infona-client 0.1.33

Two sources disagree about the same entity. Infona resolves it — which source won, why, and when it was last verified.

ERP says Acme's headquarters is Austin. A stale directory scrape says San Francisco. Reconciliation will dedupe the name variants onto one supplier, record provenance (erp, 2026-03-01, source_of_truth), and keep the losing citation queryable. Headquarters is a resolved conflict (Austin, reason: authority). Equal-trust credit_rating stays flagged — not silently guessed.

infona.ai (waitlist / demo) · what's free · API

Two sources disagree. You see the winner, the reason, and the last-verified timestamp. ingest → ask is the payoff, not the claim.

10-minute quickstart

Need: Docker + Node 20+ (for the infona CLI). A stranger gets a real answer with no API key.

Zero-key (cached-plan replay)

The prebuilt path replays a cached Cypher plan. It is not live inference. /ask stays always-LLM Cypher whenever a real model key (or INFONA_LLM_BASE_URL) is configured.

git clone https://github.com/infona-ai/infona-oss.git && cd infona-oss
cp .env.example .env          # leave OPENROUTER_API_KEY empty / as the placeholder
npm i -g @infona-ai/cli       # or use npx @infona-ai/cli in place of infona
./scripts/oss_up.sh           # Neo4j + API + loads the prebuilt trials graph
infona ask "Which Phase 3 NSCLC trials is AstraZeneca running?" --kg trials

That question should return FLAURA2, labelled as a cached-plan replay (not live inference). ./scripts/oss_up.sh compose-ups, waits until /health reports Neo4j up, writes ~/.infona/config.json, and runs ./scripts/load_prebuilt_trials.sh.

Reload the snapshot later (still no key):

./scripts/load_prebuilt_trials.sh
infona ask "Which Phase 3 NSCLC trials is AstraZeneca running?" --kg trials

Advertised bound stays 10 minutes. Measured 1 min 42 s cold on macOS 26.5.1 + Colima (Ubuntu 24.04 VM, 4 CPU, 6 GB; warm daemon, empty project, docker compose build --no-cache) from git clone to that zero-key ask. Native Linux was not measured. First-time neo4j:5-community pull is extra; 10 minutes still covers it.

Placeholder keys from .env.example (sk-or-...) count as no key. INFONA_ASK_CACHED_PLAN=1 forces replay even with a key (tests). =0 disables it.

1. Messy suppliers — conflict first

Entity resolution and conflict policy are step one. examples/suppliers-messy.csv is synthetic (Acme / Globex / Initech, fake tax IDs). No real customer data.

Schema inference needs a key (paste OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-... into .env):

infona ingest examples/suppliers-messy.csv --kg suppliers
infona er rebuild --kg suppliers

Ingest writes every row as its own Supplier fragment. er rebuild re-blocks the already-ingested graph and collapses them. A stranger should see a winner, a why, a timestamp, and one leftover conflict the system refused to guess:

Rebuilding entity resolution for suppliers…
  Supplier         6 → 3  (−3 fragments across 2 clusters)

  merge  https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/ERP-1001
         losers:     https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/CRM-4402, https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/DIR-8891
         reason:     signal-richest
         score:      1.00
         provenance: erp @ 2026-03-01T12:00:00+00:00 (source_of_truth)

  merge  https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/ERP-2001
         losers:     https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/CRM-5503
         reason:     signal-richest
         score:      1.00
         provenance: erp @ 2026-03-01T12:00:00+00:00 (source_of_truth)

  conflict  headquarters
         entity:     https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/ERP-1001
         winner:     Austin  (erp, source_of_truth, 2026-03-01T12:00:00+00:00)
         loser:      San Francisco  (directory, supplementary, 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00)
         reason:     authority

  unresolved  credit_rating
         entity:     https://graph.infona.ai/entities/Supplier/ERP-1001
         crm: BBB @ 2026-03-01T12:00:00+00:00 (source_of_truth)
         erp: A @ 2026-03-01T12:00:00+00:00 (source_of_truth)
         flagged: equal-trust sources — not silently guessed

Done. 3 fragments absorbed.

• merge — three Acme name variants (and two Globex) became one entity each. The surviving URI is the signal-richest fragment; its provenance is the source row that won (erp, timestamp, authority).
• conflict / headquarters — ERP is source_of_truth; the directory is a stale supplementary scrape. Austin wins on the authority axis. The loser stays queryable with its own provenance.
• unresolved / credit_rating — ERP says A, CRM says BBB. Same authority, same timestamp. The row stays flagged until a reviewer decides.

Fixture notes: examples/suppliers-messy.md. Hermetic proof: tests/test_suppliers_messy_fixture.py.

2. ingest → ask — the payoff

With a key, live /ask is always-LLM Cypher. The cached plan is not consulted when a real key is present.

infona ingest examples/trials.csv --kg my-data
infona ask "Which Phase 3 NSCLC trials is AstraZeneca running?" --kg my-data

That question should return FLAURA2. examples/trials.csv is a 16-row oncology sample (8 sponsors, 11 drugs, 7 indications) — public program names, synthetic TRIAL-* IDs, no patient data.

The looping SVGs are generated from scripts/render_readme_demos.py. Local Neo4j notes: docs/neo4j-local.md. infona init --local connects without starting Docker. If something fails, the CLI should name the next command.

Python package (library, not the infona CLI — that is @infona-ai/cli). Same version as the npm packages:

pip install infona-client

Import path is infona_client. Graph IRIs live under https://graph.infona.ai/.

Eval — 2 / 8 (25%), misses stay visible

Published pin: 2 / 8 (25%) on examples/trials.csv (16 synthetic oncology rows). Query model openai/gpt-oss-120b, judge deepseek/deepseek-v3.2. /ask is always-LLM Cypher — these scores are not golden-string shortcuts. Six misses stay visible; three of them are the product failing closed instead of returning a silent wrong total.

Eval is Python-only. There is no infona eval CLI.

infona ingest examples/trials.csv --kg eval-public-trials -y
python scripts/run_public_eval.py --dataset examples/trials.csv --kg eval-public-trials --questions 8

Full write-up: docs/EVAL.md. Backing JSON: docs/eval/public_results.json.

What leaves your machine

Infona does not phone home unless you turn it on. Default off.

export INFONA_TELEMETRY=1          # opt in
export INFONA_TELEMETRY=0          # force off (wins over a previous yes)

The first-run CLI prompt (infona / infona init on a TTY) asks the same question and writes ~/.infona/telemetry.json. There is no opt-out default.

Only when enabled, one anonymous JSON object per job:

• job type (ingest / ask / er rebuild / export)
• a row-count bucket (not the exact count)
• source type (csv / json / jsonl / text / http — never a filename)
• error class (exception type or HTTP family — never the message)

A random install_id (UUID) identifies the install, not you.

Never leaves: your data, column names, file names, graph content, workspace / tenant ids, prompts, answers, Cypher, emails, API keys.

When enabled, the default collector is the public Infona-oss PostHog project (write-only project token). Override with INFONA_TELEMETRY_URL, set it to off, or use INFONA_TELEMETRY_SINK=stderr / file locally.

Full contract: docs/TELEMETRY.md.

What this is not

Infona is not a memory or context layer that stuffs retrieved chunks into a prompt window. It is not an enrichment vendor — this repo registers no default open-web page fetcher; you bring retrieval or you skip web fetch (docs/BOUNDARY.md). It is not RAG over a vector index, and it is not "chat with your CSV." Two sources, one entity, a winner, a reason, a last-verified timestamp. If that is not the problem, this is not the tool.

What you get

CSV / JSON / text
  → schema inference (1 LLM call; skipped for the prebuilt snapshot)
  → deterministic row mapping
  → Neo4j knowledge graph (GraphStore / Cypher)
  → er rebuild (merge, conflict, provenance)
  → ask (cached-plan replay with no key; always-LLM Cypher with a key)

Writes go through insert_facts / refresh_after_write. Instance relationships use https://graph.infona.ai/onto/<leaf>. Ask is always-LLM Cypher when a model is configured. Grounding, probes, and few-shots inform the model; they do not replace it.

export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-...
export INFONA_QUERY_PROVIDER=openrouter
export INFONA_QUERY_MODEL=openai/gpt-oss-120b

MCP (agents)

Same ask, same graph, same exact rows — as a tool result:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "infona": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "-p", "@infona-ai/mcp", "infona-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "INFONA_API_URL": "http://localhost:8000",
        "INFONA_TENANT": "default"
      }
    }
  }
}

ask, search, agent, ingest_csv, export_kg, ontology, jobs — same backend the CLI hits. packages/mcp/README.md.

What's free

• OSS (this repo): ingest, ontology, ask, MCP / CLI / HTTP, export, free sources, BYOK registry, plugin seams, conflict policy.
• Bring your own retrieval: OSS registers no open-web page fetcher. Enrichment that needs a URL fetch declines unless you register one — or you use hosted Infona.
• Hosted-only: managed keys Infona bills, paid search/scrape ladders, curated Enhanced ontology, Explorer, billing.

Full table: docs/BOUNDARY.md.

Product path: FastAPI + Neo4j GraphStore (Cypher). SPARQL / Neptune are not product backends.

License and contributing

Apache 2.0 — LICENSE, NOTICE.

Shipped packages share one version (0.1.20): infona-client on PyPI and @infona-ai/cli / @infona-ai/mcp on npm. Release notes: CHANGELOG.md.

docs/API.md · docs/BOUNDARY.md · ROADMAP.md · SECURITY.md · CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md · CHANGELOG.md · CONTRIBUTING.md · CLA.md · AGENTS.md