Skip to main content

Hyper-fast queue for Python

Project description

HyperQ

Python 3.10+ License: MIT PyPI version

⚠️ Warning: This package is not ready for production usage yet. It's currently in active development and may have bugs, especially with multiprocessing scenarios using the spawn start method in macOS.

Hyper-fast queue for Python - A high-performance queue implementation using Cython and C++ for inter-process communication.

🚀 Features

  • Lightning Fast: Optimized C++ implementation with Python bindings
  • Inter-Process Communication: Shared memory-based queues for high-performance IPC
  • Ring Buffer Architecture: Uses a ring buffer with double virtual memory mapping to the same physical memory.
  • Two Queue Types:
    • HyperQ: General-purpose queue for Python objects
    • BytesHyperQ: Specialized queue for bytes data (even faster)
  • Thread-Safe: Safe for concurrent access
  • Unix-like Systems: Works on Linux and macOS (POSIX-compliant systems)
  • Python 3.10+: Modern Python support

📋 TODO

  • Fix multiprocessing spawn start method bug in macOS - Critical issue with multiple consumers/producers
    • Queue doesn't work properly when multiprocessing.set_start_method('spawn') is used
    • Affects scenarios with multiple consumers and producers
  • Add __getstate__ and __setstate__ methods to make queue objects picklable
    • Allow passing queue objects directly to multiprocessing functions
    • Serialize only the shared memory name/descriptor, not the entire queue state
    • Enable seamless integration with multiprocessing.Pool and other parallel processing tools
  • Add timeout support for put() and get() operations
  • Add non-blocking operations (put_nowait(), get_nowait())
    • put_nowait(): Non-blocking put that raises queue.Full if queue is full
    • get_nowait(): Non-blocking get that raises queue.Empty if queue is empty
    • Useful for polling scenarios where you don't want to block the thread
  • Add batch operations for better performance
    • put_many(items): Put multiple items in a single operation
    • get_many(count): Get multiple items in a single operation
    • get_all(): Get all available items at once
    • Reduces synchronization overhead for bulk operations
  • Design decision: Queue name management
    • Option A: Encapsulate queue names (auto-generate, hide from client)
    • Option B: Client specifies queue names (current approach)
    • Option C: Hybrid approach (auto-generate with optional override)
  • Add Windows support (requires different shared memory implementation)
  • Add more comprehensive tests including stress tests and edge cases
  • Add documentation for advanced usage patterns
    • orjson + BytesHyperQ for JSON: Use orjson.dumps() + BytesHyperQ for fastest JSON serialization and transfer.

⚠️ Platform Support

Currently supported:

  • ✅ Linux
  • ⚠️ macOS (There is an issue when start method is set to spawn and there are multiple producers/consumers)

Not supported:

  • ❌ Windows (uses POSIX-specific APIs)
  • ❌ PyPy

🔧 Technical Details

Ring Buffer Implementation

HyperQ uses a ring buffer with double virtual memory mapping to the same physical memory. This eliminates the need for 2 memcpy operations when data wraps around the buffer boundaries.

Shared Memory Architecture

  • Header segment: Contains queue metadata, synchronization primitives, and buffer information
  • Buffer segment: The actual data storage with double virtual memory mapping
  • POSIX shared memory: Uses shm_open() and mmap() for cross-process memory sharing
  • Synchronization: Uses POSIX mutexes and condition variables for thread/process safety

📦 Installation

From PyPI

pip install hyperq

From Source

git clone https://github.com/martinmkhitaryan/hyperq.git
cd hyperq
pip install -e .

Development Installation

git clone https://github.com/martinmkhitaryan/hyperq.git
cd hyperq
pip install -e ".[test]"

🎯 Quick Start

Basic Usage

import multiprocessing as mp
from hyperq import HyperQ, BytesHyperQ

# Create a queue with 1MB capacity
queue = HyperQ(1024 * 1024, name="my_queue")

# Put data
queue.put("Hello, World!")
queue.put(42)
queue.put({"key": "value"})

# Get data
data = queue.get()  # "Hello, World!"
number = queue.get()  # 42
obj = queue.get()  # {"key": "value"}

Inter-Process Communication

import multiprocessing as mp
from hyperq import HyperQ

def producer(queue_name):
    queue = HyperQ(queue_name)
    for i in range(1000):
        queue.put(f"Message {i}")

def consumer(queue_name):
    queue = HyperQ(queue_name)
    for _ in range(1000):
        message = queue.get()
        print(f"Received: {message}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    # Create queue in main process
    queue = HyperQ(1024 * 1024, name="shared_queue")
    queue_name = queue.shm_name

    # Start producer and consumer processes
    p1 = mp.Process(target=producer, args=(queue_name,))
    p2 = mp.Process(target=consumer, args=(queue_name,))

    p1.start()
    p2.start()
    p1.join()
    p2.join()

Bytes-Specific Queue (Faster)

from hyperq import BytesHyperQ

# For bytes data, use BytesHyperQ for better performance
queue = BytesHyperQ(1024 * 1024, name="bytes_queue")

# Put bytes data
queue.put(b"Hello, World!")
queue.put(b"Binary data")

# Get bytes data
data = queue.get()  # b"Hello, World!"

📊 Performance Benchmarks

HyperQ is designed for high-performance scenarios. Here are some benchmark results:

Hardware:

  • CPU: Intel® Core™ i3-12100
  • Memory: 8GB
  • OS: Ubuntu 22.04 / Virtual Box
  • Python: 3.12

Benchmark bytes transfering.

Running bytes performance benchmarks...
================================================================================

Results for 100,000 messages of 32 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.018           0.000           5,528,243           
HyperQ               0.090           0.001           1,106,593           
multiprocessing.Queue 0.334           0.003           299,499             
faster-fifo          0.406           0.004           246,330             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 5,528,243 items/s
   5.0x faster than HyperQ
   18.5x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   22.4x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 64 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.020           0.000           5,067,022           
HyperQ               0.090           0.001           1,105,261           
multiprocessing.Queue 0.388           0.004           257,635             
faster-fifo          0.397           0.004           251,805             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 5,067,022 items/s
   4.6x faster than HyperQ
   19.7x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   20.1x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 128 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.025           0.000           3,988,545           
HyperQ               0.102           0.001           984,694             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.332           0.003           301,471             
faster-fifo          0.402           0.004           248,764             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,988,545 items/s
   4.1x faster than HyperQ
   13.2x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   16.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 256 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.030           0.000           3,280,452           
HyperQ               0.098           0.001           1,024,640           
multiprocessing.Queue 0.344           0.003           290,311             
faster-fifo          0.395           0.004           253,071             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,280,452 items/s
   3.2x faster than HyperQ
   11.3x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   13.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 512 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.028           0.000           3,550,212           
HyperQ               0.105           0.001           956,745             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.357           0.004           279,993             
faster-fifo          0.420           0.004           238,251             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,550,212 items/s
   3.7x faster than HyperQ
   12.7x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   14.9x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 1024 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.042           0.000           2,390,645           
HyperQ               0.109           0.001           917,085             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.379           0.004           263,922             
faster-fifo          0.413           0.004           241,983             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 2,390,645 items/s
   2.6x faster than HyperQ
   9.1x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   9.9x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 4096 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.077           0.001           1,296,410           
HyperQ               0.153           0.002           653,955             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.420           0.004           238,116             
faster-fifo          0.437           0.004           228,823             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 1,296,410 items/s
   2.0x faster than HyperQ
   5.4x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   5.7x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 8192 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.107           0.001           936,460             
HyperQ               0.203           0.002           492,091             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.497           0.005           201,165             
faster-fifo          0.539           0.005           185,473             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 936,460 items/s
   1.9x faster than HyperQ
   4.7x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   5.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 16384 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.189           0.002           528,889             
HyperQ               0.303           0.003           329,876             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.658           0.007           152,017             
faster-fifo          0.762           0.008           131,168             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 528,889 items/s
   1.6x faster than HyperQ
   3.5x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   4.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 32768 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.375           0.004           266,432             
HyperQ               0.484           0.005           206,720             
faster-fifo          0.939           0.009           106,544             
multiprocessing.Queue 1.053           0.011           94,985              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 266,432 items/s
   1.3x faster than HyperQ
   2.5x faster than faster-fifo
   2.8x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 32 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.097           0.000           4,142,198           
HyperQ               0.313           0.001           1,276,678           
faster-fifo          0.863           0.002           463,335             
multiprocessing.Queue 2.907           0.007           137,604             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 4,142,198 items/s
   3.2x faster than HyperQ
   8.9x faster than faster-fifo
   30.1x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 64 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.108           0.000           3,713,089           
HyperQ               0.336           0.001           1,189,575           
faster-fifo          0.847           0.002           472,108             
multiprocessing.Queue 2.928           0.007           136,622             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,713,089 items/s
   3.1x faster than HyperQ
   7.9x faster than faster-fifo
   27.2x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 128 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.104           0.000           3,838,310           
HyperQ               0.293           0.001           1,365,044           
faster-fifo          0.880           0.002           454,557             
multiprocessing.Queue 2.968           0.007           134,779             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,838,310 items/s
   2.8x faster than HyperQ
   8.4x faster than faster-fifo
   28.5x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 256 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.121           0.000           3,306,829           
HyperQ               0.346           0.001           1,156,464           
faster-fifo          0.848           0.002           471,452             
multiprocessing.Queue 3.024           0.008           132,281             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,306,829 items/s
   2.9x faster than HyperQ
   7.0x faster than faster-fifo
   25.0x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 512 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.139           0.000           2,870,961           
HyperQ               0.413           0.001           968,493             
faster-fifo          0.892           0.002           448,522             
multiprocessing.Queue 3.143           0.008           127,257             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 2,870,961 items/s
   3.0x faster than HyperQ
   6.4x faster than faster-fifo
   22.6x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 1024 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.209           0.001           1,918,401           
HyperQ               0.546           0.001           732,611             
faster-fifo          0.929           0.002           430,677             
multiprocessing.Queue 3.299           0.008           121,240             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 1,918,401 items/s
   2.6x faster than HyperQ
   4.5x faster than faster-fifo
   15.8x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 4096 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.400           0.001           1,001,018           
HyperQ               0.745           0.002           536,564             
faster-fifo          1.176           0.003           340,031             
multiprocessing.Queue 4.032           0.010           99,196              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 1,001,018 items/s
   1.9x faster than HyperQ
   2.9x faster than faster-fifo
   10.1x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 8192 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.679           0.002           589,081             
HyperQ               1.111           0.003           359,917             
faster-fifo          1.554           0.004           257,363             
multiprocessing.Queue 4.742           0.012           84,353              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 589,081 items/s
   1.6x faster than HyperQ
   2.3x faster than faster-fifo
   7.0x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 16384 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          1.278           0.003           313,053             
HyperQ               1.765           0.004           226,633             
faster-fifo          2.442           0.006           163,817             
multiprocessing.Queue 6.288           0.016           63,613              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 313,053 items/s
   1.4x faster than HyperQ
   1.9x faster than faster-fifo
   4.9x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 32768 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          2.374           0.006           168,526             
HyperQ               2.887           0.007           138,536             
faster-fifo          3.804           0.010           105,154             
multiprocessing.Queue 10.354          0.026           38,634              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 168,526 items/s
   1.2x faster than HyperQ
   1.6x faster than faster-fifo
   4.4x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
Running bytes performance benchmarks...
================================================================================

Results for 100,000 messages of 32 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.018           0.000           5,528,243           
HyperQ               0.090           0.001           1,106,593           
multiprocessing.Queue 0.334           0.003           299,499             
faster-fifo          0.406           0.004           246,330             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 5,528,243 items/s
   5.0x faster than HyperQ
   18.5x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   22.4x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 64 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.020           0.000           5,067,022           
HyperQ               0.090           0.001           1,105,261           
multiprocessing.Queue 0.388           0.004           257,635             
faster-fifo          0.397           0.004           251,805             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 5,067,022 items/s
   4.6x faster than HyperQ
   19.7x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   20.1x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 128 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.025           0.000           3,988,545           
HyperQ               0.102           0.001           984,694             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.332           0.003           301,471             
faster-fifo          0.402           0.004           248,764             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,988,545 items/s
   4.1x faster than HyperQ
   13.2x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   16.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 256 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.030           0.000           3,280,452           
HyperQ               0.098           0.001           1,024,640           
multiprocessing.Queue 0.344           0.003           290,311             
faster-fifo          0.395           0.004           253,071             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,280,452 items/s
   3.2x faster than HyperQ
   11.3x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   13.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 512 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.028           0.000           3,550,212           
HyperQ               0.105           0.001           956,745             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.357           0.004           279,993             
faster-fifo          0.420           0.004           238,251             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,550,212 items/s
   3.7x faster than HyperQ
   12.7x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   14.9x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 1024 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.042           0.000           2,390,645           
HyperQ               0.109           0.001           917,085             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.379           0.004           263,922             
faster-fifo          0.413           0.004           241,983             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 2,390,645 items/s
   2.6x faster than HyperQ
   9.1x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   9.9x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 4096 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.077           0.001           1,296,410           
HyperQ               0.153           0.002           653,955             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.420           0.004           238,116             
faster-fifo          0.437           0.004           228,823             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 1,296,410 items/s
   2.0x faster than HyperQ
   5.4x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   5.7x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 8192 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.107           0.001           936,460             
HyperQ               0.203           0.002           492,091             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.497           0.005           201,165             
faster-fifo          0.539           0.005           185,473             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 936,460 items/s
   1.9x faster than HyperQ
   4.7x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   5.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 16384 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.189           0.002           528,889             
HyperQ               0.303           0.003           329,876             
multiprocessing.Queue 0.658           0.007           152,017             
faster-fifo          0.762           0.008           131,168             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 528,889 items/s
   1.6x faster than HyperQ
   3.5x faster than multiprocessing.Queue
   4.0x faster than faster-fifo

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 32768 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 100,000 (1 producers, 1 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.375           0.004           266,432             
HyperQ               0.484           0.005           206,720             
faster-fifo          0.939           0.009           106,544             
multiprocessing.Queue 1.053           0.011           94,985              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 266,432 items/s
   1.3x faster than HyperQ
   2.5x faster than faster-fifo
   2.8x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 32 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.097           0.000           4,142,198           
HyperQ               0.313           0.001           1,276,678           
faster-fifo          0.863           0.002           463,335             
multiprocessing.Queue 2.907           0.007           137,604             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 4,142,198 items/s
   3.2x faster than HyperQ
   8.9x faster than faster-fifo
   30.1x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 64 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.108           0.000           3,713,089           
HyperQ               0.336           0.001           1,189,575           
faster-fifo          0.847           0.002           472,108             
multiprocessing.Queue 2.928           0.007           136,622             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,713,089 items/s
   3.1x faster than HyperQ
   7.9x faster than faster-fifo
   27.2x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 128 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.104           0.000           3,838,310           
HyperQ               0.293           0.001           1,365,044           
faster-fifo          0.880           0.002           454,557             
multiprocessing.Queue 2.968           0.007           134,779             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,838,310 items/s
   2.8x faster than HyperQ
   8.4x faster than faster-fifo
   28.5x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 256 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.121           0.000           3,306,829           
HyperQ               0.346           0.001           1,156,464           
faster-fifo          0.848           0.002           471,452             
multiprocessing.Queue 3.024           0.008           132,281             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 3,306,829 items/s
   2.9x faster than HyperQ
   7.0x faster than faster-fifo
   25.0x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 512 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.139           0.000           2,870,961           
HyperQ               0.413           0.001           968,493             
faster-fifo          0.892           0.002           448,522             
multiprocessing.Queue 3.143           0.008           127,257             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 2,870,961 items/s
   3.0x faster than HyperQ
   6.4x faster than faster-fifo
   22.6x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 1024 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.209           0.001           1,918,401           
HyperQ               0.546           0.001           732,611             
faster-fifo          0.929           0.002           430,677             
multiprocessing.Queue 3.299           0.008           121,240             

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 1,918,401 items/s
   2.6x faster than HyperQ
   4.5x faster than faster-fifo
   15.8x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 4096 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.400           0.001           1,001,018           
HyperQ               0.745           0.002           536,564             
faster-fifo          1.176           0.003           340,031             
multiprocessing.Queue 4.032           0.010           99,196              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 1,001,018 items/s
   1.9x faster than HyperQ
   2.9x faster than faster-fifo
   10.1x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 8192 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          0.679           0.002           589,081             
HyperQ               1.111           0.003           359,917             
faster-fifo          1.554           0.004           257,363             
multiprocessing.Queue 4.742           0.012           84,353              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 589,081 items/s
   1.6x faster than HyperQ
   2.3x faster than faster-fifo
   7.0x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 16384 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          1.278           0.003           313,053             
HyperQ               1.765           0.004           226,633             
faster-fifo          2.442           0.006           163,817             
multiprocessing.Queue 6.288           0.016           63,613              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 313,053 items/s
   1.4x faster than HyperQ
   1.9x faster than faster-fifo
   4.9x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

================================================================================
Sleeping 2 seconds before next test configuration...

Results for 100,000 messages of 32768 bytes per producer:
Total messages: 400,000 (4 producers, 4 consumers)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queue Type           Total Time (s)  Latency (ms)    Throughput (items/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BytesHyperQ          2.374           0.006           168,526             
HyperQ               2.887           0.007           138,536             
faster-fifo          3.804           0.010           105,154             
multiprocessing.Queue 10.354          0.026           38,634              

🏆 Fastest: BytesHyperQ with 168,526 items/s
   1.2x faster than HyperQ
   1.6x faster than faster-fifo
   4.4x faster than multiprocessing.Queue

Results may vary depending on hardware and system configuration.

🔧 API Reference

HyperQ

class HyperQ:
    def __init__(self, capacity: int, name: str = None)

    def put(self, item) -> bool
    def get(self)  # Blocks until data is available
    def empty(self) -> bool
    def full(self) -> bool
    def size(self) -> int
    def clear(self)

BytesHyperQ

class BytesHyperQ:
    def __init__(self, capacity: int, name: str = None)

    def put(self, data: bytes) -> bool
    def get(self) -> bytes  # Blocks until data is available
    def empty(self) -> bool
    def full(self) -> bool
    def size(self) -> int
    def clear(self)

Parameters

  • capacity: Maximum size of the queue in bytes
  • name: Optional name for the shared memory segment (max 28 characters)

Important Notes

  • Blocking operations: get() blocks indefinitely until data is available
  • No timeout support: Currently no timeout functionality is implemented
  • Queue names: Must be 28 characters or less
  • Platform limitation: Only works on Unix-like systems (Linux/macOS)

🧪 Running Tests

# Run all tests
pytest

# Run with coverage
pytest --cov=hyperq

📈 Running Benchmarks

# 1 producer, 1 consumer benchmark
python benchmarks/benchmark_bytes_transfering_1p_1c.py

# 10 producers, 10 consumers benchmark
python benchmarks/benchmark_bytes_transfering_10p_10c.py

🏗️ Building from Source

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.10+
  • Cython >= 0.29.0
  • C++ compiler with C++20 support (GCC 8+, Clang 10+)
  • Unix-like system (Linux or macOS)

Build Steps

# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/martinmkhitaryan/hyperq.git
cd hyperq

# Install build dependencies
pip install -e ".[test]"

# Build the extension
python setup.py build_ext --inplace

🤝 Contributing

Development Setup

  1. Fork the repository
  2. Create a virtual environment: python -m venv .venv
  3. Activate it: source .venv/bin/activate (Linux/macOS)
  4. Install development dependencies: pip install -e ".[test]"
  5. Run tests: pytest
  6. Make your changes and submit a pull request

📝 License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

🙏 Acknowledgments

  • Built with Cython for high-performance Python extensions
  • Uses POSIX shared memory and threading primitives
  • Inspired by the need for faster inter-process communication in Python

📞 Support

🔄 Version History

  • 0.1.0: Refactored constructor and destructor in hyperq.hpp; reference count via atomic variable.
  • 0.0.9: Updated benchmarks in README.md.
  • 0.0.8: Updated benchmark suite, test suite, pyproject.toml configuration; optimized CI/CD release workflow.
  • 0.0.7: Replaced is_creator logic with ref count logic for better shared memory management; identified and documented issue with multiprocessing spawn start method not working properly with multiple consumers and producers.
  • 0.0.6: Fix cibuildwheel configurations.
  • 0.0.5: Added platform-specific build and skip patterns for Linux and macOS; improved cibuildwheel configuration with separate build targets for manylinux and macosx wheels
  • 0.0.4: Fixed cibuildwheel configuration for proper multi-platform wheel builds; added architecture-specific settings for Linux (x86_64/i686) and macOS (x86_64/arm64);
  • 0.0.3: Fixed cibuildwheel configuration for proper linux wheel build;
  • 0.0.2: Added proper PyPI wheel support for Linux and macOS using cibuildwheel; improved release workflow for multi-platform builds and C++20 compatibility
  • 0.0.1: Initial release with HyperQ and BytesHyperQ implementations

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

hyperq-0.1.0.tar.gz (110.5 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distributions

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl (181.7 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.12manylinux: glibc 2.17+ x86-64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl (186.2 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.12manylinux: glibc 2.17+ i686manylinux: glibc 2.5+ i686

hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl (138.5 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.12macOS 11.0+ ARM64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl (140.4 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.12macOS 10.9+ x86-64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl (180.3 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.11manylinux: glibc 2.17+ x86-64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl (185.9 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.11manylinux: glibc 2.17+ i686manylinux: glibc 2.5+ i686

hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl (137.6 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.11macOS 11.0+ ARM64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl (139.1 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.11macOS 10.9+ x86-64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl (181.0 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.10manylinux: glibc 2.17+ x86-64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl (186.1 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.10manylinux: glibc 2.17+ i686manylinux: glibc 2.5+ i686

hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl (137.3 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.10macOS 11.0+ ARM64

hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl (138.4 kB view details)

Uploaded CPython 3.10macOS 10.9+ x86-64

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: hyperq-0.1.0.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 110.5 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.12.9

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 0947c6293613675f60496524fd19f00943310a0e6c6d431075004d8d0f334933
MD5 431966e0b5a86dbd4185269292bb4ba4
BLAKE2b-256 132eaa679b9676a99435fac535786695f3e91212a2933b7f1074e758d1eb06e2

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0.tar.gz:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 973d9012943cafed477cd02c39ad93df78f436064b42fbe968fb66ad5d80e709
MD5 87830ca67dfc9b5d14756a5ace3dc468
BLAKE2b-256 405fc993171e1cc770158ed6c4a617b02a684eb5d0a569408e5a3be478a6b6f3

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 a331b7163a28c1ffd1963781f12c348d7bf52619580411f6020640c453cd4adb
MD5 38162f37e8959cb1f37aba240077b36a
BLAKE2b-256 d0d223aebba5c409ca315844b389781bd632df2a8c13ace05761290d54818c48

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 c1b9720fec9ac67df3533658b9cda0104faba6b568d39117c0713a2bfe89ead9
MD5 d8fa3e18d4364e32af6879a82e45f529
BLAKE2b-256 b1e4974020fac3f0b2c9b411802806652976fea708da1332716463e0b250a548

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 996e1f962ea35b76cc4626214cacf1efc4c16002ee23b72a6d810ff85b867edc
MD5 f94d73446706296980e4635de47291b3
BLAKE2b-256 65ee2fc1ddd7115275cba1173e9522febcb7dfcf01008c2a7ed30635f7931024

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp312-cp312-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 bfc4ffffc6631781cde490c214cbfba9d7fb836fc23501477d16f3fbb9397fab
MD5 f3878101d79a18fe74adc420b9d2361a
BLAKE2b-256 feb8cb4ef58dcb82f14a3e2f63951344e4916a82f71aaac4bb2509efb4a4a404

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 3f30dd8140262889413bf5f7795eb5f5c7e41525e3be8dee12bd623b5ddccb3d
MD5 307b667c98f7402d28f10802265d9731
BLAKE2b-256 f4a2faf861cd512b1fe55ca78d061ddc79c1fb793ff7fe13cdd1aa098a8dcc91

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 aac56c35cd2c547057b8162297959db6f265b31b7f9f1595425d64b3b9a16c8b
MD5 d5c66a7d19e8f87dafe2740fc8ea28e3
BLAKE2b-256 d8ad8dbbc43963426f6e79b877508638dc4c146e2406bf00379a80d16d8c19f1

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 0741adee900f3bf9a155a5ae857dc3a3610f2fdbf0e7b84c6fec360a214a749b
MD5 43202a705a5d7226c168b2267a96a7d4
BLAKE2b-256 300b88b715a4b42f6dce91dc0826422fa57a3f7b07e5747069dfd8c2aae2410d

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 40fece5462587c94ce42a38f0b7bd88c6ad00d936cf09a0ed797706016ca24de
MD5 6e39dee0e3be70c891427d09e0e64dd1
BLAKE2b-256 65b032880f908166a3abd638126954691cde490811e4ab160d9ffa8eef3e9900

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 a215a73e9ae54656090404c39a308bf0c0946579cce5dc77cfa55c0ee1da702f
MD5 88cf520eb33d60eeb77465de4839ac16
BLAKE2b-256 b967fb3a175e0bdcd176ea9f9335f6abac597307f081244b3d5800e89c8cbe52

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_5_i686.manylinux1_i686.manylinux_2_17_i686.manylinux2014_i686.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 6c4eb4a3e447de669a9e8d1f9399c9ba1cd87557734d929f58f4c96d4c608cc0
MD5 0ec7963f5fc4d5385df993c02937dc0a
BLAKE2b-256 99d069419b42a6126e89bc3b8b52c12f0bdc93557d45dd8e68209b7b10579592

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 4d4989a639c315e97d0f6b6f934c068586b73961ae58a431253dece8721ec366
MD5 9c5885fd39df2c4729edd4b5d55e18d2
BLAKE2b-256 af5ec156dac7113954250ccae74d4baa66990605f1806f4eca0593e32bb97d0f

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for hyperq-0.1.0-cp310-cp310-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl:

Publisher: release.yml on martinmkhitaryan/hyperq

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page