imbue-mngr-claude-usage
Claude data provider for mngr usage. Single responsibility: install a tiny
statusline shim into each Claude agent so each render appends one event to
$MNGR_AGENT_STATE_DIR/events/claude/usage/events.jsonl. The event
carries three things from the Claude Code statusline payload: rate_limits
(Pro/Max only), cost (always), and session_id (always). The
mngr usage CLI walks those events files itself (see imbue-mngr-usage).
How the pieces fit
mngr_claude_usage's on_before_provisioning hookimpl
└─→ writes <work_dir>/.claude/settings.local.json statusLine.command
└─→ installs <state_dir>/commands/claude_statusline.sh (the shim)
└─→ installs <state_dir>/commands/claude_usage_writer.sh (the writer)
└─→ captures any pre-existing user statusLine.command into
<state_dir>/commands/user_statusline_cmd (the sidecar)
Claude Code statusline render (every turn)
└─→ <work_dir>/.claude/settings.local.json's statusLine.command
└─→ claude_statusline.sh
├─→ claude_usage_writer.sh
│ └─→ events/claude/usage/events.jsonl (append one event)
└─→ user's pre-existing statusLine.command (chain through, if any)
mngr usage
└─→ list_agents (mngr core's CEL-filterable enumeration)
└─→ for each matching agent: scan events, aggregate by (source, session_id),
render per-session costs + freshest rate limits
All file I/O goes through host.read_text_file / host.write_file, so the
provisioner works for local and remote agents (Modal, vps_docker, lima,
etc.).
What gets captured under each auth mode
The Claude Code statusline payload's contents depend on how the user is authenticated:
| Field | Pro/Max subscription | API key (ANTHROPIC_API_KEY) |
|---|---|---|
rate_limits |
Present after the first API response of the session | Not emitted at all |
cost |
Present | Present |
session_id |
Present | Present |
So mngr usage shows rate-limit windows only for subscribers, but
cost-per-session works under both auth modes. The writer emits one event
whenever either rate_limits or cost is present -- so an API-key
user still gets cost tracking. The reader uses the presence/absence of
rate_limits to classify each Claude Code process as SUBSCRIPTION
(cost is imputed by Claude Code, not billable) or API_KEY (cost is
real billable spend), and exposes the two aggregates separately:
api_cost.total_cost_usd > 5.0 predicates real spend (the case here),
while subscription_cost.total_cost_usd > 50.0 predicates imputed
value-received under a flat subscription.
session_id is carried alongside cost to anchor the cost reading to a
specific Claude Code session. Cost resets per session, so a delta across
snapshots is only meaningful within one session_id.
Caveat: multiple Pro/Max accounts share the claude source
What's not filtered is the case where multiple Pro/Max accounts
contribute to the same claude source -- the statusline payload has no
per-account identifier, so mngr usage can't tell "used 5h: 73%" from
account A apart from "5h: 9%" from account B. The aggregation rules will
silently mix them:
- Rate-limit windows are reduced freshest-wins per source, so the displayed five_hour / seven_day reading is for whichever account rendered most recently -- not any specific one.
- Cost is grouped per-session (and per-(agent, Claude Code process)
upstream), so per-session records in
sessions[]stay correct individually. But the per-mode aggregatessubscription_cost.*/api_cost.*(and the humansubscription cost (imputed):/api cost:lines) sum across every session in the recency window of the corresponding mode regardless of account, andsessions[0]is just whichever session last rendered. Subscription accounts and API-key accounts stay distinguishable in the split (the auth mode is detected per process), but two Pro/Max accounts both contributing tosubscription_costare not.
This is rare in practice (one user = one Anthropic account), but if you run
multiple Claude Code sessions logged into different Pro/Max accounts, treat
the aggregated mngr usage view as ambiguous across accounts. There's no
field in the payload that would let us label or warn from inside the
writer; the only paths to resolution are (a) capture auth-source from a
different surface (e.g. Claude Code hooks expose apiKeySource in their
input -- not implemented here) or (b) shard the source name per account
via writer config (also not implemented).
Metadata
Release files for imbue-mngr-claude-usage 0.1.6
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| imbue_mngr_claude_usage-0.1.6.tar.gz | 23.5 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| imbue_mngr_claude_usage-0.1.6-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 35.1 kB
Release files / imbue_mngr_claude_usage-0.1.6.tar.gz
| Download URL | imbue_mngr_claude_usage-0.1.6.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 23.5 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
87138fb5aa9942c566539c869e0b94ac38ebe618394ba844a20b12fe50571072
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
67179d0cd28041196d034835335949e8c998c3548963ff2c10b122a79384308d
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jun 18, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / imbue_mngr_claude_usage-0.1.6-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | imbue_mngr_claude_usage-0.1.6-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 11.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
7d9d847c4b30af878b8338fe6c1887039c60e0627ffffef33a08441a29244a05
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
a03e84ebc6a7bf6617964589a9f23c9f920e9a43700c2a61d9f6e4b7813debd8
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jun 18, 2026.
Transparency log