harness0 0.0.3

Layer 0 of agent reliability — the framework-agnostic harness that makes any AI agent stable.

Not another agent framework.
A reliability layer that makes any agent stable.

Quick Start · 5-Layer Model · Individual Layers · User Manual · Architecture

---

Agent = Loop(Model + Harness)

You provide the Model. harness0 provides the Harness — the engineering infrastructure that makes the model work reliably in production.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│           Your Application              │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Orchestration (pick one)               │
│  LangChain / CrewAI / PydanticAI / DIY  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ★ harness0 — reliability layer        │  ← Layer 0
│  Context · Tools · Security             │
│  Feedback · Entropy                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  LLM API                                │
│  OpenAI / Anthropic / DeepSeek / Local  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Keep using whatever framework you already use. harness0 is complementary — it adds the reliability layer underneath.

Concept origin: Harness Engineering was introduced by OpenAI (Feb 2026), based on building a 1M-line, fully agent-generated codebase. The key insight: the model is the engine; the harness is what makes it driveable. harness0 is the first open-source library built entirely around this discipline.

The Problem

Every agent developer hits the same walls:

Problem	Root Cause	harness0 Layer
"Demo works, production fails"	No structured context management	L1 Context Assembly
"More tools = less stable"	Tools are an ungoverned bag of functions	L2 Tool Governance
"Afraid to let agents run commands"	Security relies on prompt-level trust	L3 Security Guard
"Agent fails but doesn't know why"	System errors aren't translated for the model	L4 Feedback Loop
"Agent drifts on long tasks"	Context decays — stale rules, bloated history	L5 Entropy Management

Existing frameworks solve orchestration. harness0 solves reliability.

---

Quick Start

pip install harness0

import asyncio
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
from harness0 import HarnessEngine, RiskLevel

engine = HarnessEngine.default()

@engine.tool(risk_level=RiskLevel.READ)
async def read_file(path: str) -> str:
    """Read a file and return its contents."""
    return open(path).read()

@engine.tool(risk_level=RiskLevel.EXECUTE, requires_approval=True, timeout=30)
async def run_command(command: str) -> str:
    """Execute a shell command."""
    import subprocess
    return subprocess.check_output(command, shell=True, text=True)

async def main():
    result = await engine.run("Summarise README.md", llm_client=AsyncOpenAI())
    print(result.output)

asyncio.run(main())

v0.0.3 — L1–L5 and HarnessEngine are implemented and functional. Framework integrations are planned. See TODO.md.

With harness.yaml — declarative configuration

llm:
  provider: openai
  model: gpt-4o

context:
  layers:
    - name: base
      source: prompts/base.md
      priority: 0
      disclosure_level: index
    - name: security-guide
      source: docs/security.md
      priority: 10
      disclosure_level: detail
      keywords: ["security", "permission", "auth"]
  total_token_budget: 8000

security:
  blocked_commands: ["rm -rf", "sudo", "> /dev/sda"]
  approval_mode: risky_only

entropy:
  gardener_enabled: true
  gardener_interval_turns: 5
  golden_rules:
    - id: no_duplicate_tools
      description: "No two tools may share the same description"
      severity: error
    - id: no_stale_layers
      description: "All FileSource layers must be fresher than 24h"
      severity: warning

engine = HarnessEngine.from_config("harness.yaml")

---

The 5-Layer Harness Model

L1: Context Assembly

Prompts are assembly systems, not documents.

Give the agent a map, not a 1,000-page manual. INDEX layers are always injected (base prompt, rules summary). DETAIL layers are keyword-gated — loaded only when the task mentions relevant terms. Per-layer and total token budgets prevent context overflow.

assembler = ContextAssembler(layers=[
    ContextLayer(name="base", source=FileSource("base.md"),
                 disclosure_level=DisclosureLevel.INDEX),          # always loaded
    ContextLayer(name="security", source=FileSource("security.md"),
                 disclosure_level=DisclosureLevel.DETAIL,          # loaded only for security tasks
                 keywords=["security", "auth"]),
    ContextLayer(name="state", source=CallableSource(get_state),
                 freshness=Freshness.PER_TURN),                    # dynamic per turn
], total_token_budget=8000)

L2: Tool Governance

Tools are governed capabilities, not a bag of functions.

Four risk levels (READ → WRITE → EXECUTE → CRITICAL), schema validation, output truncation, and full audit trail. Every tool call passes through a unified pipeline; every failure emits a structured signal the agent can act on.

@engine.tool(risk_level=RiskLevel.EXECUTE, requires_approval=True, timeout=30)
async def run_command(command: str) -> str: ...

ToolCall → Validate → CommandGuard → Approval → Execute → Truncate → Audit → ToolResult

L3: Security Guard

Security at runtime, not in prompts.

Three lines of defense: CommandGuard (pattern blocklist with fix instructions), ProcessSandbox (configurable resource limits), ApprovalManager (human-in-the-loop with SHA-256 fingerprint cache — approve once per session, not once per call).

result = engine.command_guard.check("sudo rm -rf /tmp")
result.allowed          # False
result.matched_pattern  # "sudo"
result.signal.fix_instructions
# "1. Do NOT retry — matches the security blocklist.
#  2. Reason: `sudo` causes irreversible side effects.
#  3. Safer alternatives: run without sudo, or use targeted delete."

Even if the model "misbehaves," the system has hard boundaries.

L4: Feedback Loop

System events must be translated into model-consumable signals.

The agent should never see a bare PermissionError. It should see what happened, why, and what to do next:

System Event	Without L4	With L4
Command blocked	PermissionError	"Command blocked: sudo. Step 1: don't retry. Step 2: run without sudo."
Output truncated	Silent cutoff	"Output truncated 12K→5K tokens. Narrow your search scope."
Subprocess timeout	TimeoutError	"Exceeded 30s timeout. Break into smaller steps or increase timeout."
Schema invalid	ValidationError	"Missing required parameter content. Check the tool schema and retry."

Every signal carries a fix_instructions field — numbered steps the agent can execute immediately. Signals are rendered as XML and auto-injected into the next turn's context via L1:

<harness:signal id="a3f8c1d2" type="constraint" source="security.command_guard">
  <message>Command `sudo apt install` blocked.</message>
  <fix_instructions>1. Do NOT retry.
2. Install without sudo.
3. Or request user approval.</fix_instructions>
</harness:signal>

L5: Entropy Management

Active quality maintenance, not passive compression.

Agent context decays over time. Other frameworks react only when tokens overflow. harness0 proactively detects and repairs degradation every turn:

	Passive (other frameworks)	Active (harness0)
Trigger	Token count near limit	Every turn, proactively
Method	LLM summarizes old messages	Detect + classify + targeted fix
Stale signal removal	No	Yes
Duplicate detection	No	Yes
Conflict detection	No	Yes
Background GC	No	Yes — EntropyGardener

Golden rules are mechanically verifiable invariants declared in YAML. Violations emit FeedbackSignals — the agent can self-repair:

entropy:
  golden_rules:
    - id: no_duplicate_tools
      description: "No two tools may share the same description"
      severity: error
    - id: no_stale_layers
      description: "All FileSource layers must be fresher than 24h"
      severity: warning

Cross-Layer Coordination

The 5 layers are not independent pipelines — they form a coordinated feedback loop:

L3 SecurityGuard blocks "rm -rf /"
  → L4 FeedbackTranslator generates signal with fix_instructions
    → L1 ContextAssembler injects signal into next turn's context
      → LLM receives actionable feedback, adjusts behavior
        → L5 EntropyManager garbage-collects stale signals later

→ Full API reference → User Manual

---

Use Individual Layers

Every layer is independently importable. No full buy-in required.

from harness0.context import ContextAssembler       # L1 — multi-layer prompt assembly
from harness0.tools import ToolInterceptor           # L2 — governed tool execution
from harness0.security import CommandGuard            # L3 — security enforcement
from harness0.feedback import FeedbackTranslator      # L4 — better error messages for models
from harness0.entropy import EntropyManager           # L5 — context quality maintenance

Use just L3 for security, just L1 for prompt assembly, or all 5 together. Each layer has zero dependencies on the others.

→ Individual layer usage examples → User Manual §11

---

How It Compares

Based on publicly available documentation as of March 2026. See competitive-analysis.md for methodology.

Capability	LangChain	OpenAI SDK	MS AGT	harness0
Multi-layer context assembly	—	Basic (2-tier)	—	✅ L1
Progressive disclosure	—	—	—	✅ INDEX/DETAIL
Tool risk classification	—	allow/reject	Policy engine	✅ 4-level
Sandbox execution	Remote	—	4 privilege rings	✅ Lightweight
Approval workflows	HITL	approve/reject	Yes	✅ + fingerprint cache
Feedback translation	—	—	—	✅ L4
Entropy detection + GC	—	—	—	✅ L5
Golden rule enforcement	—	—	—	✅ EntropyGardener
Declarative config	—	—	OPA/Rego	✅ harness.yaml
Framework agnostic	No	No	Yes	✅

Three capabilities no major framework addresses: multi-layer context assembly, feedback translation, and entropy management.

---

Framework Integrations [Planned]

harness0 works with your existing framework. Adapters are on the roadmap:

Framework	Install	Strategy
LangChain	pip install harness0[langchain]	Middleware hooks
OpenAI Agents SDK	pip install harness0[openai]	Input/output/tool guardrails
PydanticAI	pip install harness0[pydantic-ai]	Dependency injection
CrewAI	pip install harness0[crewai]	@harness_tool decorator

→ Integration architecture → Architecture docs

---

Why "harness0"?

The 0 means Layer 0 — the foundational reliability substrate beneath every agent framework, like Layer 0 in networking is the physical medium all higher layers depend on. Ground zero of agent reliability.

Three lessons from OpenAI's harness engineering that directly shaped the design:

1. "Give the agent a map, not a manual" → L1 Progressive Disclosure (INDEX/DETAIL)
2. "Error messages must contain fix instructions" → L4 fix_instructions on every signal
3. "Entropy is inevitable — automate the gardening" → L5 EntropyGardener with golden rules

---

Requirements

• Python 3.11+
• Dependencies: pydantic>=2.0 · pyyaml>=6.0 · tiktoken>=0.7 · httpx>=0.27 · aiofiles>=24.0
• Any openai.AsyncOpenAI-compatible LLM client

Contributing

Contributions welcome. See TODO.md for the full roadmap.

Priority areas: test suite · LLM provider layer · built-in tool plugins · framework adapters · entropy detection strategies

License

MIT

---

User Manual · Architecture · Competitive Analysis · Vision · Roadmap