, can pick it up.
• Definition of Done — Scrum, Sutherland & Schwaber. A card isn't closed because someone said so. It's closed because a checklist is satisfied.
• Status, not location — Kanban, Anderson, after Toyota. A card stays at deck/<title>/ while it moves through open → active → done. Cross-references don't break.

The argument for taking these seriously now is that AI coding agents are a much harder handoff problem than the human teams those ideas were built for. Agents read the full backlog every session, re-derive context from scratch, and never remember yesterday. A card with a stable URL, a machine-checkable closure contract, and a self-contained body stops being "discipline" and starts being how the agent finds its bearings. The 1990s primitives were right for a different reason than the 1990s knew about.

It works without any of that, too. goc new "rename the button", goc to see what's open, goc done rename-the-button to close it. No AI required. The deck is just markdown files; you read, write, edit, and revert them with the same git you already use.

What it is, and what it isn't

Game of Cards is a substrate. The CLI, the schema, the on-disk card layout, the validator — that's all it ships. There's no preferred LLM, no proprietary state, no mandatory workflow.

What sits on top is up to you. Claude Code skills come bundled as the reference harness; any editor that reads AGENTS.md (Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Copilot, Aider) can drive the same deck. So can a shell script. So can your hands.

This is not another methodology framework. Spec-Kit ships templates. BMAD ships personas. Ruler ships rule fan-out. claude-flow ships swarm orchestration. Each sits on top of a substrate that the consuming team has to provide. Game of Cards ships that.

Try it

uv tool install game-of-cards     # one-time, machine-wide
cd any-repo
goc install                       # adds deck/, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md sections, a starter card

The cost of trying is low. goc install adds files; it doesn't take any away. If you decide it isn't for you, rm -rf deck/ and revert the two README sections — you're back where you started.

A few things you can do once it's installed:

goc new "rename the button to Export"
goc                                # show what's open, sorted by leverage
goc validate                       # check every card's frontmatter against the schema
goc done rename-the-button-to-export

If you're using Claude Code or any AGENTS.md-aware editor, you can also just talk to it: "rename the button to Export." The deck reflects either flow on the same on-disk state.

What you get

• A goc CLI — 13 verbs covering create, browse, advance, decide, close, validate, and install.
• A deck/<title>/ directory per card: frontmatter-validated README.md, append-only log.md.
• A schema validator suitable for pre-commit and CI.
• A starter set of Claude Code skills (scan-deck, next-card, create-card, advance-card, decide-card, finish-card, improve-deck, extend-deck, pull-card, card-schema, deck) that turn the CLI into an autonomous workflow when you want one.
• An AGENTS.md block for editors that aren't Claude Code.

Status

Brand new. This is 0.0.1 — only a few days of implementation, no external users yet, plenty of rough edges that are unknown until someone tries it on a fresh project. Bring expectations to match.

The right way to find out if it's for you is to install it, point it at a side project, and see whether it stays out of your way for a week. If it does, you'll keep it. If it doesn't, you've spent five minutes.

License

MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Zauberzeug GmbH. See LICENSE.