harness-arena

Benchmark agent harnesses against a model, on any Harbor benchmark.

The premise, from Harrison Kinsley's The right harness is all you need: hold the model fixed, swap the harness, and the pass rate moves a lot. A model that looks mediocre under one harness can look near-frontier under another. This repo makes that measurement repeatable on your own hardware and puts every run on one page.

• Model: whatever your endpoint serves. Anything OpenAI-compatible (llama-server, vLLM, Ollama, LM Studio, TGI, SGLang) or OpenRouter. Swap the weights and re-run; the rig fingerprints them so runs can't be mislabeled.

• Harnesses: eight out of the box: dmfa-minion, minion, hermes-agent, oh-my-pi, opencode, DeepSeek Harness, Claude Code, and Codex CLI. Adding another is one YAML block, plus a Python adapter only when the harness needs one.

  dmfa-minion is a fork of minion and shares its adapter; the catalog rows differ only by repo and version, which is what makes the pair a clean two-row experiment rather than two separate measurements.

  The last two are the vendor CLIs, pointed at your model rather than at Anthropic or OpenAI, no account, no key, no proxy. That works because they are the only two here that do not speak OpenAI-on-/v1, and llama.cpp happens to serve all three dialects: Claude Code uses the Anthropic Messages API on /v1/messages, Codex uses the Responses API on /responses. See Pointing the vendor CLIs at a local model.

• Benchmarks: any dataset Harbor can resolve, in Docker. Terminal-Bench 2 is the default and the one every number in this README was measured on; the datasets: catalog in harnesses/registry.yaml also ships Terminal-Bench Pro, Aider Polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and Pro, tau3-bench and GAIA, and the dashboard's Run tab picks between them. Comparisons are always within one benchmark — a pass rate over 89 Terminal-Bench tasks and one over 225 polyglot tasks are different denominators, so the results view scopes to one model and one benchmark at a time.

  Your endpoint serves every benchmark, whether that is llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, or anything else OpenAI-compatible. On most of them your model is the agent and nothing else. tau3-bench is the exception: it simulates the user in its environment and judges outcomes in its verifier, so your model plays all three parts. That runs, and the catalog wires it up for you — but a tau3 score produced that way is not comparable to a published one, where the user and judge are frontier models. The manifest records which model filled those roles under dataset_env.

Orchestration runs on Linux, macOS and Windows; task containers are Linux.

Windows: turn on long paths before you start. Windows caps paths at 260 characters, and Harbor stores a task's files under a directory named for the task plus a 64-character hash. Benchmarks with long task names — tau3-bench reaches 287 — then download an empty package and fail much later reading a file that was never written. Terminal-Bench 2, SWE-bench and aider-polyglot fit and are unaffected. In an admin PowerShell, then reboot:

Set-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem' LongPathsEnabled 1

harness-arena doctor and the dashboard's Upkeep → Health check both report this, along with everything else that has to be true before a run works — each with the steps that fix it.

---

What it looks like

The dashboard is the whole interface: results, launching and stopping runs, endpoint setup, the harness catalog and maintenance, across five tabs.

Results. Pass rates carry 95 % Wilson intervals, because at 89 tasks a five-point gap is usually noise. If the whiskers overlap you have not shown a difference, so the disagreement set is what actually carries the comparison: tick disagreements only to filter the matrix to the tasks they differ on. The task matrix distinguishes states that all score zero but mean different things: ✓ solved, 5/6 checks passed, T 1/3 out of time carrying whatever it had earned by then, ! errored. Hovering a cell breaks down which checks failed. The live feed tails the running agent, and says so when a long reasoning block produces no output rather than looking hung.

Note the warning under the model selector: these two runs used different concurrency, so the dashboard says wall-clock is not comparable across them instead of quietly ranking them together.

Checks passed sits beside each pass rate, deliberately quieter and set apart. Scoring is all-or-nothing, so a run that passes five of six checks on twenty tasks scores zero twenty times, indistinguishable from one that wrote nothing. Counting the individual checks recovers that difference. On one smoke run here, two harnesses both scored 0%: one had passed 5 of 12 checks, the other 1 of 12.

It is measured over the tasks the run did not solve, and that detail is the whole value of it. A solved task passes every check by definition, so including those contributes a guaranteed 100% and the figure collapses into the pass rate wearing a different denominator. On four runs here the all-inclusive number read 62.1%, 60.2% and 56.3%, but 43 of the leader's 103 checks came from tasks it had already solved, and on the ones it missed it managed 35.0% against 44.6% for the run the all-inclusive figure ranked second. The ordering inverts. So the panel leads with partial credit on the misses and keeps the all-inclusive total beside it as context:

35.0% of checks on 15 unsolved
21/60 · 64/103 incl. solved

Neither is a score, and neither is comparable to the pass rate. Tasks carry different numbers of checks, so this weights a nine-check task nine times a one-check task, and the checks are not equally hard. It answers "how close did the misses come", not "how good is this harness", which is why it is never ranked on and never replaces the rate.

Choosing what to look at. Two selectors scope the whole page: model and benchmark. Both are scopes rather than filters, because nothing on this page means anything across either one — a pass rate pooled over 89 Terminal-Bench tasks and 225 aider-polyglot tasks is an average of different denominators, not a weaker number. Head-to-head pairing refuses to cross them for the same reason. The benchmark selector is shown even when you have run only one, so the scope is never left implicit.

The runs filter is a checkbox menu of every run for the selected model and benchmark, grouped by scope (stratified-25, smoke, full dataset) and labelled with when each started, because selecting by name alone stops working the moment you re-run a subset, which is the normal case here. Pick one run, a whole group, or everything. Every panel follows it, including the run log, so what you selected and what you are looking at cannot disagree.

Elapsed in the run log is wall clock: the run's own start to its last finished trial, or to now while it is going. Not the sum of trial durations, which double-counts whenever two trials overlap and would report a 2-concurrent run as taking twice as long as it did. Beneath it is the share of that time the model spent generating. The rest is image pulls, harness installs and verifiers, and it is what pipelining exists to hide.

Harnesses. The extension point, and the ones that ship. Each entry is a Harbor built-in agent name or an adapter in harnesses/, with {placeholders} resolved at run time, so registry.yaml never contains a credential, and the UI refuses to write one into it. The same tab carries the run defaults, which are bounded because every one of them changes what a run measures.

---

Quick start

Install Docker, install this, point it at a model, open the browser. Everything after harness-arena dash happens in the UI: the endpoint URL, the model, context sizes, timeouts, pre-pulling the task images, starting and stopping runs. There is no config file to write by hand.

Docker first

Required, and not bundled. Every Terminal-Bench task runs in its own Linux container, so a container runtime has to be on the machine and running before this scores anything. pip install cannot supply one.

• Windows and macOS: Docker Desktop. On Windows both defaults are the ones you want, the WSL 2 backend and Linux containers; switching to Windows containers stops every task from starting.
• Linux: Docker Engine, then the post-install step so your user can run docker without sudo.

Start it, leave it running, and confirm the daemon answers:

docker info --format '{{.ServerVersion}}'    # prints a version, not an error

Budget 100 GB free disk. The task images alone total ~60 GB.

Then harness-arena

mkdir my-bench && cd my-bench            # your config, runs and caches live here

conda create -n harness-arena python=3.12 -y   # or: python -m venv .venv
conda activate harness-arena                   #     .venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
                                               #     source .venv/bin/activate

pip install harness-arena

Python 3.12 or newer, in an environment of its own. Installing into the system Python either fails on the version or, on Debian-derived systems, is refused outright as externally managed.

The directory you run from is the one it works out of, so make one for the purpose rather than running from your home directory. Nothing is written beside the installed package.

Prefer to read or change the code, or add a harness? Clone instead, and every path moves next to the checkout:

git clone https://github.com/danaug23/harness-arena
cd harness-arena

conda env create -f environment.yml      # or: python -m venv .venv
conda activate harness-arena             #     .venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
pip install -e .

environment.yml pins only Python 3.12 and pip. Every dependency lives in pyproject.toml, so pip install -e . is the step that actually installs Harbor, and it is not optional.

Next, serve the model. What that takes depends on which server you run, and the differences do not announce themselves:

• llama.cpp, the setup this is developed against
• Ollama
• Hosted providers, OpenRouter and other OpenAI-compatible APIs

Then start the dashboard and do the rest in the browser:

harness-arena dash                       # http://127.0.0.1:8420/

Tab	What you do there
Setup	Provider, endpoint URL, model, API key; test the connection and measure speed
Maintenance	Health checks, pre-pull the task images, snapshots, delete runs
Harnesses	The harness catalog and its kwargs, plus the run defaults, concurrency, timeout multipliers
Run	Start and stop benchmarks, toggle diagnostics capture, watch the console
Results	Pass rates, task matrix, what a solve and a trial cost, live agent output

The dashboard is safe to leave open during a run. It re-reads results every 5 s and streams the running agent's output.

Pre-pull before the first benchmark. Harbor otherwise pulls each task image inside that trial's environment-start budget, and one of them is 21.6 GB, a cold pull can lose a task to EnvironmentStartTimeoutError instead of scoring it. Budget ~60 GB and do it once per machine.

Serving with llama.cpp

The setup this is developed against, and the one that needs the least telling: llama-server reports what it is serving, so the rig reads the context window and the slot count rather than being handed them.

1. Bind to all interfaces and give the dashboard the machine's LAN address, http://192.0.2.10:8080/v1, not localhost. That string is injected into every task container, where localhost means the container itself.

   llama-server --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8080 \
     --model /path/to/model.gguf \
     --alias my-model \
     --ctx-size 65536 \
     --parallel 1
   

   Allow the port through your firewall, then confirm the path end to end rather than from the host only:

   docker run --rm busybox wget -qO- http://192.0.2.10:8080/v1/models
   

   The URL works with or without the /v1 suffix; both are tried.

2. Serve at least 64K of context (--ctx-size 65536). hermes-agent refuses to initialise below 64,000 tokens, so a smaller window loses that harness entirely. The run is refused up front rather than failing once per task, but refused is still refused.

   Keep it inside VRAM. Once the model spills to CPU, throughput collapses and tasks start dying on time rather than on capability. If 64K does not fit, quantize the KV cache rather than lowering the window: --cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0 roughly halves it and is close to lossless.

3. Leave the context window box empty on the Setup tab. llama-server serves /props, so the probe reads the real n_ctx, reads total_slots, and fingerprints the weights from the model path. The manifest then records the window as detected rather than assumed, which is a different claim about a run and is why the box is worth leaving alone.

   --parallel sets how many requests generate at once. The rig defaults n_concurrent_agents to the slot count it read, so a single-slot server is never handed queued requests that would be measured as its own latency.

Swapping the loaded weights is enough for the rig to treat it as a different model. The fingerprint covers the weights rather than the alias, so reloading the same --alias with a different quant registers as a new model instead of quietly mixing two sets of results into one label.

Serving with Ollama

Three things differ, and none of them announce themselves: where the server reads its settings from, the address you hand the dashboard, and a context window that has to be told to Ollama and to this rig separately.

Two variables, and where you set them is the whole problem. Both are read by the server when it starts, so typing them in the shell you run ollama from changes nothing: on Windows and macOS the copy launched at login already owns the port, and your ollama command is only a client talking to it. Set them where that server will see them, then restart it.

	Set to	Default if you leave it
OLLAMA_HOST	0.0.0.0:11434	127.0.0.1:11434, which no container can reach
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH	65536	picked from your VRAM, 4k/32k/256k

The context default is the dangerous one. It is not a number you can predict, it changes with the card and the version, and anything past whatever it chose is truncated silently, which scores as a reasoning failure rather than as a configuration error.

64K is a floor, not a preference. hermes-agent refuses to initialise below 64,000 tokens and exits, so anything less loses that harness entirely. The run is refused up front rather than failing once per task, but refused is still refused. Serve at least 65536.

Keep it inside VRAM: once the model spills to CPU, throughput collapses and tasks start dying on time rather than on capability. If 64K does not fit, quantize the KV cache rather than lowering the window, OLLAMA_KV_CACHE_TYPE=q8_0 roughly halves it and is close to lossless. On one 8 GB card that is the difference between 64K not fitting at all and fitting in 6.4 GB, and it measured faster, since a smaller cache moves less memory per token.

Windows

Quit Ollama first, from the system tray: right-click the icon and Quit. Closing the window leaves the server running and holding the port.

Persist the variables for your account, then start Ollama again from the Start menu. Neither command touches a process that is already running, which is why the restart is the step that applies them.

# PowerShell
[Environment]::SetEnvironmentVariable('OLLAMA_HOST', '0.0.0.0:11434', 'User')
[Environment]::SetEnvironmentVariable('OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH', '65536', 'User')

:: Command Prompt
setx OLLAMA_HOST "0.0.0.0:11434"
setx OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH "65536"

Or skip the tray app and run the server in the window itself, which is the fastest way to be certain what it was handed. These last only for that window, and only reach the server because it is started from there:

# PowerShell
$env:OLLAMA_HOST = "0.0.0.0:11434"
$env:OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH = "65536"
ollama serve

:: Command Prompt
set OLLAMA_HOST=0.0.0.0:11434
set OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=65536
ollama serve

Allow the port through Windows Firewall the first time it asks, and confirm the server actually moved off loopback:

Get-NetTCPConnection -LocalPort 11434 -State Listen | Select-Object LocalAddress
# 0.0.0.0 is what you want. 127.0.0.1 means it did not take.

macOS

launchctl setenv OLLAMA_HOST "0.0.0.0:11434"
launchctl setenv OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH "65536"

Then restart the Ollama application, which is what re-reads them.

Linux

sudo systemctl edit ollama.service

Add, under [Service]:

[Service]
Environment="OLLAMA_HOST=0.0.0.0:11434"
Environment="OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=65536"

sudo systemctl daemon-reload
sudo systemctl restart ollama

Check it from a container, not from the host

Give the dashboard your machine's LAN address, http://192.0.2.10:11434/v1, not localhost. That same string is injected into every task container, where localhost means the container itself. The connection test on the Setup tab passes either way, because the dashboard runs on the host, so it cannot catch this for you:

curl http://192.0.2.10:11434/v1/models                                # from the host
docker run --rm busybox wget -qO- http://192.0.2.10:11434/v1/models   # what a task sees

Connection refused on the second with the first one working means OLLAMA_HOST did not take, and every task in the run would have failed to reach the model.

Set the context window on the Setup tab too

It has to be declared twice, once to the server and once here, and matching them is on you. Ollama serves neither /props nor meta.n_ctx, so the probe reports n_ctx: 0 and every harness would otherwise be handed the conservative fallback. One box covers every harness; there is no need to edit any harness entry. Ollama's /api/show does report a context length, but it is the model's architectural maximum rather than what the server was configured to serve, so reading it would trade an obvious failure for a silent one.

Hosted providers

OpenRouter, or any other OpenAI-compatible API, needs no server of your own. Set the key in the shell you launch from, then pick the provider and model on the Setup tab:

export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=...

There is no /props to read, so the model id you choose is the identity and the context window comes from the provider's catalog rather than from the server. The key is never written to harnesses/registry.yaml, which is committed; see API keys.

A hosted run measures an endpoint rather than a file you hold. The weights behind a model id can change without notice, which is worth knowing when you compare runs made weeks apart.

Prefer a terminal? Everything the UI does has a command:

harness-arena init                       # point it at your model server
harness-arena doctor                     # check Docker, Harbor, endpoint, disk
harness-arena prepull                    # cache task images (once per machine)
harness-arena bench --subset stratified-25

From a clone, the same commands run without installing anything: .\run.ps1 <command> on Windows PowerShell, ./run.sh <command> elsewhere.

---

Doc	What's in it
This file	Install, configure, run, add a harness, read results
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md	How it works internally, module by module
docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md	Every failure hit so far and its fix
CONTRIBUTING.md	Adding a harness, tests, the two rules CI enforces

---

Contents

1. Quick start
2. Installation
3. Configuration
4. Commands
5. Choosing a time budget
6. Swapping models
7. The context window
8. Adding a harness
9. Pointing the vendor CLIs at a local model
10. How scoring works
11. Reading results honestly
12. The dashboard
13. Tests
14. Project layout

---

Installation

Prerequisites

Requirement	Notes
Docker	Not bundled, install it yourself. Docker Desktop on Windows and macOS, WSL 2 backend, Linux containers; Docker Engine on Linux, plus the post-install step for sudo-less docker. The daemon has to be running: docker info should print a server version. Task images total ~60 GB; budget 100 GB free.
Python 3.12+	Any environment, venv, conda, uv.
A model endpoint	Anything serving OpenAI-compatible /v1, or an OpenRouter key.
Node.js	Only for the dashboard test suite. Not needed to run benchmarks.

Install

conda create -n harness-arena python=3.12 -y   # or: python -m venv .venv
conda activate harness-arena                   #     .venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
                                               #     source .venv/bin/activate

pip install harness-arena

The environment is not ceremony: the package needs Python 3.12 or newer, and pip install into a system Python either fails the version check or is refused as externally managed on Debian-derived systems.

Work from a directory of your own, because that is where it keeps your files:

	installed from PyPI	cloned
config.yaml	the directory you run from	beside the checkout
runs/	the directory you run from	beside the checkout
model label cache	.harness-arena/ there	bench/models.json
harness catalog	the packaged one, until you edit it; your copy after	harnesses/registry.yaml, committed

Nothing is ever written next to the installed package, so an upgrade cannot take your runs with it and a read-only or shared install still works.

The catalog is the one row with a catch. A PyPI install reads the packaged catalog until your first edit, at which point it saves a full copy under .harness-arena/ and reads that one from then on. pip install -U updates the code and the packaged catalog; it does not touch yours. That matters because the catalog carries the harness version: pins, so a release that re-pins a harness leaves you installing the old build under the new release's name — and new datasets: entries never appear in the dropdown.

Nothing is merged automatically: a pin you changed on purpose and one you never received look identical in the file. harness-arena doctor reports the gap, naming which pins and benchmarks differ and which release your copy was forked from, so you can apply what you want. Deleting .harness-arena/registry.yaml starts over from the packaged catalog. A clone has one catalog and cannot drift.

Clone instead when you want to change the code, add an adapter, or keep the harness catalog under version control with the rest of your setup:

git clone https://github.com/danaug23/harness-arena
cd harness-arena

python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate          # Windows: .\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
pip install -e .

Or with conda:

conda env create -f environment.yml
conda activate harness-arena
pip install -e .

Harbor is pinned. It is the measuring instrument, and an upgrade can change agent defaults or reward handling underneath you. Every run records the version it used, so bumping the pin is safe as long as you re-run the comparisons you care about.

Verify

harness-arena doctor

That checks configuration, Harbor, the Docker daemon, disk space, and whether the endpoint answers, printing the specific fix for whatever fails. Then prove the benchmark plumbing itself works:

harbor run -d terminal-bench@2.0 -a oracle --n-tasks 2 --yes

The oracle agent runs each task's reference solution. It should score 2/2 in under a minute. If it does, Docker, the dataset, and the verifier all work.

First-run setup

harness-arena prepull        # cache all task images (~60 GB, one time per machine)

Do this before your first benchmark. Harbor otherwise pulls each task image inside that trial's environment-start budget, and the images are not small. One task image is 21.6 GB. A cold pull can blow the 600 s default and lose a task to EnvironmentStartTimeoutError rather than scoring it.

---

Configuration

harness-arena init writes config.yaml, which is gitignored. config.example.yaml documents every setting.

Precedence: defaults → config.yaml → environment → command-line flags.

Pointing at a model

endpoint:
  provider: openai-compatible      # or: openrouter
  base_url: http://localhost:8080/v1

Server	Typical base_url
llama-server, LM Studio	http://localhost:8080/v1
vLLM	http://localhost:8000/v1
Ollama	http://localhost:11434/v1
Another machine	http://<host>:<port>/v1
OpenRouter	https://openrouter.ai/api/v1 (set provider: openrouter)

A local server has one model loaded and is detected automatically. OpenRouter serves hundreds, so name the one you mean with endpoint.model.

API keys

Never put a key in harnesses/registry.yaml, that file is committed.

The supported path is indirection. Keep the key in your environment and let the config name the variable:

export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=...

That is all. Each provider's conventional variable is picked up automatically. To use a different variable, set endpoint.api_key_env.

harness-arena init can also store a literal key in config.yaml. That file is gitignored and written 0600, but once you do that, treat it as a credential.

Keys are scrubbed out of run manifests, printed commands, and exported snapshots, tested explicitly, because a leak here is silent.

Run defaults

harnesses/registry.yaml holds the harness catalog and the run defaults.

Key	Default	Why
dataset	terminal-bench@2.0	Harbor dataset reference
n_concurrent	2	Trials in flight. One generating + one staged is enough to hide setup; more just sit blocked holding containers.
n_concurrent_agents	1	How many may generate. Keep at the server's slot count or requests queue.
n_attempts	1	Attempts per task
max_retries	1	Extra attempts for a trial that died of an infrastructure failure. Set 0 to disable, see below
agent_timeout_multiplier	4.0	Scales each task's agent budget, see below
environment_build_timeout_multiplier	4.0	The 600 s default is too short for multi-GB images

The two concurrency knobs

These are different and the distinction matters:

• n_concurrent: trials in flight. Their image pulls, harness installs, verifiers and teardowns all overlap.
• n_concurrent_agents: how many may generate. Harbor enforces this with a semaphore taken on AGENT_START and released on AGENT_END, so the model sees one request stream regardless of how many trials are open.

Pipelining is close to free. On a single-slot server a meaningful slice of wall clock, often around a tenth, is non-LLM work: harness installs, image pulls and verifiers, with the GPU idle throughout. Overlapping that changes nothing the model sees, so pass rates stay comparable to runs made without it. Measure your own share with harness-arena throughput.

Raising n_concurrent_agents above your server's slot count does not buy throughput: requests queue rather than share, and the degradation is severe enough to dominate everything else. Worse, the penalty is unfair: it falls hardest on whichever harness makes more calls, which is the variable under test. For real parallelism, start the server with matching parallel slots (llama-server: -np), raise both knobs together, and re-baseline.

Left unset, n_concurrent_agents defaults to the slot count the endpoint reports, so a self-hosted single-slot server is safe by default.

---

When a harness cannot reach the model

A trial can die because its HTTP request never got sent. Most harnesses report only that sending failed, not why, the underlying cause (refused, reset, timed out) is discarded before it reaches the log. So the evidence a run leaves behind cannot, on its own, tell you whether the endpoint was down or the client misbehaved.

That matters because the two have opposite fixes, and the tempting reading, "the endpoint dropped", is the one that hides a bug in the client or the adapter. In a 89-task run observed here, 37 trials failed this way while 50 succeeded interleaved with them, with the longest failure streak being 3: the endpoint was demonstrably up throughout, and most failures landed on the very next request after a successful one.

Turn on "Capture diagnostics" on the Run tab (or --debug-capture) for any run you intend to trust. It samples the endpoint on a fixed cadence for the life of the run and writes endpoint-health.jsonl beside the trials, so a failure timestamp can be checked against independent evidence rather than guessed at. It is read-only, takes no generation slot, and cannot perturb the measurement, a watchdog that competed for the one slot would manufacture the failures it exists to observe.

It also sets RUST_LOG so the Rust harnesses report connection-level detail. Most ignore it and pay nothing; Codex does not. It logs one line per streamed event, which came to 97 % of a 24.9 MB trial log. That costs disk, and it is the intended trade: the record exists to attribute a transport failure afterwards. The live feed filters it out of the view, so leaving diagnostics on does not cost you a readable panel.

Without it, the dashboard says so: a trial marked ~ reports that the request never reached the model and that diagnostics were off, so the cause is unrecorded. That is deliberately weaker than blaming the endpoint.

---

When the endpoint drops a connection

Endpoints fail. A connection is refused, reset, or times out mid-turn, the agent process dies, and Harbor records a non-zero exit. That is not evidence about the harness, but scored naively it costs the harness a task, and a working adapter starts to look broken.

harness-arena handles it in two places:

• During the run. A trial that dies of an infrastructure failure is retried once (max_retries). Nothing at retry time can tell a dropped connection from a harness crashing on its own bug, so the retry list is kept narrow and the budget is written into the run manifest, a run that retried is not the same experiment as one that did not, and the dashboard says so.
• Afterwards. bench.collect re-reads the trial log. A transport error naming a model-API path is classified as an endpoint fault: it shows in the task matrix as ~, is excluded from the pass rate rather than counted as a loss, and is left out of the run-to-run comparison, a task one harness never got a fair attempt at is not a disagreement between harnesses. The count is always shown next to the rate; the denominator never shrinks silently.

The classifier is deliberately strict. It wants both a transport signature and an API path on the same line, because an agent curling a dead port is ordinary Terminal-Bench work. A missed endpoint fault is scored the way it always was; a false one would quietly remove a real harness failure from the denominator, which is the more damaging mistake.

---

When every task fails in seconds

If a run dies instantly on every task with a Docker compose error like:

Error response from daemon: all predefined address pools have been fully subnetted
failed to create network <task>__<id>__env_default

Docker has run out of subnets, not memory or disk. Each task runs as a compose project, and each project creates its own bridge network. Docker's built-in default address pools carve two private ranges into /16 and /20 blocks, 32 networks total. A stopped or killed run used to leave its network behind, so they accumulated silently until nothing could be allocated.

Nothing in the error says "subnet", and it fires before the image or the model is touched, so it looks like the benchmark is broken rather than the host being out of a resource nobody thinks about.

Stopping a run now reaps its networks along with its containers, and Maintenance reports both. To clear a backlog by hand:

docker network ls --format '{{.Name}}' | grep '__env_default$' | xargs -r docker network rm

If you legitimately want many trials in flight, raise the ceiling instead by adding a pool to Docker's daemon.json. Pick a private range that does not collide with your own network, and carve it small enough to yield plenty of blocks:

{"default-address-pools": [{"base": "<your-private-range>/16", "size": 24}]}

A /16 at size: 24 yields 256 networks. See Docker's dockerd reference for the current built-in defaults.

---

Choosing a time budget

This is the setting most likely to make your results meaningless, and it is the one nobody can pick for you. It depends entirely on how fast your model generates.

Terminal-Bench gives each task 900-1800 s of agent time, sized for frontier APIs. A trajectory spends 30k, 150k output tokens. At 25 tok/s that is 20-100 minutes of pure generation, so at the stock 1.0× budget almost everything times out mid-task, and a timeout scores exactly like a wrong answer, so the benchmark silently measures your hardware instead of the harness.

Measure it:

harness-arena probe --speed

That times one uncontended request and recommends a multiplier. Roughly:

Output speed	agent_timeout_multiplier
~25 tok/s, large dense model, one consumer GPU	16.0
~50 tok/s	8.0
~140 tok/s, small MoE, few active params	4.0
hosted frontier API	1.0

Treat the recommendation as a floor. The arithmetic covers generation only, while the agent budget also has to absorb prompt processing on every turn, which grows with the context, plus the wall clock of the commands the agent actually runs. Doubling it is a reasonable starting point.

Err high. Over-budgeting costs wall clock on tasks the agent would have abandoned anyway; under-budgeting kills tasks mid-solve.

The default 4.0× gives the 900 s tasks 1 h and the 1800 s tasks 2 h.

Raising it has narrower reach than it looks. Once the budget is roughly right, very few failures are actually timeouts. Most end with no exception at all, meaning the agent stopped on its own. It had decided it was finished, and more time would have changed nothing. Those are correctness failures wearing a timeout's clothes. Check the T count in the matrix before spending wall clock on a bigger multiplier.

Runs at different multipliers are not comparable and the dashboard will not pair them.

---

Commands

harness-arena init          Create config.yaml interactively
harness-arena doctor        Check everything needed to run
harness-arena probe         Identify the model (--speed to time it)
harness-arena bench         Run the benchmark, one harness after another
harness-arena dash          Serve the live dashboard
harness-arena export        Write a standalone snapshot HTML
harness-arena collect       Print a text summary of all runs
harness-arena throughput    Wall clock and LLM utilization per run
harness-arena clipping      How often each harness hit the output ceiling
harness-arena template-fix  Patch a chat template that refuses a harness
harness-arena prepull       Cache task images ahead of a run
harness-arena subset        Regenerate a stratified task subset

harness-arena <command> --help shows that command's own options.

bench flags

Flag	Default	Meaning
--harness <name>	all in registry	Run only these harnesses (repeatable)
--subset <name>	none	Named task list from bench/subsets/<name>.txt
--n-tasks <n>	none	Smoke-test with the first N tasks
--task <name>	none	Run one specific task (repeatable)
--agent-timeout-multiplier <n>	4	Scale each task's agent time budget
--n-concurrent <n>	2	Trials in flight at once
--n-concurrent-agents <n>	slot count	How many may generate at once
--base-url <url>	from config	Override the endpoint
--model <id>	from config	Override the model
--label <text>	auto	Override the model's display label
--dry-run	off	Print the harbor run command without executing
--allow-hosts	off	Send the egress allowlist (network-restricted datasets only)

Anything not covered goes straight through to Harbor after --:

harness-arena bench --subset stratified-25 -- --max-retries 2

---

Swapping models

Load different weights on your server and re-run. Nothing else changes.

The runner probes /v1/models and /props and fingerprints the weights, id, parameter count, file size, ftype, trained context, and file path, not the alias. Reload the same alias with a different quant and it is correctly treated as a new model, prompting once for a display label (pre-filled from the weights filename, so it is usually one Enter). Labels are cached in bench/models.json, keyed by fingerprint.

/props is the better endpoint: it reports model_path, model_ftype, n_ctx, build_info and, critically, total_slots, which is what n_concurrent_agents should match.

Hosted providers have no /props and their weights can change without notice, so a hosted run is a measurement of an endpoint, not of a file you hold. The fingerprint is derived from the model id, and runs are labeled accordingly.

To compare across models, hold the timeout multiplier constant.

---

The context window

Every harness is told the same window, resolved once. {max_tokens} is an eighth of it, which leaves room for a long reply without letting one response eat the history the next turn needs.

Three sources, most authoritative first:

Source	When
Configured, endpoint.context_window, or the Context window box on the Setup tab	Whenever it is non-zero. Set it once and every harness gets it
Detected, what the server reports	llama.cpp publishes the loaded window on /props, and that is the right answer
Fallback, 4096	Nothing else knew. The run says so on the console and the dashboard labels it

Which one was used is recorded per run, because "128K, detected" and "4K, because nothing knew" are not the same claim about a result.

Not every harness can be capped

{max_tokens} is offered to every harness; only the ones with a knob for it run under it. Codex has none. codex-cli 0.147.0's ConfigToml carries 96 keys — model_context_window, model_auto_compact_token_limit and tool_output_token_limit among them — and not one of them caps a single completion; model_max_output_tokens does not appear in the binary at all.

That is worth stating out loud, because for a while the manifest said otherwise. A 25-task sweep recorded agent_max_tokens: 16384 for Claude Code and for Codex alike. Claude Code's largest completion was exactly 16,384; Codex's was 92,436. The two tied at 0.68, and the tie was between a harness under a 16K output budget and one under none.

Nothing here can fix that — the knob does not exist — so the rig records which harnesses were actually given a ceiling (agent_max_tokens_source), prints the ones it cannot cap before a sweep starts, and the dashboard shows no output cap where a number would otherwise imply one.

Setting the reasoning effort

The Run tab has a Reasoning effort selector: Auto, or one of none, minimal, low, medium, high. One value for the whole sweep, because a run where two harnesses reasoned differently is not one experiment. Auto probes the endpoint for what it accepts, which is what every run before this did.

It reaches every harness that has a knob for one, which is four of the eight in the catalog. Read off each CLI's own --help for the pinned build:

Harness	Flag	Note
codex	model_reasoning_effort	same vocabulary
dsh	reasoning_effort	three levels, the adapter maps onto them
hermes	--reasoning	accepts none…ultra, a superset
omp	--thinking	spells "do not think" as off; the adapter translates
claude-code, minion, dmfa-minion, opencode	—	no effort level

The selector stops at high on purpose. omp and hermes go on to xhigh, max and ultra; codex and dsh do not, and a sweep where two harnesses reasoned at different levels because only some understood the word would not be one experiment.

The four with no knob are not running without thinking. The model reasons either way — it is a reasoning model — so an unset effort is one nobody recorded, not one nobody spent. The manifest records reasoning_effort_applied per run and the dashboard says so on the run, rather than showing a value the harness never received.

A related trap is {reasoning_effort} and {max_tokens} in the same catalog block. Reasoning tokens are billed against the output cap, so a high effort can spend the whole budget before the model emits a tool call. The DeepSeek Harness ran that way on 2026-08-18 and lost 8 of 25 trials to it — every one scoring zero, three without a single tool call, while the other 17 averaged 0.765. bench warns when a block asks for both.

Ollama cannot be detected. It publishes no /props, and /api/show reports only the model's architectural maximum, not the window the server was started with. /api/ps reports none at all. Its own default has moved around (2048 historically, later VRAM-dependent) and OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH or a Modelfile num_ctx overrides it, so there is no number worth assuming. Set it on the Setup tab to match what you started the server with.

Harness minimums

A harness may refuse to run below some window, and hermes-agent does: under 64,000 tokens it exits during initialisation. Harbor sees only a non-zero exit, the same thing a crash produces, and that exception is on the retry list, so an 89-task run would reproduce one knowable refusal 178 times with the reason buried in per-trial agent logs.

Claude Code reaches the same place by a different route. It does not refuse anything; it simply sends 22,208 tokens of system prompt and tool schemas before the task is mentioned, so under about 24K every first request overflows the window and every trial fails identically. Its floor is 32768, the point below which the fixed prompt leaves no room to work in.

Such a floor is declared in the catalog as min_context_window and checked once, while the command is built:

hermes needs a context window of at least 64,000 tokens, but this run
would give it 32,768 (configured).

Note what this interacts with: the floor is only reachable because the window is accurate. A harness told nothing will guess, and guess high. The refusal is the harness being honest about what it needs, not a regression. Raising the configured number without raising what the server actually serves converts a loud refusal into silent truncation, which is strictly worse.

The fallback is deliberately small. Overshooting is the dangerous direction: the server truncates in silence and the run scores it as a reasoning failure rather than a configuration error.

It matters because the window is what a harness measures itself against: it decides when compression fires and when history gets truncated. A harness left to guess is not running the same experiment as one that was told, and the difference shows up as a capability gap that isn't one.

Each harness is given it in the key that harness actually reads:

Harness	Key	Notes
dmfa-minion	MINION_MAX_TOKENS only	Same adapter, same probe as minion
minion	MINION_MAX_TOKENS only	Reads /v1/models and /props from the server itself, the same source this rig probes, so there is nothing to pass and no second setting to disagree with it
hermes	model.context_length, model.max_tokens	Auto-detects otherwise, and its own example config names a local server with a custom num_ctx as a case where that goes wrong
oh-my-pi	contextWindow, maxTokens	In the generated models.yml
opencode	limit.context, limit.output	In the generated opencode.json
DeepSeek Harness	contextWindow, maxTokens	In the generated --patch overlay, per model and again as defaultContextWindow. Its own fallback is 1,000,000 tokens, so an unset window does not read as unset — it reads as a model nobody is running
Claude Code	CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_CONTEXT_TOKENS, CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS	Sizes auto-compaction from a built-in table of model ids. A self-hosted model is not in it, so it assumes 200K and says so, set this or it works to a window the server does not have
Codex	model_context_window	Config file only; there is no environment variable for it, which is the entire reason harnesses/codex.py exists

No adapter carries a fallback constant. A hardcoded window would be a second answer that goes silently wrong the moment you load a different model, so when no value is supplied the setting is omitted and the harness decides. A window of 0, what a server that advertises nothing yields, counts as no value.

Both numbers are recorded in each run's manifest and shown in the dashboard, so a run made at a different window is visible rather than something you have to ask about.

---

Adding a harness

1. If Harbor already ships an agent for it (harbor run --help lists them) and that agent can reach your endpoint, you need no Python, just a registry block.
2. Otherwise drop an adapter in harnesses/<name>.py: a BaseInstalledAgent subclass with install(), run(), and optionally populate_context_post_run() for token accounting. harnesses/omp.py is the worked example; harnesses/hermes.py shows how to subclass a built-in agent to change only its config.
3. Add the block to harnesses/registry.yaml:

  mycli:
    label: "My Harness"
    vendor: "someone"
    repo: "https://github.com/..."
    agent: "harnesses.mycli:MyCli"   # or a Harbor built-in name
    model_ref: "local/{model_id}"    # what --model receives
    agent_kwargs:                    # passed as --ak key=value
      base_url: "{base_url}"
      api_key: "{api_key}"
    agent_env:                       # passed as --ae KEY=VALUE
      SOME_FLAG: "1"

Placeholders filled from the live probe: {model_id}, {base_url}, {base_url_root}, {host}, {n_ctx}, {max_tokens}, {label}, {api_key}.

{base_url_root} is {base_url} without a trailing /v1, for a harness whose client appends its own version segment, Anthropic's does, OpenAI's does not. Getting it the wrong way round fails every trial at the first request; see Pointing the vendor CLIs at a local model.

{api_key} resolves at run time and is scrubbed out of manifests and logs. Never write a literal key here. This file is committed.

Nothing else in the codebase knows harness names. See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for the adapter contract.

Expect one non-obvious detail per harness, and expect it to be undocumented. Every adapter here needed something the README of its own project did not mention, found by running the CLI and reading the source:

Harness	What it needed
dmfa-minion	Everything minion needs. The adapter's repo kwarg selects which fork to install, so one adapter serves both rows.
minion	A named source (MINION_SOURCE_<NAME>_BASE_URL), not a single base URL, and --yolo for approvals. One-shot saves no session, so usage comes from its traffic log.
hermes-agent	model.base_url plus a local-server provider; it discards a non-loopback base URL otherwise, and an empty key aborts before the request is built.
oh-my-pi	Install the release binary; the npm package needs Bun. Every model role must be pinned or a subagent calls a cloud provider.
opencode	--auto and --pure. Its token stream can end without the final step_finish, so the exported session is the fallback.
DeepSeek Harness	A C++ toolchain. It is npm-only and its tree reaches node-pty, a native addon with no prebuilt, so the install runs node-gyp; Terminal-Bench 2's images have gcc but no python3, make or g++, and every trial died in setup. Two --, not one: its launcher and its one-shot app each parse with commander, the launcher eats the first, and the app then reads a task beginning with - as an unknown option. And DSH_PERMISSION_MODE=danger-full-access, which is both the approval policy and the only mode that does not need a bubblewrap or Landlock backend the container does not have.
Claude Code	ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL must not end in /v1, the client appends /v1/messages itself, and it has to be set on the harbor process, because the built-in agent reads that one straight from os.environ. It also sends a non-first system-role message, which some chat templates refuse — see below.
Codex	base_url must keep /v1: it appends only /responses. A custom provider block also fails to load without a name field, with provider name must not be empty.

The pattern: the failures are silent. A harness that is not allowed to use tools still produces a transcript, still burns wall clock, and still scores zero, it just looks like a model that cannot code.

---

Pointing the vendor CLIs at a local model

Claude Code and Codex ship as products for their vendor's own API, and the common assumption is that using either with a self-hosted model means running a translating proxy. On llama.cpp it does not: the server implements all three dialects directly, so both CLIs talk to your endpoint the same way every other harness here does. No proxy is involved, which matters. A proxy would be a second implementation sitting inside the thing being measured.

What each one needs, verified against this rig's endpoint rather than inferred from documentation:

	Claude Code	Codex
API	Anthropic Messages	OpenAI Responses
Path	POST <root>/v1/messages	POST <base_url>/responses
Base URL	/v1 removed ({base_url_root})	/v1 kept ({base_url})
Credential	ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (any value)	OPENAI_API_KEY via the provider's env_key
Adapter	none, Harbor's built-in plus env	harnesses/codex.py

The base URL is spelled two different ways on purpose, and that is the one thing most likely to bite. Both are correct: the Anthropic client owns the version segment and appends /v1/messages itself, so a URL ending in /v1 becomes /v1/v1/messages; OpenAI's client does not, so the same URL must keep it. That is why there is a {base_url_root} placeholder alongside {base_url} rather than a fixup inside one harness. The distinction belongs to the SDK, and the next Anthropic-shaped harness will want the same thing. tests/test_local_agents.py asserts both spellings together, because the bug is the pair disagreeing.

Neither CLI needs an account. A local server ignores the key, but both refuse to start without one, so the rig passes the literal local when the endpoint wants no credential.

Check your server actually serves the dialect. llama.cpp does; most others serve only OpenAI's. Two curls settle it:

# Claude Code needs this to be 200 (note: /v1/messages, not /messages)
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' -X POST "$BASE/v1/messages" \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"model":"m","max_tokens":16,"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"hi"}]}'

# Codex needs this to be 200
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' -X POST "$BASE/v1/responses" \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"model":"m","input":"hi"}'

A 404 on the first means Claude Code cannot run against that server without a proxy. A 404 on the second means Codex cannot, set wire_api: chat in its registry block to fall back to /v1/chat/completions, which every OpenAI-compatible server implements.

A 200 on the second is necessary but not sufficient: Codex always asks for reasoning, and a server can serve /v1/responses while refusing an effort. Add "reasoning":{"effort":"low"} to that body to see which you have, the rig probes exactly this and adapts, but it is the difference between a Codex run that works and one that fails on every task.

A 200 on the first is not sufficient either, and this one is not about the server at all. Claude Code sends a second, non-first system-role message after the opening user turn — its agent and skill listings. llama.cpp forwards that role to the model's chat template, and some templates abort rather than render it:

Error: Jinja Exception: System message must be at the beginning.

That is a property of the weights, so it appears the moment you load a different model and nothing else changes: the same llama.cpp build, Claude Code version and Harbor version ran a full sweep against one GGUF and could not make a single request against the next. Add a trailing system message to the first curl above to check for it, or let the rig ask:

harness-arena template-fix          # reports it, and writes a patched template
harness-arena template-fix --verify # after restarting the server with it

harness-arena bench asks the same question before it builds a container, and drops only the harnesses whose refusal it recognises — the rest of the sweep runs untouched, which is what usually happens, since every OpenAI-shaped harness sends one leading system message and never reaches that branch. --skip-wire-check turns the preflight off.

The patch is to the template, never to the request. Rewriting what a harness sends would mean the harness under test is no longer the harness being measured, which is the one thing this rig cannot trade away.

Two further notes worth knowing before reading results:

• Claude Code's fixed prompt is large. Measured at 22,208 tokens before the task is mentioned, 18,455 of that is the schemas for its 26 built-in tools. That is a real part of what the harness is, not overhead to subtract, but it is why its min_context_window is 32768: below that there is no room left to work in. An image carrying MCP servers pays more (33,182 tokens across 88 tools on a developer machine).
• Both are told the window explicitly. Left alone, Claude Code assumes 200K for a model it does not recognise and Codex falls back to its own metadata, each would then be running a different experiment from the other four.
• Codex's reasoning effort is probed, not fixed. It sends a reasoning object on every request and gives no way to omit the effort, leaving the setting out still sends {"summary":"auto"}. Servers disagree about what they will accept: llama.cpp takes any effort from any model, Ollama answers 400 does not support thinking for a model that cannot, and that reply kills every trial at its first request. So the endpoint is asked once and the effort is set to none when it refuses one. Both the value and where it came from land in the manifest as reasoning_effort and reasoning_effort_source, because a run that reasoned and one that did not are not two measurements of the same thing. Pin it with endpoint.reasoning_effort when you need one effort across an experiment.

---

How scoring works

Per task, after the agent phase ends (finished or timed out):

1. Harbor copies the task's tests/ into the container, after the agent is done, so the agent never sees the tests during its run.
2. tests/test.sh runs pytest, emitting a CTRF report.
3. The decisive line:

   if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo 1 > /logs/verifier/reward.txt
   else                  echo 0 > /logs/verifier/reward.txt; fi
   

4. Harbor reads that into verifier_result.rewards; a task counts as resolved only if every reward is ≥ 1.0.

Scoring is binary and all-or-nothing. One failing assertion out of the whole file scores zero. There is no partial credit, 5/6 checks scores exactly the same as 0/6.

That is why the matrix shows the check ratio: the reward alone cannot distinguish a harness that nearly solved something from one that had no idea.

The verifier runs even when the agent times out. Harbor grades whatever is on disk, so a trial can time out and pass. The reward is ground truth; such a cell renders as a pass with an amber underline.

---

Reading results honestly

Confidence intervals. Terminal-Bench 2 is 89 tasks, and a subset is fewer. At that size a 5-point gap is often noise. Every pass rate is drawn with its 95 % Wilson interval; if the whiskers overlap, you have not shown a difference. Compare the disagreement set instead: tick disagreements only on the task matrix, which leaves just the tasks the harnesses did not agree on.

Errors are not wrong answers. A trial that dies on ApiConnectionClosedError or EnvironmentStartTimeoutError scores zero but says something about plumbing, not reasoning. Those get their own ! cell and are broken out in the run log.

But a submission that would not build is a wrong answer. On benchmarks that compile their tests against the agent's code — every aider-polyglot task in C++, Go, Rust or Java — code that does not compile cannot be scored, so Harbor raises RewardFileNotFoundError. That is the normal way to fail there, not a plumbing problem, so it renders as an ordinary failure · and the tooltip says no score was produced. It stays unresolved and stays in the denominator; it just does not wear the mark reserved for the rig falling over. Terminal-Bench 2 scores a missing implementation as a plain zero and never raises this, which is why the distinction only became necessary once a second benchmark existed.

Timeouts are not wrong answers either. A T cell means the agent was still working when the budget expired. That is a statement about your hardware and the multiplier, not the harness's ability.

Subsets vs smoke tests. bench/subsets/stratified-25.txt is a deliberate experiment: 25 of the 89 tasks, difficulty-stratified to match the full set's mix, stride-sampled over sorted names so it is deterministic and not alphabetically biased. Every harness runs that identical list, which is what keeps the harness comparison valid even though the absolute pass rate is not leaderboard-comparable. Regenerate or resize with harness-arena subset.

An ad-hoc --n-tasks 3 run is a different animal. It gets a smoke badge. Named subsets keep their name as the badge instead.

hide smoke runs is off by default: nothing disappears unless you ask it to. Switch it on and it reports what it is holding back (1 hidden), so a missing run is always accounted for on screen. Note that a smoke run is excluded from run-to-run comparisons regardless of that checkbox, because it did not run the same task list, re-run it with --subset <name> to make it comparable.

What the rig refuses to compare. A comparison is only drawn between runs that share a model, a subset, a partial-status, and a timeout multiplier, and differ in harness. A harness given twice the wall clock finishes strictly more tasks, so pairing across budgets would measure the budget while looking every bit as authoritative as a real comparison.

Harness defaults are part of the harness. Each runs with its own default thinking effort, turn limits and toolset, that is the thing being measured, and it is what you would actually get if you used it. The adapters disable persistent memory/learning wherever a harness has it, without which task N would be solved by an agent shaped by tasks 1..N-1 and the benchmark would measure accumulated memory rather than the harness.

---

The dashboard

harness-arena dash          # http://127.0.0.1:8420

A single-screen grid; panels scroll internally rather than the page. Below 1180 px wide it unwinds into a normal stacked document.

Panel	Shows
Live feed	Tail of the running trial's agent output, with liveness state
Pass rate	Per-harness bars with 95 % Wilson whiskers
Task matrix	Task × run grid; ✓ solved, 5/6 checks passed, T 1/3 out of time with partial credit, · failed (including work that would not build), ! errored
Cost of a solve	Median task wall clock vs output tokens per solved task
Cost of a run	The same chart over every trial, won or lost. A harness that solves the cheap tasks and loses the expensive ones reads cheap on the first and dear on this one
Run log	Every run on disk with its full configuration

Hover any matrix cell for the per-check breakdown. The legend lists only the states actually present. "Disagreements only" filters the matrix to tasks where harnesses differ.

Any panel opens full screen. Six panels on one page means each is small, and the two holding the most, an 89-row task matrix and the run log, are the ones that suffer. The button in a panel's top-right corner expands it to the whole window; Esc, the close button, or a click outside puts it back. The expanded copy is the same panel, so it keeps updating on the 5 s poll while it is open, and its chart/table toggle still works.

The model selector, headline numbers and filters sit in the first column above the live feed rather than in a strip across the top. As a full-width strip they cost every column a band of height, and the pass rate and task matrix, the two that most need it, were paying for a row of controls.

The live feed goes quiet during long generations, output is piped through tee, which flushes per line, so an unbroken reasoning block produces nothing until it ends. The panel says so rather than looking hung.

What the feed hides, and what it never hides. Agent logs carry machine exhaust alongside the transcript, and two kinds are filtered from the view only, the log on disk always keeps every byte:

• Claude Code's thinking_tokens counter, emitted once per couple of tokens of reasoning (measured at 91 % of one 6.6 MB log).
• Rust tracing at TRACE/DEBUG/INFO, which --debug-capture switches on and which Codex, being Rust, emits once per streamed event (97 % of one 24.9 MB log), including the field-list trailers that continue a record onto its own line.

WARN and ERROR are deliberately kept: a refused connection or a reset stream announces itself there, and those are the reason diagnostics get enabled in the first place. Tool output is kept too, however ugly, an agent that hex-dumps a binary produces a screen of hex, and that is the work, not noise.

Because a filtered log can be almost entirely filtered, the feed budgets scanning separately from rendering and reads far past the first window to find content. When even that comes up empty it says so, naming the cause, silence would read as a hung agent, which is the one thing this panel exists not to do.

The control plane

The other four tabs write: they save configuration, start and stop processes, edit registry.yaml, and delete run directories. That has security consequences, so:

• It binds loopback. Any page in your browser can send requests to 127.0.0.1, so localhost alone is not a boundary.
• Writes need a token minted per server start and injected into the page. It travels in a custom header, which cross-origin JavaScript cannot set without a preflight, and this server answers none and sends no CORS headers.
• The Host header is validated, which is what actually defeats DNS rebinding. Only JSON bodies are accepted, because form encoding is the one content type sendable cross-origin without a preflight.
• API keys are never sent to the browser. The UI is told that a key is set, never what it is.
• registry.yaml refuses credentials. It is committed, so a key pasted into a harness field is rejected with an explanation rather than saved.

None of that makes it safe to expose. Keep it on loopback or put it behind an authenticating proxy. harness-arena dash --read-only serves results with the control plane disabled entirely.

Stop really stops. Killing the runner is not enough: Docker owns the task containers, not the process, so the agents inside them keep generating against your endpoint. Stopping therefore also removes the containers that run created, identified by exclusion against whatever was already running, so unrelated containers are untouched, and reports how many it removed.

Maintenance shows which files are in play. An editable install pins an absolute path, so launching from a second clone silently serves the first one's runs; cd does not change how Python resolves imports. The tab prints the code root, config path and runs directory, and doctor warns when your working directory is a different checkout.

harness-arena export writes a standalone snapshot with the data inlined; it works offline with no server and carries no control plane. It inlines run manifests, so look at what is in one before publishing it.

---

Tests

python tests/test_config.py      # config precedence and secret redaction
python tests/test_api.py         # control-plane auth, validation, redaction
python tests/test_supervisor.py  # run guards and stop semantics
python tests/test_collect.py     # comparison rules and statistics
python tests/test_tokens.py      # adapter parsers and generated configs
python tests/test_local_agents.py # endpoint routing for Claude Code and Codex
node   tests/test_dashboard.mjs  # every dashboard render path

All seven run in seconds and need no benchmark data, no model server and no Docker. They cover what a real run validates too slowly or too late, and what fails silently rather than loudly:

• Token accounting: a trial takes hours, and a silent zero would make the efficiency panel wrong rather than broken.
• Which runs may be compared: a bad pairing renders a confident disagreement set that is actually measuring the wrong variable.
• Secret handling: that a key never reaches a run manifest, a log, or the browser. A leak here changes nothing visible; the credential is simply also in a file you published.
• Control-plane authentication: every gate that, if it regressed, would leave the server working exactly as before while also doing what a hostile page asked.
• Stop semantics: a stopped job that is not marked reads as running forever, so its partial results masquerade as a benchmark in progress.
• Endpoint routing for the vendor CLIs: Claude Code needs the base URL without its /v1 and Codex needs it with, from one configured value. Either one spelled wrong fails at the first request of every trial, which reads as a harness that cannot solve anything rather than as a URL bug.

node tests/test_dashboard.mjs <results.json> runs against real collector output instead of the built-in fixture.

---

Project layout

harness-arena             the CLI (bench/cli.py); run.ps1 / run.sh wrap it
config.example.yaml       every setting, documented; copy to config.yaml
environment.yml           conda env with harbor pinned
pyproject.toml            package metadata and the console script

harnesses/
  registry.yaml           harness catalog + run defaults, the extension point
  hermes.py               hermes-agent adapter (local-endpoint routing)
  minion.py               minion adapter (named-source config, traffic-log usage)
  omp.py                  oh-my-pi adapter
  opencode.py             opencode adapter
  deepseek.py             DeepSeek Harness adapter (patch overlay, session log)
  codex.py                Codex CLI adapter (provider block + context window)
                          (Claude Code needs none. It is a registry block and
                           environment variables, nothing more)

bench/
  cli.py                  the `harness-arena` command; init and doctor
  config.py               layered config, provider catalog, secret redaction
  probe.py                endpoint -> model fingerprint + label; speed probe
  runner.py               registry + model -> `harbor run`, one harness at a time
  supervisor.py           start/stop a run on behalf of the UI, one at a time
  registry.py             read and edit the harness catalog, safely
  collect.py              runs/ -> normalized index (pass rate, Wilson CI, head-to-head)
  activity.py             live tail of the in-flight trial
  throughput.py           wall clock and LLM utilization per run
  clipping.py             per-response output ceiling, per harness, compared
  prepull.py              cache task images ahead of a run
  make_subset.py          regenerate a stratified subset from the dataset repo
  subsets/                named task lists; every harness runs the same one

dashboard/
  server.py               stdlib HTTP server: results API + authenticated control plane
  index.html              the dashboard and its five tabs, self-contained

tests/                    seven suites, no benchmark data required
runs/                     Harbor job dirs (gitignored)

runs/, config.yaml and bench/models.json are gitignored. The first is large and regenerable, the second may hold a credential, and the third records which weights are on your disk.

Each run directory names what it measured, so a listing is readable without opening anything:

runs/
  omp__qwen3-coder-30b-q4-k-m-a1b2c3d4__tb2__full__20260815T173206Z
  hermes__qwen3-coder-30b-q4-k-m-a1b2c3d4__polyglot__stratified-25__20260815T181500Z
       harness  model (label + fingerprint)   benchmark  scope   started (UTC)

The benchmark segment is the short slug from the datasets: catalog, and the scope is a subset name, smoke for an ad-hoc --n-tasks run, or full. Those are the facts that decide whether two runs are the same experiment; everything else that varies — context window, reasoning effort, time budget — is in the run's harness-bench.json, which is the actual record. The name is a human index, not the data.

---

Credits

harness-arena was created and is maintained by Dan August (@danaug23).

If it is useful in published work, please cite it:

Dan August. harness-arena: comparing agent harnesses on one held-constant model.
2026. https://github.com/danaug23/harness-arena

---

License

Apache-2.0, Copyright 2026 Dan August. See NOTICE for the projects this runs against, Harbor, Terminal-Bench, and the harnesses under test are fetched at run time and carry their own licenses.

Apache-2.0 requires anyone redistributing this, modified or not, to keep the NOTICE file intact, so the attribution travels with the code rather than living only here.